Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brent Bozell's blog
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'
  • Tea Partiers Confront Comcast CEO: Why Would a Conservative Want Their Money to Pay Al Sharpton's Salary?
  • Bob Schieffer Spins Obama Scandals: White House Not Like Nixon's, Which Had Burglars and Bomb Plots

Bozell Column: No 'Glee' About Virginity

By Brent Bozell | November 12, 2011 | 10:17

A  A
Brent Bozell's picture

In Hollywood, the only truly serious sexual disease is virginity. It’s a dire and embarrassing condition, desperately in need of elimination. Teenagers that still have “it” are woefully immature. They might as well consider themselves to be walking the school hallways in diapers.

Along comes Fox Entertainment to enlighten us. Get ready. It’s sick.

 

Fox’s “Glee” devoted an entire episode on November 8 to setting up and celebrating the shedding of virginity by two teenage couples on the show. One was heterosexual, and one – yippee! – was homosexual. TV critics were raving in advance. Entertainment Weekly’s Tim Stack all but demanded everyone watch: “It’s without a doubt one of Glee‘s best installments ever and features two popular couples on the show having sex for the first time.”

This is a show with an enraptured following of teenagers, especially teenaged girls. Children love the musical numbers, and stay for the propaganda. Stack was especially thrilled that the gay teens Kurt and Blaine would “finally decide to take the next step in their relationship.” When you’re 17, it’s time for “finally” getting over the dreaded V-word. Stack oozed, “It’s all handled very delicately and is incredibly moving. I can’t think of another network series that’s taken a teenage gay relationship so far or been so progressive.”

Entertainment Weekly put the “Glee” gay-teen couple on the cover of their magazine back in January to pay tribute to “How a bold new class of young gay characters on shows like 'Glee' is changing hearts, minds, and Hollywood.” Boundaries must be pushed, and traditional values smashed. Network executives only insist this be scheduled to air during November sweeps.

Kristin Dos Santos, a blogger for the E entertainment channel was too desperate for the show to start. One blog post began “Enough with the foreplay already!” In another, she crowed:  “Tonight is the night, Glee fans! Candles lit? Sheets silky? Music playing? Check, check, check.”

This Very Special Episode of Glee romanticized the “first time” from beginning to end. The musical teens at McKinley High performed “West Side Story,” but for some odd reason, the director was a teenager.

As the episode begins, the director finds that his two romantic leads are still virgins, which will allegedly ruin everything. They will be exposed as drama frauds since the musical is about “sexual awakening.”      

“As a friend, I support your strange aversion to fun. As your director, I’m concerned.” Virginity is thus shameful, slightly psychotic, a “strange aversion.” The lecture continues: “How do you expect to convey the human experience to an audience when you haven’t ever opened up yourself to one of humanity’s most basic and primal ones?”

Two teachers in the room who are supervising the musical quickly vacate the room once virginity came up between the teens – because, as perfectly written for Fox, they’re both adults still burdened with the shame of virginity. They’re sympathetic characters, but they’re romantically disabled. In short, they’re lovable losers.

Since he’s been intimidated that it’s time to “lose it,” Blaine insists to Kurt that it’s time for adventure. “Don’t you think now is the time to be adventurous, while we’re still young?” In their hunt for “adventure,” the high-school senior and junior go to a gay bar called Scandals, where their fake ID cards are approved and they can experience Drag Queen Night. This is how “progressive” Fox can be at 8 pm Eastern, 7 pm Central time. Sixth-graders can now talk about “gay bars” and “drag queens.” Who said TV can’t be educational?

As for Finn the quarterback and Rachel the aspiring Broadway star, their first attempt at “love” when parents are missing is ruined when Rachel confesses she’s mostly eager to improve her acting. Then she turns to her fellow females in the glee club for advice. On the side of retaining virginity is only fear and disgust: fear of pregnancy (from one who gave a baby up), and disgust that the quarterback is terrible in bed. There was no debate.

There is only advertising. The “progressive” side has only beauty and romance. One girl goes into a reverie about her first time the previous summer, complete with snippets of a love song from “West Side Story.” It was “just right, not rushed. It was amazing.” As the song ends in a crescendo, she declares “He’s my first love, and I’ll always look back at that moment as absolutely perfect.”

