NewsBusters is holding a 5th anniversary happy hour in Washington, and you're invited! Click here for details.

Obama-Loving Spammer 'Ellie Light' Dupes 42 Newspapers

Photo of Candance Moore.
  • Bookmark and Share

In January, an anonymous person supposedly named "Ellie Light" launched a massive PR campaign on behalf of President Barack Obama.

The goal appears to have been to infiltrate as many newspapers as possible to spread pro-Obama propaganda -- as if the press needed the help.

Light's plan was simple enough: write a compelling letter to the editor, pretend to be a concerned reader in the region, and persuade the paper to print her liberal blather.

For three weeks, editors of mainstream newspapers big and small allowed Light to spread Democrat talking points under the guise of small-town grassroots without anyone bothering to double check her story.

The content of her letter was also quite simple:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
Blame George Bush.

Dozens of times over, Light echoed the sins of the previous administration and urged readers to give President Obama more time. Light's argument was nothing unique, but it was good enough to impress some of the best editors in America.

Politico's Ben Smith was first to take the bait publishing the letter on January 7 and explaining that it was just so well-written he couldn't resist.

By the time a quick reporter wised up to the game, Light had appeared in 42 newspapers claiming different residences, with each letter almost identical, and no one knowing any details about the masked citizen.

The scam abruptly came to an end Friday when reporter Sabrina Eaton of the Cleveland Plain Dealer followed a simple procedure of actually verifying a source. Light had appealed to the Cleveland paper to publish her screed, but as soon as a real reporter practiced some journalism, her cover blew wide open.

Readers are warned to avoid all beverages as they review Eaton's account of the hilarity that ensued (emphasis mine):

Light - who e-mailed an identical missive to this reporter on Jan. 16 without listing a hometown - would not answer e-mailed questions about the address discrepancies in newspapers that ran her letter, or her identity, although she did say she wasn't a former co-worker of this reporter's who had a similar name.

"I do not write as a representative of any organization," she said in an e-mail. "The letter I wrote was motivated by surprise and wonderment at the absence of any media support for our President, who won a record-breaking election by a landslide less than 18 months ago, and now, seems to be abandoned by all, supposedly for the infantile reason that he couldn't make all of Bush's errors disappear in one day."

Light's defensive replies prompted the paper to investigate her, and the truth was quickly found. From Eaton's Friday article:

In recent weeks, Light has published virtually identical "Letters to the Editor" in support of President Barack Obama in more than a dozen newspapers. Every letter claimed a different residence for Light that happened to be in the newspaper's circulation area.

[...]

Variations of Light's letter ran in Ohio's Mansfield News Journal on Jan. 13, with Light claiming an address in Mansfield; in New Mexico's Ruidoso News on Jan. 12, claiming an address in Three Rivers; in South Carolina's The Sun News on Jan. 18, claiming an address in Myrtle Beach; and in the Daily News Leader of Staunton, Virginia on Jan. 15, claiming an address in Waynesboro. Her publications list includes other papers in Ohio, West Virginia, Maine, Michigan, IowaPennsylvania and California, all claiming separate addresses.

The Cleveland Plain Dealer has a standing policy of using telephone contact to verify a writer's identity. The Richmond Times-Dispatch, which serves my personal locale, confirmed a similar practice of their own.

Almost every paper uses some kind of vetting process precisely to stop such spamming. It boggles the mind that editors in dozens of newsrooms did nothing until she got this far.

The day after Eaton's story broke, Patterico took to the chase and compiled a more complete list of Light's appearances. No thanks to the mainstream media, bloggers worked their search engines to expose the size of Light's scam.

All told, 42 newspapers had fallen for Light, and on the very day that the Cleveland paper broke the story, USA Today had just printed their own version. It is absurd that three weeks passed with no one catching on.

Within the city of Philadelphia, for example, Light was published by the two major newspapers - the Inquirer and the Daily News - within the same week, and somehow nobody noticed her duet performance. Three papers within the state of Connecticut, two in Maryland, and three in Wisconsin also fell for the trick.

Either competing papers within the same city don't bother reading each other's content, or someone was remarkably lazy not to connect the dots. Aside from the proximity of such news outlets, Light got so much exposure that any editor should have been aware.

It should warm your heart to know that mainstream newspaper editors are so out-of-touch, something can appear in the blogosphere and all of their competitors for three weeks without them even noticing.

Some 48 hours after breaking the story, the Cleveland Plain Dealer stands alone as the only mainstream newspaper pursuing it. While the scandal grows in the blogosphere, the outlets that printed her letters have left them online, untouched, intact, and with no corrections offered to their readers.

Ellie Light remains a mystery, and with no interest from the media to confront their own negligence, very little pressure is being applied to find out who she is. After three weeks of blissful ignorance, the editors who fell for Ellie Light are content with the truth remaining untold.

It seems that lying about your identity is not a big deal if you write gushing praise of Barack Obama - and even if you get caught, the mainstream media will actively keep it covered up.

NewsBusters is turning 5. Enter our free t-shirt contest to help us celebrate!


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Can I post my Ellie mugshot

Can I post my Ellie mugshot again?

BK, Please do.

I caught that over at Gio's a little while ago.

ROFL!

-Dave

When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered. -Dorothy Thompson

 

Too funny...

Nice touch. Very fitting all things considered.

--------------------------

Liberal Idiot of the Week:

http://www.flpundit.com/journal/2010/1/22/liberal-idiot-of-the-week.html

Thanks Dave

BK, Looks like Axeltube's sex-change has gone somewhat awry

LOL - I thought the facial hair was supposed to go first.

-Dave

When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered. -Dorothy Thompson

 

I'm not sure he's taking his

I'm not sure he's taking his estrogen.

Look at that cleavage!

If he is taking estrogen, he's taking the prescribed dosage of a 75 yr. old woman.  His ta-tas are down to his knees (according to his droopy cleavage)

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

Bo---

If he was'nt taking estrogen, his ha-has would be down to his ankles.

That is the real reason athletic supporters were invented, because before estrogen became available for use by old guys, they were continually tripping over their ha-has, falling and breaking things; usually on themselves.

What?

Oh, ta-tas.

Sorry.

Never mind.

Apologies, either  to David Keith,  or the female he was referring to in "An Officer and a Gentleman".

A bodacious set of ta-tas, indeed.

MD

matthew - we need to pitch in

and get you booked into as many comedy clubs as possible!  You could teach 'em while tickling their funny bones!  ROFL!!!!

