Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brent Scher's blog
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun
  • New Liberal Study 'Lends Credence to Conservative Charges' of Bias; Dramatic Media Tilt Toward 'Gay Marriage'
  • Senate Amnesty Supporters Boast Marco Rubio ‘Neutralized’ Limbaugh, Fox News

Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget

By Brent Scher | February 09, 2012 | 17:52

A  A

Time magazine's Mark Halperin on Thursday admitted that if Republicans were in control of the Senate, which has now gone over a thousand days without passing a budget, the liberal New York Times wouldn’t be giving them the same free pass that it is giving the current Democrats in the Senate. 

Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough pondered, “What would the New York Times editorial page say about a Republican Senate that didn’t produce a budget in over a thousand days?”  Halperin, who is also an analyst for MSNBC, quickly shot back, “They would be getting creamed.”

It was actually Halperin that brought up the media’s blatant bias in regards to covering the Senate’s failure to pass a budget. Huffington Post reporter Sam Stein discussed White House Press Secretary Jay Carney’s comments regarding the Senate’s lack of a budget. Halperin pointedly asked whether this is a “question about the media?” 

Everybody else immediately understood Halperin’s sentiments, except Stein. Stein quizzically responded, “About the media?” as though it could do no wrong.  After clarification he stated, “I think it gets a fair amount of coverage,” much to the dismay of the rest of the discussion. Stein continued, “It’s always talked about, the fact that the Senate hasn’t passed a budget in 900 days,” a large understatement.

Unfortunately, neither Stein nor anybody else at the Huffington Post has spent much time covering this egregious failure on the part of the Senate Democrats. If he had, he may have known that it has actually been 1016 days since the Senate passed a budget...and counting.

Video of the segment can be seen here.

 

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The relevant transcript follows:

Morning Joe

02/09/12


JAKE TAPPER (ABC NEWS REPORTER): I’m not actually asking your opinion, but the White House’s opinion.  The position of the White House is that– the White House has no position on whether or not the Senate should pass a budget?  The President’s going to introduce one, the Fed Chair says that not having one is bad for growth, but the White House has no opinion about whether –

JAY CARNEY: I have no opinion, the White House has no opinion on Chairman Bernanke’s assessment of how the Senate ought to do its business. 

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Sam Stein, no opinion on whether the White House after, the Senate after a thousand days should pass a budget.

SAM STEIN: I mean obviously they would love nothing more than for the House Republicans to introduce a budget so that they could just kill ‘em for it.  Obviously it’s the –

JOE SCARBOROUGH: They could kill ‘em.  The Senate’s gone over a thousand days.

MICHAEL STEELE: A thousand days without passing a budget.

SAM STEIN: I’m less concerned about that than the hypocrisy, obviously, of them just loving the idea of Paul Ryan reintroducing his budget so they can make it an election issue.  And then, you know–

MARK HALPERIN: Is it a question about the media?

SAM STEIN: About the media?

MARK HALPERIN: That if the Republican’s hadn’t produced a budget in a thousand days, it wouldn’t be–

SAM STEIN: Listen, I’m not speaking for the media, I just like pointed out an incredible–

MARK HALPERIN: Why doesn’t that get more coverage?

SAM STEIN: I think it gets a fair amount of coverage.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Ugh

 MICHAEL STEELE: I haven’t seen it.

SAM STEIN: It’s always talked about, the fact that the Senate hasn’t passed a budget in 900 days.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: By Republicans.  By Republicans.  Mark Halperin, let me ask you a question.

SAM STEIN: We’re on the media right now, aren’t we?

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Last time I checked.   

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Seriously, Mark Halperin.  What would the New York Times editorial page say about a Republican Senate that didn’t produce a budget in over a thousand days?

MARK HALPERIN: They would be creamed.   What’s incredible is, is you know, the conventional wisdom is that nothings gonna happen this year except dealing with the payroll tax cut.  This is a quarter of the President’s first term, and maybe only term in office, and he’s going to put out a budget, the House is going to do a budget, the Senate probably won’t, and there’s almost no discussion of it.  A budget with huge implications for Federal policy, and fighting for deficit reduction. Incredible. 

  • Budget
  • Congress
  • Morning Joe
  • MSNBC
  • New York Times
  • Brent Scher's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

The sad thing is

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 6:01pm.

it's working.

  • Login to post comments

Last time I checked

Submitted by KornKing on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 6:45pm.

Thanks for stopping by there, Bubbles

  • Login to post comments

Anyone got a finger in the media wind?

Submitted by CO2Maker on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 7:24pm.

I've noticed a number of articles in the last short while in which a member of the MSM or DBM have said that the press gave Obama too much love in 2008, didn't vet him or get tough on him, and are (or would be) harder on the Republicans for things that they merely chastise the Democrats for doing (like not passing a budget).

It's as if it's now a little safer for reporters and pundits to speak favorably of conservative positions and politicians without getting their hair set on fire by the fellow-travelers in the newsrooms and green rooms of the media.

In a related development, it seems that more Hollywood stars and Big Names are coming out of the closet of conservatism, too, in the last few years.

Is this a mere anomaly, a sociological statistical outlier, or the leading edge of a trend?

  • Login to post comments

I have a finger for the MSM

Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 8:05pm.

Same finger I've been using since the Carter Administration.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama

  • Login to post comments

CO2Maker

Submitted by amyshulk on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 9:32pm.

No finger from me, but it seems like the msm is *trying* to be fair - in the way an alcoholic gets to the first step of acknowledging they are an alcoholic - but they never seem to progress from that point, and seem to think they deserve kudos for stating the obvious.

Since there are more C's than L's, even with the constant indoctrination/propaganda machines running 24/7, perhaps the msm feels it *must* champion the underdog and they finally figured out they went way too far, when OWS is the {untidy} result?

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Hey, Halperin... Time to Man Up, You Absentee Landlord!

Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 2:23pm.

Whoopee.

You see the rape happening but you choose to watch, not report it or to challenge it???

What does that make you?

An enabler!

I'm not sure your crime is bigger that the crimes being committed by Comrade Downgrade and his Do-Nothing Senate.

The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)

  • Login to post comments

You're being to kind...

Submitted by AGreer on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 7:26pm.

by calling them enablers. More often than not I'd call them "abettors".

Abet:

1. To approve, encourage, and support (an action or a plan of action); urge and help on.

2. To urge, encourage, or help.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/abettor

That sounds about right.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • Rand Paul: ‘I Want to Go From 5% of the African-American Vote to At Least 20-25%’
  • Chris Cuomo Claims He’s ‘Completely Divorced From Ideology’ While Talking Up ‘Advocacy Journalism’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use