Bozell Column: MTV's Sordid 'Skins'
The cultural Left would like you to think that children should be free to experiment persistently in the Laboratory of Life without soul-stifling rules. They have limits to libertine behavior, to be sure. No high school bake sales (encourages obesity), no bottled water (destroys the environment), and absolutely no uncivil bullying of people who are different than you (unless they belong to the Tea Party, in which case you can blame them for random shootings.)
Now those secular progressives at MTV have opened a new front. They feel one should enjoy a childhood stuffed with sex, drugs, and alcoholism. That would be the message of their new teen drama “Skins.” Adapted from a British series and filmed in Canada, MTV boasts that the actors are actually under 18 – in another intepretation, we call them “children” – and that the show's writers are barely out of high school, so its libertine escapades are authentic, “the real secret lives” of teenagers.
MTV promotes itself as “the world’s premier youth entertainment brand” and “the cultural home of the millennial generation.” It’s so proud of this show's sleaze that they're even rating it TV-MA (for mature audiences only). It's not a warning. It's an invitation.
The show is so sleazy that the New York Times reported Viacom is now pondering whether the upcoming third episode will have to have teen actor nudity edited out so MTV won’t break child pornography laws.
This show is so debauched that even the TV critics are panning it. Washington Post critic Hank Stuever announced he would usually dismiss the warnings of the Parents Television Council and other supposedly uptight hall monitors of TV, but: “By and large, 'Skins' is a repugnant, irredeemably nihilistic viewing experience for grownups -- the very thing for which 'off' buttons are made,” even if for actual teenagers it “might be something of a vicarious thrill.” He reluctantly concluded that “'Skins' is so determined to relate to hardened kids -- without sermon, theme or context -- that it accidentally discovers a new frontier in phoniness and filth.”
The PTC has called on the House and Senate Judiciary Committees to investigate Viacom and compel Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate this show for possible violations of laws against child pornography and exploitation.
The show centers on a ringmaster of sleaze named Tony. In the first episode, he’s busily arranging for his friend Stanley to lose his virginity (that horrid yoke) before he turns 17. He tries to persuade several high-school girls to be Stanley's “candy mountain,” then settles on a girl named Karen, because she’ll do anything if you provide drugs, or “a busload of bud,” as Tony promises. How cynical is Tony? He explains his plot to Stanley thusly: "So we go to a party and get some girl racopiously spliffed up, in a confused state, and she comes to believe, however momentarily of course, that you're attractive, and...she bangs your brains out."
Tony is having trouble getting others interested in confirming the success of his plans for Stanley because there is a “big gay lezzerama” planned. One male friend (a Muslim that Tony pulls out of morning prayer at the mosque) boasts it will be “Like live porn, man. And Chris said we can probably convert them, it'll be like girl on girl on dudes!"
The episode ends with Stanley still a virgin, since Katie overdoses on pills before Stanley takes advantage of her. Tony says to him, “That's embarrassing,” and Stanley agrees.
They should just call the show “High School Orgy.” That's at least the tone of the talk on this barbarity. But kids will be kids, as MTV knows so well. “Skins” debuted with an audience of 3.2 million, and one million viewers aged 12 to 17. They decided to watch because of an intense marketing campaign from MTV that directly targeted this age group. The creator of the show even bragged in an interview that he would deliver kids to advertisers.
The advertisers came in droves, especially the movie promoters. Some ads matched the show's tone perfectly, like the new movie “No Strings Attached,” which features Ashton Kutcher and Natalie Portman promising to use each other for sex – until someone has an ounce of actual love for the other one. An ad for the ultraviolent video game “Dead Space 2” features mothers (or grandmothers?) tut-tutting the shooter game as the announcer promises, “It's revolting, it's violent, it's everything you love in a game. Your mom will hate it.” That spot ran twice.
There was also an ad for Taco Bell to support this junk, and one for Subway. Their new slogan should be “Eat fresh, but watch poison.” It perfectly matches the new rules of the cultural Left. Taco Bell has pulled out now – but only to advertise on other MTV garbage.
- Brent Bozell's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
But then I remembered I
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 7:06pm.