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

OK, BO---

but I would have to be allowed a few "test tickles" to weed out any nuts in the audience who might be heckler trainees.

MD

Bwahahaha!

H.I.L.A.R.I.O.U.S. !!

Thanks for the laugh this evening.  Now I'll never get to sleep, or at least I will have nightmares.  

Speechless

Stunningly...  obfuscationalist.

Obfuscational!!

One of my favorite tags for the msm, especially here in Maine where the act was utilized bigtime during the homosexual marriage veto last Fall.

We had "hate" signs in Wilton that were burned before the police turned the case over to our dem Ag. Btw the event happened on friday, the article ran the day of the election. 

We had a school counselor who may lose his job for siding with the "Stand for Marriage" campaign. Teachers stood with the homosexuals and nothing happened to them.

The AG "decided" the law itself had nothing to do with a homosexual agenda in our schools. Problem is we already have civil rights teams that insure little Johnny/suzie is not bullied and I am sure "The King and the King" is being taught. Technically, the AG was right as the law did not mention teaching these abominations in our schools. 

Obfuscational!!

ALSO, if you check up on the LaVallee murder case!! The details are too graphic, I will let you do the looking, but the guy murders someone during a homosexual act, they know who he is days later, let him go to CA, let him speak at the hearing about his "committed" relationship, he lives in the same neighborhood as a Senator(homosexual who initiated the law) in S Portland, they are from the same area in CA, he is arrested for murder but convicted of manslaughter. 

The Blog "As Maine Goes" has a thread re this obfuscation and links to all the events. 

To Harry Reid . . . .

She's probably "Ellie Light-Skinned". 

By the way, as one who has had a letter or two published by a local paper I am absolutely incredulous she was published without an ID verification.

Exactly, Caring

as one who has had a letter or two published, I have to give them my name, address, day time and night time phones I can be contacted at.  And, I'm called every time they publish a letter.  Although, now, the GR Press seems to be on the side of the global warming alarmists, as they refuse to publish anything from anyone, doubting AGW.

One maroon wrote that he and his parents discussed AGW over the dinner table every night back in the 70's, not even noting that Time and Newsweek were warning of the coming ice age.  So, who told them about global warming?  But, letters like his make it into the press every week, folks who doubt it, not so much as a line.  Maybe I should just sign it "Ellie Light"?

Duped, my ass. They are all in on the Ellie Light scam

Seriously, how many letters to the editor did you write back when you still actually read these sheets of birdcage-liner, yet never saw them published?

I mean, what are the odds here?

This smells to high Heaven of Axelstick and Sunstein.

-Dave

When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered. -Dorothy Thompson

 

Axl: "We're getting the band back together for the midterms!"

New album expected by 2023.

That would be what: Axl

That would be what:

Axl Rod and Runs-N-Poses

The Emperor Tour 2010

EDIT:  Couldn't resist giving this the "BK" treatment:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/46915053@N07/4303877306/

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

LightGate?

With the probability that thousands of people write very compelling "letters to the editor" every day without ever getting published ... ever in their lifetimes, what is the probability that a single writer gets the same basic letter published in over 40 newspapers over a period of weeks?

It takes an enormous willingness to "suspend disbelief" to accept that this could happen through the meer negligence of not "vetting" the writer. 

 metaphorsbwithu

you are correct

especially larger New Papers. 

It would be more likely that OBAM  ADMIN held a comference call like that of teh NEA, and got these papers to conspire to print variation to disiminate the possitive info on Obama.

And if we watch we will see all papers that printed will indeed receive bail out fund from Washington

They probably

Want to make sure they don't rock the boat.

If they withdraw the letter, they may not get their Press Bailout from the Obozo administration.

jd

Record-breaking?

"Ellie Light":  "I do not write as a representative of any organization," she said in
an e-mail. "The letter I wrote was motivated by surprise and wonderment
at the absence of any media support for our President, who won a
record-breaking election by a landslide less than 18 months ago, and
now, seems to be abandoned by all, supposedly for the infantile reason
that he couldn't make all of Bush's errors disappear in one day."

"Record-breaking election by a landslide"?  Was a record broken in 2008?  It was historic because our first black president was chosen, but I don't think it was record-breaking.  But then this person seems divorced from reality.

 

“Always love your country — but never trust your government!" -- Bob Novak (1931-2009)

52.9% = Landslide to Liberals

"Record-breaking election by a landslide"?

Liberals know if they keep repeating a lie over and over, they'll have some people believing it. 

 


خال

First time I've ever heard

First time I've ever heard it referred to as a "landslide" by anyone--including liberals.

Jer

Jer,      That's

Jer,

     That's right.  I believe that they just called it a "mandate" before.  Sort of like that fish I caught last month; it just keeps getting bigger with time.

JoeBob

Without recognizing the ordinances of Heaven, it is impossible to be a superior man. - Confucious

Thanks, JB...

And here I thought "mandate" was a term used by Massachusetts gays to describe their Scott Brown fantasies.

Jer

         Nope

 

 

 

 

 Nope !

Jer , It's a term they use when they view their  photos of Rahm Emmanuelin His ballet outfit .

nixon...

Honest to god?  Tights or tutu?

Jer

Yep ! Tights and heels :)

Yep ! Tights and heels :)

Tanks Jer

Now THAT was funny

MORE HUMAN THAN HUMAN !!!

Landslide in Electoral

College is maybe what she meant. O doubled Mc there. Still a stretch.

The letter I wrote---

was motivated by surprise and wonderment at the absence of any media support for our President,---"

Only someone in the media could have glossed over that ridiculous statement.

"Absence of any media support---" my a**.

MD

 

Only someone in the media

Only someone in the media could have written that without collapsing in laughter!

There you go, mb---

That proves it was a media person and not a citizen.  ;^)

MD

Rahm or Axelrod for sure

It's Rahm or Axelrod for sure. Great pic link above!

ACORN tactics applied to ....

.... letters to the editor.

Another One...

Someone else tracked her down:

Going Light?  http://www.classicalvalues.com

A real sweetie; looks familiar though.

Gotta give it to Stinky...

He's got better cleavage than BK's vanilla version.

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

Amazing

At last count, it's 42 publications in 18 states plus D.C., in addition to Thailand!

You guys are friggin' hilarious

Holy Cow! I just dropped in here following some links around for a late night surf before turning in and here I find I don't have anywhere near a big enough tin-foil-hat. You guys are a riot.

The "massive PR campaign" letter you are so worked up about was 250 words or so of "feel good" pap mostly published in small market newspapers, although a few larger market ones also were "taken in" by this horrendous conspiracy.