Fox used the same tactic for the final scene, where the fireside consummation of the two “first times” among teenagers is celebrated as Blaine and Rachel sing the love song “One Hand, One Heart.” It’s implied that both performers have now mastered the authenticity of their love scene...by overcoming their terrible, odious virginity.

About the Author

Brent Bozell is founder and president of the Media Research Center and publisher of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Brent Bozell on Twitter.
  • Homosexuality
  • Budget
  • Culture/Society
  • Sexuality
  • Entertainment Weekly
  • FOX
  • Glee
  • Celebrities
  • Brent Bozell's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Glee sucks this year

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 10:27am.

The content does not bother me, but the script and storyline have to be good. A show has to have more than sex appeal to succeed.

That is why the Playboy Club and Charlie's Angels got cancelled and Friends lasted around 9 years and Two and a half men is still on.

  • Login to post comments

shawn, maybe this is what

Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 10:41am.

shawn, maybe this is what happens when a show decides to go from entertainment to shilling for a "cause."

  • Login to post comments

MB

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 10:53am.

You could be right. I am giving it a few more episodes, and if it still sucks I am taking it off my DVR list.

  • Login to post comments

Motherbelt

Submitted by LinTaylor on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:26am.

If you want a perfect example of what you're saying, look no further than the cartoons of Seth MacFarlane. Family Guy started off as a well-performing (if crude) animated sitcom, but after being saved from cancellation it came back and positively fixated on insulting everything conservative with no reason or meaning behind it. All you need to do is see the episode where one "joke" just devolves into three characters saying "Laura Bush killed a guy" over and over for about 30 seconds, or pretty much any episode where the family dog (who usually acts as the writing staff's mouthpiece) champions a cause like gay marriage, legalizing pot, or atheism.

On the other hand, there's American Dad, which was specifically made to mock conservatives with its overzealous FBI agent protagonist and his supposedly wiser liberal daughter. After a couple of years the show moved away from politics and became more of a standard sitcom, at which point it actually became fun and interesting. More to the point, the same father who treats his gun like a pet dog has become much more sympathetic and understanding, while the daughter became a one-note walking stoner joke before being shunted into the background due to the writers' inability to write for teenage girls.

So of course we have the irony that the sitcom went political and became very unpopular, while the political show went comedic and started being entertaining.

  • Login to post comments

Family Guy is sucessful

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:30am.

And makes money. It might be political, but it obviously has an "it" factor to sell as many DVDs as they do.

  • Login to post comments

Maybe so, Shawn

Submitted by LinTaylor on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:57am.

But the last couple of seasons where they skewed heavily liberal and sacrificed humor in order to say "Anyone conservative deserves to die" were subject to massive backlash from the fans. One specific example is the episode "Not All Dogs Go to Heaven", which was heavily atheist and so ham-handed that nobody liked it. Or "Family Gay", which was supposed to be pro-homosexuality but portrayed gays using all the classic stereotypes of gay men as swishy, catty, effeminate, and slutty. Thankfully the writers caught on and have dropped most of the political humor, as well as recognizing that the dog character is thoroughly annoying and unlikable and have severely scaled back his liberal advocacy.

  • Login to post comments

LinTaylor

Submitted by hydrodynDM on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 8:13pm.

I've quite literally made almost the exact same argument regarding my changing views of Family Guy and American Dad (even specifically mentioned the episode you did about Laura Bush).

I used to love the former and was originally dismissive of the later but have changed by attitude regarding both in the same way you have and for the same reason.

  • Login to post comments

Oh, indeed.

Submitted by LinTaylor on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 9:04pm.

One of my best friends is a gay liberal, and he's completely disgusted at the idea that Seth MacFarlane supposedly has the same kind of political beliefs as him (especially when it comes to gay rights). I can't remember which one, but a recent episode offended and annoyed him so much that he's completely sworn off of watching Family Guy ever again, even the older episodes that were more comedic and less political.

  • Login to post comments

STORY LINE? TWO AND 1/2 MEN HAS A STORY LINE?

Submitted by Dr. Ron on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 12:36pm.