But then I remembered I thought Glee was overly sexual. But then I remembered sex in high school. But then I remembered no drugs—they hadn't been invented. And then I remembered some booze. I'm lucky I remember anything. Kids today need adults to tell them how to misbehave? Losers!
Evan, so you're condoning the
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 7:10pm.
Evan, so you're condoning the use of drugs and sex by teens? How wonderful. I'm sure all the kids with drug problems, std's, and unplanned pregnancies are with you. Then there are the kids who don't accomplish all the could because they've used drugs to the extent that it's interfered in their studies.
You are just such a voice for kids aren't you?
I expect that show will
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 7:56pm.
I expect that show will offend my sensibilities, and I wish it were cancelled.
I'd cancel sex, drugs, drinking and violence.
I feel sorry for kids today. And parents. Because hormones work, right?
Life is getting more complicated for kids, and yet the issues are often the same.
Sigh—I remember the youth "golden age"—it didn't last long—after The Pill and before AIDS.
~It's only complicated
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:02pm.
If you let your kids be exposed to this stuff. Any parent who even allows a connection to MTV is being irresponsible. This is one reason why I don't have cable and never turn the TV on when the kids are awake. (Okay, they've seen their dad watch some football games on the weekend, but that's it.)
Libs brush this stuff off with, "But our grandparents thought Elvis was shocking!", but you gotta draw the line somewhere.
It's up to parents to
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:24pm.
It's up to parents to equip their kids with morals, not firewalls.
If kids are 15 and don't have access to the wicked world on their laptops, they're goners.
Crummy show like soooo many crummy shows. They are all crummy, you're right. Glee grosses me out, as if life were all about appearances. I hope parents are teaching better than that.
~Firewalls
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:33pm.
are entirely appropriate for small children and pre-teens. With increased maturity comes increased responsibilty for oneself.
Think of it this way. You don't let little kids play in the street, and they aren't allowed to cross it without you. You teach them how to cross it safely and when they get older they do it by themselves.
(On a side note, some things are simply pointless. No one needs to see a show like this anymore than they need to eat garbage.)
Increased maturity and
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:57pm.
Increased maturity and responsibility don't come from a firewall. But of course firewalls are appropriate as parents decide. But I said 15 because children can be harmed by overprotectiveness, as I'm sure you'll agree. The kids WILL cross the street, and you won't see them do it when they do.
This show is crap; my first thought about it.
I hope no parent reading this lets his/her children play violent video games! Grrrr...
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:20pm.
Increased maturity and responsibility don't come from a firewall.
I didn't say they did. They don't come from being exposed unnecessarily to smut, either.Wouldn't it be a shame...
Submitted by gvik on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:33pm.
....if MTV got shut down over this? I'd almost feel bad. Oh wait, I quit watching way back when Music Television stopped playing music. Quite frankly, I'm amazed that some of the absolute "vomit-on-screen" shows they've put out in the past hasn't gotten them into trouble before.
But seriously, who is the moron sitting in a corporate office somewhere that had this pile of stupidity pitched to him and decided it would be a great idea to run with it? Can anyone please explain to me the thought process involved? Or rather, the lack of thought? I would love to see the suit that saw this before it went to air and said "That's great! Put it on!". Really?
I dunno, maybe I've grown far older than I thought in the 34 years I've spent on this planet, but I just can't see how this could have possibly been a good idea in any sense of the word. But then again, common sense seems to be extinct in the newer generations. Right alongside personal responsibility.
As I Wrote In My Previous Post...
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 2:41am.
Well, knowing what I know about the entertainment industry, if a movie or TV show uses underage teens for some scripted sexual situation, particularly if it involves nudity, I believe the parent or guardian of the actor or actress must sign off on it and must be there supervising their child as the scene is filmed. I know that the actress who played the daughter in American Beauty had to do a fully topless scene, and that she was 17 when she filmed it. So, she had to have her parents approve it in legal writing and be on the set as the scene was filmed. I believe it was a scene where her boyfriend is peeping into her window, so that is only vaguely sexual in terms of her boyfriend being a peeping tom, so I don't know.
