NB Publisher Bozell: Gingrich Won Debate, 'It's Over' for Pawlenty
Editor's Note: What follows is NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell's thoughts on who won, who lost, and who should just pack it all in following last night's Republican presidential debate in Ames, Iowa.
Gingrich: The winner. Wasn't even close. Showed why Obama would pee in his pants having to debate this man.
Santorum: Also a winner. Showed most passion, and took on and beat up other candidates. But was it enough to keep him alive?
Romney: Draw/Win. Played not to lose and in that sense succeeded. Didn't accomplish anything, but no one laid a hand on him either.
Bachmann: Draw. Up in that she very successfully deflected attacks. Down in that she came out with plastic speeches when asked to "speak from the heart."
Cain: Draw. Answered some questions well, others not so well. In the end it wasn't enough to save him.
Paul: Loser. Time to go home, Ron. His attacks on the US vis-a-vis Iran were insulting.
Pawlenty: Like the boxer told in the 12th round that he needed a knock-out, Pawlenty threw wild punches everywhere -- and never scored. It's over.
Huntsman: Who?
- Brent Bozell's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Why vote for Paul?
Submitted by Vonu on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:19am.
He doesn't have the balls to speak at convention. Wasted money. Buy gold instead.
Agreed
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:24am.
He is a LOSERTARIAN...... he has NOT ONE conviction that will make the American voters vote for HIM!
Speaking of debate....
Submitted by nonncom on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:32pm.
there will be no debate....Barry will never allow that....only questions submitted in advance....I agree with Bozell....Ginrich would kick his ass in a real, stand up, on your toes, think on your feet debate...never happen....teleprompter man would fold like a cheap shirt in a Chinese laundry....
Gingrich's overlooked remarks at Fox News debate
Submitted by lrgon on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 5:57pm.
"The Ve[r]ona files proved their were spies in America." ---Newt Gingrich
The VENONA files are decoded cables sent from Soviet agents in the United States to Moscow. Transcripts of the intercepted cables were released by the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency in 1995 and 1996.
The VENONA transcript with the most relevance to the Hiss case is #1822, sent March 30, 1945 from the Soviet's Washington station chief to Moscow.
Hiss continued to work as a Soviet agent well until 1945, well after his association with Chambers ended in 1938. The period of the 1940s was one during which Hiss served as an important policy maker in the State Department and was first "Acting" Secretary General for the United Nations conference.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/hiss/hissvenona.html
Shhhh. Boys and girls. The Loon is building a nest.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 9:02am.
Don't disturb it. It can never attract a Loonmate without a nice nest built of loneliness, frustration, and crushed dreams.
I want RUDY
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:22am.
Read the lastest Poll Rudy is up 5 points on El Presidente Barry!
Rudy
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 10:14pm.
You can have him!
Paul: Loser. Time to go home,
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:23am.
Paul: Loser. Time to go home, Ron. His attacks on the US vis-a-vis Iran were insulting.
Ron Paul's candidacy is nothing more than narcissism.
24 years later, he still refuses to get the message.
24 years later
Submitted by kevtheweb on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:49am.
24 years later, and now look at all the "real" candidates out there who are now borrowing his views.
All except one view. And we
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:58am.
All except one view. And we all know what THAT is. Which is why he is unelectable in a GOP primary.
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
Well, well, another paulbot.
Submitted by UpNorth on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:20pm.
Welcome Kevpaulbot.
Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:27am.
Although some were less awful than others...
When the MSM piles on whoever wines the nomination..
And President Downgrade get his brownshirts to do the same..
Only a really smart, well-spoken conservative will be able to survive.
I didn't see one last night.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Only a really smart, well-spoken conservative will be able to su
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:36am.
Survive what? You have an example?
Are You Lost?
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:39am.
Survive the hate onslaught by the MSM and Barry's Campaign Smear machine.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Isn't that a foregone
Submitted by Immortal Fish on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:55pm.
Isn't that a foregone inevitability no matter who secures the nomination? Consider what was done to Bob Dole v2.0 aka "media darling" John McCain.
Good grief,
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:44pm.
So, who in you opinion can? Anyone?
The first thing the Right needs to do, is buck-up and find a little courage for heaven sake!
Ummm,
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:57pm.
Did you notice the older white-haired round-faced guy at the far right (of the line-up, I mean)? If you don't at least think he was smart, well, I just don't know what to say.
Agreed on all points
Submitted by dreamsincolor on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:30am.
Newt acted as if he was talking to someone across a dining room table, glib, confident and was never even close to rattled.
It does seem to be true that he is the smartest guy in the room, regardless of the room.
And yes, Obama would be puddle of jello after a public debate with Newt. (as would the most sycophantic Obama supporters after witnessing said debate)
I just know that ANY of the
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:49am.
I just know that ANY of the candidates yesterday would be better than Juan McLame debating the narcissus-in-chief
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
How did Juan McLame...
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:18pm.
get the nomination, anyway? I certainly didn't vote for him.
Ha!
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:30am.
Seems we agree.
Who here is surprised that
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:38am.
Who here is surprised that Bozell would name the authoritarian wannabe-tyrant Santorum a winner? That Bozell would say Paul is a loser in the debate for standing up for Founding principles is equally expected.
Hey, Brent, pick up a history book.
Maybe he watched the debate?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:54am.
Can you say the same? Oh wait, you already admitted to Blonde in another thread that you didn't. Galactic stupidity, thy name is Incestmo! (h/t Blonde).
