Bozell Column: Remembering Ted Kennedy

Photo of Brent Bozell.
  • Bookmark and Share

NewsBusters.org | Media Research CenterOur national media are treating the passing of Sen. Edward Kennedy as an historic event, more historic even than the deaths of presidents like Gerald Ford. Is this level of attention warranted?

We can all grant that Ted Kennedy was a major legislator with his hands in a lot of historic government action. He was at times a very eloquent speaker and was always a passionate fighter. To his side of the aisle, he was their inspirational leader.

Now add the personal story: Two of his brothers were mercilessly assassinated. He was the final Kennedy from that generation. Clearly, when the media spent countless hours mourning the death of John F. Kennedy Jr., a man who never had a political career, the death of an actual Senator of 46 years should be a greater event.

It is not the amount of coverage that bothers, it is the quality of reporting. "[The Kennedys] are the closest thing we have in this country to royalty, the clan's iconic images engraved on our national consciousness." That's how ABC's Claire Shipman put it on the August 26 Good Morning America, echoing what others have been saying across the dial. CBS anchor Harry Smith began this way: "He bore the unspeakable grief and overwhelming hopes of a nation."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

This suggests a popularity that simply did not exist. The last time Gallup polled nationally on Kennedy (in February of 2008) his favorable rating stood at 40%, his unfavorable a whopping 48%. Even earlier this month, with the news of his mortal illness known by all, still his favorables according to CNN could not climb past 51%.

Along with the inaccurate suggestions we're hearing from the press that he was beloved by all are the suggestions, again echoed across the dial, that Ted Kennedy was a great bi-partisan leader. His was "a life that was able to bring friends and enemies together," said CBS anchor Maggie Rodriguez.

That is also inaccurate. It is not questioned that he enjoyed many friendships across the political aisle, but that has no bearing on political bi-partisanship, and it is simply not true to suggest that Kennedy was committed to bi-partisanship. What did he do to help Nixon with Vietnam? Reagan with tax cuts? Bush 41 with Clarence Thomas? Clinton with welfare reform? Bush 43 with Iraq?

Senator Kennedy was smart enough and pragmatic enough to reach across the aisle to get deals done - but only to the degree that they advanced his agenda. He worked across the aisle to ensure the never-ending growth of federal taxes and spending, consistently opposing American foreign policy abroad while working tirelessly to defeat conservative nominations and initiatives at home.

And when he felt it necessary to wear brass knuckles, he did so. Conservatives (especially) will quickly recall his initial floor speech in 1987 against Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork:

"Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government," and on and on.

It was vicious, and untrue, but for a liberal like Kennedy, for whom ends justified means, it was also strategically necessary and therefore appropriate. "The statement had to be stark and direct so as to sound the alarm and hold people in their places until we could get material together. I was confident we could win this one." That's how Ted Kennedy justified his action to Ethan Bronner, author of "The Battle for Justice."

Bronner added that Kennedy later sought out Bork's wife to say "I hope you understand it is nothing personal."

The networks cast every law Kennedy passed as an achievement. This is true -- if you're a liberal. It's the opposite if you're a conservative. Despite their surprising generosity to Ronald Reagan when he died, the TV elite nonetheless questioned his policies. On ABC, Peter Jennings asserted "a great many people [read: liberals] thought he'd made the wealthy wealthier and had not improved life particularly for the middle class." On CBS, reporter Bill Plante asserted the Iran-Contra affair helped "set the stage for the first Iraq war and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism." And so on.

Edward M. Kennedy was a liberal's liberal. His supporters can cheer his intense commitment to a leftist agenda. His opponents can -- and should -- respect his dogged refusal to compromise on that philosophy. But his detractors (which, let us remind ourselves, outnumbered his supporters) also found his leftist agenda destructive. And the national news media are doing a great disservice by omitting that from their Camelot narrative.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"But his detractors also found his leftist agenda destructive"

But his detractors also found his leftist agenda destructive...

