Bozell Column: Why Recycle the Osbournes?

Photo of Brent Bozell.
  • Bookmark and Share

When MTV creates hazardous waste on television, there is no Superfund cleanup program. Worse still, sometimes their toxic programs end up getting recycled by desperate executives eager for a sleazy splash. Fox is the latest network to ooze desperation by trying to take Its hottest program, "American Idol," a huge hit with families, and follow it with "Osbournes Reloaded," a show so vile and lacking in redeeming social value that even Fox affiliates (reaching up to 11 percent of the nation’s viewers) have delayed or refused to air it.

After seeing the promos for the program and looking at the six-minute "sizzle reel" the network sent their way, at least 16 Fox TV stations refused to air the rocker-shockers’ truncated 35-minute "variety" special. An additional 10 Fox stations moved it into late night, as late as 1:35 in the morning. Fox was so concerned it screened the whole special for the Maryland-based Sinclair Broadcast Group, which sadly decided to stick with sewage in prime time on its 19 affiliates.

The protesting affiliates should be saluted for putting any kind of brake on this profanity-celebrating bleep-a-rama, especially when it’s aired right after a show watched by an estimated four million children. The Osbournes proudly announced at the show’s open they were the nation’s "first family of being f—ed up."

Fox knew this was garbage; it did not make the first hour available to the media or to most of its stations. The Washington Post reported the "sizzle reel" that affiliates were given featured "a grandmother in silhouette, stripping and playing with her breasts," as well as an unsuspecting young man in a blindfold being tricked into kissing an elderly woman. It also included a dreadfully unfunny skit imagining elementary-school versions of Ozzy Osbourne and wife Sharon cursing their mouths off at their first date inside a movie theatre. Interestingly, the stripping, stroking grandma somehow didn’t end up in the 35-minute cut, perhaps due to the affiliates. But the Parents Television Council still counted 49 bleeped and unbleeped expletives and partially obscured obscene gestures stuffed into this show.

Fox issued a statement suggesting it still has a Standards and Practices Department, which is a little like suggesting Elvis is alive. "'Osbournes: Reloaded' was thoroughly vetted by our Standards and Practices Department to ensure it was appropriate for broadcast during the scheduled time period. If any network affiliate feels the programming may be inappropriate for its individual market, however, it has the right to preempt the program." This is a network with no shame.

One of the sadder gimmicks in the last few years have been horrific attempts at an old-fashioned "variety show" like Ed Sullivan’s or Carol Burnett’s, with none of yesterday’s charm and all of today’s cynical sleaze. NBC thoroughly flopped with a crass Rosie O’Donnell hour last Thanksgiving. Why would this be any better?

In fact, "variety" isn’t the proper word for this incessant spectacle of infantile rebellion and swear words. "Comedy" doesn’t fit, either. It was apparently defined by 60-year-old Ozzy putting on a leotard and pretending to be the dancing girl in "Flashdance," with the alleged punchline of a concluding fart.

The saddest stunt in the whole wretched mess was a forced wedding ceremony. The Osbournes pulled a "random" man out of the audience, then presented him with his long-time girlfriend, who came on stage in a wedding gown and threatened "It’s over – unless you marry me tonight." Family and friends and a minister were all pushed in the groom’s face. "The marriage union is the closest relationship that can ever exist between two individuals," the preacher declared. "It is not something to be entered into lightly" -- as if being forced to marry on a trashy Osbournes special isn’t taking it lightly. The groom surrendered, and Ozzy soaked the audience with foam from a hose.

Why would Fox try to resuscitate the nasty, cursing Osbournes four years after their program died on MTV? It certainly wasn’t done for critical acclaim. Tom Shales of The Washington Post flagrantly denounced it as "Must-Flee TV." Even Post TV reporter Lisa DeMoraes, who normally finds indecency to be an occasion for fun and frivolity, suggested it had "gone too far, even for Fox." Newsday insisted: "Too bad it wasn't shortened to 35 seconds...35 microseconds...In fact, too bad it JUST WASN'T CANCELED."