He didn't even watch it? LOL
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 5:40pm.
That's why them call them Paulbots.
Satchmo is a Retard. Ron Paul is a damn liar.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:26pm.
Screw you Paultard. I said Ban this troll now.
King Paultard Ron Paul: “Iran is a threat because they have some militants there, but believe me … Iran does not have an air force that can come here — they can’t even make enough gasoline for themselves,”
Did Iran need an air force to kill our troops and others in any of these places?
April 1983 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- A truck loaded with explosives blew up in front of the American embassy in Beirut. Sixty-one were killed and 120 more were injured.
October 23, 1983 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- The headquarters of the U.S. Marines in Beirut was destroyed in a suicide attack by Iran's terrorist surrogates, resulting in 241 dead, 80 seriously wounded.
March 1984 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- William Buckley, an American citizen living in Lebanon, was abducted by Iranian terrorist surrogates. He was secretly taken to Tehran, where he was killed in 1985 by the Revolutionary Guards.
December 03, 1984 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- Peter Kilburn, a librarian at the American University of Beirut, was abducted by Iran's terrorist surrogates. He was killed in1986.
June 1985 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- A TWA Boeing 727 was hijacked en route to Rome and Athens and was diverted to Beirut. One of the passengers on board who was a diver in the U.S. Navy was executed on the plane by the hijackers.
July 31, 1989 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- Colonel William Higgins, an American officer working for the United Nations in Lebanon, was abducted and executed by the Iranian regime's agents. A video recording of his hanging was given to international news agencies.
March 17, 1992 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- An attack against the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires resulted in the death of 20 and the injury of 250 people.
April 25, 1993 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- The New York Times reported that at least $100,000 had been deposited in the account of the prime suspects of the February 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The money primarily came from Iran.
July 18, 1994 --- IRAN WAS RESPONSIBLE --- A bomb at the Amia Jewish Center in Buenos Aires left 85 civilians dead and 230 injured. Argentine intelligence officials later announced that the Qods Force’s former commander, Ahmad Vahidi, helped plan the bombing.
Source
Great sourcing, Vet!
Submitted by Grumpy in Arizona on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:45pm.
I counted 53 terrorist incidents by Iran listed in your source... yet still, the "Paulinators" refuse to understand how naive and irresponsible is their little tin god.
I've said what I had to say about the debate on the "Open Thread" but just couldn't resist commenting on your excellent sourcing... Thank you.
- Grump :o)
I'm a Libertarian..
Submitted by adamsmith on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:04pm.
and Ron Paul is an idiot. Santorum not "allowing" rape victims an abortion is a sure winner. It'll be Romney with maybe Bachmann for VP. Perry is finished before he started between that SERMON he gave the other day, and his ties with some group called "The New Apostles" who believe now is the time to start some kind of war so Jesus comes back. Palin, Perry, and Santorum are evangelical dead weight, followed closely by Bachmann. Romney keeps his beliefs to himself and will be the winner for it.
Romney-Bachmann
Submitted by Clyde Gatton on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:32pm.
Funny you should mention that duo. I've said for months that if Romney and Bachmann would get together and campaign in the primaries as a ticket, they would not only cruise to a nomination, but would also beat Obama handily (barring some Hand of God intervention on Obama's behalf).
My wife and children think I'm crazy, because they A) don't like Romney, or B) don't like Bachmann. Of course, they have yet to propose an electable ticket themselves. And Lord knows, we don't want to spoil a surprise by choosing a running mate when it could actually help!
V/R
Clyde
"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC
I think Romney has some
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 8:37am.
I think Romney has some issues regarding his implentation of something similar to Obamacare in Mass. that will be difficult to overcome plus some not-so-conservative fiscal policies he had while Governor (also could prove difficult to overcome).
Total Ticket
Submitted by Clyde Gatton on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 5:12pm.
True, hence why I said a total ticket . They each fill in the other's shortfalls with one group or another, and that type of ticket needs time to age, so it is palatable to John Q Public. Hence the call to run the primaries as a team.
V/R
Clyde
"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC
Huh. None of those attacks
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:51pm.
Huh. None of those attacks took place on American soil. How strange. Why, it's almost as if our interventionism made us a target. And, wait...all of those took place after the 1950s, the decade in which Eisenhower instructed the CIA to overthrow the constitutional monarch of Iran and replace him with the tyrannical Shah, which they did, and with the aid of Nazis. Huh. This, of course, led to the Islamic Revolution. I can't imagine that there would be any animus against the United States for any of that. Weird.
But you just made a hell of an argument for our interventionism resulting in the deaths of Americans. Nice job!
And you make a hell of an
Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:55pm.
And you make a hell of an argument for why Ron Paul will never be president.
Nice job!!
Paultard Satchmo can't breath with his head up King Loon's ass.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:17pm.
More Lies from the biggest Sissy Paultard here. BLAME AMERICA FIRST!
Everyone enjoying this Sissy that claims any deployment of troops on the planet anywhere automatically is "intersissyism" simply because we deployed troops. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SEND TROOPS ANYWHERE. Troops are for protectiong the northern border in case Canada attacks.
April 1983 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- A truck loaded with explosives blew up in front of the American embassy in Beirut. Sixty-one were killed and 120 more were injured.
October 23, 1983 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- The headquarters of the U.S. Marines in Beirut was destroyed in a suicide attack by Iran's terrorist surrogates, resulting in 241 dead, 80 seriously wounded.