LETS' SEE ..CHARLIE GETS LAID WITHA NEW GIRL EVERY WEEK; HIS BRO EVEN GETS SOME. CHARLIE BEDS HIS BRO'S EX; HIS BRO EVEN BEDS HIS EX. THEY BRING IN ASTON K. TO REPLACE CHARLIE AND HE SOON IS IN BED WITH CHARLIE'S MOM...THERE A STORY LINE IN THERE??

Ronald John Lofaro, PhD
  • Login to post comments

There is more than sex and T&A

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:17pm.

There are also clever lines and snappy dialogue. Shows that just base their whole plot on sex appeal and the same jokes die or fade quickly

When Married with Children came out it was one of my favorite shows, i lost interest because you can only do so many fat jokes and display hot women coming into a shoe store before it gets lame.

  • Login to post comments

Two and a Half Men was funny!!!

Submitted by Newsbubba on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:19pm.

They have to have the best comedy writers in television.  Some of the lines on the show absolutely knock me out of the chair.

Sure, it was all about the life of a sex maniac and his brother, who is just a maniac., but you have to admit that opens up a lot of comic opportunities. Having a kid who wasn't smart and snappy and sooooo politically correct is genius.  Jake is the perfect example of what most teen age boys are, complete dumbasses.  It gets boring watching super smart TV kid characters who seem to be the adults in the room.

Bertha, the housekeeper, is the perfect example of an employee who lets the home owner actually think that the owner is the boss, when in truth, she is pulling the strings, not to mention her whore daughters and grand daughters.

The best part about the show is that Charlie never had to act! He was doing on the show what he did in real life.  Unfortunately, Ashton "Moore" is doing the same. In real life, he is an overpaid, no talent, dumbass who bangs older women. What you see on the show in Walden is the real deal. Stupid ain't nearly as funny as unrepentant whore dog, but these writers are trying.

I think the real genius of the show is the fact that they place the show's star in roles that aren't even a stretch. They just show up at work, and do what they did last night at home or out on the town.

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

Why does shawn keep talking about sex appeal and teenagers?

Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 8:46am.

Glee is an American musical comedy-drama television series that airs on Fox in the United States, and on Global and Fox Canada in Canada. It focuses on the high school glee club...

shawn: A show has to have more than sex appeal...

shawn: ...plot on sex appeal..

sex appeal: 1. the ability to excite people sexually.

Why are you, a grown man over the age of 25, talking about sexual excitation when referring to a show about teenagers?

  • Login to post comments

Actually

Submitted by shawn. on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 1:06pm.

I was responding to a poster that was talking about Two and a half Men's plot. Why are you so concerned about my age. Aren't you less than a decade from getting a AARP discount?

In my first post to MB I said a show has to have more than sex appeal and the script and content don't bother me

  • Login to post comments

Actually

Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 8:35pm.

Actually. It is about a grown man making posts about the sex appeal of a show full of teenagers. But nice try at redirecting.

Actually. Your very first post, the first post here, you spoke of your sexual excitement at watching teenagers. But nice try at redirecting.

Actually. Your response to motherbelt made no mention of your sexual excitement at watching teenagers. But nice try at redirecting.

Actually. It matters not how close I am to getting an AARP discount. I do not make skeevy skeezy posts about getting sexually excited watching a show full of teenagers. But nice try at redirecting.

  • Login to post comments

No actually

Submitted by shawn. on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 9:35pm.

I said a show has to have more than sex appeal to survive. I know it is your schtick to twist people's words and falsely acuse people. In this case you are accusing me of excitement over teenagers

You are free to think that if you want, just like I am free to think that a fifty year old man like you was fed poo as a child, hence your infestation with feces

Unfotunately I don't have the patience of Liberallies to go over 400 post and outlast you till you shut up and cry, so please take comfort in the fact that no matter how much you twist words and lie, some folks will always heart the vet. Sniff

  • Login to post comments

Whatever.

Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 9:46pm.

shawn: Glee sucks this year...A show has to have more than sex appeal to succeed.

And insulting me will erase that how?

  • Login to post comments

Lol

Submitted by shawn. on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 10:23pm.

Looks like you missed some of my quote. Insulting you doesn't erase anything, it's just fun :-)

  • Login to post comments

Whatever. Play stupid.

Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 11:45pm.

Yeah, I missed some of your quote. Whoopie doodles. Except that part of your quote did not relate to your perversion and your constant attempts to make us care about your perversion, now did it?

shawn: Glee sucks this year...A show has to have more than sex appeal to succeed.

shawn specifically mentions Glee. Then specifically says "A show..." has to have more than sex appeal. "A show...." "A..."

a: 3a—used as a function word before a singular noun followed by a restrictive modifier <a man who was here yesterday>

The sentence "A show...." specifically referred to the show Glee mentioned in the Subject Line. But let's play stupid and act as though it was not and instead come out with one ad hominem insult after another. Now, tell us why you think it is ok to talk about getting sexually excited over a show about and starring teenagers.

shawn: I was responding to a poster that was talking about Two and a half Men's plot.

Lie. Yours was the very first comment. A LIE. We now know it was a lie because you went into insult mode rather than admitting it was not true.

shawn: In my first post to MB I said a show has to have more than sex appeal...

Another lie. We now know it was a lie because you went into insult mode rather than admitting it was not true.

  • Login to post comments

Lol

Submitted by shawn. on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 12:52am.

Oh please. Your just going to twist it anyway so think what you want. At least your not attacking me about my spelling today.

Hopefully somebody will post soon telling about how wonderful you are and you can feel appreciated soon, so your ego can get its fill.

This site would suffer terribly without you so we would not want you feelings hurt. Or sorry Teh feelingz teh hurtz. Your trademark funny language. Hee hee.

  • Login to post comments

Whatever..

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 1:09am.

Yes. Providing direct quotes is now classified as twisting.

You win. Insulting is now a resounding refutation of direct evidence. Must suck when people don't buy into your game. Now insert your DVD of Glee and tell us how teenagers sexually appeal to you.

shawn: Glee sucks this year...A show has to have more than sex appeal to succeed.

PS- Again, whatever. Display your stupid.

shawn: Teh feelingz teh hurtz. Your trademark funny language.

As usual, wrong. And stupid as well. Not my trademark or invention.

Teh  is an Internet slang neologism most frequently used as an English article, based on a common typographical error of "the". Teh has subsequently developed grammatical usages distinct from the.[1] It is not common in spoken or written English outside technical or leetspeak circles, but when spoken, it is pronounced /tɛ/ or /tə/.[2]

Might as well try actually talking about your perversions and skeeviness. Lying and insulting just ain't working for you, now is it?

  • Login to post comments

I have...

Submitted by ridunculous on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:14am.

never seen a show go down so far, so fast as Glee.  Forget Bozell's typically sanctimonious rant...the show is terrible!  The first half of the first season was fantastic, but it quickly devolved into nothing but social commentary and progressive propaganda.  The increasing focus on Kurt's gayness and the associated bullying was excruciating to watch...we get it!  He's gay, he's a proud stereotype, bullying is baaaaaaaad!  I hate it when a good show is wasted.  

  • Login to post comments

leftism = juvenilism

Submitted by wizardjr on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:14am.

Leftards are stuck in their puberty years. Look at how they vote, it's like a student council campaign for them. It's all about celebrity rather than skill and ability. The same goes for their various causes. It's about good intentions and never about results. Utopian dreams outweigh practical truth. Children in adult bodies.

  • Login to post comments

The homo agenda glitzed up

Submitted by winston smith on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:23am.

The homo agenda glitzed up for a prime-time kids show. The subject of this show came up in a conversation with my niece earilier this year. She is a high school student at a public school in blue-state suburban New Jersey . She says most of her friends don't care for the show's overt gay theme. They like all the acting and music and such but many are put off by the gay stuff. Kids are smart, they know how to pick and choose. The vast majority know homosexuality is the wrong choice no matter how ridiculously hard popular media tries to convince them otherwise.

MSNBC - Lean Leftward
  • Login to post comments

Virginity is boring

Submitted by CherryBomb on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:30am.

Sex is wonderful. I'm sure someone agrees.

  • Login to post comments

scandalous cretin!

Submitted by ridunculous on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:45am.

Did you like that? It's my Bozell impression.

