Bozell Column: Newt vs. The Ruling Class
By Brent Bozell | December 13, 2011 | 22:26
The media elite and the Republican Ruling Class are remarkably similar in their political projection for the coming year. Journalists spent the entire year savaging every fast-rising challenger to Mitt Romney. The GOP’s power pundits became equally agitated at the sniff of a conservative anywhere near the top of the GOP pack. It’s the odor of extremism that both the elites in the media and the GOP have detested – always.
So here we are, on the cusp of the election year, and both these groups have one primary target: Newt Gingrich. Both are using the same ammo: Newt is too unstable, immature, flawed, and arrogant. Or as power pundit Peggy Noonan put it, Newt is “a human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying, ‘Watch this!’” The Washington Post’s political cartoonist drew him as a suicide bomber.
I think they’re stuck in the past. The candidate that people are now seeing is not the self-styled “revolutionary” of the ‘80s and ‘90s. He’s an older man, a wiser man, but that man has a vision of both American history and the American future – and that’s what scares the establishment. Pundits like Noonan live to throw beanbags at conservatives on the set of “Morning Joe.” Oh, how they delight their liberal chums with a taste for GOP fratricide.
Ari Melber of The Nation eagerly quoted Noonan’s “human hand grenade” line and compared Noonan (mostly favorably) to that liberal windbag Maureen Dowd of The New York Times. This is high praise in New York and Washington. The rest of the country couldn't care less about Maureen Dowd.
It brings us back to Angelo Codevilla’s piece last summer in The American Spectator on “America’s Ruling Class.” What Codevilla called the “country class” – the party of freedom, as opposed to a “ruling class” that resents the country’s input – has rarely captured the GOP flag. The GOP rulers sabotaged Barry Goldwater and ultimately were stuck with Ronald Reagan. Contrary to quaint historical rewrites, they were not in his camp, and instead bogged Reagan down with establishmentarian deal-makers and principle-shredders.
The country class is demanding the GOP choice be independent of the GOP establishment and confrontational with the radical Left. It is why both camps are now united in their desire to tear this man down. He is a threat.
When Gingrich climbed to the top of the polls, the Newt-hating media were so predictable they merely recycled all their liberal talking points from the mid-nineties. NBC’s Lisa Myers narrated their rerun: “Gingrich shut down the government....At the time, Gingrich generated this headline [‘Cry Baby’], after suggesting that he shut down the government because the President made him sit in the back on Air Force One....He became the first Speaker ever reprimanded by the House for ethics violations, and was fined $300,000 for misusing tax exempt funds.”
What tired old spin this is. (1) Can you believe NBC ignored crooked Jim Wright’s resignation in that “first Speaker reprimanded” summary? (2) Eighty-three of eighty-four ethics complaints were dismissed and on the final one, Gingrich made the political equivalent of a plea deal, agreeing to a fine over the college course he was teaching while he was Speaker of the House. Big deal. (3) Myers and every other network reporter and outlet ignored the part where the IRS was brought in to investigate Gingrich, and in 1999, cleared him unequivocally of <ital>everything<ital>.
(4) Apparently these reporters will cling to their “Gingrich shut the government down” propaganda as long as they live. That’s not true. Technically, it was Clinton who shut it down. And (5) it’s another media myth that the shutdown was some personal tantrum over airplane
seating.
That's five massive distortions and falsehoods in one report.
Some attacks on Newt the Bomb-Thrower are coming from professional bomb-throwers. Take Chris Matthews, who said “ever since he appeared on the national scene, politics has been nastier, more feral, too often uglier” and suggested Gingrich being nominated for the
presidency would be a cause for “embarrassment and sadness for our republic.”
This, from the man who then described Gingrich as a “political killer, a gun for hire.” Republicans, he feared, “may be ready to bow down before this false god of hatred.” The Ruling Class is losing control of its senses. Maybe, just maybe, the Country Class has found its champion.
- Brent Bozell's blog
- Login or register to post comments



















Comments
He is NO savior
Submitted by Texndoc on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:06pm.
I'm voting for a sitting governor with a successful record, Governor Perry. The moment Newt the Adulterer and his Mistress Calista are nominated is the moment I know the "delightful" Michelle and her adorable daughters needn't pack one suitcase because they aren't moving anywhere in 2013.