March 1984 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- William Buckley, an American citizen living in Lebanon, was abducted by Iranian terrorist surrogates. He was secretly taken to Tehran, where he was killed in 1985 by the Revolutionary Guards.
December 03, 1984 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- Peter Kilburn, a librarian at the American University of Beirut, was abducted by Iran's terrorist surrogates. He was killed in1986.
June 1985 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- A TWA Boeing 727 was hijacked en route to Rome and Athens and was diverted to Beirut. One of the passengers on board who was a diver in the U.S. Navy was executed on the plane by the hijackers.
July 31, 1989 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- Colonel William Higgins, an American officer working for the United Nations in Lebanon, was abducted and executed by the Iranian regime's agents. A video recording of his hanging was given to international news agencies.
March 17, 1992 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- An attack against the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires resulted in the death of 20 and the injury of 250 people.
April 25, 1993 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- The New York Times reported that at least $100,000 had been deposited in the account of the prime suspects of the February 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The money primarily came from Iran.
July 18, 1994 --- WE WERE INTERVENING HOW? --- A bomb at the Amia Jewish Center in Buenos Aires left 85 civilians dead and 230 injured. Argentine intelligence officials later announced that the Qods Force’s former commander, Ahmad Vahidi, helped plan the bombing.
See the logic of sissies and cowards? Any troop deployment. Any embassy personnel. Any international flight. Any United States flagged ship. It is all intevervening. Therefore all our fault.
More from the Sissy cut and run Coward Satchmo
58. We have wasted 60 years militarily. Wasted. Winning the Cold War. Persian Gulf War I. Persian Gulf War II. Grenada. Libya in the 80's. Haiti. Panama. Vietnam. Kosovo. Somalia. Korea. All wasted. Gold Star mothers should hang their head in shame.
57. We lost a fighter jet in Libya. But under the Satchmo/Paultard philosophy on non-interventionalism where everything is our fault, all those fighter jets would be consigned to rust and mold away in a hanger. Money saved - none.
54. Germany declared war on us and we should have just ignored them cuz hey they did not do anything to us or nothin' like, attacking our merchant ships, inserting spies into our country, or attempt to get Mexico drawn into the war among other things. Ron Paul rules!
55. Again, every attack on our citizens, military, and soil is our fault. Phweet.
56. The NAZI party is our fault too.
BLAME AMERICA FIRST! ELECT KING LOONTARD RON PAUL. MAKE AMERICA WEAK!
"The NAZI party is our fault too"
Submitted by lrgon on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:34pm.
The Nazi war machine was built up by industrialists outside of Germany. So you make a point albeit a point you distorted in your attack on Satchmo. It isn't the "people" of the US or for that matter England who build up dictators; its the officials who have taken control of the people's government and are using it for their own gain who are responsible.
Noted researcher Anthony Sutton of Stanford makes the case in his books:http://antonysutton.com/
USA CIA assets/ puppets: Saddam Hussein ---Osama Bin Laden.
During the war between Iraq and Iran Saddam was a US ally in that war. The ayatolla was the bad guy in that war and Saddam got a friendly letter hand delivered to him by Donald Rumsfeld.
Rummy would later be rewarded by moving on up in a later administration to rise to Sec.of Daaa-fense where he would use his power to jail and torture Navy vets who dared to speak of corruption in our own military. http://www.bing.com/search?q=suit+aganist+Rumsfeld&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM...
During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden was who's ally? The ruskies or did the CIA hire the future co-conspirator behind the 9-11 attack on US soil?
Oh look boys and girls. The Lonely Loon searches for a mate.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:41pm.
Hear the Loon call the Loon Mating Call again and again. "CIA" "CIA" CIA" "CIA"
Alas for even the female Loon hears this and says "Oh do shut up".
Is it any wonder this species is nearly extinct boys and girls?
any wonder this species is nearly extinct boys and girls
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 6:46pm.
Not to worry, they will kill off whole populations, to save the dimwit
Protecting the northern border
Submitted by km2002 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:06pm.
It's for certain we're not using troops to protect the southern border from the Mexican invasion.
Yeah, SatchelMouth---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 5:25pm.
Seems I do recall reading about those Nazis running in high style in stealth circles in the 1950's, with Eisenhower's backing.
Putz.
MD
http://totallyfreepress.wordp
Submitted by Satchmo on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 10:47am.
http://totallyfreepress.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/irans-history-the-cia-m...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'état
"But a reconstruction of the coup from other sources, especially from the archives of the British Foreign Office, indicates that this report is highly sanitized. It glosses over such sensitive issues as the crucial participation of the U. S. ambassador in the actual overthrow; the role of U. S. military advisers; the harnessing of local Nazis and Muslim terrorists; and the use of assassinations to destabilize the government."
www.fill_in_the_subject_line.upyours.
Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 08/15/2011 - 8:24pm.
""Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action," Paul wrote.
Paul continued that politically sensible blacks are outnumbered ""as decent people." Citing reports that 85 percent of all black men in the District of Columbia are arrested, Paul wrote:
""Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal," Paul said.
It's not only that I disagree with you....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:59pm.
Actually, yeah. That's pretty much it. On everything.
I completly agree
Submitted by Samshile on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:06pm.
Santorum= control freak
Paul= truly Power to the People
I would like several of the candiates to be part of the presidential cabinet
Santorum is a control freak, Samshile?---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 5:30pm.
Is that a snide remark?
Didn't you just chastise JPT and suggest taking the "high road" when talking of others?