You respond with an outpouring of conspiracy theory, cries of foul-play, demands for investigations, and a bunch of really creepy photoshopped pictures of he-shes that you apparently really like.

Too funny. I'll have to bookmark this joint. Thanks for the laughs.

CappyQ

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

 

You're full of it retread

Believe it or not, we know how long it takes to get accepted here. You have been a member less than an hour as of this posting. 

Just how many SN's are you going to assume? 

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

Retread? How long exactly does it take, restless?

The most paranoid of the text discussion groups on usenet back in the day would have been proud to have you aboard, RESTLESS 1.  Don't answer the post, just accuse the poster of being someone else and make allusions to things that don't matter.

In my post I stated that I'd just surfed here following some links, then you think yourself clever to have discovered my "membership" was less than an hour old?

No wonder you are so amused by lousy photoshop images and scared of the big media conspiracy against you.

Those same groups on the old usenet also had a number of trolls that attempted to discredit posters when they couldn't debate their points by calling them such things as "it" or "drive by posters", I see you have some of them here as well.

You disappoint this old troll if this is the best you got.

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

It usually takes about a week.

So no way you just happened across this, and jumped in.

Oh, and where did I comment on the photoshop?

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

The Stopwatch Is Ticking

tick-tock- tick-tock- tick-tock- tick-tock- tick-tock.

(Ellie?  Is that you?)

 

Sarah Palin: The Most Dangerous Conservative In America

oooh!

It quotes kurt vonnegut. so coooool! I guess its just driving by. 

"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'

So, crappy had the same elective surgery

all Libs. get: removal of their funny bone.  Big deal, what else is new.  If you ever develop a sense of humor, come back crappy.  On second thought, don't, because your version of a sense of humor is probably frightening.

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

no funny bone removal here

Hi there, Bo Stinks.

First off, let me say what a witty and profoundly telling username you have.  It is understandable that one with the wit and intelligence to come with such a stinker as that would need to mispell other's usernames in order to attempt to belittle them.

Secondly, thanks so much for your concern for my welfare. However, like this whole tempest in a tea-bag pot you folks are attempting to stir up over these letters to the editor(s) it is sorely misplaced.

I still have all my arm bones intact, thanks.

"all Libs. get: removal of their funny bone."

My sense of humor is apparently as intact as my skeletal structure as I find your attempts at punctuation and writing in general hilarious.

Once again, you generalize and attack progressives for that which is only true of your regressive selves.  I think your conspiracty theories around the letter are funny as hell.  You, on the other hand, have no sense of humor and go so far as to admit that the idea of one is frightening to you.

As to your permission or denial of permission for me to "come back" when you deem it okay, get over yourself, Bo Stinks, develop a little sense of humor.

And finally, I find the concept of quoting Ann Coulter in an attempt to display erudition wit and/or wisdom pretty damn hilarious as well.    

All in all, I'd have to rate your entire post as a big fat FAIL.

Feel free to try again, though.

--

CappyQ

"Hmm, tea-bag tea-pot tea-party pot-party, hmm.  Obviously by drawing a straight line through from one to the other we have proven beyond all doubt that all tea baggers are pot heads.  Shame on you."

um, excuse me... *inhales

um, excuse me...

*inhales sharply and yells*

GET OFF THE WEB YOU BIG DOPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

noted

Your attempt to control the behavior of others based on their disagreement with you is noted.

Another FAIL.

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

Interesting choice of words for you

"your attempt to control the behavior of others based on their disagreement with you..."

Isn't that exactly what you are trying to do in regards to commentor's reactions to Ellie Light's actions? 

You are saying:  it doesn't matter, don't waste time trying to find out what is going on, etc.

That, CappyQ, is attempting to control someone's behavior as well.  Nice lookaway!  You are good at this.  I am guessing lots and lots of practice.

Do you ever get tired of erecting straw men?

<blockquote>"You are saying:  it doesn't matter, don't waste time trying to find out what is going on, etc."</blockquote>

The problem being, I never said that.  I said that trying make all of the fuss over who the poster of the letter is, rather than paying any attention at all to the content of the letter is making a tempest in a teapot in what I believe to be an attempt to divert attention from the reasonable message the letter writer(s) were trying to get across to as many people as they could.

So no, I'm not attempting to control your behavior or anyone else's, I'm just pointing out what I feel the true nature of the behavior is, which seems to be touching nerves.

-- 

CappyQ

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

Your own words Cappy

"I do indeed say that what the letter writers, or more likely copiers and senders, did was really no big deal, but in doing so I've certainly not ignored the reality of what happened."

The content can't be debated, it is that person's opinion.  What is being debated is the deceit used by Ellie Light.  You believe the message [contents] is reasonable.  I think it is not.  So what.

If you sincerely think that commentors on this page are spinning their wheels in a fruitless effort, why would you attempt to stop them by making fun / light of their pursuits?  Doesn't it make your life easier if your opponents are chasing windmills?

Answer this question directly please.  Do you think it is okay to lie to get your agenda published?  Yes or no will do.

More control freak behavior

"Answer this question directly please.  Do you think it is okay to lie to get your agenda published?  Yes or no will do."

Why do you seek to control the behavior of others, even when demanding they answer your insipid questions?  Why do you quote something I said as if it makes the point of the previous poster when it doesn't at all?

 

I demand direct answers to all those questions.  Yes or no will do.

 

And no, I don't think it is okay for me in my personal behavior to lie for any reason.  I don't do it. 

 

However, to try make such a huge deal out of a lie like the home address of a letter writer to a newspaper told in order to get the letter possibly published, is merely a smoke screen put up to deflect from any actual and real discussion of the current state of affairs in our country and the letter's actual content as regards to the current spate of regressive's reactionary and hatefully divisive rhetoric.

 

It was a stupid lie and the newspaper editors with nothing better to do than vet the address of every single letter to the editor that crosses their desk who didn't catch it should be embarressed and made to walk in public with egg sandwiches on their faces.  It was a stupid way to attempt to get the message across to a lot of people, even though it was successful in getting the message across to a lot of people. 

 

Worst of all, it was most likely done by some well meaning circle of friends who shared an email with the suggestion of "send this email to your local paper's letters to the editor section so people without computers can see it" and was very unlikely to be some insidious plot hatched out by the nefarious and communist people who are ensconced in the White House with the intention of turning our country into a Communist State and our citizenry into a bunch of zombie robots marching in lockstep to the government's every whim.