You can't blame me if Obama is re-elected
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 7:56am.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
Me? I'm voting R, no matter who it is.
Battle-scarred Newt
Submitted by deadeyedan on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:14pm.
Newt wears his scars well; as someone who took heat for a very long time he has obviously learned from the pain inflicted.
He has seen what the problems are, who are responsible and has probably figured out how to hurdle the daunting obstacles in the path of solving those problems.
He was especially aware of how much the Republican elitists (Bush 41, Karl Rove, Donald Rumsfeld and that bunch) forced him to throw in the towel in the late '90's because he was too conservative for them (too much prosperity).
His demeanor in the debates strongly suggests that he has learned from the trials of the past and is willing to fight for Reaganesque principles.
WHERE'S MY GIRLFRIEND JODI TONIGHT????
CLIMATEGATE (now I & II) - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution
Too conservative?
Submitted by Texndoc on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:21pm.
Wow, a Newt supporter with a global warming as bunk tag and you've SEEN the Nancy Pelosi couch commercial.
Old, pudgy, and grey with a blonde plastic trophy wife, #3. He'll lose in a landslide.
Couch commercial
Submitted by deadeyedan on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:58pm.
Be advised that the commercial with Pelosi came before ClimateGate and Newt has had a profound awakening on that subject since.
GLOBAL WARMING - authoritarian, rather than authoritative, science
Awakenings are good.
Submitted by Karma on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 8:00am.
But who is awakening? Newt or conservatives? I'll bet you $12,847.00 that Newt, if elected President, will once again be snuggling with Nancy on the Progressive Culture Couch.
TOO Conservative??!!!
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:29pm.
You have GOT to be kidding. [h/t John McEnroe]
Jer
unstable, immature, flawed, and arrogant...
Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:24pm.
Aren't these all the qualities liberal radicals aspire to?
If media radicals are afraid of him, Gingrich MUST be someone that frightens them.
Romney on the other hand is nothing more than a liberal Massachusettsian like his fellow RINO Scott Brown.
Mitt Romney's Deception -- His Stealth Promotion of "Gay Rights" and "Gay Marriage" in Massachusetts:
http://massresistance.org/romney/
NO MORE MASSACHUSETTS POLITICIANS!
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
Disturbing to see guys like Krauthammer and Hume go after Newt
Submitted by krendler on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:35pm.
...simply because Newt dared to respond in kind to Romney's Freddie/Fannie snipe.
I say "Give 'Em Hell, Gingrich." He's going to need that fighting, "I ain't takin' your bs lyin' down", in-your-face attitude if he becomes the nominee and has to go against "Obama/AxelSleaze + National Media, Round 2."
Krauthammer simply pointed out
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 8:08am.
that Newt's criticisms against Romney were those of a socialist. I have to agree. There was a lot of the same class warfare rhetoric that we criticize Obama for.
Newt's point was that what
Submitted by redfish on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 12:23pm.
Newt's point was that what neither of them did was wrong, and neither should be cajoled into giving back money. Newt had a consulting group that worked with some corporations that succeeded, and others that failed. Romney worked with Bain capital, which helped some corporations succeed, and others go bankrupt.
That's why he compared giving back Freddie/Fannie money to giving back the bankrupted companies' money. Government backed companies hire consultants all the time. In 1988 the US Postal Service hired a consulting group formed by Ross Perot (The Perot Group) to give them advice for being more efficient and using information technology (the deal fell through). Did this make Perot a dirty lobbyist and part of the corrupt establishment? The US Postal Service also wanted Perot's name attached to them, like Freddie/Fannie wanted Gingrich's name attached to them -- what some people are calling "lobbying"
If it was anyone's fault, it was Freddie/Fannie execs for making stupid hiring decisions.
Only people looking for drama would see more in Gingrich's comments than were in them.
As for the Left...
Submitted by zenman1661 on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:35pm.
Conservatives should be cautious about anyone they approve of. As for the ones on the Right attacking Newt, they better realize they are like the parent of a teenage girl going out with a boy they feel is harmful to her. The problem is they need to be careful about what they say. The more they try to keep them apart the more she wants him. The best thing they can do is say little and hope she learns for herself what kind of guy he really is before it is too late.
I'll vote for anyone other than Obama
Submitted by LDW on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:41pm.
