Bozell Column: Avoiding Dr. Kermit Gosnell
Once again the “news” media yawned as tens of thousands of Americans clogged the streets of Washington on January 24 for the annual “March for Life.” This year’s protests should have gained more attention since it came in the wake of absolutely vomit-inducing news from Philadelphia that an abortionist named Kermit Gosnell was charged by the District Attorney with a series of murders.
In a horrific 261-page report, Gosnell is accused of delivering seven babies alive and then killing them with scissors. He also allowed a woman who had survived 20 years in a refugee camp in Nepal to be incompetently overmedicated on Demerol and die at his clinic.
So much for abortion being “safe, legal, and rare.”
Associated Press reported “Prosecutors described the clinic as a ‘house of horrors’ where Gosnell kept baby body parts on the shelves, allowed a 15-year-old high school student to perform intravenous anesthesia on patients, and had his licensed cosmetologist wife do late-term abortions.”
Or try the Philadelphia Inquirer: “Semiconscious, moaning women sat in dirty recliners and on bloodstained blankets. The air reeked of urine from the flea-infested cats permitted to roam the clinic. There was blood on the floor and cat feces on the stairs.”
“If it bleeds, it leads.” Remember that mantra to explain the TV networks’ fascination with gory visuals? And yet these same networks could barely touch this story, even with its jaw-dropping ratings potential. “CBS Evening News” had one story, NBC's "Today" "offered 50 vague words, and ABC couldn’t be bothered. Rachel Maddow anchored an entire hour-long special on the shooting death of abortionist George Tiller, but a Nexis search finds no one on MSNBC could even whisper the name of Kermit Gosnell. (CNN and Fox News each followed the story for a few days.)
What monster would kill a child who survived an abortion? On August 5, 2002, President Bush signed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, which stated that any baby mistakenly born (oh, the irony!) during an abortion has all the rights of any other living human being. None of the broadcast networks covered that at the time. On CNN that day, it was dismissed as “a really symbolic bill” (reporter Kelly Wallace), a “largely symbolic law” (anchor Miles O’Brien) that was only aimed “to appease anti-abortion advocates” (deputy bureau chief Steve Redisch). Was it “symbolic” to Dr. Gosnell’s seven infants, born alive and then stabbed in the neck with scissors?
Again, the Philadelphia Inquirer: “One premature infant wiggled around on a counter for 20 minutes before an untrained worker slit his neck -- after first playing with him.”
But the networks just don’t bear blame for skipping past this story in 2011. This hideous creature was making headlines in 2010, too. NPR reported on Gosnell on March 30 of last year, when his medical license was revoked. Marie Smith told her story of her abortion at the filthy clinic at the age of 19, followed by a week of fever and vomiting. Smith was rushed to a local hospital, where X-rays revealed parts of her baby were still lodged in her uterus.
Somehow, the national media can find no scandal in the state’s abortion lobbyists – and the alleged clinic inspectors at national groups like the National Abortion Federation – failing to report these conditions to authorities. How can liberal media outlets who bray about Catholic bishops failing to go to the police about child abusers in the 1950s fail to muster any outrage over doctors and clinic inspectors failing to go to the police about baby killers? No state official had inspected Gosnell’s practice since 1993 – and that’s not worth exposing?
NPR’s story typically concluded with bizarre defenses of this killer and the people who failed to report on him. Abortion advocate Susan Schewel claimed “all we had was hearsay” from the women who were patients, and the patients can’t go to the authorities, apparently, because “the thought of talking to a state bureaucrat about something as stigmatized as an abortion, it's a low priority when you’re trying to figure out how to pay your electric bills.”
How’s that for a putting a value on human life?
Gosnell’s then-attorney, William Brennan, insisted the doctor “provides family care to individuals who otherwise would have to most likely travel outside their neighborhood.” Wouldn’t it be better for women to travel “outside their neighborhood” rather than end up dead from an overdose? Wouldn’t it better than a filthy clinic that lets people with no medical qualifications do the anesthetics and the abortions?
Apparently, just about nobody in the national media really cares about who dies at an abortion clinic, whether it’s a child or a mother. But kill a killer of babies – and that’s headline news. That’s why tens of thousands clog the streets to protest – not just the killing, but the radio silence.
