Violence – especially grotesque, gory or bloody violence – has become a staple of network television during sweeps periods. But there’s a new kind of violence surging -- violence against women. A new study by the Parents Television Council called "Women in Peril" reveals that between 2004 and 2009, CBS, NBC, and Fox (but not ABC) all green-lighted a significant increase in the incidents – and degree – of violence against women.
On average, during the five-year span there was a two percent increase in overall violence during the prime time viewing hours. But during the same time period there was a 120 percent increase in the number of times the audience would be exposed to a violent scene with a female victim.
CBS, the "CSI" network, led with 118 violent storylines on women, but NBC had the largest increase, at 192 percent. The forms of violence depicted included rape, stabbing, dismemberment, electrocution, poisoning, shooting, beating, and torture. Death was regularly a result of the violence.
This stat tells it all: In a complete reversal of tradition, network programmers strongly favored violence depicted on screen (92 percent) rather than implied (5 percent) or merely described (3 percent).
Flipping channels in prime time can be a scary proposition with children in the room. Viewers of the NBC comic-strip-themed show "Heroes" saw images in flashback of the villain Sylar’s evil deeds, including a scene of him stabbing a woman in the chest with scissors. On ABC’s popular and sleazy "Desperate Housewives," viewers were shocked when one of the main female characters was shot in the chest while camping in the woods. It turned out to be a murderer’s daydream, and his plot was conveniently foiled before he could kill off a major character.
Nothing’s sacred. A smaller, but growing category in network sensationalism is violence against female children, virtually unseen in the past (six incidents in the 2004 February and May sweeps). There were 30 such scenes on the same networks during the same time slots in 2009. CBS’s "CSI" featured a plot about a teenaged girl found dead in a parking lot (with the corpse shown several times), and in flashback scenes, viewers saw her assaulted by a friend’s father. For good measure, there was an attempted sexual assault while she was unconscious. A gorier scene aired on NBC’s "Medium," where a suspect was shown photos of a teenage girl whose throat was slit and covered in blood.
The acceptable rules of engagement for female characters keep expanding. Chivalry is dead, and so are lots of women on television, splayed in all kinds of horrific poses. Graphic violence and bloody crime scenes were not necessary for people to enjoy "Police Woman" or "Hill Street Blues." Now it’s seemingly essential. It makes you sentimental for the days of shows like "Mannix," where people would get shot and fall down. Was it realistic? No. Neither was it horrific.
Then there’s the bloody violence and brutality in cartoons. It’s not as "real," and therefore perhaps not as bothersome as live action, perhaps, and because of that, it’s far more gruesome.
Imagine what would have been the audience’s reaction, children and adults alike, a generation ago if, watching "The Flintstones," suddenly Fred Flintstone were to smack Wilma in the face, or Bam-bam were to pummel Betty Rubble with his stick.
Yet on today’s prime time cartoons, aimed at adults and children alike, the creators think it’s hilarious to abuse their female characters. On "Family Guy," the lead character tells his son that he should be the "best leader of the household" he can. So the son pushes his rear end into his sister’s face and flatulates, and then punches his mother in the face. On "American Dad," a female dentist saves the lead character from a shooting. When she approaches for a hug, he punches her in the face and takes her gun. See the "hilarious" pattern?
Then there’s the bloody violence. On "Family Guy," a joke about the "extensive divorce procedure required by 18th century society" is illustrated by the lead character shooting his daughter dead with a musket. On "American Dad," there’s so-called comedy in suggesting lawn sprinklers are a deadly household hazard. In a cautionary film, two little girls are shown playing catch with a doll, when one girl trips and lands on the sprinkler, which pokes through her chest cavity. The sprinkler showers the house, lawn and the other little girl with blood.
The creator of those shows recently had his contract renewed, reportedly at $100 million.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Yet Media Violence Doesn't Equate Real Violence...
October 30, 2009 - 22:37 ET by The7SticksHere we go again. How many times has it been disproved that media violence doesn't equate real violence? If Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris had been motivated to commit the Columbine High School massacre through cartoons and police procedurals, then how come part of their plan incorporated homemade explosives that potentially could have caused the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil up until 9/11? That's right, they would have outdone the Unibomber and Timothy McVeigh combined. And how can you blame that on the media? You can't. Some people are born with an innate latency to be psychopaths, sociopaths or emotionally disturbed individuals. More regulation of the media would be a useless gesture that would not even come close to the surface of solving the problem, while also limiting freedom of speech. In fact, they wouldn't be able to show "The Passion of the Christ" on TV for church groups because the broadcasters would be regulated into not broadcasting it for concerns of violence.
As for violence in cartoons, I'm suprised the frist thing that came to your mind was The Flintstones. Apparently you've never heard of The Bullwinkle Show. I have a DVD set where in one Peabody and Sherman cartoon, they meet an American Indian with arrows sticking out of his head (no blood though.) A few seasons later, Rocky and Bullwinkle have to figure out how to stop Boris and Natasha, but Rocky says "Bullwinkle, they don't allow violence on TV anymore."
Heavens to Betsy, let's hope you never travel to Japan and find the menagerie of fighting cartoons with schoolgirls that are the main characters. Oh, that would just blow your mind. Hopefully not.
-Lois: "You can't hit me, I'm a girl!"
-Peter: "Sometimes I wonder..." -From "Family Guy"
Haven't you heard of the
October 31, 2009 - 08:45 ET by Radical1979Haven't you heard of the U.S. military using violent video games to desensitize recruits to make it easier for them to kill? Do you really think the images on television don't affect people? Why do you think advertising is such a lucrative field?