--

CappyQ

 

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

Trying to avoid 8 pg dissertation from Cappy = impossible

Cappy, you asked for yes or no answers to your questions.  I oblige.  The fact that your questions don't make sense with yes or no answers tells me a bit about you. 

It is obvious that you can't restrain yourself when answering my questions.

And by the way, you were responding to me; telling me that I had misunderstood what you previously posted.  That is why I used your own words, and it makes sense.

Cappy's questions [to be answered with yes or no, per his instructions]:

Why do you seek to control the behavior of others, even when demanding they answer your insipid questions? 

Reply: No. 

Why do you quote something I said as if it makes the point of the previous poster when it doesn't at all?

Reply:  No.

Here's an unsolicited bit of advice:  try to get a few more emotional or derogatory words in your discourse, I know you can do better.  These are the terms you have used and the people you apply them to:

Hatefully divisive [conservatives]

Regressive [conservatives]

Well meaning circle of friends [liberals]

Conspiracy Theory [conservatives]

Feel-good pap [liberals]

Paranoid text discussion groups [conservatives]

Tempest in a tea-bag pot [conservatives]

Pseudo Conspiratorial Claptrap [conservatives]

Manufactured and silly outcry of regressives online [conservatives]

Spit out your sour grapes along with your venom [me]

 

Good point.

"It was most likely done by some well meaning circle of friends who
shared an email with the suggestion of "send this email to your local
paper's letters".  You're right, Cappy.  It's called talking points, and it's part of an astroturf campaign. 

And if you feel that it "was successful in getting the message across", I hope that Axelrose, and the ballerina continue, eventually they'll even make the LSM nervous about playing along with them.  

and then... no point at all

"It was most likely done by some well meaning circle of friends who shared an email with the suggestion of "send this email to your local paper's letters".  You're right, Cappy.

I know that.

It's called talking points,

No, it isn't.  "Talking points" doesn't get to be whatever you want it to be, it is a term that has an accepted meaning and that letter didn't come close. 

and it's part of an astroturf campaign. 

No it isn't.  "Astro-turf" used in this way has an accepted and specific meaning and sending the same letters to multiple newspapers simply doesn't fit anyone's accepted meaning unless you accept the premise that you can use any term to mean anything you want because that's the way it is because you say it is.

You know, like Glenn Beck does.

 And if you feel that it "was successful in getting the message across",

I see you are sarcasm challenged, that often happens with you non-elite non-intellectual types.

I hope that Axelrose, and the ballerina continue,

Right on-board with the juvenile terminology though.  You guys really do display a lot of them homo-erotic tendencies what with your fascination with he-she photoshops and Rahm in a tutu and all the rest of your little gay-boy-lady-business jokes.

eventually they'll
even make the LSM nervous about playing along with them.
 

I'm new at this stuff so I don't savvy all the clever ack-ronyms you fellers use (although I suspect this one has something to do with another "clever" renaming of some media outlets) but I'm sure you're quite right about making someone nervous about playing along with something or other.

--

CappyQ

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

Bulloney

You are going to reply that the "letter writer(s) were trying to get across to as many people as they could;" and you actually believe that? Or are you taking this position on an obviously Conservative website because you are bored and want to throw rocks at the bull's nuts?

You don't need to "point out what I feel the true nature of the behavior is."  No one here was asking for your view on a fictitious letter writer of obviously propagandic crap.  Unless you have something real to say, beat it chum.

Right on, bertk---

Good lead-in.  Covers most everything crappyQ has posted.

MD

Welcome to NewsBusters, troll.

My name is Dave, and I am the official troll greater here at NB.

I, along with all of my friends here, would like to wish you a most pleasant stay, whatever its duration.

Please let me know of there is anything I can do for you while you are with us.

Be seein' ya 'round the threads.   :-)

-Dave

When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered. -Dorothy Thompson

 

Re Troll Greeter

Be nice, maybe they can get us some White House souvenirs to sell on eBay.

Oooooohhh, shaking with fear...

Yep, crappy's attempt at humor was frightening;  Frighteningly awful!

PS - the bolding of Ann's quote is for you, specially anointed elite (crappy).

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

Your quote has a small problem, stinky.

How do you think Ann explains the existence of so many liberal ministers if liberals hate the idea of God?

-- 

 "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."

Your hero, Ann Coulter

Well, crappy...

I have read that quote from Ann (within context as you are apparently unable to do) and see absolutely nothing wrong with it. The NYSlimes is filled with traitors and the US would have been much better off if the building had been hit when reporters and editors were the only ones there.  Oh, one thing:  I am not your Google monkey - if you are unaware of the traitorous behavior of the Slimes - do your own research.

Yes, there are liberal 'ministers.'  In reality, they are just another propoganda arm of the DNC, re: the tenets of the Bible they like to p$%s on.

Must go and visit my grandson that my gorgeous daughter-in-law chose NOT to abort, so will not be able to reply quickly (don't get your panties in a twist).

edit: typo

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

Holy Hateful Diatribes, Stinky!

"The NYSlimes - traitors - better off if the building had been hit - traitorous behavior - Slimes - propoganda arm of the DNC - p$%s on - panties in a twist - hate"

Whoaaa....hold on there stinky.

I was going to ask you to please provide some sort of context that could make expressing an idea like advocating the killing of American citizens in a terrorist act based on them excercising their Constitutionally protected right to free speech but I can see that you would have no problem with the concept at all, un-American and traitorous as it may be. 

Amusing that you feel it is okay to spew all that hate and bile but balk at spelling out the word "piss".

-- 

CappyQ

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity."~~ Ann Coulter

 

Welcome to Newsbusters,

traitor-lover.

edit:  Your tagline - best Ann Coulter quote EVER - thanks for the memories!

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

Thanks for the welcome, you shouldn't have.

"traitor-lover".

Hate monger.

--

"Take that bone out of your nose and call me back."

                                               ~~Rush Limbaugh

You really are sorta fun, crappy.

In a weird hippie-stuck-in-the-sixties-ready-to-try-forms-of-government-that-killed-over-a-hundred-million-in-the-20th-century kind of way.  You know, so passe'.

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

CappyQ you are certainly playing it by the Lib book

I can summarize what you are attempting to do:

Ignore the action, focus on the reaction.

You basically say that what Ellie Light did is no big deal.  You ignore the action.  What you spend your time commenting on is other people's reactions to Ellie Light's actions.

One thing that is clear to this observer is that Ellie Light's actions are not honorable.  He/she lied.  He/she lied in an effort to influence someone's thinking. 