[Image: Zap2it.com]


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I would agree

 ...that perhaps 9pm is a little early to show the Osborn show. Maybe 10 pm might be better.

If it makes FOX money, then I guess it would be a good business decision, but again 9pm might be a little early, but at least it comes with a warning that you should be 14 to watch it.

He had my vote

True shawn

I'm thinking FOX is onboard the Crazy Train with this show.  Sheesh!

 

Gary

"Things can only bother you if you let them bother you" -My Dad

I watched it (even after it

I watched it (even after it was moved to after midnight), and didn't find it that entertaining.  A couple of laughs, a couple of decent shocking moments.  Mostly it was dribble.  Like something you'd find on cable.

Rukus, the big problem with Ozzy Ozbourne is...

...that he died ten years ago and hasn't had the good graces to lay down in the grave!

"Who am us, anyway?" - Firesign Theatre

Hehe

He's chemically perserved doncha know!

 

Gary

"Things can only bother you if you let them bother you" -My Dad

Here in the east many Fox

Here in the east many Fox channels carry local news at 10. The local Fox station touts its news as "At 10 it's news. At 11 it's history."  

Semper suprene nitens

Geezer and Tony...

...aren't taking part in this circus. They have better things to do...

http://www.roadrunne...

 

Ozzy won't be missed.

2010: A GOP Hill

Regis and Kelly

Regis and Kelly interviewed the Ozbournes last week. Unfortunately they didn't have a translator so I don't know what the heck Ozzy said. I just found it strange that Live With Regis and Kelly (owned by Disney) was interviewing them.

Let's waste time, chasing cars, around our heads

LOL!

Kinda like this!   

Gary

"Things can only bother you if you let them bother you" -My Dad

EXACTLY!

 Yup! Thats funny :)

Let's waste time, chasing cars, around our heads

One can only hope...

...that this didn't make it on to the iPod that Obama gave the Queen.

Why can't sleazeballs just turn the channel?

There are plenty of channels to get their desired filth on.  

-------------------------------------------

Google and Apple officially fought traditional marriage: .  Please Boycott them.  A Boycott changed McDonald's mind.

I don't understand

this show, the people? in it, or a network televising it!

Simply, outside my paygrade and my imagination I guess?

this program

and others like it is a sad commentary on the moral and spiritual decay that is eating at the core of our great country. we have shaken our collective fist in the face of Amighty God and have said "leave us alone, we don't want You or need You" and now we are seeing the results in the entertainment world. Hollywood is demented and the music industry is producing some pretty vulgar stuff. Without any moral guidelines anything goes and it is so very prevelant. Without a Higher Authority to answer to, anything goes. Romans 1: 18-32 says it all.

Lighten up, Mr. Bozell! 

Lighten up, Mr. Bozell!  I've seen the promos for this show, and it looks like a crap sandwich.  You can bet that it will go off the air in no time due to lack of audience.  Why not just let the market have it's say?

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill

Osbourne proves hell on earth

The fact that the very self-destructive Ozzy Osbourne lives on to set a horrible example and a model celebrity like Michael Landon dies of a brain tumor at an early age is proof that earth is hell.

Ozzy isn't a musician, he's a character

Singers have a hard time staying relevant when they don't write music.  Ozzy is little different from Madonna or Britney Spears.  They need to be controversial because they really don't have musical skill.  Ozzy has slowly descended into joke status.  And I'm a big Sabbath fan.

Angry White Dude

www.angrywhitedude.c...

Gah....Mr. Bozell gets his

Gah....Mr. Bozell gets his panties in a bunch over some crappy TV show yet again.  I bet you're a barrel of fun at cocktail parties!

Bozell is being a total Prude

And this is precisely why we libertarians are not conservatives. 

We're with you guys on 80 to 85% of the issues.  We're with you all in the trenches against evil Obama-liberalism (Fascism).  We love you guys on economics, though you get a bit too squishy for us sometimes.  We're behind you in the War on Islamo-Fascism.  Hell, we're even with you on half the civil liberties issues: Gun Rights, ending Seat Belt laws, opposing Political Correctness, ect...