Well maybe not anyone. But if it comes down to Newt vs Obama, I'll take Newt. There is no perfect candidate and Santorum, Newt or Bachman are all better than the goof in the White House now. Just keep Ron Paul away from any foreign policy or we're bound to be the victim of a terrorist attack.
Isn't it strange how Bozell focuses on Noonan and MSNBC and
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 11:47pm.
the usual cast of lib suspects while conveniently ignoring--other than a vague reference to GOP elites--the phalanx of staunch conservatives who have been carving up Gingrich like a Christmas turkey. [You mean GOP elites like Ann Coulter, Michael Savage, and Glenn Beck?]
Well, I guess not all that odd, now that I think about it.
Jer
Whoops. Wrong website.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 12:15am.
Here you go - Gather up the names of our enemies - Kristallnacht 2 is coming.
There, you can list all the right leaning leaners of the right you want.
Who inspires you to give?
This holiday season, we're giving you a chance to have a little fun at the expense of a Republican in your life by letting them know they inspired you to make a donation to the Obama campaign.
Simply enter their name and email address below. Then, we'll send them a message letting them know we know where they live, the names of their children, and what re-education camp they need to attend. Nothing like threats to get the campaign really rolling. Merry Christmas from you friendly liberal fascists!
Is it just me,
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 12:29am.
Or has Jer become as hysterical as they get?
It's just you,
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 2:00am.
Boudin.
Jer
Beck is a "GOP Elite"?
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 8:12am.
I hope you're being sarcastic or whimsical or something. But if you're serious, you obviously don't listen to Beck. You should probably not pretend to know things you obviously don't. Beck riles up Pubs weekly.
Your first guess was correct, Q-socialist...
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 2:09am.
I thought the sarcasm was obvious. If I had only mentioned Coulter, your puzzlement might be justified. But the inclusion of Savage and Beck should have resolved any doubt.
Jer
Isn't it strange how Bozell
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 9:59am.
Isn't it strange how Bozell focuses on Noonan and MSNBC and the usual cast of lib suspects...
What part of "Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias" do you not understand? (emphasis mine).
So conservatives of all stripes, elite or otherwise, can blast
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 2:18am.
Gingrich with only a glancing reference by Bozell, but lib criticism of Newt is evidence of liberal bias to be exposed and combated? I guess I don't understand that, Scube. Please explain it to me.
Jer
Well, I can see how a liberal---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 5:11am.
wouldn't understand NewsBuster's mission statement when the word Liberal, in relation to bias, is bolded.
It does confuse them, as they believe the two words do not go together. :o)
MD
This shouldn't require an explanation, Dean...
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 5:27am.
but for you I'll make the point with a simple question:
If conservative opinion pundits A and B call Republican candidate X unqualified, and
liberal opinion pundits C and D call candidate X unqualified,
how is the latter case, in and of itself, an example of liberal bias?
Jer
If a conservative pundit calls an R candidate ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 6:48am.
unqualified, he is likely referencing the R as not being, in the pundit's mind, conservative enough.
If a liberal pundit calls an R candidate unqualified he is likely biased against R's and conservatism, but doesn't give a rap about how deeply conservative the candidate is or isn't, the label alone is sufficient to throw rocks at.
If a liberal is all for liberalism, and not conservatism - biased against it - and speaks out against R's because they are more conservative than liberal, then that is an example of liberal bias.
I wasn't saying conservatives aren't biased - because I am one and I am most certainly biased against Lib-Dims.
Conservative + bias = conservative bias.
Liberal + bias = liberal bias.
This ain't rocket science.
MD
Matthew, I would agree if that were the primary issue in the
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 3:29pm.
criticism of Newt, but it's not--at least not in every case--and that is apparent if you read or listen to Coulter's fairly brutal description of Gingrich, for example. And she is a supporter of Romney.
Jer
update: Having now read additional comments by Coulter, I must concede that she does indeed take issue with Newt's conservative credentials as well. That said, the case of liberal bias against Gingrich--although it may be an undeniable reality--is accompanied by a similar anti-Gingrich conservative bias vocalized by a wide range of sources and for a variety of reasons which the lack of specification by Bozell strips his argument of needed context--imo of course.
It would appear then, Jeringo---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 7:24pm.
that we basically disagree based on our respective viewpoints, i.e., left vs. right.
How odd.