- Brent Bozell's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Safe, legal, and medium rare
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 12:28am.
The sacrifices to Molech were not halted all the days of Obama's reign.
And the people did that which is evil in the sight of the Lord.
LATE TERM ABORTIONS
Submitted by jaywl on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 12:46am.
Are actually the same kind of murders. It is about time that people are confronted by the truth that the so-called "Privacy Right" to a late term abortion is the same procedure of instruments scrambling the brain, cutting the spine, and I suppose other gruesome methods leading to the death of a living human baby. The amazing difference is the legal abortion is performed before the baby leaves the mother's womb. This idiot doctor didn't have brains enough to do his murders before the baby took a breath. If I were his lawyer I would tell him to shut up and claim these babies were killed as part of a late-term abortion, they never took a breath. Maybe the "Privacy Rights" people will help defend this killer. Would they dare?
It breaks my heart to hear
Submitted by Slyrr on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 12:48am.
It breaks my heart to hear stories like this. Children should be cherished and nourished by loving parents.
This is monsterous in the extreme, and all the more so because there is a political party that defends this as 'the right to choose'. The blood of all these unborn are on their hands, and on the hands of the media who winks and smiles and nods and holds the coats of people like this Gosnell monster.
I can't wait to see mamabear Mengele's response to this
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 1:34am.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
What can you say?
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 1:49am.
Abortion is evil.
To support it, under any precondition, is to support evil--and to be tainted by it.
We can pray for Gosnell, those like him, and those who support his supposed "right" to kill children both born and yet-to-be-born.
But the concern is always that people such as Gosnell have, indeed, abandoned themselves to the evil they embrace.
--Mike
Mr. Bozell....
Submitted by gwalt on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 8:16am.
"Once again the “news” media yawned......."
Mr. Bozell,
The "news" media have names. Start naming names, in public, on billboards, on TV in newspapers. We will contribute to a fund that puts Katie Comrade Couric on I-95 with "Biased, Liberal, ---Don't Trust her" underneath her seemingly innocent smile.
It's 2011, not 2005. They have changed. They are outright lying. Time to change your game. Build it and we will come.
Look what they did to Sarah Palin after Tucson. They will stop at nothing. Neither should we.
"A lot of briefing for a 2 hr. special with Dan Rather. Saw the show & wonder why we bothered". Ronald Reagan
What if the "Doctor" were white? Outrage then?
Submitted by Red Jeep on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 9:11am.
Is it OK because the so called "doctor" is black?
"Abortion Kills More Black Americans Than the Seven Leading Causes of Death Combined, Says CDC Data"
http://www.cnsnews.com/node/55956
According to some sources the black population here would be at least 1 1/2 times the size it is now if there were not this abortion rate.
You would think that the Democrat Party wouldn't want to lose that many voters or social security contributors.
GWalt and Red Jeep...You two
Submitted by WarEagle66 on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 11:52pm.
GWalt and Red Jeep...You two are spot on.
I am amazed how it is that black women seem to love abortion so darn much.
How about keeping your legs closed and your pants on? It is so easy NOT to become pregnant.
And these people in the media should be blasted for ignoring this. It's sickening what this man was accused of doing. Really....clipping the spinal cord with scissors for God's sake.
Not true!
Submitted by GW on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 9:18am.
"Abortion advocate Susan Schewel claimed “all we had was hearsay” from the women who were patients"
Susan Schewel (assuming she was correctly quoted) is in error. She also had the report from the National Abortion F (Federation? Foundation?) inspection conducted two months prior to Gosnell's clinic being shut down. The NAF inspector reported that Gosnell's was the worst clinic she'd ever seen and refused his application for being admitted to the NAF.
Pro-choicers (their term, not mine) will claim that they never again want to see back-alley abortionists. Well, guess where they all went. Did they go away? Gosnell was a back-alley abortionist who opened up his own legal clinic where he continued very much the same practices. He didn't go away.
I read the report from the Grand Jury. It reads like a horror novel. It claims that Gosnell was allowed to continue to operate because the prevailing political will was reluctant to place any restriction on 'choice'.