But then comes the Sexual Freedom issues, and the issues of Cultural hipness, and you guys jump off the Freedom Train. 

Leave Ozzie alone, please!  You all know that our beloved Ted Nugent is just as racy and raunchy as ole' Ozzie.  Ditto for KISS conservative and diehard US Military supporter Gene Simmons.  Even Charlie Daniels has had his "busty blonde" female songs. 

This is precisely what separates the libertarian from the conservative.  Libertarians are the cool ones on the Right.  Conservatives are our Dweeby-little Black-framed glasses wearing Prude allies.   

Eric at Libertarian Republican blog

Good morning eric

Your free sex has brought us a real increase in every STD in the book. NICE going.

Ozzie has done for drug addiction what free sex has done for STDs.

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

Good morning cocodrie

I do not believe libertarians necessarily all want to have as much free sex as they can get, they believe they can make the decision on their own without being preached on what they should and should not watch on tv.

Parents should be in charge of what their kid watch on tv. Adults can make their own decisions on their personal television choices.

He had my vote

absolutely Shawn! and one

absolutely Shawn! and one way parents take charge of what their kids watch is by supporting standards for broadcast TV.   Are you trying to take that right away from these parents and force your morals on them?

You are free to subscribe to watch whatever you so desire. 

"Outside of a dog a book is man's best friend,------------inside a dog it's too dark to read"   ---Groucho

bruce

I'm not trying to take away anything Bruce. I believe that parents be in control of what is on the television at home and if the honor system did not work, there is V-chip technology available.

There is a difference in supporting standards for broadcast tv and telling everyone else what they should watch.

He had my vote

shawn

who ever told you what to watch?  I want to watch Moonlight but they cancelled it, it's their perogative.  In the same way it's their perogative to not show Ozzie.  It is parents rights to lobby the networks as to what to show.  There is no violation of rights here you have your say but expect me to have mine.

Fair enuf? (ht Noel)

"Outside of a dog a book is man's best friend,------------inside a dog it's too dark to read"   ---Groucho

Well Bruce

I do not believe I ever said any rights were violated in this thread, at least I am pretty sure I didn't.

I simply stated to cocodrie that the difference between libertarians and conservatives is one lets you decide for yourself, and the other loves to preach morality.

On the other hand since you brought it up, I am not for taking away the rights of Mr. Bozell and the PTC when they try to threaten sponsors with boycotts and take away from the rest of us programs we like to watch.

I am hopeful that some others will see it the way I do, that it is pure censorship. Much like people are not trying to take away the rights of the KKK, but rather bring attention to how silly their cause is.

He had my vote

shawn

I don't think it's unreasonable to have certain expectations, for both network and cable television.

Mostly to do with content during the hours of say, 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.  Exclude any nudity, sexual content, etc. on any channels that are not adult content.   I am really speaking more of the advertisements than the content of the shows (blocking channels is easy). 

My concern here really, is the adverts that one might see on a non-kid channel, but something which kids might watch.  I think parents should have a reasonable expectation that their kids could watch Buffy or somesuch without a "Girls Gone Wild ad".

Do you remember when Dennis Franz' ass was a big deal on NYPD?  Oh for the simple days.

 

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Blonde

I totally agree with you, I believe networks should be responsible on what time a show should be shown.

My main concern is about the PTC, where they threaten sponsors for advertising on certain shows and essentially take away from others what they consider filth.

The market should be driven on ratings and what works, a great example are programs not limited to tv  like  Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Family Guy and South Park.

If you don't agree with it, don't watch it.

He had my vote

Shawn

It's free market capitalism at its best.

People are free to boycott, protest, etc.  OR support and try to enlist others to the cause of watching something.

I'd agree with your statement, if you don't agree with it, don't watch it.  But if you hate it, and it offends you, by all means, do something.

(Remember, I'm probably the only fan here of Nip/Tuck....and caught alot of grief for it too.  But I still think it's a hoot in a very adult, black humor way).