Do as I say, not as I do, eh?
MD
Paul is "insulting" because he wants to end the war?
Submitted by lrgon on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:12pm.
Mr. Bozell was against the Vietnam war!
When Brent was publisher of Triumph Magazine the Vietnam war was one of those topics discussed and Brent opposed it probably along the lines that Paul opposes the wars in the middle east- they are "unjust wars" as articulated by the fathers of the Catholic church to which Brent belongs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumph_(magazine)
Paul's foreign policy is right in line with George Washington and John Q. Adams.
The confused posters would be cheering to end the war if Bush II came out in favor of a non aggressive/ non interventionist foreign policy. Oh, wait he did favor a non aggression position. Clinton was the war monger back in they 90's and "DUHHHHHH---ubya " was playing the part of John Q. Adams and more in line with Ron Paul's non interventionist views.
Funny how things in politics change but Paul stays true to the principles enshrined in the Constitution! Maybe that's why some hate him.
Oh good grief! What idiocy…
Submitted by Grumpy in Arizona on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 6:25pm.
... “they are "unjust wars" as articulated by the fathers of the Catholic church to which Brent belongs.”
Go back to your “Chick Tracks” … meaning “hate Catholics and take the teachings of the Church out of context to further your own warped opinion.”
Please, take comfort in the same gross violations of common sense that Ron Paul does… but don’t try to inflict your skewed ramblings upon the rest of us!
newt
Submitted by kinijane on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:39am.
I thought he was the winner also, but he has a long way to go.
Loved it when he hit Wallace with the gotha thing, Wallace wanted
a dust up and he managed to get it with Pawley and Bachmann.
Wallace wasn't interested in the issues as much as he wanted
to cause controversy
.
Totally agree with your assessment
Submitted by Conservator on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:04pm.
IMO, this will never get old:
Newt To Wallace: Put Away The Gotcha Questions & Stop Playing Mickey Mouse Games! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6zqZr0YRyo4
Also recall that in 2006, The Washington Post revealed Wallace had been a registered Democrat for more than two decades. Wallace explained his party affiliation in terms of pragmatism, insisting that being a Democrat is the only feasible means of participating in the political process in heavily Democratic Washington, D.C.
While I understand MRC's close relation with FOXNEWS and the benefit it presents, I wish the liberals on FOX be exposed more here. Two weeks ago, I saw to FOX anchors ask questions of Republicans based on the online and unscientific poll results of the Washington Post. Does anyone at FOX know how left the readers of the Post are? - check out their comment section and it's hard to miss.
Which of these has the best
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:40am.
Which of these has the best chance at beating Obama?
Is Perry stronger than all of these guys?
When is Palin going to quit playing cat-and-mouse and declare one way or the other?
Obama doesn't have a chance.
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:46am.
Obama doesn't have a chance. His chance was lost long ago.
But why bother right?
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 6:51pm.
Because they are all the same, except Paul right?
Easy.
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:46am.
All of them.
Probably.
Wait and see like everyone else.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I Wish I Shared Your Optimism...
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:49am.
I see nothing "easy" about it.
President Downgrade is cratering now, but the MSM will still carry his water.
And Barry will have $1B to spend on slurs and attack ads.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
President Downgrade, as you say
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:56am.
...will continue to crater. There is nothing he can possibly do, now, that will turn this economic ship around, unless he becomes a conservative to the right of Sarah Palin.
There is just really one question, which Reagan used. You know which one that is. Any candidate who asks that question, while stating the FACTS (Unemployment Rate, Record Deficits, Losses in the Markets, etc., etc.) will win.
No one is listening to his unpaid slurs and attacks, why would anyone pay attention to paid slurs and attacks? The liberal media is beginning to take shots at him as well...once there's a lot of blood in the water, they'll be "draft Hillary" cries from them.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I Want To Believe in Blonde.. But
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:25pm.
Reagan's approach was effective 30 years ago, and we are much different nation today...
Did the MSM take some shots at Professor Downgrade last week? Yes they did, but only because he embarrassed them. And if he continues to do so, they may in fact cut him loose. But he is the Great Campaigner and the slightest uptick in this economy will give the hope and change crowd just enough to squeak one out.
I so want to be wrong. But...
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Blonde as much as I want to
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:44pm.
Blonde as much as I want to believe that Barry will crater, I believe in the stupidity and ignorance of the American voters. Any way you slice it it will be a close race
along with...
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:01pm.
ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, MSLSD, CNN, ESPN (probably), the AP and Reuters blowing his horn as well.
Huntsman: Who? He's the
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:42am.
Huntsman: Who?
He's the EASY RIDER candidate.
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
Jarhead Loser
Submitted by JEB Stewart on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:47am.
Get off the LOSERTARIAN BS.......you seem more afraid of Paul than Obama. You may not agree with Paul on Iran, Iraq or Afghanistan (I don't), but what has Obama done? At least Paul respects the Constitution. If I had to choose between Paul and Obama........I would pick Paul.
Well............NOT a Loser... NOT afraid of lil barry........
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:25pm.
Put that way I would agree........... Given the choice of Paul or Obama I would vote Paul. HOWEVER thats a STRAWMAN.... Now let me knock your strawman down the question isn't Paul or barry.... the QUESTION IS Can Ron Paul BEAT barry..... THE ANSWER TO THAT IS NO!!!!!!!! HE WON"T WIN! STOP MUDDYING the water and lets support a candidate that WILL WIN!
