The baby boomers are trotting out the celebrations for the 40th anniversary of the "Summer of Love," complete with all that soggy and groggy Woodstock nostalgia. Perhaps the singular statement of that summer was the music and the open celebration of "free love."
All of which, believe it or not, is preferable to what is on the air this summer.
Start with the big hit "Birthday Sex," which brought quick fame (which is to say, infamy) to a singer named Jeremih. (Why must these people always celebrate illiteracy?) His basic lyric is "Don’t need candles and cake / Just need your body to make / Birthday sex." But Jeremih also elaborates about how he wants sex in the kitchen, on a waterbed, and so on. It’s an audio porn movie.
Interestingly, and sadly, few can be found to disapprove of foisting these "adult situations" lyrics on children. Radio station managers are, as a group, completely apathetic. But school administrators? The Chicago Public Schools enlisted their newly famous alumnus Jeremih in an online Twitter campaign to urge Chicago teens to go back to school this fall.
At least the Chicago Sun-Times was bold enough to disagree with this campaign. "We know CPS kids will listen to ‘Birthday Sex’ and far raunchier tunes whether Jeremih is a CPS spokesman or not," the paper editorialized. "We also know CPS must do all it can to deal with its horrific dropout problem. But that shouldn't include implicitly promoting the message in ‘Birthday Sex,’ no matter how appealing the messenger."
Jeremih was not alone in the gutter. The rapper who calls himself Flo Rida unleashed a big hit with "Right Round," which celebrates oral sex: "You spin my head right round, right round / When you go down, when you go down, down." He’s not talking about spinning his eyeballs around.
Dirty lyrics don’t keep an "artist" from appearing on the network morning news programs. They’re fine with it, too. On the August 14 Today show, the rapper also performed a previous hit song, "Low," with lyrics like this: "Shawty was hot like a toaster / Sorry but I had to fold her / Like a pornography poster."
Flo Rida granted an interview to NBC anchor Matt Lauer, who buttered up his guest by asking if his mother deserved credit for inspiring him to ascend from the rougher neighborhoods of Miami. Flo Rida’s answer was even more offensive in its hypocrisy: "I mean, most definitely. She always taught me to dream big, put God first, you know, sacrifice and the sky's the limit."
I wonder what God thinks of that.
It’s not just men who behave like pigs. The dance diva named Lady Gaga had a hit song titled "Love Game" that repeatedly celebrated the male anatomy: "Let’s have some fun, this beat is sick / I wanna take a ride on your disco stick." A newspaper in the Philippines put the perfect spin on her concert there: "Lady with Legs Wide Open." Her songs aren’t just a smash on the radio: they star on TV shows like "So You Think You Can Dance" on Fox.
These songs are not the cutting edge. They are the mainstream. The Culture and Media Institute studied 29 songs that were listed on top 20 airplay charts posted by Mediabase from June 10 to July 22. A large majority (69 percent) of the songs made at least one reference to sex, alcohol, drugs, or contained profanity. Nearly half (46 percent) of the songs contained sexual lyrics and 31 percent of the songs referenced drugs or alcohol. Profanity occurred in 41 percent of the songs.
Dr. Brian Primack of the University of Pittsburgh Medical School studied more than 700 ninth-graders and found in a study earlier this year that sexual songs lead to more sexual activity by teens: "High exposure to lyrics describing degrading sex in popular music was independently associated with higher levels of sexual behavior. In fact, exposure to lyrics describing degrading sex was one of the strongest associations with sexual activity." This might seem like an obvious finding, but no one in the music business bats an eye.
If tobacco companies can be blamed for lung cancer, and oil companies can be blamed for global warming, why aren’t radio stations and record companies that churn out pornographic music blamed for teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases?




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I contend that popular
August 22, 2009 - 06:49 ET by marvlI contend that popular music ended in the middle 1990s following the demise of the Grunge period. What we have today is the illiterate ramblings of a bunch of talentless oafs whose intellectual abilities seem to emanate from their brain stems. They might as well be earth worms, or some similar nonthinking life form. Hell, if a boiled turnip could be made to vocalize, it could do as well as Flo Rida. Or Tex As, or Al A Bama, or I Da Ho.
What's truly worrisome is that kids actually seem to enjoy this dreck. We're headed for intellectual dark ages, if we're not there already.
By the way, Matt Lauer is just a boiled turnip in an Armani suit. The media and pop culture is littered with mentally challenged overachievers.
We're not "Slouching
August 22, 2009 - 08:59 ET by motherbeltWe're not "Slouching Towards Gomorrah" any more....
We're flying there (as in the Comcast ad) ...like a rabbit, genetically bred with a panther, shaved, on a rocket driven by an overcaffeinated pilot, down a ski jump, greased.....
That Flo-Rida can talk about put[ing] God first while he peddles this sludge he calls art and/or music, is positively disgraceful.
That's right, Flo...put God first, THEN degrade yourself and everyone who listens to you. Your mother must be so proud. And I'm sure you think that your fiscal success is "proof" that God is pleased with what you are doing.
