Bozell Column: A Kidnapped 'Fetus'?

Photo of Brent Bozell.
  • Bookmark and Share

Darlene Haynes was only 23 years old when another woman brutally slashed her open and removed her eight-month-old baby girl from her womb. Her decomposing body was found on July 27, wrapped in a blanket and dumped in a closet inside her apartment in Worcester, Massachusetts. The body was so mutilated that when they found it, the police said they couldn't immediately determine its gender.

The suspected murderer, 35-year-old Julie Corey, lived in the same apartment building and was found soon after the crime in Plymouth, New Hampshire, claiming the baby was her own.

This heart-rending story is also notorious for how the "pro-choice" media sputter and struggle to deny the humanity of a baby, even as the child is slashed away and stolen by a psychopath. I would highly doubt Corey said to bewildered onlookers, "Look at my new fetus."

And yet journalists insult this motherless baby as merely a "fetus," this their dismissive blob-of-tissue word suggesting an unborn baby is subhuman until birth, no matter how many months along in the pregnancy, and no matter how physically able it is to survive outside the womb.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The word "fetus" isn’t even synonymous with human, since dictionaries define it as describing any "developing mammal or other viviparous vertebrate."

A blog called Verum Serum collected some headlines from media sites on the Internet as the story broke on July 30. The early headlines used "fetus," even though the baby had already been born in a violent way. Fox News started with "Pregnant Massachusetts Woman Killed, Fetus Taken." ABC News reported "Mom-to-Be Darlene Haynes Killed, Cops Search for Her Fetus." CNN’s story was "Woman killed, fetus cut from body."

The same thing occurred in newspapers. The Boston Globe’s headline was "Authorities in Worcester seek killer in case of fetus cut from womb." The Boston Herald echoed: "Officials search hospitals for victim’s fetus."

It’s one thing to insist that a "fetus" is an unborn baby. But once the "fetus" has been removed – and survives – what is the excuse for journalists to search for a "fetus" on the lam? This baby that first saw the light of day in such a foul and violent fashion deserved better than to be described merely a "fetus," with all the compassion you would offer a stolen lab rat.

On television, "fetus" and "baby" were almost interchangeable. On NBC’s Today, news reader Ann Curry relayed that "Darlene Haynes was found dead on Monday in her apartment, her fetus taken from her womb. The baby was found alive last night." Co-host Matt Lauer offered the same contrast: "Her fetus has been taken from her womb. Last night as neighbors and friends mourned outside her home, police reported the missing baby had been found alive, 130 miles away in New Hampshire."

On ABC’s Nightline, reporter Stephanie Sy used both terms as she described the sickening (if rare) criminal trend: "In 2000, the body of an Ohio woman was found in a shallow grave with her fetus removed. In 2004, a Kansas woman's baby was carved out of her womb with a kitchen knife and just last month, a pregnant woman was killed by a woman she met on Craigslist. The baby died shortly after being ripped from the mother."

Media outlets must have received an avalanche of responses on their terminology, and in the wake of the mother’s violent end, and that she didn’t make the "choice" of terminating her pregnancy, the word "baby" became common. It also helped that the baby girl (named "Alita" by the suspected murderess) survived the assault.

In the second go-round, Fox News carried the headline "Woman Suspected of Cutting Baby From Massachusetts Mom’s Womb Held on $2M Bail." CNN’s story came with the title: "Baby cut from slain mom’s womb found alive." The Boston Herald reported "Suspect in brutal murder, baby snatch held $2M bail." NBC’s Ann Curry announced that the suspect was "arrested in connection with the murder of a pregnant woman whose baby was taken from her womb."

Online, ABC News updated the story with "Baby Cut From Slain Mom’s Womb Found Alive." They ruined the trend with this later headline: "Slain Pregnant Woman Lived in Same Building With Accused Fetus-Stealer."