Perry
Submitted by JEB Stewart on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:56pm.
Who " Healthcare Romney"? Perry????
Omigod -- has it really been
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:52am.
Omigod -- has it really been FOUR YEARS since the last massive attack of the RONBOTS...
Seems only yesterday!
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
I...I...I...
Submitted by Karma on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:57am.
Obama is the champ but there were way too many "I's" used by most of the debaters.
Thats your argument??
Submitted by boscokraft on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:37pm.
its time we grew up and matured as voters
Argument?
Submitted by Karma on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:30pm.
That was a simple statement. For the most part, I simply don't vote for chest thumpers. No reason to cry about it.
Dead on
Submitted by clintm19 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:58am.
Couldn't agree more, except maybe Santorum. I'm not a fan -- he ties everything into a moral agenda, Constitution be damned. What happened to smaller government?
I'd like to see this group get down to Romney, Gingrich and Perry -- 3 very different candidates -- and let it rip.
Moral agenda, Constitution be damned?
Submitted by km2002 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 11:04pm.
A widely available John Adams quote states, "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." I'm not sure how a moral agenda translates into a "Constitution be damned" mentality. It's usually the amoral who want to toss the Constitution into the trash; witness Obamacare for one.
Santorum: "I respect the
Submitted by clintm19 on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 12:35pm.
Santorum: "I respect the 10th Amendment, but we are a nation that has values. We are a nation that was built on a moral enterprise, and states don't have the right to tramp over those because of the 10th Amendment."
Sounds to me like he's saying "values" trump the Constitution.
He could have
Submitted by Bob K on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:07pm.
left the debate being carried on the shoulders of cheering Iowa republicans for all I care......he is STILL unelectable. If by some miracle he was the nominee, I would stay home on election day. It will take more than a planned and rehearsed routine at the debate to impress me.
Well, at least I have my priorities straightened out...
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:33pm.
I watched some football instead! ;)
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Well, Canuck
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:36pm.
I wanted to see Denver/Dallas, alas, it wasn't on here.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Same here...
Submitted by falcon on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 11:16am.
except it was on here in D/FW, and I only watched the third quarter - long enough to watch Stephen McGee throw his first touchdown pass of the night.
Not interested in a "debate" because words don't get anything done.
“I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership, that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose.” – Ronald Reagan, July 17, 1980.
I totally agree
Submitted by boscokraft on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:35pm.
Gingrich is brilliant, he knows the domestic and foreign policy issues backwards and forwards. But the American voter is so immature, that they generally want the "Rock Star" candidate. Gingrich is the only candidate that can get us back on track.
Agree on voter immaturity.
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:07pm.
Both "submissive" wife and I agreed Newt is strongest. He does have some baggage. But, Americans want the most "likeable" candidate rather the most qualified one. He's as strong on Middle Eastern policy as Santorum and is not afraid of anyone in D.C. (He knows where the bodies are buried)
I started watching the debate
Submitted by marpel on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:48pm.
I started watching the debate last night, but the timer buzzer Fox used sounded like my doorbell. Every time it sounded, my dogs thought someone was at the door and they'd start barking and running in circles. It finally got to be too much. I knew I could depend on Newsbusters to catch me up. Thank you!!
"Deep within my heart lies a memory. A song of ol' San Antone..."
Newt needs to be teaching
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:53pm.
Newt needs to be teaching courses in political science, publishing treatises on theories of governance, appearing as a smart guy on Sunday talk shows, and keeping a close eye on his wife's shopping habits. He does not need to be President; America does not need him to be President; and he doesn't have a chance in hell of being President.
Jer
Jer needs to be quiet.
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:09pm.
He does not know what America needs.
almostacowboy needs to increase his Gingrich knowledge
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 5:45pm.
base before shushing someone who has lived in the district adjacent to Gingrich's and has closely followed his career for the past 35 years. It appears that Gingrich's original campaign staff as well as the American public [Newt is at approximately 4% in the recent polling] tends to agree with my assessment.
Jer
He said, Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 6:21pm.
that you do not know what America needs.
If you are indeed a liberal Democrat, and follow your liberal Messiah, Obama, and believe in him and his policies, then almostacowboy is correct insofar as the ultimate America Obama wants is one that no intelligent person (as opposed to a member of the sheeple), would be satisfied with, nor tolerate.
MD
When were you appointed cowboy's spokesperson, interpreter,
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 6:36pm.
and designated dummy, dean? Your assistance is not required, however. I can read what cowboy typed. To be precise, I didn't specify what America needed. I offered an opinion on what Newt needed, and what America did NOT need. And I'll stand by that opinion. By the way, a couple of your strings are loose, Mr. Woodenhead. ;-)
Jer
Long after you appointed yourself as the official---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:39pm.
NewsBuster fence-sitter; thereby allowing yourself to attempt to overshadow any of your liberal bullshit on a conservative site by continually, everlastingly, perpetually, and most complainingly pointing out your occasional slap at a fellow liberal or Democrat.
And as a conservative, I stand by almostacowboy77's statement about you..
A liberal who uses the occasional gaffe or misstep by a fellow Party member as a chance to bolster his "fairness" creds, but who inexhaustibly defends Obama, does not know what America needs.
And if you indeed, can ask "When were you appointed cowboy's spokesperson" and "I can read what cowboy typed", when the poster's username is almostacowboy77, I would suggest in regard to loose strings, getting your own reading comprehension strings tightened.
Hah!