I know one...
October 31, 2009 - 13:42 ET by Independent_Otaku<I>Heavens to Betsy, let's hope you never travel to Japan and find the menagerie of fighting cartoons with schoolgirls that are the main characters. Oh, that would just blow your mind. Hopefully not. </I>
Queen's Blade comes to mind... >_>;;
Anyway, there are always people that can't separate fantasy from reality, whether now or 50 years ago.
"The only cure for stupidity is death" - Raven, Tales of Vesperia
Huh, when did evil,
October 30, 2009 - 22:39 ET by Dim BulbHuh, when did evil, misogynists conservatives begin to influence television programing?
And where is NOW?
Oh, that's right, they're still beating the hell out of Sarah Palin.
NOW is partially responsible
October 31, 2009 - 08:40 ET by Radical1979NOW is partially responsible for this. This wouldn't happen if they didn't try to pretend the sexes were the same in every way.
No one is trying to glorify violence toward women
October 31, 2009 - 00:04 ET by shawn228Lots of women in real life get killed and raped. shows like CSI are about crime and solving them so it belongs in the script. I have not watched it for about a year, but there were very strong women characters on the show Hero's and they had no problems defending themselves.
As for Family Guy, they always have had crude humor
"The creator of those shows recently had his contract renewed, reportedly at $100 million."
Its all about the ratings and how one show is more successful than the other right? Or does that only go for Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh?
"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK
I dunno
October 31, 2009 - 16:16 ET by nwahsHaving reached my limit of witnessed autopsies on CSI type shows, I find my self switching to the early news. It looks like shows go out of their way to be gross. If I want to watch an autopsy, I'll choose a time I'm not eating spaghetti.
But that's what they make the remote for.
TV programming is garbage
October 31, 2009 - 00:25 ET by LorraineI don't watch TV - ever. It's a total waste of time.
My family does watch some science and history shows on cable, but that's about it.
We happened to catch a few minutes of the Sex in the City movie, what degenerate, sleazy garbage! I can't believe how many people let their young teens (or even older teens) watch this garbage.
People wonder why our children's cultural experiences are filled with sex, drugs, and disrespect. It answer is pointed directly at parents who don't supervise what their kids see and hear.
Great Post Lorraine
October 31, 2009 - 00:40 ET by shawn228Nice to see someone acknowledge that is the parents reponsiblity to monitor what their kids watch, the government should no be a nanny for every sleazy thing on tv.
"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK
Freakonomics.....
October 31, 2009 - 02:10 ET by big.league.sliderStatistically, more husbands are murderded by their wives each year, than wives are killed by their husbands. It's a statistical fact, but the sad reason behind it is that men tend to simply beat their wives. While abused wives tend to respond by shooting or stabbing their abusive husbands.
A great argument for CC laws.
"The problem with political jokes is they get elected." -Henry Cate VII (?)
Desperate Housewives
October 31, 2009 - 06:10 ET by goldwaterfanSo ABC is the one network that you say has not greenlghted more violence against women, but you call Desperate Housewives sleazy? What are you on Brent? Put down the pipe!
I am old enough to
October 31, 2009 - 07:10 ET by MidAmericaI am old enough to remember TV's golden years when the creators of TV programming were truly creative and watching TV was fun. Today TV is using shock value to gain audience. When we pass a wreck on the highway we all look as we go by. That's the 'creativity' of much of todays writers. That plus the generous sprinkling of ant-Christian and anti-consevative American dialogue, TV shows are just not worth my time.
If you really want to be
October 31, 2009 - 08:23 ET by Tom PaineIf you really want to be terrified, watch some of the old ALfred Hitchcock movies. In the classic shower scene in in Psycho we never see the woman acutally get stabbed, nor do we ever see the body lying in the bathtub. Instead we see the look of terror on her face and shape of her mouth which then transitions to image of the shower drain with the blood flowing into it. Graphic violence is a cheap substitue for creativity. Another thing, in Hitchcock movies and in his television show - the bad guys never got away with their crimes. They were either brought to justice or died horribly. How far we have come...
SOURCE OF ACTUAL VIOLENT ACTS
October 31, 2009 - 16:52 ET by wotsiznamewotsizname I doubt that Bullwinkle and Boris did us much harm: They were obviously detached fantasy that even a young child could understand. The violence then did not seem real. But now the explicit photographic detailed violence is hard to ignore, and is often shown as violent news or fiction against women and girls. How did we get this way? When I grew up women were revered as something special, to be honored because of their place in human society. A man rose when a lady walked into the room. Women's "Lib" rejected this view, and equated women to men. The license (liberty) they preached changed our society for the worse. Yes, the old was stilted and indeed needed adjustment. But they threw out the old and put irresponsible behavior in its place. How did they do it? Teenage girls on the cusp of adulthood are the ones who set the moral tone for each succeeding generation. They were told, "You can do anything you want and there are no penalties." And the boys, of course, will do whatever the girls tell them to. The result is moral anarchy and lack of honor for womanhood and motherhood. Society then deteriorates into the survival of the fittest, strongest; and rejection of mores which formerly held violence, selfishness and contempt in check. Women's rights are real, and the careful observation of them ensures the success and peaceful survival of a nation. Cases in point: The Jewish women have respect, a high place in society, and rights and privileges no one can challange. Across the border the Arabs treat their women as animal posessions with no freedom at all, and murder for disobedience. We treat our livestock better than they treat their wives, mothers and daughters. They haven't made an inch of social or moral progress in thousands of years. That's why. Do we want to descend the rest of the way into this, I don't. Read the Declaration of Independence. It is our plan for survival.