In a media world that’s sensitive enough to fire radio hosts for saying "nappy" next to "hos," where White House reporters scream for Fox hosts to be fired for suggesting the president is a racist, when will the time come that journalists are sensitive enough to stop denying the humanity of an unborn eight-month-old child? Or at the very least, could they stop demeaning the harsh reality of a child cruelly ripped from a murdered mother’s womb?


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

              

                    I think we all should call and email General Electric and ask them what the MSM is going to report, next. After all GE is the one in charge. The others are just expendable journalists.                                       Patriot & Proud! From Conception!

→ Brent

Never hear an expectant mother exclaim "The fetus just kicked"

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Nor have I

I've also never heard of a stillborn (or stillbirth, as is the medical term) being referred to as a "stillfetus."

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

>>>Good day CA

I'm not sure where I got this picture, it may have been from this site, but I know I'd call it a baby...

BK... That is one of my

BK...

That is one of my favorite pictures as well of a baby.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

This is the same reason a

This is the same reason a lot of more ardent pro-abortion groups fight against fetal homicide laws.

Someone brutally murders a pregnant woman and her unborn baby, and because they don't want to acknowledge the humanity of that baby, it - to them - should not be a crime to have caused the death of said baby.

Even if the mother had clearly chosen to have this baby, and that right to choose was stripped from her by some heartless thug.

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam

I heard about this the

I heard about this the other day...the whole thing is despicable, what this country has become is beyond sad to me at times.

I am glad to see the msm finally decided to call a baby a baby...better late than never, still disgraceful with the attempt to try to minimize life....as they always do.

If OCare passes we will be paying for Planned Parenthood and paying for abortions in huge numbers, the likes of which we have never seen...dollar wise and unheard screams from these babes as they are murdered.

People had better wake up...the agenda is in full swing.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Indeed, bt - the $$$ the government will take from Medicare will

instead be used to kill unborn babies...and, hey, they'll get a good return on the other end while they are at it...think of all the seniors that will have to do without adequate healthcare because of those missing funds! 

'Killing two birds with one stone comes to mind'...oops, darn, now this will be sent to FLAG - oh well, I'm just one of those expendable seniors they want to get rid of anyway!  Hopefully I'll be assigned to cook at the retraining camp - at least then my fellow NB posters who are also 'flagged' can count on some good eats.  Do you suppose they'll make sure we eat a healthy diet at the camps???  After all, the Health Czar said we MUST!  As for my hubby...so sorry, love, you'll have to exist on your famous scrambled eggs ;-)

This comment comes from a proud Tea Party attendee, otherwise designated by Homeland Security as a Domestic Right Wing Terrorist!     It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue ~ Sam Adams

Sex Without Consequences

It gets kinda complicated and confusing for this crowd sometimes, doesn't it?

Still naive

I saw one of the references to "fetus". I assumed the baby had died because of that word. I would have used baby. But knowing what these people are, I assumed they used fetus simply because if the baby had died they could use the ambiguity (in the minds of the "privacy" believers) to avoid using baby. There I went again, giving these people the assumption of common humanity.

Roe vs. Wade

There are many reasons for the loss of respect for morality and humanity which have infected America over the past half century. But none compares to the day this country made the murder of children legal. Now, with any excuse, we deny a child the right to live.  This, more than anything else, will cause our demise. Sad and disgusting!

BTW--you "old folks"--you're next. Check the "healthcare" bill.

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

 

 

And what, these ...

And what, these freakin' journalists think some magician said some magic words and "puff" they came into existance, full grown. Give me a break, they don't believe that, or do they?

As far back as I can remember, when my mother was  pregnant, she was always having a baby. Only the heartless low-life liberals would consider an unborn baby as anything less than human (fetus). 

Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.

For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor that the protected will never know.

Also remember folks, that the way to SUPPORT THE TROOPS is to support their mission. Anyone who says that they support the troops but don't support their mission is lying about supporting the troops. And if you want to know, yes I do have a dog in the fight, he is a United States Marine.