MD
I thought almostacowboy would be pleased to learn I recently
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:52pm.
promoted him to full-fledged cowpoke status since he stopped riding sidesaddle.
Jer
I do believe, Jer,---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:58pm.
I will leave that post in almostacowboy77's capable hands for a direct reply.
If the "cowboy" feels such is warranted. :^O
MD
You know, Jer,
Submitted by UpNorth on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:34pm.
your two sentences apply to Oblahma, more than to Newt, or any of the others at the debate last night.
Oblahma has to win in '12, he can't afford either Mooschelle's eating habits or her vacation destinations.
Ever heard the phrase
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:29pm.
"He aint Heavy, he's my Brother"? Now tell us why any conservative would heed the advice of a self professed lib?
I think Obama and his whole admin should resign, but some how, I doubt you agree.
Yeah...I think those were the words of Michael Moore's
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:41pm.
brother shortly before his hernia operation.
Because I know what's best for you folks. I'm standing on the outside where the view is unobstructed, the picture clear, and the perspective broad. Y'all are on the inside--addled, confused and bumping into each other.
Jer
Were ok, really
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:30pm.
Dont worry about us
Can't help it...
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:37pm.
I'm just naturally a 'reaching across the aisle' kind of guy.
Jer
Newt may be brilliant at
Submitted by Ruths husband Ben on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 12:59pm.
Newt may be brilliant at debating, in fact I am willing to concede that he is brilliant period, but he has so much baggage and so much scar tissue from self-inflicted wounds that it would be impossible for him to win. Unless of course he is facing an incumbent who has made such an unholy mess of his Presidency in both foreign and domestic policy, that the citizens are willing to overlook massive personal failings and missteps just to get rid of him. Hmmmm, Newt may stand a chance after all.
What is interesting is even
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:03pm.
What is interesting is even though Mr. Bozell is of the opinion that Gringrich won the debate hands down, the liberal MSM and various libs still aren't attacking him on the same level as Bachmann, Palin and soon Romney. Seems the libs aren't taking Gringrich seriously. Yet?
AND THE BIG LOSER WAS........
Submitted by Herbster on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:03pm.
The big loser last night...THE MEDIA led by the troll Wallace. He has joined the other mediapimps playing the "Gotcha" game. The woman on the panel was a joke, Byron York was a HUGE disappointment and Bret Baier was just kind of "There" breathing air and taking up space. Fox (Fake) News should be ashamed! These panelists were only interested in making their bones.
The candidates? Romney did his thing by making no mistakes. Bachmann showed her "Titanium spine" schooling Good and Pawlenty.......Pawlenty showed how weak he is----hes done! Cain? My nominee to head the Commerce Dept. A savvy businessman. Santorum? Yesterday's news. Ron Paul? Another Wendell Wilkie - but the guy is not playing with a full deck. Huntsmann? The lefty liberal in the hen house. He'll be tomorrow's chicken soup. Not a factor. Never was. Gingrich? The smartest in the class....he'd kick obama's a - - in a debate. Too bad he's got all that baggage.
Savvy business man?
Submitted by PaleHorse on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:16pm.
Savvy business man? Godfather's Pizza is garbage. Cain is a walking joke. The more he speaks, the dumber he looks. He should do himself a favor and zip it. His lack of skill was on full display last night. I tried to feel sorry for him until I remembered the long list of moronic comments he's made over the past three months. I love how having any business experience at all somehow sets politicians above the fray. That's hilarious. If you want business experience, get Bloomberg to run. I'd vote for him in a heart-beat.
PaleHorse of the Barrackalypse
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:52pm.
Godfathers Pizza is 300+ Million/year business. Shows how ignorant you are to so casually dismiss running a company that size.
Meanwhile, Bloomberg, although he too ran a Business, as mayor or New York he continually proved he did not understand what a good tax policy is, and he drove Millionaires out of The City.
Truely, your ignorance is astounding.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Free Stinker, have you ever
Submitted by PaleHorse on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:02pm.
Free Stinker, have you ever eaten there? I was commenting on the quality of the product. It's horrific. By they way, you clearly know little about Cain's tenure as CEO. Sales dropped by 41% on his watch. As soon as he stepped down, sales increased. He was a LOSER. Wow, he clearly knew what he was doing. What a strong businessman.
PaleHorse of the Barrackalypse
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:09pm.
Clearly the Pizzza is good enough that they sold 300+ Million worth of it annually. You neglect to add that after Mr.Cain turned Burger King's Philly division from their bigest $ loser to their bigest $ maker, he was then tapped tp save Godfathers Pizza. Yep. Their sales dropped right after he rook over. (as they had bwwn dropping BEFORE he took over) He stopped any further drops and saved the company. Ran it for some 8-10 years. Your cherry picked "facts" only sound bad to people who are not informed, such as yourself.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Free Stinker, dubious
Submitted by PaleHorse on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:16pm.
Free Stinker, dubious premise. Numbers don't lie. The sales were down every year that Cain was at the helm. He never brought them above $300 million. That didn't happen until he left. I will say that I was shocked to read that they made any money at all. The pizza is horrific. Although I guess it does look appetizing in areas where the only other options are McDonald's, Sonic, Burger King, and the Waffle House.
Yeah, he was doing such a
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:29pm.
Yeah, he was doing such a horrrible job he was able to convince invetstors to join him in buying GF pizza from Pilsbury . . . And he would remain President.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Winner
Submitted by PaleHorse on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:11pm.