  • Login to post comments

Hey fella

Submitted by americanjarhead on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:39am.

It's desensitizing us to the gay life style, just like CBS does with NCIS autopsy's. The idea being, you'll get use to it. Plan B, we'll shove it down your throat. Read about this years ago.

  • Login to post comments

Medical View

Submitted by Pharmer on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:41am.

Have you ever noticed how little time the dramas devote to the medical inconveniences attendant with having sex with various people whom one doesn't know well, or even like?

There is a lot of physical down time, and resultant lack of spontaneity, which is never addressed.

Also, people in the West are generally not tolerant of arranged marraiges. This Glee episode seems to be about accepting others' choice of when and with whom the first sex experience should be. That's an interesting contrast.

  • Login to post comments

And do you think pushing the

Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:45am.

And do you think pushing the idea that high school is the appropriate time for one's first sexual experience is interesting?

  • Login to post comments

I watched it...

Submitted by ridunculous on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:51am.

I don't know why, it's absolutely dreadful. I don't think it was pushing that idea, that's just Bozell's interpretation.

  • Login to post comments

The plot line for not one,

Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:53am.

The plot line for not one, but TWO of the show's couples, one straight, one gay, just happened by accident? It wasn't planned?
What idea do YOU think they were pushing?

  • Login to post comments

yes...

Submitted by ridunculous on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 12:01pm.

but if you actually watch the show, it doesn't encourage sex in high school...certainly not promiscuous or ill considered sex.  Sex is something that happens in high school so I don't see a problem with the show addressing it.

  • Login to post comments

Sex isn't as common in high

Submitted by redfish on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:28pm.

Sex isn't as common in high school as television makes it seem, most kids stay abstinent. A lot of kids who don't aren't interested in sex, but TV makes it seem as if that isn't normal, so along with peer pressure they're rushed into it. That's life imitating art, rather than the other way around.

Abstinent teens don't make good storylines for ratings though.

And Glee has regularly made fun of people who argue for abstinence, poking fun at a "Chastity Club" at the school. In this particular episode, it certainly was ill considered sex. Having sex as a means of method acting is a horrible reason to have sex.

So I would disagree.

  • Login to post comments

they do...

Submitted by ridunculous on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 1:00am.

poke fun at the abstinence club. I'll give you that. I'm ten years removed from high school, and Glee is basically Mary Poppins compared to my high school.  Glee ain't the enemy - I'm not sure what the enemy is...but it isn't Glee.  

  • Login to post comments

I would make fun of the

Submitted by redfish on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 12:53pm.

I would make fun of the abstinence club also, even as I stayed abstinent. Its just corny. But abstinence clubs aren't really a big problem in schools, if they exist at all; its strange that it even makes it into a storyline. A lot of entertainment today makes out social conservatives to be pests that are everywhere in high school, bothering people, and just won't go away. Look at Easy A also, where the school rallied around an obnoxious bible-thumping girl to persecute someone for gossip. Where the hell does that happen in real life? What the shows and movies do is caricature everyone who disagrees with a certain point of view as a member of a Chastity Club or a bible-thumper.

I'm about 15 years removed from high school, you're right, Glee is about Marry Poppins compared to what I experienced also. That doesn't mean we were all having sex and doing drugs. Most people didn't take high school seriously; it was just 'thing' we had to get through. There were no cliques. We thought the message "don't take drugs" was patronizing because we were smart enough to figure it out for ourselves. High school was boring. We were glad when it was over we were actually moving on to our lives. Glee makes high school look more dramatic than it actually was.

The people who would join school clubs and participate in school politics were the most annoying people on campus, and everybody knew they were just doing it to have something on their college transcripts. They also tended to be the more liberal kids in the school, because being liberal was seen as popular, and they wanted to be popular. I'm reminded of Tracy Flick in Election. There were no bible-thumpers. I had a friend who was pretty religious and conservative, but he mostly kept to himself. The only place he spoke up was in challenging a teacher we had who was self-professed Maoist.

But TV does influence people's perceptions of reality and that has consequences also.

Whether or not Glee is the enemy... it is part of the media bias on these issues.

  • Login to post comments

I agree...

Submitted by ridunculous on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 8:22am.