That's never happened before. :o)
MD
In the spirit of Christmas and in furtherance of peace
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 7:37pm.
and harmony among men and women of good will around the world, I pledge to make a special effort to find areas of common ground--even with close-minded ideologues such as yourself, Matthew. ;-)
Jer
And in furthering your furtherance, Jeringo---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 10:30pm.
I solemnly vow to be more open-minded so as to be able to take note of even more of the inanities drooled from the tired, worn lips of the Obama ass kissing media and his menagerie of lib sycophants.
I mean, fair's fair.
MD
You still do not understand,
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 1:47pm.
You still do not understand, should.............................................I..................................type.......................slower?
This is a website combating liberals. Mr. Bozell will concentrate on those more than conservative,RINO's and others. We here in the comments section more than make up for that.
No, Scuba...
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 2:50pm.
You...........should..................think....................more....................clearly.
I understand the mission statement of this website very well. However, Brent's essay doesn't further that mission inasmuch as the facts which he ignores in this particular case undermine the claim of bias.
Jer
I should think clearly?
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Fri, 12/16/2011 - 2:43pm.
I should think clearly? LOL
It appears all your years being and defending the liberal position has made you a tad delusional or has the scar tissue of having your head slapped around here by other folks at NB having an effect on the old thought processes? :-)
How any Conservative (more
Submitted by VBaxter on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 12:57am.
How any Conservative (more specifically, Tea Partier) could support GOP Establishment Newt is beyond me.
Ron Paul 2012
How any sany, well educated
Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 1:32am.
How any sany, well educated Conservative could support crazy, nut job, wacked out, radical, sound like the Left Ron Paul is beyond me.
Honest to goodness
Submitted by Prisondog1776 on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 1:46am.
i cant for the life of me figure out what Paulbots want? I suspect they smoke a lot of weed and are hoping that he legalizes it.
That`s the only reason i can think of!
To you Paulbots, please please show me his record that makes him a such a perfect candidate.
He is pretty much the most
Submitted by VBaxter on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 5:29am.
**Double post.
Ron Paul 2012
He is pretty much the most
Submitted by VBaxter on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 5:28am.
He is pretty much the most consistent Conservative there is in Congress. Just look at his plan for the Presidency.
Cut a trillion dollars year 1.
Abolish 5 executive departments.
End the TSA.
End subsidies and foreign aid.
Lowers all taxes, repeals Obamacare and Dodd-Frank.
Audit and end the Federal Reserve System.
Etc, etc.
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/
Ron Paul 2012
You forgot some stuff.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 11:59pm.
Appease our enemies.
Bow down before our foes.
Pretend we a still a tiny country that just won independence from England.
Act as though we are not the sole arbiter of freedom on a planet chock full of ruffians and dictators.
Get rich as hell when all the stock investments in gold pay off when he kills the dollar.
http://RonPaulisaCrankandRonPaulFollowersareCranksSquared.com
Ron Paul is the most
Submitted by VBaxter on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 5:32am.
Ron Paul is the most Conservative of all candidates.
Rick Perry - Mandate on vaccines and illegal immigrants get in-state tuition.
Mitt Romney - We all know his flip flops on the individual mandate and TARP.
Newt Gingrich - See: Mitt Romney, also called Paul Ryan's plan "Right-wing social engineering".
Michelle Bachmann - Wants to end the payroll tax cut.
The rest don't really have a chance (Huntsman, Johnson, Santorum, etc.)
Ron Paul 2012
Ron Paul, foreign policy leftist
Submitted by Tim Graham on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 5:43am.
Most conservative!!! Ron Paul has the foreign policy of a Cindy Sheehan...complete with the high-pitched whining about American empire. He should wear a Code Pink suit to debates.
You could be a Libertarian non-interventionist without blaming 9/11 on the victims and insisting we're the global problem.
The payroll tax is what funds
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 8:17am.
all these entitlements that nobody wants to get of. And puts us week-by-week deeper in the hole for Social Security. Payroll tax is the closest thing we have to a flat tax. The cut is something that Dems wanted so that the poorwould pay less taxes--it's also the reason why less than 50% of people now pay any federal taxes.
You Ron Paul acolytes are like Cult followers...
Submitted by stage9 on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 8:33am.
Ron Paul is the MOST CONSERVATIVE?????
No, my friend, Ron Paul is the most LIBERTARIAN!
Libertarianism: Marxism of the right
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/article/2005/mar/14/00017/
Bachmann, Santorum and Perry are the MOST CONSERVATIVE, NOT Paul.