I would pay good money
Submitted by Burnside on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 11:29am.
to watch this murdering son of a bitch fry.
Abortionist
Submitted by Bradford on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 11:27am.
"Abortion advocate Susan Schewel claimed “all we had was hearsay” from the women who were patients"
It can hardly be called "hearsay" if the person telling the story was the person having the abortion. She is an idiot.
Another point, he appears to be black so it would be racist to report a negative on this clinic.
Schewel is an idiot, all right...
Submitted by uhohshortsonthe... on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 5:32am.
"Heresay": would be if someone told a story about some woman who had an abortion at this clinic, but this person wasn't there to witness the actual event. Schewel seems to be another example of the "abortion rights at all costs" activists.
Expect more of this when abortion is illegal
Submitted by johnfromberkeley on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 12:53pm.
The wost part, is that we'll be able to expect a lot more of these stories when abortion becomes illegal. It already sounds like exactly the kind of place you'd expect an underground abortion clinic to be.
The last thing we want is a clean, regulated environment for women to have abortions. We want more places like this.
The newest old troll on the
Submitted by stratman on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 2:33pm.
The newest old troll on the forum today?
Member for 4 years and 36 weeks and this is his first post.
Not the first time abortion has been discussed. Why wait so long to post?
From Berkley no less. Perhaps
Submitted by WarEagle66 on Wed, 01/26/2011 - 11:58pm.
From Berkley no less. Perhaps he is working on his PHD and this is part of it.
As for clean and safe...this is it my man.
This was inspected by government and allowed to continuing murdering babies. Government run anything nowadays means crap standards and practices. Can't wait for my government run health care. Thankfully though Berkley's friends in government do not have to subject themselves to what they impose on us.
Eau de Toilette
Submitted by stratman on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 2:22pm.
Riffing of the clean aspect: Patchouli, dirty sandals and bong water are not smells of success, unless you are from places like Berkeley.
Probably can find dude in at least one picture of various Berkeley happenings at http://www.zombietime.com/.
Good catch stratman*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 12:38am.
I think I have ID'd him for you.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dodo.blog.br/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/modern_dodo.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.dodo.blog.br/tag/drawing/&h=439&w=400&sz=57&tbnid=i6S7FBzcCgonZM:&tbnh=235&tbnw=214&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpics%2Bof%2Bdodo%2527s&zoom=1&q=pics+of+dodo%27s&hl=en&usg=__MuVCFY45HJNBgwMTsZKJmB-B0EA=&sa=X&ei=xu1ATffJIcXegQeIwdS0Aw&ved=0CBgQ9QEwAA
Hi Cajun2
Submitted by stratman on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 2:04pm.
LOL!
Yep, wingless, flightless, and witless. This one's soon to be extinct too.
Are all you moonbats synchronized?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 2:33pm.
Focus on the unsanitary aspect, and not the inhuman crimes themselves.
It appears this Berzerkeleyite troll is a dump-and-runner
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 11:20pm.
What a surprise.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Far from over*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 12:29am.
This story includes more than just the horrors in Philly.
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/01/25/abortionist-gosnell-had-ties-to-louisiana-delaware-centers/
But dont worry. Those who believe in eugenics are not done. They are already spinning this story. Look for more trolls to offer cover and probably use this story as '"talking points".
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-01-20/philadelphias-abortion-murder-the-need-for-safe-abortions/
This article by Michelle Goldberg is as horrifying as Dr Gosnell. Please read Michelle Malkin's article on this issue as well.
There would be more to this
Submitted by stratman on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 2:58pm.
There would be more to this story, and I figured some of it would be in Delaware where I found he also had a license while searching docboard.org and the AMA's website.
Did not realize the Louisiana connection. Ugh.
How the hell does one go from medical school ostensibly wanting to help, not hurt, people to become so depraved as to snip newborn's spinal cords and have such a foul squalid workspace? Mental illness? Years' long desensitization of ever-increasing magnitudes? Drugs/alcohol fueled?
Concerning your second link by Goldberg - A perfect example of the effete elite (or pretender to be a pretender) not wanting to soil their hands in the muck and mire of the little people:
Well Strat*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 3:24pm.
One explanation that would explain these whack jobs. The oath "first do not harm" is second to the gospel of Margaret Sanger.