Glee is definitely part of the bias against conservatives...it's part of the reason I don't watch it anymore - that and the script writing just went to hell.

Actually I agree with everything you said. You're smart :) and nice Election reference, great movie.

  • Login to post comments

What's next...?

Submitted by NeoKong on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:44am.

Maybe they can devote a show to the first time one of the girls turns a trick for her pimp boyfriend or maybe the first time someone shoots heroin.
Wouldn't that be so edgy...?
After all. No one can stop them.

Follow me on Twitter
  • Login to post comments

I don't have a problem with

Submitted by LinTaylor on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 11:50am.

I don't have a problem with the gay part of the story; what bugs me more is the fact that the characters made the decision to have sex so carelessly and for such a frivolous reason as "It'll help me understand my character better". Of course it will; West Side Story, like its Shakespearean source material, is about two kids so caught up in their hormones that they make idiotic decisions that harm themselves and those around them.

What I find more disconcerting, however, is that the director encouraged them to have sex and nobody spoke up or even pointed out the terrible leap in logic it takes. Apparently method acting is the only way to go. I kind of want to see them get to the rumble scene because I fully expect the director hand the actors real knives and say "You won't be able to play the role properly unless you're actually trying to kill each other, so get to it!"

  • Login to post comments

You're right

Submitted by shayne62 on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 12:32pm.

When I heard about this scene (I stopped watching the show after the first year because of the blatant antisemitism), my first though was, "does this mean that these characters can't play a murderer in a play because they've never killed anyone?"

I believe what upsets me the most is not so much the portrayal of teenagers who wish to lose their virginity - heck, I don't know a teen who doesn't - but the irresponsibility of the show to gloss over the emotional damage many kids suffer from teenage sex. 17 year old children are not emotionally capable to understand the ramifications of their actions. That's why we don't allow them to vote yet (and really, shouldn't until they are 21).

The thought that sex is all glamor is destroyed after the first attempt. Yes, sex - especially between two consenting adults - is a wonderful experience. But without a commitment (and I don't mean the kind horny teenagers make with one another in high school), it's shallow and often times regrettable. There are many women who regret the fact that they "gave themselves" before they eventually married someone else. Consider the affect on their future spouse when it's found out that sex isn't as special as it should be.

If the show wishes to portray the reality that high school sex "happens," then the responsibly thing to do is show both sides of the equation - good and bad.

But responsibility and "Hollywood" are complete opposites.

Shayne
  • Login to post comments

"If the show wishes to

Submitted by redfish on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:39pm.

"If the show wishes to portray the reality that high school sex "happens," then the responsibly thing to do is show both sides of the equation - good and bad."

I think people should also keep in mind, like I mentioned above, most teenagers don't have sex in high school. The problem with television is it often distorts reality in the attempt to make reality look more dramatic (or more "issue-oriented"). If we had a realistic show, it would reflect that.

  • Login to post comments

Quinn got pregnant in season one

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:47pm.

She chose not to get an abortion and kept the baby, so no pro choice story line there. They also showed how hard it was for the parents emotionally when they gave the baby up for adoption

I agree Glee is liberal propaganda, but they show both sides once in a while.

  • Login to post comments

Except for one thing

Submitted by shayne62 on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 3:12pm.

Yeah, they showed how hard it was for the parents. And in doing so, they portrayed the father as a Glenn Beck watching, angry and bitter arse who could really care less about humanity. I don't call that fair, or balanced, Shawn.

Shayne
  • Login to post comments

I did not say it was fair or balanced

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 3:32pm.

I was addressing what you said and I also believe I said Glee promotes liberal viewpoints did I not?

"I believe what upsets me the most is not so much the portrayal of teenagers who wish to lose their virginity - heck, I don't know a teen who doesn't - but the irresponsibility of the show to gloss over the emotional damage many kids suffer from teenage sex. 17 year old children are not emotionally capable to understand the ramifications of their actions. That's why we don't allow them to vote yet (and really, shouldn't until they are 21)."

  • Login to post comments

How is that not pro-choice?

Submitted by redfish on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 7:57pm.