Please spend some time thinking about Ellie Light's actions and see if you can support them.  Perhaps stretch your tolerance and see if you could support them if Ellie Light were writing in support of a Conservative.

Your actions define you.  You ignore/belittle Ellie Light's actions and you go after the people reacting to Ellie Light's actions.  You dishonor yourself.  Your type of thinking is what is wrong with the U.S. today. 

Yep

 
Lib certainly do need a new playbook

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Good shot, hobie---

Actually, a great shot, put politely right between Cappyqs' running lights!

MD

"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."

Mark Twain (1835-1910)

Much appreciated MD

We need to start keeping the focus on the details.  Comments like CappyQ's are designed to be a diversion from digging deeper into the facts.  

CappyQ's comments are specifically designed to deride anyone who wants to find out why Ellie Light is doing what they are doing, and why the media is supporting Ellie Light's efforts.

I call for a new Sarbanes Oxley style legislation for the media.  Legislation that makes individual reporters / writers / editors / publishers personally liable for false statements.  Information is power, disinformation is just as powerful.

The only diversion I seek is for my own amusement...

"We need to start keeping the focus on
the details.  Comments like CappyQ's are designed to be a diversion
from digging deeper into the facts."

LMAO... Dig away all you want.  Let me know when you get to the root of this horrible controversial act designed to destroy the entire free world by placing a letter to the editor in a bunch of newspapers that are apperently not even closely read by the editors. 

"CappyQ's comments are specifically designed to deride anyone who
wants to find out why Ellie Light is doing what they are doing, and why
the media is supporting Ellie Light's efforts."

Well, you are half right.  I'm certainly deriding anyone who thinks they need an explanation for "why Ellie Light is doing what they are doing".  As for your paranoia about the media actually supporting "her" efforts, you really should adjust that medication, sport.

"I call for a new Sarbanes Oxley style legislation for the media.
Legislation that makes individual reporters / writers / editors /
publishers personally liable for false statements.  Information is
power, disinformation is just as powerful."

Call all you want, too bad for you that you have no power to call for anything except a pizza.

We have legislation that makes all those persons liable for false statements, why do you think our court system is so tied up with ridiculous litigation and our lawyers are the richest on the planet?

As for disinformation, you might want to speak to your man Glenn about that.

--

CappyQ

"I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could
kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it."

~ Glenn Beck

 

 

Hobie, your summary is far off base....but I suspect you know it

I do indeed say that what the letter writers, or more likely copiers and senders, did was really no big deal, but in doing so I've certainly not ignored the reality of what happened.  I just am not buying into the pseudo-conspiratorial claptrap when in reality, it is no big deal and for all you really know the letters were sent in by staffers on the Rush Limbaugh show seeking to help Rush in his attempts to ensure that the present duly elected President of this country fails. <sarcasm alert> 

The letter was simple and only suggested that people should really relax a bit, calm down, give the government a chance to govern without all the extremist and hateful reactionary rhetoric being spewed from the right and the left.  The writer did point out that in essence the duly elected President of the United States had not really broken any promises and had in fact warned people that economic recovery and a return to a peacetime America would not be easy and would take some time.  If you find that imminently threatening then you really should get your medication adjusted.

The disingenousness of trying to base your complaints on the dishonesty of placing the letter into multiple "letters to the editor" sections and employing the ruse of changing return addresses to fall in the general circulation area of the newspapers it was sent to is simply a deflection on your part.  You aren't challenging the letter or what it says, you are the ones seeking to deflect from the simple message in the letter and make the dialogue all about the messenger.

Making this worse, of course, is the fact that you transparently are seeking a smoke screen.   The regressive tea-party astro-turf organizations have been exposed again and again as being funded not by grass roots funding but by big businesses with a huge financial stake in the pot.  The regressives are now throwing the term "astro-turf" around as if it applies here, it does not.  The letter isn't seeking to organize or to put together any sort of movement, it is a letter of opinion.  An astro-turf organization is one that seeks to organize people around a cause under the guise of coming from the individual citizens, the grass roots, while in fact it is organized by big business with a large scale agenda.  You know, like the "Al Gore's Penguin Army" film on YouTube that was exposed as not being amateur but done by a Washington PR firm with ties to big oil corporations.  You know, like when Bonner & Associates, a Washington Lobbying firm got busted sending forged letters to members of congress to attempt to influence voting.  Or the corporate funded Freedom Works organizing "grass roots" health care reform protests with no agenda to help our government come to a good decision, just an attempt to disrupt our government.  

The list goes on. . .

Yet you want to whine about how "Ellie Light" is so dishonest and this decietful conspiracy to defraud everyone should be investigated and ... and then what?  "Ellie" gets denied priviledges to post any more letters to the editor?  Letters that almost nobody reads and that, were it not for the manufactured and silly outcry of regressives online, would more than likely have simply gone unnoticed?

You ask if I could support them if Ellie Light were supporting a Conservative...

Do you mean like all the conservative (more accurately regressive, they have actually co-opted and soiled the term conservative, just like Beck has co-opted and soiled the term libertarian) media, most admittedly from one source, FNC, who come out daily with unsupportable and previously debunked lies and rumors in order to try to sway people's opinion?  No, I couldn't support them.

However, if you wrote a thoughtful and concise letter to some newspapers expressing a true conservative and pro-American viewpoint (as opposed to speaking in favor of and trying to bring about the failure of my country's government) and did whatever you needed to do in order to get it published as widely, say, as your comment posts get published...I'd be okay with you doing that, yes.

If you really do believe that something of this nature is really an insiduous plot by the liberals in the federal government whose only agenda is to turn the country into a communist state and turn all your children against you in state sponsored schools...then you really do need a much bigger and thicker tin-foil hat.

Again, the letter was about 250 words of feel-good pap that simply presented a more calm and reasonable view of what is happening in Washington than either the far right or the far left has come to be spouting.  If that is all it takes to bring down YOUR country then your country is much more weak than the America I know and love.