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Blonde

speaking of commercials, check PM i don't know if i shopuld even post this one

"Outside of a dog a book is man's best friend,------------inside a dog it's too dark to read"   ---Groucho

OMO Bruce!

Sure, put it up, but with an adult content warning....and a beverage alert.

I was thinking it was rather racy until about 3/4 the way in, until I "got it".

I think that would fail, here, to make the cut for kid friendly.

Where do you find this stuff?

 

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

well since you

already did a beverage and adult content alert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBkR09sP4T4

"Outside of a dog a book is man's best friend,------------inside a dog it's too dark to read"   ---Groucho

Do you remember when Dennis Franz' ass was a big deal on NYPD?

J,

LOL-And to think, I had managed to forget about that hideous episode.

-Dave

This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.

Dennis Franz' a@@

Seems it's getting as much attention now as it was then, LOL.

My eyes!!!!!!!!!!

 

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Good evening Shawn

The only way parents can totally control what their kids see on TV is to keep them locked up at home and never let them out.

The increase in STDs, teen pregnancy, murder, etc. is directly related to the decrease in teaching morality.

Hollywood is increasingly encouraging youngsters to engage in immoral behavior.

Your situational ethics carried to its logical conclusions will be disastrous.

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

coco

 

"The increase in STDs, teen pregnancy, murder, etc. is directly related to the decrease in teaching morality.


Hollywood is increasingly encouraging youngsters to engage in immoral behavior."

You could be right coco, but that is how the free markets go. As long as what they are showing are within the law, it is not the role of government to intervene or be preachy.

He had my vote

That's the point Shawn

That's the point Shawn, the government has been intervening and teaching children that immorality is OK' Just wear a condom and do whatever your little heart desires.

Why should we change the laws and restrictions to allow more degeneracy?

Youngsters will do whatever we allow them to do regardless of the consequences. All of these educational programs assume that teenagers make sensible decisions but they make urealistic and senseless decisions.

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

cocodrie

I do not believe anyone is deceiving anyone and saying everything will be ok if you wear a condom.

However I would rather if people do have pre marital sex, that they do use a condom. Like I said many times before, I will take 98 percent chance against 0 anyday.

I know your comeback will probably be abstinence works 100 percent of the chance it is tried, I realize this, but if teenage hormones take over, i would hope they know to use a condom.

He had my vote

And dont forget abortion on

And dont forget abortion on demand which has lead to partial-birth abortion.  More than the camel's nose is in the tent...

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

I'm a libertarian, but I

I'm a libertarian, but I still beleive what comes over the public airwaves should be censored.  I don't pay for movie channels because I don't want the explicit sex and violence in my home.  I shouldn't have to be exposed to it changing channels.  I also don't want my children exposed to it.

It's kind of like keeping my meds locked up and away from my children.  I know it's not protecting them from all the drugs out there, but I want them protected from them in my own home.

 

Very surprised

I thought most libertarians for for personal freedoms. It would not be in your house if you did have a tv.

Most televisions also have parental controls.

He had my vote

osbournes

The filth that is currently on TV and branded as entertainment is horrible. I can't believe that there are so many people, especially women, that are willing to get their 15 minutes of fame by acting like trashy, vile, morally bankrupt idiots.  I don't watch any "reality" shows because, of course, there is no reality in them.  To think that anyone would find these shows entertaining in any way is beyond my comprehension.  The Osbournes coming back on tv just proves that Hollywood is out of original ideas, and will throw out whatever they think America will watch, no matter how revolting. I never considered for a single moment ever watching this show, no matter what the reviews turned out to be.  My time is more valuable to me, and I care about what I let into my consciousness.

Another reason I limit my

Another reason I limit my tv viewing to Turner Classic Movies and the Westerns Channel.  The rest of the world has Ozzy as a role model, I have Gene Autry.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

Good morning misterbee

 You're singing my tune.

Unfortunately we have Present Hussein "Lonesome Rhodes" from A Face In The Crowd as our fearless leader.

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you