 

Foetus means baby

A foetus is baby or offspring.  Liberals non medical means it's definition is limited to the child before birth. 

The truth uis Marxist situational ethics.  In some cases it is kidnapping and murder and in other cases it is condoned.  Hitler had a lot of situational conflicts he dealt with.  It was ok to kill dogs. 

 

Ok, this is a first for me...

I may actually defend the MSM, and disagree with Mr. Bozell here.

If people were "looking for the fetus", would that imply that they don't know whether s/he survived the extraction?  I mean for all they know, the "fetus" might have been mangled as much as the mother was. Once it was determined that the baby lived, calling it a baby might be more reasonable.

It seems to me that saying "looking for the baby" might imply that it was known that the baby lived, when that was not the case.

Now, having said that, I would've preferred they said baby as well.  And then just explained in the piece that it's not known. But this isn't something I can manufacture outrage over.

Look, I'm not trying to be heartless. My wife and I lost a child through "vanishing twin syndrome", and even though this was at about 12 weeks into the pregnanc, I don't think of her as a "fetus" or even an "embryo", which might even be more correct, but rather a "child". We have a tree planted in our backyard to remind us of her. 

Anyway, I can see and understand the reasoning by the MSM on this one. I may not agree, but at least I am not wondering what planet they're living on.

They can't say "baby" -

They can't say "baby" - that would force them to accept the reality of what abortion is.  And libs can't handle reality.

I guess it's a fetus if it's violently removed from the womb, and it's a baby if it makes it out of the delivery room alive.

Congratulations!  It's a viable humanoid biological mass! 

Imagine being invited to a fetus shower.

These people can't see how sick they are.

mattm...  These people

mattm...

 These people can't see how sick they are.

Oh they can, they don't care, don't give a whit one...they have an agenda for Roe v Wade and making sure is stays that way.

For me they are soulless.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Yeah, but....

...when the media, or the propagandists, deliberately change the use of the language in order to make brutal voilence against helpless little babies seem like a mere misfortune happening to a blob of biological matter, well that's just sick... and the ones using this rhetorical tactic are blind to how sick they really are - or else they're just plain evil....

bt - I think that part of the monster healthcare bill is going

to be a troublemaker, too!  How dare they think they can use MY tax dollars to pay for someone's abortion!  And there is no way they can say 'oh it will be from another account' - right!  They have ONE MONEY TREE and feel free to pick from whatever branch they want to for whatever they want!  Hmmm - that almost sounds like the A.C.O.R.N. diagram that Glenn has shown us!

This comment comes from a proud Tea Party attendee, otherwise designated by Homeland Security as a Domestic Right Wing Terrorist!     It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue ~ Sam Adams

Right you are CC...I've

Right you are CC...I've posted about that as well

Plenty of $$$ for Planned Parenthood and abortions in the bill...this hasn't even got traction...YET!

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Human history shows that

Human history shows that when a group of people want to excuse the murder of a sector of humanity, they dehumanize it by calling it something other than a human being.

The pro-murderers of unborn babies have been at it with playing words for a long time. It is not longer pro-choice, but Reproductive rights.

It is not a human being, the baby is referred to as a fetus. Of course the argument from the pro-murderers of babies in the womb of a mother is that fetus is the scientific term. As I tell these wackos, then why don't you refer to the rest of humans by their scientific term?  idiots.

Just remember, in the eyes of the law an unborn baby has less rights than the egg of a turtle, eagle. An unborn baby has less rights than an unborn whale in the womb of its whale mother.

The wacked out left in America has forced unborn human babies to have no rights while in the womb of their mother, however, they have given countless of rights to animals while gestation in an egg or inside the womb of their animal mother.

Don't forget that these are the same wacked out, crazed out fools that do not want the mother to be to be fully informed about the decision they are about to make if they go for an abortion. The pro-murder of unborn babies do not want women to see what the unborn child looks like inside their womb. They have fought very hard to not allow the new 3-D ultrasounds. Yet, these same fools claim a woman that is making her own choice. How can you make an inform choice when half of the information is kept from you from the pro-murder of unborn babies group?