...thus his real legacy: the unborn, gay marraige, immigration imbalance...

v

The Kennedys have had one

The Kennedys have had one member elected president, and none elected governor. The Bush family has two presidents and two governors. Aren't they closer to being considered the closest thing to royalty than the Kennedys?

They have many relatives as

They have many relatives as federal or state representatives.  I'm not a fan of a Bush dynasty either.  In fact, I'd like to get all new politicians in office...

Royal Prerogative...

Royal Prerogative would seem to fit only the Kennedy's...and ruling out the Bush family. 

v

 

Don't forget the Adamses

No blood has had more influence on creating America, nor in maintaining, advancing, and understanding it than the Adamses.

Nearly all his tenure

 

was done under the cloud of his being able to buy off the police department over the negligent death of Mary Jo Kopechne.

Had the police department, district attorney and the media treated him as any other person, he would have stood trial and faced the consequences for his drunken behavior.

Oddly enough, Mothers Against Drunk Drivers also gave him a pass for the death of a pregnant woman.

His only undying love was for every tinhorn communist dictator in the world and his skill at getting US Taxpayer help for them.

Much the same as is what is ocurring in Honduras right now.

He is finally dead, others can rest in peace now.

http://gjresult.com

 

WLJ

i couldn't have said it any better.

may he toil in hell for all eternity

hear hear

DANCE WITH JOY AND RELIEF upon the bastards grave

"I hope (ted) understands - it is nothing personal."  

Palin/Prejean 2012

IMO, the attention is

IMO, the attention is warranted. Sen. Kennedy served for a long period of time and, for better or worse, was a very influential voice. I was around when John and Robert were assassinated. I didn't know anything about politics at the time. All I knew was that two men who were important Americans were murdered. The shock was very much akin to 9/11. And thus did the Kennedy family become so iconic.

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."

—Margaret Thatcher

Influential, yes; positive, no

They're "iconic" because the Life magazines and the network Kennedy flacks relentlessly pushed their "royal" presence incessantly. You're repeating the Matt Cooper outrage of comparing the death of two Kennedys to 9/11. I'm sure it was shocking. It was not the death of 3,000. They do not compare.

As for the Bork speech, Kennedy's vicious pile of twaddle was just another day at the office. Even Kennedy knew that making Bork into some crazed KKK member who hated evolution and might root in the future for an Elian Gonzalez raid was the worst kind of spoiled baloney.

Kennedy utterly changed the rules of Supreme Court nominations: they were now just another political campaign, and conservatism was now a disqualification for the high court. That's a legacy, all right, but it's not a good one.

Tim: Were you around when

Tim: Were you around when John and Bobby were assassinated? I think you misunderstand the comparison. I remember how I felt then and I remember how I felt on 9/11. Shock, helplessness, vulnerability, sadness, anger. Despite the historical record of past assassinations, personal experience makes much more of an impact. It's not about two men vs. 3,000. It's about the impact on the American psyche. Sure, post 9/11 the comparison seems outrageous. But at the time of the assassinations, the news was just as shocking and unbelievable. And I can say from my own experience that, other than the fear that remained after 9/11, the emotional impact was similar. But I'm sure that if I were a New Yorker, the impact of 9/11 may have been even more profound.

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."

—Margaret Thatcher

Kennedy was a liar, a

Kennedy was a liar, a cheat, a coward, a murderer, and his moral compass seldom pointed north.  He meddled in the affairs of America for many years, and America is a worse place because of him.  How can anyone praise someone like him?

 I'm sorry, but the first thing I thought when I heard of his passing was "good riddance."   And good riddance to the Kennedy clan in public life.  Royalty?  America does not need or want royalty.  And that includes the imbecile currently in the white house.

absolutely -

absolutely - this "respectful" BS "reverence" from the right is anything but genuine - lets not be two-face like the average democrat - lets respect history and the people - the guy was a domestic enemy - one of the greatest - perhaps THE greatest...

royalty has rarely been good for the people - that was the primary impetus for our REPUBLIC - the brits even ditched it eventually

so in that respect i can agree - the kennedy cartel was our tax-horny king george court on steroids, booze, and heroin combined 

may he burn in hell where he belongs - he earned it fair and square

Palin/Prejean 2012

The Kennedys are royalty, my lilly-white, libertarian ____.

