Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 25, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brent Bozell's blog
  • WashPost's Milbank Mocks Nikki Haley, 'Reached Out to' 'White Supremacists'
  • Networks Give Three Times More Quotes to Supporters of Gay Scout Admittance Than Opponents
  • State Dept. Official Who Altered Benghazi Talking Points Promoted; Only Fox Covered
  • MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Gushes Over Obama Speech, Claims the President is ‘Reining In His Own Power’
  • NBC Fails to Report Its Own Scoop That AG Holder Approved Investigation of Fox's Rosen
  • Video: Bozell's Prediction Pans Out, Media In Full-on 'Move On' Mode in Obama Scandal Coverage
  • The Long Hike: Media’s 13 Years of Bullying Boy Scouts Over Gays
  • Only CBS Notes IRS Official’s Leave, Yet ABC and NBC Have Time to Show Obama’s Prom Photo with ‘Foxy’ Friend

Bozell Column: CNN's Obama Adviser

By Brent Bozell | May 17, 2011 | 22:15

A  A
Brent Bozell's picture

As much as CNN likes to tell the public and advertisers that it’s squarely in the sensible center between the partisan attacks of MSNBC and Fox News, the reality says otherwise. Even if CNN has no Screaming Schultzes or Crazy Larry O’Donnell types, it’s still firmly in the Democratic sphere of influence.

On his show “In The Arena” on May 12, CNN host Eliot Spitzer recounted how a story in The New York Times “brought a smile to my face. It said the president of the United States calls you for wisdom and advice about issues around the world. So first, when he calls you, what does he say? Hi, Barack calling for Fareed? What does he do?”

His guest Zakaria replied, “Mostly it's been face-to-face meetings. You know, usually organized by Tom Donilon, the national security adviser,” and it’s been a “very thoughtful conversation.” (That certainly compliments both sides of the chat.) Spitzer then added “I’m not going to ask you what you have said to the president but it makes my heart warm that the president is calling you for wisdom and advice.”

Zakaria is the host of “Fareed Zakaria GPS,” a Sunday CNN news offering. He was happily – proudly – acknowledging that he counsels the president. Neither CNN nor Zakaria found this admission compromised its self-image of neutrality for an instant. There were no urgent denials, as Katie Couric tried to smother Whoopi Goldberg’s on-air claim in 1997 that they marched at abortion rallies together. Zakaria openly proclaimed his presidential access.

The folks at CNN certainly failed to remember how their network reacted on November 18, 2002, after Bob Woodward broke the “scoop” that Fox News president Roger Ailes had sent a memo on the War on Terror to Karl Rove, who then shared it with President Bush. CNN anchor Paula Zahn (a former Fox employee) asked commentator Jack Cafferty,“Does that shed new light on ‘we report, you decide’ Jack?” Cafferty joked, “‘Fair and balanced.’ [laughter] We better leave that alone.”

On that day, the Ailes “controversy” was in heavy rotation. CNN's “Talkback Live” also devoted a segment to the subject, as did “Crossfire” and “Wolf Blitzer Reports.”

So how many segments has CNN devoted to its own compromised position? None, unless you count Howard Kurtz brushing over it all by himself (no outsiders, please) on “Reliable Sources” on Sunday. Zakaria never touched it on his own Sunday show, and when he showed up on Monday’s “Situation Room” to discuss rape allegations against the head of the International Monetary Fund, Wolf Blitzer wouldn’t breathe a word of it.

If Roger Ailes sending a memo to Rove compromised Fox’s independence, then what about Zakaria’s ongoing face-to-face strategy sessions with President Obama? As controversy grew over the weekend, Zakaria tried to claim, “At no point did President Obama ask me for advice on a specific policy or speech or proposal, nor did I volunteer it. I know that he has had similar meetings with other columnists.”

This denial doesn’t pass the laugh test. What the hell did they talk about, then? If Obama is looking to formulate a policy and a speech (as the New York Times article asserted), then merely being in the room with him and moving your lips is advising him. As Zakaria himself said of meeting Obama in the Times, “He is searching for a way to pull back and weave a larger picture.”

But Zakaria isn’t just a “columnist,” as he’s been with Newsweek and now Time. He hosts a Sunday show on foreign policy for CNN. To now claim that Zakaria's covert meetings do not conflict with his journalistic integrity is not only inaccurate, it’s hypocritical by CNN’s own standards. If they were really interested in the image of journalistic independence, Zakaria would recuse himself immediately from covering foreign policy that affects the United States.

