Bozell Column: No Cash for 'Bruno'

Photo of Brent Bozell.
  • Bookmark and Share

When it comes to awful movies, Pat Buchanan once quipped he didn’t have to look underneath a manhole cover to know there’s a sewer down below. The smutty new movie "Bruno" can be read by its cover. In the midst of a barrage of crude sexual humor, master satirist Sacha Baron Cohen is once again exposing Americans for what Time magazine calls their "ignorance and prejudice, hypocrisy and primitive rage."

Yes, I’m sure it has its funny moments, and some are laugh-out-loud hilarious. I say I’m sure because I really don’t know. I was on my way to the theater when I reversed course. I’m not going to give these slimy people $9.50, or $1.50. Besides, it’s all there on the Internet.

In his last film, "Borat," Cohen played an idiotic journalist from Kazakhstan who attempted to expose unsuspecting people as misogynistic, racist, and anti-Semitic. The new title character of "Bruno" is a flamboyantly gay Austrian fashion reporter who is going to expose the raging "homophobia" in America, especially the South (also targeted in the last film).

But this character is so unbelievably stupid and self-absorbed that the film seems to set the cause of sexual "liberation" backward by a decade or two.

The shock and disgust arrives early, when Bruno has a tiny Asian lover who helps him pour champagne. It’s not hard to imagine where Cohen places the champagne bottle as he pours the little man like a teapot.

Bruno decides to come to America and make a pilot of a new celebrity-interview show. But since Bruno is an idiot and can’t land a celebrity interview, we’re left with a scene where a focus group watches as Cohen’s pilot displays a long, drawn-out shot of a penis twirling around like a pinwheel, which then points at the camera and "speaks."

The focus group speaks for almost everyone when they suggest they’d rather pluck their eyes out than watch any more of this garbage.

"Bruno" originally drew an NC-17 rating, but the viewer is left wondering if putting a tiny black box over sex acts, real or simulated (like group sex at a swingers club) is all Cohen needed to get an R rating. This film’s full-frontal nudity and gross-out clips are more than a permissive parent bringing a teenager will expect.

It’s not a huge hit with audiences – it "flamed out in its second weekend," the website Box Office Mojo reported, without a wink. But it will make enough profit in theatres and on DVD to offer Cohen another opportunity to abuse unsuspecting Americans with his film droppings.

And maybe that’s what’s more upsetting than the smuttiness. It is the systematic dishonesty. Cohen’s filmmaking strategy is to lie relentlessly to the real people he interacts with on film.

Take Alabama pastor Jody Trautwein, who earnestly tries in the film to convert Bruno to leave his homosexual lifestyle in favor of Christianity. As the pastor talks of following Jesus, Cohen has his idiot character talk dirty, asking if the pastor had ever put woodwind instruments "up your Auschwitz"? (Cohen, who is Jewish, uses the name of the concentration camp as a synonym for anus in the film.)

Now, here’s how Trautwein explains how he was approached about the scene. On January 30, 2009, he received a phone call from a Todd Lewis of Amesbury Chase productions in Los Angeles (a fake firm, complete with phony website). He told him that German One Television (also fake) had hired them to produce a documentary. He said that with the recent rise in Europe of liberalism and increasing immorality in America, German One really wanted to show strong, pure American traditional moral values.

"One of the ways they wanted to do this was they had a young man who was desiring to come out of homosexuality and wanted to give his heart to Christ," Trautwein explained. "He asked me if I would be interested in having them produce this documentary [meant to] alert parents and leaders of young people, and expose the deception and perversion that some in the entertainment industry want to perpetrate against our children, our families and our homes."

Trautwein sat with Cohen’s character for two entire hours, absorbing Cohen’s abuse. The pastor said director Larry Charles (who only used his first name) praised him when the abuse was over. "He said he didn't think he could have been that patient with Bruno."

So a good pastor is set up and ridiculed because, well, because he’s a good man, and nothing else. That’s humor?


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

              

               And this is what Hollywood calls entertainment? Is there something in the water in California? They couldn't pay me to watch this crap.

What on earth is the point of this article?

I think this is about the 3rd article on this movie. We get it, it's crude, you don't like it. It's gonna make about $70mil at the box office which is pretty good and even in the article you cited it's enough for another project. It's an R rated film in the middle of summer which isn't expected to make that much money in the first place.