We are fortunate here in La the pro-life attorneys have not only gone after these 3 deplorable abortion clinics in La but they have also sued the La State Dept of Health who have ignored repeated complaints about these clinics for years just as the authorities in Philly.
What is of interest to me is that the left always present themselves as the "compassionate" ones and conservatives are the racist. Yet they advocate the theories of people whose focus is to rid society of the least productive and murder of children is acceptable to prevent those poor children from having to suffer a life of poverty. The elitist intelligencia believe that eugenics will eventually solve the problem of entitlements and rid society of the unproductive. That is why they adore their messiah. He is one of them.
g
Submitted by GW on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 3:18pm.
Thanks for the link. These statements from the article stood out to me:
“That such clinics can flourish until the inevitable disaster occurs strikes me as a ‘perfect storm’ caused by the marginalization of abortion care from mainstream medicine, the lack of universal health care in the United States, and the particular difficulties facing undocumented immigrants in obtaining health care in the United States,” she wrote.
GW> So the solution was to make more doctors perform abortions, make the taxpayers pay for everyone's medical care, and make that include illegal immigrants. Sounds like they covered their liberal bases.
When abortion is shrouded in shame, excluded from public health-insurance programs, and made harder to get because of a web of legal restrictions, horror ensues.
GW> No, horror ensues when those who support abortion turn away to ensure that no restrictions whatsoever are placed on anyone who wants to do this. Actually, I think the entire concept is horror.
Good catch GW*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 3:41pm.
Here is an article that has gone viral with all the liberal media and far left web blogs.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41280864/ns/health-mental_health/
The problem with this study is that it is basically a lie and faulty documentation but that wont stop the far left. This article was lost amongst the interwaves until the story of the Philly horror came out. Notice, read the next link very carefully. Even our own APA, a very liberal organization, has trouble with this same issue.
http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/abortion/index.aspx
This assessment by the APA got very little play in the media. The very liberal APA admits to being confounded by the lack of valid studies on this issue even though monies are available through grants and studies, years of legal abortions, and millions of women available for study has provided no study of real substance but rather specific targets of studies designed to produce a desired result for special interests. AND THE APA ADMITS THIS!
Academia is like journalism , lost all effectiveness, professional ethics, and objectivity having been infiltrated by far left radicals to spew their own ideology thru carefully designed propaganda.
I'm throwing the BS Card on
Submitted by stratman on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 11:13pm.
I'm throwing the BS Card on the APA and the equivocation of abortion with post-natal health. The study result were based on a 1 year interval follow up from date of abortion or birth. No mention what happens when the transitory post-natal period ends, nor could they reasonable measure results because of too many other factors involved in the mental health of a person over the years. Also, no mention how the finality of abortion affects women throughout their lives.
The Danes are obviously more damaged psychologically than I previously thought. I do not agree that the US is comparable to the Danes. First, my own experience in Denmark demonstrated a huge cultural difference - how do we know that the stoic Danes are seeking mental health services upon reaching similar levels of morbidity as Americans, who, ironically, are viewed as ultrasensitive to adversity/unpleasantness by the rest of the planet. Second, the abortion rates are different between the two countries, and, interestingly, no comparaison of reasons for abortion was given in order to quantify. Third, Denmark has a higher rate of suicide, both men and women, than the USA. In fact, the prevalence of suicide in Danish women is twice as much as American women. The Danes neighbor Sweden is approximately the same rate while the Finns are substantially greater.
Interestingly, according to a study involving a "Happiness Index", the Danes rate themselves happier (91%) than Americans (84%). The Swedes also rated themselves quite happy as well (91%), so it seems a paradox that the "happier" the country is the more suicides it has. Doesn't that make you feel warm all over.
In conclusion, I am not buying into neither Danish study and its conclusion nor the AP article. I smell an "ends justify the means" rat.
"Safe, legal and rare..."
Submitted by uhohshortsonthe... on Thu, 01/27/2011 - 5:29am.
I now come to regard that phrase as having the same bu()sh!t equivalent as "the religion of peace." It is a phrase designed by the left in hopes it would become a nationally accepted mantra to justify morally reprehensible behaviors.