I weep for my grandchildren. They will grow up in a sewer.
Exactly, Marvl
August 22, 2009 - 07:01 ET by FeynmanFanYou hit the nail on the head.
Wrong Year
August 22, 2009 - 07:29 ET by easygoerA small point, but the "Summer of Love" was 1967.
Music...
August 22, 2009 - 10:06 ET by adamsmithThe problem is too much money was made over the years and you literally have guys in lab coats writing this drivel. Music started it's demise with MTV, when music became a beauty contest. Think about it. Bob Dylan starting out in 1982. Never would have made it..There are tons of recordings(blues) from the 20's and 30's that have all kinds of dirty references. They were entertaining to adults but were couched as double entendre where kids would never get it. That was creative dirt, and I still enjoy it.Music companies don't want bands like the Who,Stones,Zeppelin anymore. They make tons more money turning out one hit nobodys that are disposable,talentless and easily replaceable. YouTube is the future lies for music...
Music!
August 22, 2009 - 08:48 ET by compguytracyMaybe im old, who knows, but i know music, and this crap, aint it. all it is is bubble gum pop, it lasts as long as the flavor of dubble bubble, and has as much nutrients for your brain as gum does for your body. In 5 years, please tell me who these people are. what happened to music that survived the test of time? i mean, my kids may not have been around in the 70s, but the know who led zeppelin, the doors, black sabbath, the who, stones, dylan, springsteen, et al, are. music is a history lesson, and history is made not by temporary people. All music is is a marketing tool, ride the musician for all they are worth, and throw them away, your single serving friend. no lasting power, and any pop star in this day and age will only be remembered for there failures, i.e. britany spears, et.al. not for any redeeming quality, or memorable music. i mean, toxic, or stairway to heaven?
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?…
Ceteris paribus
Keeping it real
August 22, 2009 - 10:02 ET by KC MulvilleBut Isn't That What's Been Done Since The Age Of Aquarius?
August 25, 2009 - 19:50 ET by The7SticksDo you honestly think that any songs by the Rolling Stones are these beaming beacons of light, prudence and chastity? John Lennon made a song in the early 70's called "Working Class Hero", and I don't think I have ever heard a more passionate, yet subdued utterance of the word f***ing. Yes, John Lennon sang that word in his song. He was also the one who observed that the Beatles must be "bigger than Jesus." In other words, this stuff has been going on since the dawn of time. If I had a penny (a penny, for goodness sake!) for every time I hear the term moral decline, I'd have a million dollars. That's how often I hear it even though the world never came to an end every time I expected it to.
Of course what do I know about current music? The only new stuff I ever listen to are from older acts like Depeche Mode, U2, Bruce Springsteen and Bob Dylan. And I'm only twenty-two.
Whoa there
August 26, 2009 - 09:18 ET by KC MulvilleYou can't complain about constantly hearing "moral decline" when you brought it to this topic. I wasn't saying that. All I was saying was that if a singer can only sing about sex, drugs, and violence, then his reality is a cesspool. That doesn't mean my world is a cesspool, or everyone's, just the singer's.
Be careful when you argue that something "has been going on forever." Longevity isn't a defense. It doesn't justify the something. After all, theft and murder have been going on since Cain and Abel, but the longevity of it doesn't justify it.
Finally, you have to make a distinction. There's a difference between "moral decline" and profanity. I'm not sure whether society has declined morally over the past fifty years. Among other things, we have a breakdown in attitudes towards marriage and sex. Abortion has weakened respect for life (just my opinion). On the other hand, we're less racist than we used to be. My niece is dating a black guy, and nobody in the family minds or makes jokes -- that wouldn't have been true fifty years ago. We're less sexist. So, I don't know how to measure moral decline in a civilization.
However, I will argue that we are definitely, absolutely more profane than we were fifty years ago. I'm not just talking about language. I'm talking about profanity in the sense of [opposite of sacred.] What's sacred anymore? Mircea Eliade wrote a book called "The Sacred and the Profane," addressing this very subject. I consider it a must read. The argument is that we used to respect sanctity or holiness. We need to show reverence for the sacredness in the world. Popular culture, however, takes us in the opposite direction. We tear down saints. We attack them on suspicion of hypocrisy.
These days, we may not have any better morality, but we certainly are more profane.
eh
August 22, 2009 - 10:15 ET by candanceWhen Elvis made it popular to shake his hips on stage, and when The Doors wrote lyrics about getting high, and when "good music" was acceptable even when it glamorized immorality, Baby Boomers thought all this was funny.
Good job, older generations. You let the bar slip down for your own pleasure and are now shocked that you lost control. We're so very thankful for the leadership.
Excellent Post candance
August 22, 2009 - 11:30 ET by shawn228I remember the fact that the older generation did not get out music, now people my age in their mid to upper thirties are turning into a bunch of prudes.