What’s happened to our “news” media? They don’t see their role as simply providing the public with the best information. They would much rather apply all their wisdom gleaned from their Harvard and Yale educations to assist the government in running the country.

Incredibly, here’s how Zakaria actually ended his show on Sunday. He showed several Internet reworkings of the historic picture of Obama’s staff watching the bin Laden takedown, and announced: “This one may be my favorite. The superhero squad. President Obama is Captain America, Vice President Biden as Flash. Madame Secretary [Hillary Clinton] as Wonder Woman, and many more.”

Where are Jack Cafferty’s “fair and balanced” wisecracks now?  

About the Author

Brent Bozell is founder and president of the Media Research Center and publisher of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Brent Bozell on Twitter.
  • Fareed Zakaria
  • Column
  • Brent Bozell's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

And so what's up with the Hussains?

Submitted by ThisnThat on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 10:31pm.

obama: "Zakaria, how would you like to continue this relationship for another 4 years? You can, if you remember to paint my oponents a certain way; if you ignore certain world events; and if you simply provide a little ooph now and then when I need it."

Same thing CNN did with Saddam to prevent getting thrown out of the country, didn't they?

Critics said such self-censorship on the part of CNN was not only unprofessional but prevented some key facts about Saddam Hussein from being known during a time when they would have been a part of debate about going to war.

I wonder how many key facts CNN has about obama that, if known and truthfully reported, would help us prevent a total collapse of the U.S. economy?
 

__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court

  • Login to post comments

Direct route

Submitted by Jerry Mack on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 10:27pm.

Straight from the Messiah's lips to Zakaria's audience!

  • Login to post comments

It makes his heart warm....

Submitted by Calypso Jones on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 10:37pm.

are we certain that Spitzer is straight? I have never seen a bigger bunch of mancrushes in my life.

  • Login to post comments

CNN should have disclosed

Submitted by TheGreatHatman on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 11:18pm.

CNN should have disclosed that information. However, it's my understanding that Zakaria is more of a commentator than a reporter if he has his own show: http://www.fareedzakaria.com/home/CNN/CNN.html. I figured he had a position on CNN comparable to those of Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck on Fox News, no?

Also, Roger Ailes is the President of Fox News, not just a talking head. Wouldn't he have more sway over news content and reporting than a contributor would? If we're simply talking about news networks not self reporting their own biases, fine; however, I don't think it's fair to equate the influence of a network president to that of a commentator.

  • Login to post comments

F.Z. on the D.L.

Submitted by Tim Graham on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 8:51am.

Oh my, how fast would CNN reject your comparison of Zakaria to O'Reilly and Beck! Zakaria matches the usual template: a liberal ideologue posing as a "neutral" Sunday show host.

As for Ailes, of course he is a powerful man in the media, as Rove and Bush were powerful men in politics. But liberals like Bob Woodward view their interactions with great suspicion, as a vast conspiracy of warmongering. But when liberal journalists get invited to the White House for brain-picking sessions (which could be advice-seeking, or buttering-up ploys), there's no reason to be suspicious.

The double standard's very obvious. But then, CNN is the network that hired Eliot Spitzer as a talk-show host, so who says "journalistic principles" are being observed?


  • Login to post comments

Let's see.... Fareed

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 1:51pm.

Let's see....

Fareed Zakaria:  B.A. Yale University; President of Yale Political Union...PhD Political Science, Harvard University;  Managing Editor, Foreign Affairs; Named one of the 100 leading public intellectuals in the world;  Author of several books including The Future of Freedom and The Post-American World and numerous scholarly treatises and essays on international politics and Middle Eastern affairs

Invited along with other Mid East analysts by George W. Bush's Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfewitz, to provide input on Iraq in 2001.

But, then, I'm sure O'Reilly could offer his invaluable insights on "left-wing loons and their War on Christmas", while Beck could deliver his slide-splitting mockery of the Obama daughters whining "da-dee, da-dee...when are you gonna fix the leak?"  And, as a very special bonus, Dick Morris could elucidate the delicate art of toe-sucking.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by Lord-come-soon-... on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 4:32pm.

I think the point is, that is inappropriate for an on air host on a major news network to be meeting with the President. There is and always should be a wall of separation between the press and the politician, or else you end up with "journalists" who simply give out the information the politician wants then to give out. And his CNN program didn't start until 2008, so his invite to the white house in 2001 is irrelevant.

  • Login to post comments

I don't think Zakaria is

Submitted by TheGreatHatman on Fri, 05/20/2011 - 12:30pm.

I don't think Zakaria is bombastic (like O'Reilly and Beck are) but their network roles are alike (since they're both commentators). Ailes controls programming, though - I just see it as a bigger deal.