I thought last night's true winner was Bret Baier. He was a masterful moderator. Put CNN to shame. Kudos to Fox News for hosting one of the best debates I've ever seen.
As for Gingrich, please. He's dead in the water. The story line of the day is that Rick Perry won b/c the field was so weak. Sure it's cliche, but I couldn't agree more.
Ever see the movie....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:21pm.
Friday the 13th? :-)
Cannot wait until my
Submitted by marpel on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:23pm.
Cannot wait until my Governor, Rick Perry, jumps into the debates. I think he'd be a good choice to beat B.O. He loves politics, and so does his wife. Texas is in a lot better shape than the rest of the nation through his efforts. He wouldn't be another George Bush...they hate each other...
I happen to love them both.
"Deep within my heart lies a memory. A song of ol' San Antone..."
I guess--
Submitted by milootoole on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:32pm.
I guess you like two mile wide highways through Texas and open borders.
Perry:
""We must say to every Texas child learning in a Texas classroom, 'we don't care where you come from, but where you are going, and we are going to do everything we can to help you get there.'" he said. "And that vision must include the children of undocumented workers. That's why Texas took the national lead in allowing such deserving young minds to attend a Texas college at a resident rate. Those young minds are a part of a new generation of leaders, the doors of higher education must be open to them. The message is simple: educacion es el futuro, y si se puede."
"Over the last decade, Perry saw his most ambitious transportation infrastructure plan, the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC), torn apart in the state legislature by Republicans and Democrats alike."
Pro-Amnesty Perry
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:44pm.
There it is. Thank you for that quote.
Now, all you pro-Perry people, please tell me again how he is tough on illegal immigration?
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Rick Perry
Submitted by JustAl on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:45pm.
Al Gore's campaign chair in Texas, oh yes, he's for small government (LOL). Texas does well in EVERY economic downturn primarily because we are protected from the politicians by our state Constitution. His "efforts" have had minimal impact. In state tuition for illegals, yeah, we need more of that. AZ's law, "not right for Texas" that is until he read the poll numbers. He is nothing but a blow with the wind politician who thinks preaching is the way to get votes. He is, quiet possibly, a worse possibility than Romney, and I didn't think that was possible.
There are two ways to look at this...
Submitted by falcon on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 11:10am.
One, that RP had seen the light after 2000 and decided he didn't really sit with the Left. After all, even the Bible says to give people the benefit of the doubt.
However, a famous saying indicates a leopard can't change its spots. And the second way to look at this is the way you describe - that RP is the consummate politician and simply waves in whatever direction the wind blows.
I will say this, though, as both a (undeclared) Republican and a conservative and a Texan. If Perry somehow wins the Republican nomination, I will vote for him in the general election. And if there is any doubt as to the other nominees up until the nomination, I will support Perry against them. But if one of the other nominees emerges as the strongest candidate, I will support that person over Perry.
The only thing that could further throw this equation into chaos is if Sarah Palin decides to run. She could win the nomination, but only after first polarizing the GOP - and the schizm could be too great to overcome if Republicans decide to play petty politics against the welfare of our nation. But if they decide to come together under one candidate's banner - despite any ideological differences they may have - then that candidate will defeat Obama in a landslide.
And that's my point. At this point, we all have our favorites in the horse race. But when it comes down to the nomination, we should all be prepared to rally behind the strongest candidate, regardless of whether they're "perfect" or not. If that happens to be Rick Perry, we should all be prepared to support him. If it's someone else, same thing. But people need to put their differences aside at that time, and not sit on their hands, because that's what handed Obama the election in 2008. Evangelical Christians decided not to vote because they didn't like McCain - and if they had, it could have turned the election in the GOP's favor. (Would it have made a difference? Probably not - McCain is nothing more than Obama lite.) But despite our personal differences with a candidate, if that candidate is the nominee, we should stand behind him or her if for no other reason than to remove Obama from office.
“I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership, that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose.” – Ronald Reagan, July 17, 1980.
Newt was great. Romney playing safe.
Submitted by snowshooze on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:26pm.
Brent, you got that right.
Newt is a very powerful speaker, and Romney was pretty good.
Bachmann had to defend against the junkyard dog...no way could she shrink from a direct assault.
Santorum... barely got in there.
This was a fun debate, and as Newt and Romney have always talked the way they do, and did whatever later...that didn't win me over.
In fact, this debate did little for me to favor anyone.
But I now dismiss a few. So thinning is helpful.
TPAW.. cheap shots.. he's out. Ron the loon... he's out, Huntsman... out.
Nothing I can do about Newt and Romney.
But I really enjoyed the debate.
Was Huntsman Being Chased by Ghouls?
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 1:37pm.
Who is backing this gerbil with cash?
He looked like he was scared shitless.
Maybe I should run.
I could be at least as good as that "The Rent is Too Damned High" Guy...
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Probably his daddy Motormouth
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:20pm.
His daddy is the billionaire and philanthropist, John Huntsman Senior (Beck had him on a few times, he started the big Cancer Institute, and also has donated gobs to Wharton).
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
IF ONLY
Submitted by KornKing on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:12pm.
Newt had figured out a long time ago how to avoid pissing in his own oatmeal
Aye of Newt
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:18pm.
Newt may be knowledgable and a great speaker, but after he figuratively gave The Tea Party Movement The Finger, I have no use for him.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Kind of thing I meant
Submitted by KornKing on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:25pm.
Mouth in gear with brain in park too many times-would be a good candidate for "eliminating federal departments" czar
Yep
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:41pm.