The United States that I live in has a strong government, based on a document written more than 200 years ago by some men whose bravery, honesty and intelligence we could use more of today.  This government is a Democratic Republic which means that, since we hold elections to decide who gets to be the boss for a while, sometimes our very favorite choice doesn't win the election and we have to suck it up and try to do better next election. However, with their wisdom, and supported by more wisdom from our government along the way, we have a system where no single branch of our government runs the whole thing.  We also have frequent elections and, if the new boss is worse than the old boss, we get to throw the bums out after 4 years and try again, all the while having faith that our government and our country and her people are strong enough to withstand four years of imperfect government.  However, the strength of our government and our country depends on our people standing strong on that one point, this IS OUR country and we are all in this together.  If we spend the next three years like we spent the last one, fighting amongst ourselves and allowing the rhetoric to get more and more venomous as time goes by, then perhaps our country will not be strong enough to withstand that.  Perhaps in three more years the next great hope will be elected and will be handed a country in even more of a mess, if possible, than ours was in 2008.  Or perhaps Beck will get his way and he will incite enough people to enough violence to whatever end his deluded brain has in mind. 

You will get to spit out the sour grapes along with your venom and Rush will get to go on the air crowing about "I told you so".... but do you really hate our country that much that you are willing to be a part of that?

I wonder.

--   

CappyQ

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

Long, long, long post there, Claptrap CrappyQ---

Full of the most platitudinous pack of platitudes ever purposely perpetrated out of the pecksniffian liberal playbook.

The letter of which you speak, wherein the author said something akin to "I am disheartened at the lack of media support for our President" was indeed a laugher; but you attempt to make far less of its' import than truly exists.

The fact that so many of the dead tree media would actually print it without lifting a finger to vet such a pusillanimous piece of crap, shows the extremely sad and bad state of the print side of the msm.

You pooh-pooh a conservatives' concern over the continuing efforts of liberal governments' communistic left leaning and leftist liberal indoctrination throughout the education system that are causing problems for this Country.

It is happening.

The reason we experience "fighting" amongst "ourselves" is because we refuse to peer through the type of rose colored glasses that are apparently nailed to your head.

"The strength of our government and country depends on our people standing strong on that one point--" (voting out an imperfect government).

No.

The strength of our government and country depends on being informed as voters, learning what we are able, assisted by the msm, about all candidates in order to avoid voting for and electing a pos like Obama whom the msm carried on their collective shoulders.

"Ellie Light" is a perfect example of the kind of problem that faces those of us outside Lib-Dem circles.

We seek the truth.  The msm feeds us propaganda.

Disregard the facts of the situation if you choose.  That is your right.

Ignore these facts if you want.  That makes you a fool.

Denying these facts orally or in print makes you a liar.

MD

"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."

Mark Twain (1835-1910)

 

Pretty proud of your puffery, perhaps?

You use what is apparently a common logical fallacy in this forum to attempt to discredit the argument I advanced...you mischaracterized a statement I made and dishonestly substituted something you made up in order to make it easier to make your point.  It's called a straw-man.  Easy to burn down a straw-man, isn't it Matt?

"The strength of our government and country depends on our people
standing strong on that one point--" (voting out an imperfect
government)."

You either missed or dishonestly mischaracterized my point.

the "one point" I referred to was the idea that our country, as conceived and built by our Founding Fathers, is strong enough to withstand a poor president or a poor congress for the duration of their terms. If the members of the Congress or the Executive branch are not serving their constituency, our government is set up, and wisely so, in such a way that we can "vote the bastards out" fairly soon.

I also never said or meant, as you disingenuously attempt to imply (or perhaps you are really that simple as to only see one point at a time?) that this was our country's ONLY strength. My country, as it exists today, has many strengths. I don't know about the one you fantasize about.

"The strength of our government and country depends on being informed as
voters, learning what we are able, assisted by the msm, about all candidates . . ."

This is partly true, yes.  Informed voters do lead to a stronger government.  You do falsely imply that the only assistance available is that of the mainstream media, which we both know is a lie of convenience because you'd like to blame the fact that the candidate you voted for in 2008 lost the election on the mainstream media, but forgetting that little lapse of honesty for a moment. . .

". . . in order to avoid voting for and electing a pos like Obama whom the msm carried on their collective shoulders"

...you now divorce yourself from the truth completely when you go on to imply that the definition of "informed voters" is simply "those who think like me".

This is simply not true.  It is pure and simple sour grapes, expressed in a petty and childish way.  You are repeatedly trying to blame the mainstream media for the election of a candidate who was elected legally by the American voters in an uncontested legal election.

If you don't LIKE this president, and that is most certainly your right, I don't really think he's all that and a bag of chips, then find someone with a half a chance to beat him to put up against him in the next election.  Point out loudly when he fails if you want, but don't hope and pray that he fails (like Rush) so you can indulge in an "I told you so" glow.

And stop trying to make people believe Obama or any other single man in government is anything more than that...just a man who was elected by a majority of his fellow Americans.

Spending four years whining about a lost election and trying to do everything you can to foment civil unrest and dissatisfaction based on hyperbole, insinuation and outright lies, that's not so much the American way. 

"The reason we experience "fighting" amongst "ourselves" is because we refuse to peer through the type of rose colored glasses that are apparently nailed to your head."

Well, "you" aren't fighting amongst yourselves, you are quite well united in your simplicity and lack of intellect, from what I can tell.

However, in attempting to debunk one of my points, which was simply that the American public would be better served by working together instead of allowing divisive forces to pit us against each other in order to further their own agendas,  you clumsily make the point more clear.  You refuse to accept that another point of view may be valid, even if you don't share it.  Then you go on to characterize any point of view that you don't share as fitting a simplistic stereotype that is easy for you to discard.

-- 

CappyQ

"I say on the air all time, "if you take what I say as gospel, you’re an idiot."~~Glenn Beck

In case you haven't noticed, perfesser

Everyone skipped class today, your lectures are just too boring and predictable.

I hope he fails, too. 

 

 

And yet ...

"Everyone skipped class today," 

And yet here you are.  Feeling a bit left out?

-- 

CappyQ

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

Cappy, the USA has changed

Cappy, the USA has changed for the worse.  Yes the people vote in teh government and when fed the truth can hopefully maake a good choice.  But in 2007 and throughout 2008 and 2009 the public has been fed lies from sunup to sundown.  People no nmatter what they tell you are basically sheep and want to follow a leader.

For proof just look to any gathering where people are asked questions, if the sampling of people is random like in a classroom there will be few people stepping up and taking teh lead.  And so it is in the peoples voting patterns; they are fed and they vote accordingly.

So the biggest problem with this free society is that the people dont want to go to any effort to research the truth; including me and you.  Information in most cases is second hand through filters.  This is how the people were fooled to voting for Duh Vain One who has no skills except to read from a teleprompter.

BTW the idea is media bias and it shifted to the left and more so since 2007 than anytime in history.  The founders also left us a way to do as Beck says and take the country back by force.  Dont lecture us on the Constitution.

crappyQ---

Nice intro with the plethora of p's.