"I swear sometimes the self-appointed moral police are as obnoxious and demanding of big government interference as "environmentalist" gun control advocates, labor unions and trial lawyers"~fitzfong
Good morning Shawn
August 22, 2009 - 11:57 ET by cocodrieAre you saying that there is no difference between the music of the past and the noise of today?
People played instruments and sang in the music of the past. Today someone beats incessantly on drums while a durgged out no-talent screams obscenities.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Good Afternoon cocodrie
August 22, 2009 - 15:12 ET by shawn228Its been a long time, nice to see you friend. I am a huge proponent for free speech but when It comes to protecting children I agree with that we should be more diligent.
It was shocking when last month I heard my daughter singing "If U Seek Amy". I did not like it at all, but that was not the point of Marvl's post. He is accusing a poster I like alot about something she never said and that is a very annoying debating tactic.
"I swear sometimes the self-appointed moral police are as obnoxious and demanding of big government interference as "environmentalist" gun control advocates, labor unions and trial lawyers"~fitzfong
So, you see no difference
August 22, 2009 - 11:41 ET by marvlSo, you see no difference between Elvis and the Doors and Flo Rida? You kinda prove my point. Since you have no critical skills and have no idea what constitutes "good music," you probably think Flo Rida is "like, totally aweome." You're both circling the cultural drain of humanity. It won't be long... so long.
hardly marvl
August 22, 2009 - 11:48 ET by shawn228Candance has a very good point that each generation is different. How do you know what Candance's idea of good music is?
"I swear sometimes the self-appointed moral police are as obnoxious and demanding of big government interference as "environmentalist" gun control advocates, labor unions and trial lawyers"~fitzfong
oh please, marvl
August 22, 2009 - 14:23 ET by candanceKeep pretending like I said Elvis is the same as some rapper I've never heard of.
EVERY generation, from the Baby Boomers onward, always says that things were a little risque in their time, but nothing like those teenagers now. The bar gets a little bit lower with every generation. It was a joke when you were a teenager, but now that the envelope is pushed beyond YOUR comfort zone all the sudden it's tragic.
Whatever this Flo Rida guy's big sin is, I guarantee if John Lennon had done it with "good music" playing in the background, you would be defending it as art.
I don't care if music is "good" or "bad" in its execution. Music that glamorizes sex and drugs should have never been tolerated in the first place. Don't start whining now just because some kids took the joke too far.
I don't listen to modern music, had never heard of Flo Rida before this thread, don't think rap is "like totally awesome" and don't go around making assumptions about people.
Since you have no debating skills and think it's cute to insult people, I see no need to continue this discussion.
marvl
August 22, 2009 - 15:40 ET by MrShy"You're both circling the cultural drain of humanity."
Though it sounds kinda cool, I think it means nothing. Sound and fury from a lib. Not a first.
candance
August 22, 2009 - 15:38 ET by MrShyShaking hips is immoral?
And I was considering shaking my hips for my upcoming video (I even did a bit of this in CTA) but out of deference to you, I'll stick to jet-packing.
I am putting in placeholders for Angel and Stalker in the build I'm working on, so this should help. Will send to you shortly.
"Music"
August 22, 2009 - 10:28 ET by ForbusWhat I get from the lyrics is in addition to their pornographic, tasteless, exploitative features...they're just plain silly. They're so childish that it reminds me of a pack of dogs in heat.
Stupid song
August 22, 2009 - 13:36 ET by Kat Outta the BagSo it's Lady GaGa who sings that insipid disco stick thing? When it comes on the radio I can't turn the station fast enough so I never hear who the "artist" is. From everything I've seen and read about her, she's trying to out-do Madonna on the depravity and immorality scale.
LADY GAGA...
August 22, 2009 - 20:17 ET by danybhoyLook kids, Lady Gaga is really no different then anyone who came before her in music who pushed their presentation to the extreme edges of what is considered acceptable. From Elvis, Black Sabbath, Alice Cooper, The Doors, Jimi Hendrix, Madonna, Motley Crue, Eminem, NWA, Twisted Sister, Public Enemy, all the way to Lady Gaga, are all using the basic concept that being a bit lewd, sleazy, & dirty sells, that's the bottom line.
Is Lady Gaga here for a while or gone by the end of the year? Who knows? I don't, but if she puts out a followup that sells, God Bless her. If not, she moves on with her life as we all do. Just remember, she has the right to perform her music, & the people will vote with their money. Simple as that, soemtimes what is very good never catches on, & other times, the masses buy crappy no talent wannabees & make them rich & famous. Who knows, & in the end, who really cares.
"...How blind can you be, don't you see...
...that the gambler lost all he does not have..."
Nightwish
Always the hypocrisy of
August 22, 2009 - 15:45 ET by Radical1979Always the hypocrisy of saying music (or sex and violence on tv) doesn't cause people to act in a certain way, until it's used in advertising. THEN companies pay big bucks for it because it's proven to influence people.
Influences them to buy
August 22, 2009 - 20:21 ET by balboaInfluences them to buy something. I don't know about acting on the lyrics.
I'm sure someone used to think Lawrence Welk was scandalous, what with showing women's ankles and all.