That's what Coors Lite is for...putting on your cereal when you run out of milk.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Never Lite!
Submitted by Clyde Gatton on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 4:44pm.
No, no, no, Blonde! Never Coors Lite! That's for the under two year olds, lol.
How you be, girl?
V/R
Clyde
"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC
Why be crude about the President, Brent?
Submitted by ncwood on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:27pm.
The "peeing in his pants" is beneath you.
Since my state of Texas votes
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 2:54pm.
Since my state of Texas votes after the field thins out drastically; I don't care who won the debate. I did watch it and some of the analysis after. I am traveling with my family and took over the TV to the distress of my wife and kids. I said tough nuggies, but we can go see Graceland tomorrow if you are quiet. So I will pay more attention around our primary time.
Too bad Blonde
Submitted by texusmc on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:03pm.
Mr Tebow was getting some critiscism about his lack of accuracy in pre game warm ups. That is until the threw a really nice 60 yard pass on target. then scrambled around got a touch down (broght back because of holding) then did some pretty nice work. Quincy came in after that and almost managed to beat Dallas. Mcgee NEEDS to learn how to get rid of the ball faster. This aint college ball anymore and you dont need a wide open reciever to throw to. Just folllow the plan and throw it to a spot and let the reciever do the rest!. NFL will learn NOT to do close ups of the new Dallas Defensive coordinator. Reading his lips left no doubt as to the language coming out of his mouth hahaha.
final score Dallas 24 Denver 23.
Thanks, Tex
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:49pm.
I read a bit about the game this a.m. 6/7 isn't too shabby. Tim will get the hang of it if they just give him the opportunity...and if not, I wish they'd trade him to someone who would. He'll work harder than any offensive line in the NFL.
As for the DC, someone on my Gator boards said he looked like our departed (thankfully) OC Steve Adazzio...with a SHAGGY BEVO wig on! LOL!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Seems like the part where
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:38pm.
Seems like the part where everyone said they'd oppose the 10:1 deal is getting a lot of play online. Do you guys think the candidates are crazy for all saying they'd oppose it?
Seems like the Subject line is there for show.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:53pm.
Do you guys love cop killers like balboa?
balboa: Mmmmmm yummy yummy cop killers. Get me some.
Pawlenty
Submitted by dubuqueman on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 3:46pm.
I like Pawlenty, but it's idiotic to attach Bachmann because she could not assert her will over the entire House. That's just juvenile and transparent.
Serously
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:18pm.
I agree completely. Pawlenty needs to donate his war chest to Bachmann, he will just be wasting it from here on out
Well this certainly has been fun
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 7:30pm.
Lets just remember boys and girls play nice. Keep the focus on getting this train wreck out of the White House, November 2012, not too far away, but long enough to cripple the rest of the country. Don't forget he said "We're only half way there." And please dear God please no more embarrassments like John McCain.
"Don't let the bastards grind you dow."
Entitled
Submitted by topdog729 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 8:58pm.
Mr Bozell 99.9 % of the time I love this site, However this brings up that .1%. You're entitled to your opinion, how ever the fox poll suggest you are wrong DEBATE Ron Paul go home, Really ???? I heard that same line from the libtards you oppose.
As well as you're entitled, so am I, you've with that statement degraded this site. Your an asshole and a moron. But Jodi is sexy as hell and funny, so Till you get rid of her I ll keep checking in.
How many times you vote?
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:08pm.
Paulbot
Hello topdog*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:28pm.
Mr Bozell gets called names and you then make a sexist remark as to why you keep coming back to NB Substance missing from your post but still tells us a lot about you.
How uttlerly insightful topdog
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:35pm.
There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don't know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both boys and girls feel the impact of just a moment’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Gosh! You guys let that just sit
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:44pm.
No one even asked if I was drunk posting or somesuch.
THAT was a "comment" from my blog...I get about a zillion of these idiot spam posts daily, and I figured maybe I'd just put them to good use and post them at the trollsters in response to their obvious banality. Kind of like we used to immediately talk recipes and vegetables (asparagus, anyone?).
Guess it didn't go over too well, huh? Although let me tell you, some of the Chinese to English translators come out really, really strange and kind of funny.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Blonde---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:54pm.
I figured you were just trying to get through to nimrod topdog by speaking at him in his native tongue.
You know, basic balderdash. :o)
MD
MD & Blonde "Balderdash"
Submitted by Grumpy in Arizona on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 10:11pm.
ROFLMAO! I haven't heard the word "Balderdash" in years! Thanks for using it!
Blonde, sorry for not picking up on your "Coor's Light" comment above! Another LOL!
Best to you both and thanks for the laugh... (Hey, if you think I need a life... you're right!)
- Grump :o)
J, LOL - I thought you were just messing with his head
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:56pm.
Honest. :-)
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Er, Calling the Boss an a-hole and a moravian...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:40pm.
...in the same sentence, no less, is probably not exactly conducive to long life and prosperity here on the pages of NB.
But keep trying, if you must.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 9:58pm.
Nimrod topdog appears to have been born in July of 1929.
Dudes gotta be what, 92 years old?
You cut him some slack, I'll cut him a break, and Blonde will cut the mookster long, wide, and deep.
MD
md,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 08/12/2011 - 10:05pm.
He must have parked his SN and password under his dentures and forgot all about them, as his account is nearly 2 years old, and he has but 7 posts under his belt.
Or is it his Depends?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November