Please Brent. Take one week and get caught up with the rest of us. There's so much to rail against and you totally miss it. I hate the fact that on networks like MTV we have shows where parents set their kids up with 2 dates while they are already dating someone, or on Oxygen there's a show called, "Dance your Ass Off", nothing wrong with the show, but just the fact that profanity is a part of the title is offensive to me. There are countless shows during the day that do paternity tests on multiple guys for one girl to determine who the dad is. All of this is in our house EVERY DAY! Not in a theater where you have to actually decide if you want to see it or not.

Please! For the love of Pete! No more American Teenager, Family Guy or some random movie that appeals to the male 18-35 demo.

 

 

Cheers,

Chuck

Not Even If It Were Free

Yep, that Sacha Baron Cohen, you never know what crazy stuff he's going to do........unless you've seen anything he's ever done before. This, this is what qualifies as any sort of comedy.  Any wonder why he didn't pull this sort of stunt say, in a predominately non-hetrosexual area?  Who actually finds anything humerous in this?  There's nothing new, nothing inventive, nothing leading edge. 

"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"

I tried to watch BORAT...

...a few weeks ago on TV...for free. What I saw was attempt after attempt to make normally nice folks uncomfortable. The BORAT character repeatedly took advantage of people trying to be helpful or courteous and inject improper language and situations upon them. Insulting a generous Jeweish family offering him a room at their bed & breakfast after hours, making foul comments and bringing a hooker to an otherwise innocent social dinner where people practiced decorum and polished their conversation skills.

All of which could have very well been left alone.

BORAT's content can be summed up by the bumper sticker:

My Kid Beat Up your Honor Student  

Re Fatah interview

I'm not going to pay for it either, but I have to give Sacha a thumbs-up for his interview with a Fatah member in either 'palestine' or Israel. He billed it as an interview with a real terrorist, and of course didn't let on that it was for one of his goofy movies. The 'palestinian' is mightily po'd at him and Sacha is PNG in that part of the world as a result.

"Baron" Cohen, puh-leeze

Despite the laborious attempts of some film critics to like and make excuses for this beyond-awful film, try this intellectual exercise. If a raunchy right-wing shock jock tried to make a film that mocked gay males as fervently as this film does, and imagined its idiotic gay lead character would acquire an African baby for an i-Pod, and use Mexican laborers as furniture, wouldn’t the filmmaker be burned at the metaphorical stake by the cinematic elite? The elite sees this man as exposing the ugly underside of America, so they’ll be in on the joke.

 “Bruno” is accurately described as a series of stupid publicity stunts that add up to one giant publicity stunt. In the end, Sacha Baron Cohen isn’t in any way smart or mature. He’s simply stunted.

Americans won't suffer fools when they're forking over cash

Brent, that's one thing I don't worry about.

It’s not a huge hit with audiences...(B)ut it
will make enough profit in theatres and on DVD to offer Cohen another
opportunity to abuse unsuspecting Americans with his film droppings.

If people don't like it enough to spend less than 10 bucks on it at a movie theater, they're sure as heck not going to spend 20 bucks on a DVD of it.  People tend to buy what they really like and will plan to watch more than once at home.  But I could be wrong...

Scout

This little tidbit also caught my attention:

'' . . . abuse unsuspecting Americans with his film droppings.''

When I saw the ads on TV for this turd's first movie I got that exact feeling - crapola on film.  Then the truth came out about how he lied to just about everyone that he used (twice - literally) to hammer home his warped, Leftist (please excuse my redundancy) 'message'. This is how Michael Moore and other film 'makers' (or film 'fakers') use people and distort reality - all in the name of their alleged 'truth'.

Truth is almost always the victim of these types of 'entertainment'.  Very much like the news media.

The plot/character idea of

The plot/character idea of having a moronic fool "innocently" exposing others as even bigger morons and fools and, in the process, ridiculing morals and values in which they disagree is tired and dishonest. Since they get to call the shots, they can make "ordinary" people look as bad as they want.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Opening Your Big Mouth Doesn't Solve Anything...

You see, this is what is usually referred to as the "politics of personal destruction." You trash the name of someone (whether it's Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney on the right, even though I totally disagree with their politics) or what you are doing to the left, which allegedly this Sacha Baron Cohen is supposed to be. If I were to go by that logic, then South Park must be a steaming pile of leftist propaganda because they did a movie featuring George Clooney and the composer of Prop. 8 the Musical, Marc Shaiman. Also, it makes fun of censorship based off of allegedly innapropriate content.

I like it when Republicans try to protect the country from our foreign and domestic enemies, but I don't particularly consider a fart joke to be a domestic enemy. No thanks, I don't need any protection from that.