"Spending four years whining about a lost election and trying to do everything you can to foment civil unrest and dissatisfaction based on hyperbole, insinuation and outright lies, that's not so much the American way."

So, crappyQtroll, in what country do you reside?

You must have missed eight solid years of that kind of action by the Lib-Dems regarding George W. Bush.  That kind of action is the American political way of life for them.

Logical fallacy-straw man-missed or dishonestly characterized-disengenuously attempt-divorce yourself from the truth completely-lapse of honesty-falsely imply-lie of convenience-perhaps you really are that simple-petty and childish way-sour grapes(one of your favorites).

Do you know what a self-inflicted wound is crappyQ?

Re-read the paragraph above starting with logical fallacy (another troll favorite), and then re-read the penultimate sentence of your 14:23 ET post.

You will find that all you managed to do with your lengthy post, is shoot yourself in the ass.

You ask, "Easy to burn down a straw-man, isn't it Matt?"

I reply, "Easy as spotting a Lib troll, crappyQ."

MD

"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."

Mark Twain (1835-1910)

edit-typo

Digging deeper on your diversion

Talk about getting off base.  [by the way, nice ability to ramble]

We are talking about a very specific event.  Nothing else.  I did not broach a broad set of subjects.

You are right; I don't challenge the letters content.  Ellie Light or whoever wrote it is entitled to their opinion.  What I challenge is their dishonesty.

The thing is, we are dealing with something right here, right now.  I say it is dishonorable.  You say I am being disingenuous because I don't look at this act in your context.  I stress that it is your context within which you would like to have this discourse.  I choose to look at Ellie Light's actions on a standalone basis.

You did answer my question.  I asked if you would support or dismiss as unimportant a conservative letter writer in posting multiple letters under false pretenses.  You replied that you thought it would be okay if I wrote a thoughtful [apparently you get to be the judge on that element] letter to the editor.  What is interesting is that you still think it is ok to do whatever I need to do to get my opinion in front of other people including lying.  Lying about where I live for example.

I disagree with you that it is okay to lie to get your point across to as many people as possible.  If your point is good, they'll get it without you having to lie. 

I love this country.  I despise socialism.  What I am trying to prevent is guys like you deciding what is best for me. 

 

LOL, Hobie

You asked a simple question...and also requested a simple yes or no.

You got War & Peace.

I hope he fails, too. 

 

 

having trouble?

"You asked a simple question...and also requested a simple yes or no."

Different post, blondie. Do try to follow along.

"You got War & Peace.

I bet that was simply too long for you to try to read as well.

"I hope he fails, too."

No surprise there, blondie.  So do Al Qaeda and the rest of the jihadists...good company you keep.

--

CappyQ

"The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart."
Kurt Vonnegut (in Sirens of Titan)

Only my friends may call me "Blondie"

And you, sir, are no friend of mine.

 

I hope he fails, too. 

 

 

Retread just lost his sidewall... another 50 miles max

"Stop stalking me! (insert name here _________)"

Well thank you

 "And you, sir, are no friend of mine."

I'm glad we got that clear, blondie.  I'd hate for there to be any confusion on that issue.

--

"I'd rather stick needles in my eyes" 

                         ~Garrett Breedlove

Wow, crappyq is still staying with us?

LOL - Guess I'll have to get the maid staff to stop by and change the troll-hair covered linens in his suite.

BTW, we charge a slight extra fee for removing troll hair from linens. Extra wear-and-tear on the washing machines, ya know, not to mention cleaning the filters and all.

Oh, and your room-service order may be a little late, as we are having a little difficulty coming up with a sufficient number of worms to fill out the order, but I have top people working on it.

Top people.

I really thought he would have checked out of here by now.

-Dave

When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered. -Dorothy Thompson

 

Checking out

  And the overabundance of his words has caused the vaccum bag to need to be emptied several times so there should be a small extra charge for that as well.

sheryl,

LOL - Actually, I think we're going to have to break out the de-luxe, extra-large professional-quality manure shovels for that.

-Dave

When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered. -Dorothy Thompson

 

I can't argue with cappy

  Because I don't have the patience or desire to read through his long convoluted self-serving posts to try and figure out what it is he is trying to say.

So I will just sit back and watch you guys take him apart.  (Thanks since my work is done and I don't have anything good on tv to watch)

Yea, sherylsims, that's whaat I do 'round here


So I will just sit back and watch you guys take him apart. 

Some of the best views, EVER lol.

Oil Glut, now

Dave

What we have witnessed on this particular thread (redirection, obfuscation, childish name calling, logic twisting - when there is any logic to speak of, and all around thread derailment) is what the higher priced Organizing For America ''Organizers'' are capable of when given full leash. This one might even have an Ivy League t-shirt.

2 Days and 1 Hour as of this writing.

Soon, now. Very soon.

 

Sarah Palin: The Most Dangerous Conservative In America

Agreed

What I have witnessed is a ton of redirection.  CappyQ simply cannot stay on point.  He/She has a fixation with Beck apparently.

''IT'' . . . .

 . . . . is now gone. TA! 

 

Sarah Palin: The Most Dangerous Conservative In America

Holy Liberal Talking Points, Batman!!!!

We need a better class of troll, here. ©

I hope he fails, too. 

 

 

There must be more than one

There must be more than one Kool-Aid drinker out there sending in letters supporting President Barry...so why would so many pick this one?

Sounds more like they all knew it was a plant and figured no one would notice.

"Under Capitalism, man exploits man.  Under Communism it's just the opposite."

"All that Communism needs to make it successful is for someone to feed and clothe it."

What did you think Ms. Dunn would be doing...

Anita you old cow, slow down the spamming.

Why use only one name?

 So my take on this is that even editors have quit reading newspapers. I am curious as to why Ellie Light was used as the name on all of the letters. I don't expect that the person/group responsible will be stupid enough to make this mistake again.

 

How many guys?

Wonder how many men make up Ellie Light? I suppose we can't assume she is a woman or that "she" is one person.

Why Ellie Light?

Seriously, the Bush bash from the left has got to come to an end and somebody on the Republican side of the aisle needs to step up and defend the good things Bush did and the good things he tried to do (reign in Freddi and Fannie??) while in office. Kept us safe for 8 years. Had to overcome the dotcom bubble burst, the energy bubble burst and 9/11 all the while keeping unemployment well below 6%. Oh, and he reached across the aisle and got things accomplished with only 51 votes in the senate and an equally small margin of majority in Congress.