Every time I hear that about them, I want to puke.

This is one of the most dysfunctional families in the history of families. They are the real-life version of the Simpsons and the Bundys rolled into one.

As for Ted Kennedy himself, he had more to do with pushing this nation to the very edge of its own destruction than any other person who ever existed.

His constantly pushing to exponentially expand the freedom-robbing nanny-state may very soon result in a financial meltdown unlike any other in recorded history.

Our economy is currently dying under the weight of the cost, as well as the debt, that Ted Kennedy's "legacy" of unbridled, irresponsible socialism has left us.

This man does not deserve to be lauded in any way. He deserves to be reviled and despised, as he was a charter member of the Enemy Within Club.

-Dave

Even when the government tries to kiss you, it is just a prelude to a good screwing. -Neal Boortz 

Dave... Glad to hear

Dave...

Glad to hear Levin last night, and now Rush reading that letter of offer to the USSR to destroy Reagan that some of us linked here from Sweetness and Light a couple of days ago.

...and like I said then, and will again, people forget or didn't know that Teddy groomed John F'n Kerry...and he admitted that with pride on some show I caught late last night...think it was CNN.

Wake up America...these people were and are enemies within!

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

bt,

Ted Kennedy's attempt at conspiring with the Andropov government to bring down Reagan was one of the most despicable, traitorous acts in history.

When his hideous treachery was discovered, they should have locked him up and thrown away the key.

-Dave

Even when the government tries to kiss you, it is just a prelude to a good screwing. -Neal Boortz 

Heck Dave...he was a

Heck Dave...he was a leftist, enemy within...and the rest of the party agreed with him for the most part, still do as you well know...

btw..besides Kerry, Tom Harkin ring a bell from way back when?

 

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

"one of the most despicable, traitorous acts in history"

why hasn't this letter been more noticed?  This guy is a traitor!

v

V Do you know if the origin

V Do you know if the origin of that document is online or available to the public? Right now I see a letter referenced in the appendix of a book. It would be nice to see the original and the translation. 

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MM..been looking for the traitors trail...

...found this:

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly
In this hagiographic account, political scientist Kengor (God and Ronald Reagan) makes the familiar case (made most recently by John Lewis Gaddis in The Cold War) that Reagan played a decisive role in ending the Cold War. Reagan was troubled by communism well before he arrived at the White House. As a young man in Hollywood, he railed against the red threat, and as early as 1967, he called for the destruction of the Berlin Wall. As president, Reagan engaged in "economic warfare," invaded Grenada and proved that the Soviets couldn't win an arms race against the U.S. Though "those enslaved by the Soviet Communist state" didn't find freedom until after the Reagan administration, Dutch gets the credit. And what of other major figures who contributed to the Cold War's end? Gorbachev, of course, figures prominently, and John Paul II makes significant appearances—Kengor credits the pope with helping turn Reagan's attention to Poland. Ted Kennedy, on the other hand, emerges as a sneak and a dupe, willing to undermine U.S. foreign policy and make nice with the Russians. The book's structure is somewhat stilted—each chapter is broken up into short chunks, so it feels as though one is reading not a sweeping narrative, but an annotated time line of Reagan's presidency. While the book is workmanlike, the chronology is useful and the footnotes reveal an impressive amount of research. (Oct. 17)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

...from here

...and this...

Kengor: It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped

v

...pass the popcorn and a rope please 

 

vr... Thank

vr...

Thank you.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

MM and BT...there's more...

FP: Did you have the document vetted?