However, Bachmann, Santorum, Perry and Paul AREN'T going to win!
That leaves Romney or Gingrich.
Romney is a social liberal.
Mitt Romney's Deception -- His Stealth Promotion of "Gay Rights" and "Gay Marriage"in Massachusetts!
http://massresistance.org/romney/
That leaves Gingrich -- the farthest thing from the "best candidate". But defeating Obama is the key, and if a TRUE Conservative isn't going to get the nomination, then GINGRICH WILL HAVE TO DO!
No true Conservative sees Gingrich as the "answer", but he stands apart from the others -- articulate and brutal. That's what you're going to need to defeat Obama. Not some incompetent John McCain-like dolt who doesn't understand how the federal government works (like Perry) or appears like a fanatical old geezer like Paul!
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
How anyone could support a marxist of the right...
Submitted by stage9 on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 8:24am.
is beyond me! The man who plans to allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon to then use against Israel and the US. A man who is utterly naive in regard to the issue of marriage - the fundamental foundation of our society -- believing that protecting it is not the federal government's role is no different than Obama on many of his fanatical stances.
NO THANK YOU!
Libertarianism: Marxism of the Right
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/article/2005/mar/14/00017/
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
Amateur hour is over.
Submitted by Order270 on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 3:03am.
It's time to bring in a pro. Obama has turned our country into a train wreck and we need someone experienced in fixing train wrecks. Spending is our biggest problem and Newt is the only person in the last 50 years who seems to know how to STOP SPENDING MONEY!!!
We need a proven leader who has weathered the storm and Newt has weathered storms. They ran him out of town so badly I never thought he would be back. Just the fact that he has climbed back impresses me to no end.
A hack? yes but not a
Submitted by buddyc on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 10:28am.
A hack? yes but not a "pro".
Newt will be a disaster. Let Obama complete the wreck rather than let Newt be blamed. Newt doesn't have a clue how to solve our problems.
Funny, he is the only one who has shown to have a clue.
Submitted by Order270 on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 1:12pm.
Our deficit is our biggest problem. Our debt is our second biggest problem. Newt has shown to be the only person capable of producing a balanced budget.
The more they attack
Submitted by TexasMom0517 on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 4:41am.
The more the pundits attack Gingrich, the more inclined to vote for him I am.
I well remember how the GOP establishment HATED Ronald Reagan and tried to paint him as unstable, stupid, a B-list actor, etc. and they wanted George H. W. Bush as president. Unfortunately, the ruling class, while paying lip service to Reagan, still firmly believes that the "peasants" don't know what's best for them, and they, the elite, do.
On PAPER, Bush had the perfect credentials, the perfect resume, and he's an honorable man, good father, faithful husband, war hero, etc., but he was not a good leader for the country.
The ruling class would prefer Obama or Huntsman, but Romney will "do," if that's their only other choice.
your first sentence
Submitted by oldfart on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 7:36am.
Here also.
mirror mirror on the wall
Submitted by MidAmerica on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 6:33am.
The wealthy Washington insider Republican elites actually like obama because he reminds them of themselves. We don't.
Some words about Gingrich
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 8:29am.
Some words about Gingrich from someone who has known him for a long time.
Newt's Past and Future Leadership
Those that know him the best
Submitted by buddyc on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 11:17am.
Those that know him the best like him the least. That should tell you something.
There comes a time when
Submitted by buddyc on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 11:16am.
There comes a time when people have to care more about the country than they do themselves. Newt, if elected is NOT going to help us solve our problems. He is part of the group who compromised our way into this mess. He has no clue what we need to do to turn around the economy.
I love your work but you are dead wrong to call Newt a conservative. Opportunist? yes! Flake? yes! Hack? yes. Incompetent? yes!
I will NOT vote for him over Obama. I refuse to dishonor my country by electing such a disaster. It would be better for the Country in the long run to let Obama collapse things and take the blame rather than allow a Republican to be blamed for it.
I'd vote for the gift of flight if I thought...
Submitted by Order270 on Thu, 12/15/2011 - 1:33pm.
...it could save us from this Thelma and Louise cliff dive. Obama has put us on a death grip mission to a state controlled government. Newt has the leadership to reverse this course. It may not seem like it, but these really are desperate times.
DO NOT VOTE FOR Obama. You should be wanting to take responsibility before wanting to dole out blame.