Here's the interesting fact: The film is rated R, so there is an argument as how it could be child pornography, but it would be impossible to indict every moviegoer who went to see American Beauty at the theater, or have since bought it on DVD or Blu-Ray. And you know that the Motion Picture Academy would be up in arms if they were accused of awarding something that can be construed as child pornography the Academy Award for Best picture that year (Personally, I would have preferred seeing either The Matrix, The Iron Giant or the South Park movie win Best Picture. Heck, maybe even Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace.)
That's why I think prosecuting this show is not worth the effort. First of all, that would indict the writers, all of whom I have heard are teenagers themselves, in producing child pornography. While I think this show's premise is a seriously unrealistic take on the everyday lives of teenagers (I should know: I was one only until four years ago, and I never witnessed any of the stuff described in the show when I was attending high school.), I think it is been proven time and again that if you prosecute a teenager as a sex offender simply based on "tough love", you are going to endanger teens more than you would protect them. Second, you end up creating the kind of controversy that a show like this craves in order to get itself into the popular culture. The TV critics were already reading the last rites for the show, but now this child porn accusation is simply the exorcist needed to revive it.
Well, that's about all I know, and as Indiana Jones might say:
"Archaeology is the search for fact... not truth. If it's truth you're looking for, Dr. Tyree's philosophy class is right down the hall."
This is based on the truly
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 7:14am.
This is based on the truly degenerate (with no redeeming qualities) British version.
And I'm a fan of True Blood, Deadwood, et al. So have no problem with fantasy profanity.
All the characters are degenerate scumbags, whose whole lives revolve around nothing scuzy behavior.
The clip shown on Fox News tells you EXACTLY how these producers just LOVE STICKING IT RIGHT IN THE FACE OF CONSERVATIVES FOREVER.
The school cafeteria is called NUTBUSH...
Like wow, d'yall GET IT. They took NUT and BUSH and put them together.
Can't you just see them all sniggering like 10 year olds who just discovered the f+ck word, and what it actually means.
These vicious leftists never tire of their relentless agitprop. First and LAST season in one go.
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
I'm sure your television
Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 5:23pm.
I'm sure your television comes with both a power button and a channel button, Mr. Bozell. If you don't like what's on tv, then turn the channel or turn it off. Instead of offering market solutions, Mr. "Conservative" always comes down on the side of censorship and running to the government to investigate or intervene.Admit it, you're fantasizing
Submitted by bkeyser on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 5:27pm.
Admit it, you're fantasizing that these kids are siblings, aren't you?
Good evening Satchmo
Submitted by cocodrie on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 5:33pm.
Maybe they should televise the sex acts performed by 2nd graders allowed and witnessed by their teacher in the classroom for your enjoyment.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Lay off Satchmo!!!
Submitted by MrShy on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 5:44pm.
Listen, if it's between two consenting 15-year-olds, then it's nobody's business.
Also, government and media need to stay out of 15-year-old's bedrooms!! (unless of course you're a cameraman or director working for MTV.)
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
Good evening Shy
Submitted by cocodrie on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 5:51pm.
A teacher allowed his 2nd graders to perform sex acts on one another while he watched. I don't know where but if it was consensual-------
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
cocodrie
Submitted by MrShy on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 6:08pm.
First off, good evening???? I'm still downing my "morning" coffee and powdered mini-donuts here. :)
But yes, EXACTLY. What consenting..... human beings.... do is no one's business, be they 5, 15, 55, 105 (eeewwwww.....)
EDIT: Actually, "eeewwww" to all four of the above, even if I'm not that far from #3. :p
Oh, and, /sarc (just in case)
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
Surprise Shy*
Submitted by cajun2 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 6:05pm.
It happened in California to our surprise.
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2011/01/21/second-graders-may-have-had-oral-sex-in-classroom/
Youre so cool! I dont suppose
Submitted by sherylbeb on Mon, 02/14/2011 - 6:58pm.
Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to search out someone with some original ideas on this subject. realy thank you for beginning this up. this web site is one thing that is wanted on the internet, somebody with slightly originality. useful job for bringing one thing new to the internet! ParyPoker Bonuses uncounted casino bonus hemophage Poker en ligne Francais fores~SPAMMER ALERT
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Mon, 02/14/2011 - 7:02pm.
.