Kengor: Of course. It comes from the Central Committee archives of the former USSR. Once Boris Yeltsin took over Russia in 1991, he immediately began opening the Soviet archives, which led to a rush on the archives by Western researchers. One of them, Tim Sebastian of the London Times and BBC, found the Kennedy document and reported it in the February 2, 1992 edition of the Times, in an article titled, “Teddy, the KGB and the top secret file.”

But this electrifying revelation stopped there; it went no further. Never made it across the Atlantic. Not a single American news organization, from what I can tell, picked up the story. Apparently, it just wasn’t interesting enough, nor newsworthy.

Not interesting enough my

Not interesting enough my rear...as usual the leftist press kept it quiet.

I thank you for the work vr...saved the link and passing this on.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

thanks v

I did a little reseach myself. All I can find is hearsay and references to the book. And it's all over the web. Even Michelle Malkin did a piece in 2006:

http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/20/the-kennedy-kgb-letter/

Her conclusion: not enough evidence. It would really be great to see the original documents!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

On your knees peasant,

On your knees peasant, worship and genuflect to the Kennedy-Hapsburg-Von Trapp monachy who rule by divine decree.

Don't you know Americans fought a revolution to bow to royalty!!
 

Thanks Barack! You've done more to promote conservatism than any president since Ronald Reagan (PBUH).

Jack... You speak the

Jack...

You speak the truth...that is what is spooky...and that is why we are seeing a slow up-rising that is going to gather strength in my opinion...a lot more.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

More media

This is simply more media Kool-Aid and I am sicken by it.

DDM... So am I. TV

DDM...

So am I.

TV remains on mute...and will for the remainder of the day until Beck comes on.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

Glenn Beck

will be on in about 5 minutes here...I will turn Fox on then.

...

Ding dong, the Ted is dead, which ole Ted, the killer Ted, ding dong, the wicked Ted is dead . . .

 

One less skirt-chasing, booze swilling, two-faced lying scumbag who left a girl to drown POS

 

and... RIP MJK

fin

47 years

TK is the reason we need term limits on these professional politicians

 

 

 

 

"The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can
bribe the people with their own money." – Alexis de Tocqueville

OBAMA TO HAVE 'EMERGENCY CONTROL' OF INTERNET!!!

Via Drudge

 If ya don't want to be called a Nazi, stop acting like one.

Pretty simple

SSS... That isn't going

SSS...

That isn't going to happen anytime soon, not by this administration.

A few of us were talking about what you are also somewhere here on NBs.

Spooky what's happening at break-neck speed.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

The fact that it was even

The fact that it was even considered is frightening.

I never thought colossal  ignorance could actually get elected.

I fear for this country. I really do

SSS... So do I. I've

SSS...

So do I.

I've never seen anything like what is happening now in this country in my lifetime.

One thing about it...people are waking the heck up all over this nation...this is just the beginning, anyway, that's how I feel.

I just hope and pray it lasts until next year at this time, and the way this administration and congress is going now...I feel it will.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

Ignorance

The level of ignorance displayed by Obama is not unusual for Senators.  This is one of the reasons that so few get elected to the Presidency.  If the Republicans had not had the "open" primaries last year that could be rigged by the Democrats to get their pick of opponents thing could have been different.  The thing that scares me most is that Obama said in his address to Congress that the country that invented the car would never abandon the Automobile.  This explains why Mr. Obama is so popular in Germany where the car was invented. 

What scares me is that the speech as a major address must have gone through every aid in the Whitehouse west wing and none of them knew that Mr. Benz invented the Automobile.  Not only is Mr. Obama a last place Jeopardy player ,everyone he brought into office with him is too. 

In honor of TEDDY

I think it is only fitting that the private Congressional Health Care Plan should be named after Teddy Kennedy. The TEDDY KENNEDY PLAN, a symbol of self-indulgence and total disregard for the public. The other plan, the PUBLIC plan is something else, however. I suggest that the public plan be named the MARYJO KOPECHNE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. This will properly memorialize a lifetime of Teddy's work. Surely the public WILL NOT receive the same benefits as Congress but this Kennedy plan will provide the same level of care given to Maryjo by Teddy, with similar results. For those who wait eagerly for passage of the public plan, (as Maryjo probably waited) my advice based on past history is DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH!