Is it possible

That this was a test by a conservative? Write two type of letters, an over the top Obama loving letter and either a rational or over the top Obama critique, under two different names, and see which gets published, multiply it 42 times. The left leaning papers, agreeing with the Obama loving letter, publishes it without verification. The Obama critique gets dumped, technically because it cannot be verified. Why else use the same name over and over, even in the same town. Just a thought.

Re Verification

Not that different from the famous Dan Rather/Mary Mapes standard, -'some stories are too good to verify'. This letter was too good to verify.

Why the same name? Contempt and arrogance. They knew they would get away with it, and once found out they wanted to rub the media's nose in it, because they have contempt for the media. Watch a Gibbs press conference and tell me he is not comtemptuous of the media. The man that hired a doofus to be press secretary feels the same way about them. They are the Bamster's useful idiots.

Ellie Light is ...?

One guess making the rounds since early weekend is that the Ellie Light sockpuppet is Samantha Power. Commenter BSQ on Patterico blog put it this way:

I believe “Ellie Light” is a woman named Samantha Power. She is a former reporter and graduate of Harvard Law who, in 2005 won the National Magazine Award (the nickname for which is the “Ellie”) for an article entitled “Dying in Darfur”. The feminine name “Ellie” is derived from a greek word which means light.She was on the Obama Campaign team until she was forced to resign for calling HRC a “monster”. Obama recently appointed her to a position on the National Security Council. Oh yeah…She is the current spouse of Mr. “cognitive infiltration” Cass Sunstein which may be relevant.

Link to BSQ comment here 

Sounds about right, too clever by half. Regardless of who it is, we know what it is:  another stealth effort across the major newspapers to establish a meme. With the Obama crowd, it's all about the cadence of the message, never the content. 


---

It is my two cents. Let me spend it.  -Anon

 

"Ellie Light remains a

"Ellie Light remains a mystery." Huh? It's called astroturf.

Ellie Light

I expect we shall see her sitting next to Michele Obama at the State of the Union speech! Hope they have 42 extra seats for her!

WH Boiler Room

A reminder; A-G Eric Holder put together a blogger/poster boiler room operation last year, discussed on NB at that time:

"...Eric Holder has apparently hired former Democratic campaign bloggers to work at the department in what appears to be a secret propaganda unit. According to a story at The Muffled Oar website, the bloggers are housed in the Office of Public Affairs (the press office). Their job is to place 'anonymous comments, or comments under pseudonyms, at newspaper websites with stories critical of the Department of Justice, Holder and President Obama.'” (h/t American Thinker)

Source: The Most Transparent Administration Ever: http://corner.nationalreview.com

Ellie Light is very likely a government employee working in DC. This would be congressional investigation material under a Republican president. The liberal media would be pounding the pavement to expose and out these fake letter writers. Under the Bamster, not so much.

Is this criminal in any of

Is this criminal in any of these Jusridictions?

Isn't presenting yourself under a false identity in order to obtain some monetary value, in this case, free advertising, a crime in some of these places?  Or is this Ellie Light the source's real name?  Then it becomes a question as to what this person's real address is.  Apparently it's everywhere.  At least one of the addresses given must be a lie since they are not all identical.

Government payroll

"I do not write as a representative of any organization," somebody doesn't want to lose that government check when they are found out. This phrase is just legal base covering. You are going to hear that they did this as a private citizen not in an official capacity as a gov. employee. I think it is the Hatch act or something that bars feds from electioneering in an official roll.

Re Legal?

...and also laws against using a government computer, telephone, ISP connection, stationery, desks, etc. Many Congressmen have been investigated over the years for using government facilities for campaigning.

The mere fact that Holder has a boiler room is highly questionable in a legal sense. Again, cause for a congressional investigation under a Republican president.

You're all meanies at

You're all meanies at NewsBusters by Ellie Light

Why do you continously attack the most intelligent man who has ever been president and his perfect wife? He is saving our country. You are all meanies who we will get some day.  I hate you, hate you, hate you!

 

Nice try, Chris---

but we all know that it is you hiding behind that username.

Caught ya!

MD

"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."

Mark Twain (1835-1910)

I have found it hard to

I have found it hard to have a letter to editor published...so to see someone whom has same letter published all over is quite odd.

 

something is definately amiss here..

 

the letter she wrote just does not have a real powerful, gripping message, to be so well done all papers like it.

 

odd very odd that it was published so many times in so many places.

Remember....

No matter how you cut it, astroturf is still nothing but phony grass.

Go towards the light Ellie,

Go towards the light Ellie, go towards the light.

If I could be bothered to check this out, first stop would be the local ACORN office to see if there was a confluence of zip codes.

ADDENDUM

Ha. I wrote too soon. Looking to the Editor's Picks on site I see that there is the beginning of a trail if breadcrmbs leading to (possibly) the White House.

LET THERE BE ELLIE LIGHT... AND THERE WAS

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2010/01/linking-ellie-light-to-the-white-house.html

Does the road wind up-hill all the way?
Yes, to the very end.
Will the day's journey take the whole long day?
From morn to night, my friend.

How interesting! The MSM fails to vet, yet again!

How can anyone post the same letter to 40 different newspapers?  I've written several letters to my local liberal rag, the Star and Tribune, and they always ask for a phone number so they can get my approval to publish it. I guess no one bothered to check the her phone number to see if it matches the local area code.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Growing...

This story is exploding, Ellie Light's 'letter' is now up to 62 publications in 29 states, and two foreign publications. Other names are being found that have broadcast letters. Check http://patterico.com/

Well, this is definitely one of their

more entertaining efforts at propoganda! As usual, though, they score an epic fail as far as disguising the Goebbelism.

 

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

Wouldn't it

be great to hear every Republican chant "Ellie Light, Ellie Light" every time Obama reached an applause line in the SOTU speech?  That would be far better than Joe Wilson's "you lie". 

Good one, UP

:-)

"Liberals hate the idea of God because it competes with their conception of themselves as a specially anointed elite."~Ann Coulter  

Thanks, BO

Just be fun to watch the looks on the faces of BO, Ninja Joe, and Pelousey.  And Meeeshelle.

....Or have 500 women all

....Or have 500 women all dressed in the same outfit, each waving a huge "I am Ellie White" sign.

How Entertaining

How entertaining it is that the same letter was written in 62 different papers by 62 different women named Ellie Light (Sounds a lot like ELITE) but I'm just a right-wing idiot clinging to my guns and religion.....oh well

Barack Obama= Half Honkey...ALL Donkey

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.