How is that not pro-choice? Pro-choice supporters lately have been pushing the line that its okay if the woman decides to keep the baby, whats wrong is that there's a political issue about it. This was pushed on an MTV program about pregnancy which showcased how difficult it was for mothers to decide to abort.

The decision isn't either pro-choice or pro-life.

Bozell's point is still true, they don't deal with the emotional ramifications. He isn't talking about the consequence of having a baby, but issues of maturity, such as whether abstention from sex helps you learn maturity, or whether involvement in sex at that age gets you off track. A storyline where a teenage mother decides to have the baby tries to sympathize with the idea that teenagers are fully mature and there's nothing to worry about, as was what the MTV program was trying to push.

  • Login to post comments

Simple

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 7:59pm.

Instead of aborting the baby she decided to keep it.

  • Login to post comments

The only conclusion there is

Submitted by redfish on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 8:10pm.

The only conclusion there is that teenagers are mature enough to make decisions about sex and about whether to abort their pregnancy.

Do you think watching that, a teenager will decide to go through with a pregnancy and decide to put it up for adoption and deal with the emotional anxiety of giving up the baby? Or, decide to abort?

There isn't a pro-life message there, any more than there was one in Juno.

  • Login to post comments

Nope

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 8:11pm.

The character took a chance with unprotected sex and got pregnant and did the responsible thing.

  • Login to post comments

Or is the responsible thing

Submitted by redfish on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 8:11pm.

Or is the responsible thing to abort? The only message anywhere, either way, is you can expect teenagers to be responsible.

  • Login to post comments

No I didnt

Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 8:17pm.

A big criticism about Glee and other lib shows is they have sex and don't show the tragic consequences. In this case they do.

  • Login to post comments

I don't think its a way of

Submitted by redfish on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 8:48pm.

I don't think its a way of showing the consequences of sex; the character could have always chosen to abort. Most teenagers who watch Glee, I think, will see how hard it was to give up the baby and, if they're ever in the situation, they'll decide to abort. Abortion prevents them from dealing with those decisions, after all. Its an easy copout.

And if they're not going to abort, they're going to practice safer sex, always use contraceptives, and use the morning-after pill as opposed to an abortion.

Do you think the message of Juno was pro-choice or pro-life? I think its kind of the same storyline.

I don't think the consequences Mr. Bozell was referring to have to do with childbirth.

  • Login to post comments

Just one problem, Shayne

Submitted by LinTaylor on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:42pm.

You forgot that Hollywood is totally down with the idea of shallow sex for the hell of it; they firmly believe that only Fundamentalists think there should be any depth or meaning behind the act. Though in Glee's defense, even if these kids did make a stupid decision for a stupid reason, at the very least they were already couples and not just running off to shag the first person they could find.

  • Login to post comments

Time to confess.

Submitted by Newsbubba on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:26pm.

After all the chatter on NB about this episode, I went to On Demand and watched it. My first time!

The music was amazing.  Such talent in one high school. Who'da thunk it?

The rest of the story line was totally lame.

I was left with one burning question.  Do ANY of these kids have live-at-home parents? I mean, are they all wealthy and have homes of their own to have sex, of whatever variety they choose, whenever they choose?

The best I can figure is the kids are all wealthy orphans, living on their own, and the teachers work for them to make them great performers since they all seem to be Broadway quality natural talents already.

Did I miss something?

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

basic and primal human urges?

Submitted by UndercoverConse... on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 10:10pm.

like the ones to kill to protect what we think belongs to us? to kill to take what we want? Unbridled greed? to dominate and control? To hate and destroy that which is different? Those are just as primal "urges" as sex. But as society we MUST control and limit when and how they are manifested-there should be no shame in NOT acting like an animal without intelligent control.

BTW, they must've forgotten...sex is a "primal urge" to MAKE BABIES, not "recreation" or "romance".

So if they're not all knocked up, or breeding, then they STILL haven't "experienced" any primal urges.

WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)

"Proportional Response leads to Perpetual War"

"Remember, Remember the 2nd of November!"

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
  • ABC Drama Warns of ‘Conservative Overlords’ Bringing Anti-Black ‘Salem Witch Trials’ to DC
  • Gay NBA Player’s Twin Brother Gets ‘I’m The Straight One’ T-shirt From Jimmy Kimmel
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use