Kennedy, He Dies as He Lived..A Lie.

Kennedy is one of the men who came to power in the nineteen-sixties or seventies who defended their power with utter ruthlessness but never seemed to comprehend either how badly they hurt people or how much they were hated. Chris Dodd was genuinely surprised last year when he only got one vote out of every five thousand cast in some of the Midwest primaries.   The bad things that Edward Kennedy did legislatively are too numerous to recount but range from corrupting the United States immigration laws to destroying our energy infrastructure.  That people are singing praises to such a man in death is hurtful to the living and just plain cruel. 

 

""He bore the unspeakable

""He bore the unspeakable grief and overwhelming hopes of a nation."

Bull. He might have bore the collective blood alcohol content of a nation...

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Have a little empathy.

I like to reach across the aisle whenever possible and this is a good chance to do it.  I am happy to mourn Ted Kennedy's passing.  I would be happy to mourn the passing of any of a number of liberal politicians.  I guess I am just a bigger guy than most of you.  ;)

 

Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho

LOL Ben... I love how you

LOL Ben...

I love how you put that...that was priceless.

I'm with you!

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

To me, Kennedy embodies the

To me, Kennedy embodies the rot - political, social, economic, moral - that liberalism has unleashed on the framework of the country. He and his ilk started the horrific practice of getting away with bad behavior as long as one was famous.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Whatever!

I'm old enough to have lived through the Kennedy era and I can tell you that Camelot was a myth and those who think of the Kennedys as royalty are sadly mistaken.

 

 

IaT... So am I...my one

IaT...

So am I...my one wish is the msm for the most part were just a myth as well.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

              

                 I cannot respect a murderer.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Teddy Kennedy

Ted Kennedy was a mean spirited self absorbed tax evading left-wing loon. He
had the morals of a cad and felt anything was AOK if it advanced his causes. He
was a fat Patrick Leahy.

While any feeling person can sympathize with those who loved him, the fact
that he is dead doesn't change what he really was.

I've Skimmed Through Robert Bork's Own Book, And I Thought YIKES

 

""Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government," and on and on." Well, not as badly as that, but he definitely would have tried to censor television, that's for sure. I skimmed through a book that Bork himself wrote and I thought "Yikes!" Perhaps being "Borked" isn't as bad as it sounds.

Anyway, yeah, the coverage is pretty much over the top because they're trying to turn a good man like Ted Kennedy into a great myth. Of course, I think that's done to overcompensate some of the bad things that are being said about him as well. We get it, he screwed up on saving his wife or lover or something in Chappaquiddick, so what? Is he the anti-Christ or something? Is he the second coming of Jesus? No, I think he was just a good man who tried to follow his conscience. And yeah, I think he had a conscience.

 

Stix

Is he the anti-Christ or something?

No.  He is a Male (not a Man) that left a young woman to die in the aftermath of a car crash.

So what?

"Is he the anti-Christ or something?"

No he didn't make it that far. He was an apostate Catholic, womanizing, drunkard murdering lying theif. Not to mention the prime mover in the deaths of millions and millions of unborn and partially born babies. Where was his "conscience" through all that?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Forgetaboutem!

Sigh!

Throw some dirt on him

Throw some dirt on this POS and let's move on, Ted in no hero unless it's in the USSR

 Yeah, I'm having trouble

 Yeah, I'm having trouble understanding why he is basically being heralded as an America hero... when we rarely honor people who are real everyday heroes to this nation. I feel like its just because of his name- celebrity status can get you almost anything these days, especially 3 full days of reporting on the "developing story" of your death... I'm not saying it isn't sad, or that he didn't accomplish anything worthwhile, I'm just saying that the way everything is being portrayed seems a bit extreme to me, and even sort of exploitative as they use his death to support Obamacare... 

 

www.endthebias.com