 

→ Futbol!

That's true.

Wait for the subtle semantic shift from "the elderly" to "the infirm"

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Cool Arrow, I do not

Cool Arrow,

I do not doubt it.

With wording in the health care bill such as, "End of life counseling as an alternative..." we already know what is coming down the pipe. The Liberals can deny it all they want, but if we take their believes to the logical conclusion.....

Already in England, Canada, France and the rest of the nations that have a government run healthcare, elderly are sometimes denied healthcare because they are no longer considered productive members of society.

The sad thing is that most of these young Liberals will be there some time regretting the crap that they push in their young age.

sad, sad....

 

 

the word is baby !

I guess if the mother had aborted the baby that would be ok.. since it's not really human before birth. If this crazy woman had killed the baby along with the mother, would she be charged with 2 deaths?  Is she being charged with kidnapping, since she took the baby?  Can you kidnap someone that doesn't exist?

I guess using fetus instead of baby is a not so subtle way of downplaying the existence of a living human being.  Or so they think.

it's about partial birth abortions, of course

that explains the weird language

Barry has no problem with fetus' being tossed in trash cans ...

... while they die after being aborted.  I think in Barry's mind I am still a fetus as I have not been "properly socialized."

 

WARNING -- Usurper in the White House!

→ Jayke

At least he's not promoting littering.

That would be a sin against Mother Gaia.

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

I saw that headline, I

I saw that headline, I wondered why no one caught it...talk about media bias; the unborn are only blobs of tissue to the liberals in the this County. Sad indeed.

As any mother can tell you, that little person already has

developed a personality of its own...some are busy wiggling and kicking while others are just enjoying the comfortable ride ;-)  And how many fathers can honestly say they didn't get a thrill when they placed their hand on the tummy when the BABY kicked!  BLOB of tissue NOT!

This comment comes from a proud Tea Party attendee, otherwise designated by Homeland Security as a Domestic Right Wing Terrorist!     It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue ~ Sam Adams

Cape, I know, I am on

Cape,

I know, I am on your side.

Ah, the phoenix of ...

Ah, the phoenix of Hitler is rising from ashes. Obama wants a master race. Only the healthy will be allowed to live so they can serve the state. Then women will be forced to have genetically engineered children who will be perfect. The inperfect fetus will be removed and destroyed. This will be done. "The one" has spoken.

Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.

For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor that the protected will never know.

Also remember folks, that the way to SUPPORT THE TROOPS is to support their mission. Anyone who says that they support the troops but don't support their mission is lying about supporting the troops. And if you want to know, yes I do have a dog in the fight, he is a United States Marine.

Of Course It's A Baby At 8 Months! Who Wouldn't Say That?

I think the problem goes more to those who reffer to a fetus, say 8 days rather than 8 months, as a baby. Pro-abortion people don't feel comfortable about reffering to a fetus as a baby because they feel less guilt about terminating the pregnancy than if it were given a human face. I pretty much determined that the most appropriate time for an abortion to occur is within the first 24 days after conception, at which point the heart has fully formed and the baby has the ability to feel pain. At least that's from the science that I have read. I figure the narrowest window of opportunity, the better it is for both sides to agree. I was wondering why people reffered to a baby at eight months as a fetus, though. My brother was born prematurely at the upper end of 7 months, I think. Well, he was born prematurely, let's just say that. I think by that point, it's safe to say that a baby is growing in the womb. I just have a problem with these anti-abortion activists who claim it's a baby from ther moment of conception. Who wouldn't complain about that?

Poignant

Brent,

In a long history of excellence, this piece is the most poignant article you have written.  Your analysis is spot-on and original.  What an indictment against our "state-run media" and our unfeeling society!

 

                                                                 

A conservative believes in putting his money where his mouth is.  A liberal believes in putting your money where his mouth is. -- mbs6