Let's flip the roles - let's say Ariana Huffington sent memos to David Axelrod, and Rush Limbaugh mentioned on his show that he "talked policy" with G.W. Bush. The MSM would slam Rush, but wouldn't the conservative reply be, "Ariana runs the Huffington Post! Rush is just a commentator!"?

Tim, is your dismissal of Spitzer due to his extra-marital affairs? I hear similar condemnation from the left about Newt's personal life. My reaction: it makes them slimy, but does it affect how they perform their jobs? (Tim, I could be setting up a "straw man" here - that may not be your opinion!)

  • Login to post comments

Hmm...

Submitted by Jer on Tue, 05/17/2011 - 11:45pm.

This piece seems so familiar. Oh yeah...it's essentially the same one Brent published just yesterday but with a few paragraphs juggled to impart, one supposes, the whiff of novelty.

Mr. Bozell's position is clear enough:  He is extremely disconcerted by the recent Zakaria/Obama consultation disclosure and its implications with respect to the political neutrality of the CNN host.  I don't know why Zakaria's announcement prior to the 2008 election that he was voting for Obama wouldn't have been a rather significant clue regarding his ideological inclinations and raised similar concerns over objectivity.

The simple fact is Brent is merely speculating about the nature and extent of Obama's and Zakaria's interactions.  The latter is a widely recognized and respected authority in Middle Eastern affairs, has many contacts throughout the region, and his insights on the subject are invaluable.  He has also counseled Condi Rice.  [Nor is he the first and only journalist whose input has been sought by a sitting president.] 

Zakaria anchors a first-rate program featuring guests who span the entire political spectrum.  It is fair to say the revelation and explanation of contacts with the president should have come earlier.  Otherwise, far too much is being made of this.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

I think the important point

Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 12:10am.

I think the important point for NB's purposes is the non-reaction by the rest of the press over this. I can still hear the pious howls of "outrage" in 1980 when it was disclosed that George Will advised then-candidate Ronald Reagan. It too was well known that Will was an avowed supporter of Reagan. Mr. Bozell is merely echoing the usual lines of "outrage" we would hear if Mr. Zakaria was a conservative who disclosed that he had been advising President Bush in private meetings.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

Chris...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 1:16am.

I recall the Will/Reagan episode and the subsequent finger-wagging, although I''m not sure I would characterize the general reaction as 'howls of outrage'. But there was criticism, to be sure. Maybe the fact it involved debate coaching put it on a more politically partisan level. Still, my startle response just doesn't get too jacked up over incidents such as these.

Mike Wallace is/was one of the toughest interviewers in the history of journalism. He was also a very close friend of Nancy Reagan, and his farewell conversation with Ron and Nancy at the end of Reagan's presidency was virtually a lovefest. Didn't bother me.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Confusing

Submitted by Unsane on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 7:20am.

You are confusing Mike with Chris. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

  • Login to post comments

No, I'm not.

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 11:26am.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Ah

Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 12:45am.

But you are.  Chris is far superior to Mike. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

  • Login to post comments

Jer,

Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 9:44pm.

Of course you might characterize the reaction differently - in fact, I'd be shocked if you didn't. Still, the Will/Reagan "controversy" was very prominent and ongoing. The Zakaria non-controversy should be more controversial, since Will was clearly a self-identified conservative - a columnist who didn't host his own news show. Zakaria, although he announced his support for Obama, doesn't identify himself as a liberal and he is offering up "objective" analysis of US foreign policy that, depending on which of his version of events one accepts, he might have had influence in formulating. Further, his reversal (you can almost hear his transmission grind and tires squeal) of the significance of his conversations with the President are almost laughable and should diminish his credibility. His changing story has all the acceptability of a kid caught with a trunk full of expensive stereo equipment.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

You don't have to keep

Submitted by Thoreau on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 6:29am.

You don't have to keep slamming Zakaria. He's a muslim. Nobody cares what muslims say except communists and other muslims.

Preaching to the choir Brent.

  • Login to post comments

I'm glad that

Submitted by johnsonl on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 7:10am.

everyone has a warm heart in liberal land. The unicorns must be very happy!
Idiots.

  • Login to post comments

What do you expect from CNN?

Submitted by rockman on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 12:52pm.

No wonder he's always bashing Bush and the GOP.Imaging Fox doing this, what CNN and main stream media would have been saying by now.He thinks he knows everything about the world economy and the Middle East.Great job you guys are doing by exposing CNN and their baise and they say in the middle.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use