Bozell Column: It's Not a 'Stimulus' Bill

Photo of Brent Bozell.
  • Bookmark and Share

Must we always fight Washington policy wars using preferred Democrat terms? Today’s example is the "stimulus package," or as ABC touts on screen during its newscasts, the Obama "Rescue Plan," as if the new president was donning Ronald Reagan’s lifeguard uniform and pulling the economy out of the surf. Despite the dominant media terms, liberals like those at The Huffington Post are complaining the Democrats aren’t effectively resisting "as Republicans seek to tar it as a ‘spending bill.’

Only in the world of politics does one "tar" an issue by calling a spending bill a spending bill. But Republicans and conservative activists are doing more than that. They’re denouncing the bill’s enormous size – larger than the combined cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan up until now! They’re also focusing on how it’s light on actual "stimulus" items and heavy on grants pleasing traditional Democrat special interest groups.

Economist and blogger Robert Brusca estimated that only about 24 percent of the spending in the Senate plan can be categorized accurately as "stimulus," and the rest is either "cushion" for the hard times, or categorized as "agenda" spending, advancing Democratic policy dreams. Even the stimulus is delayed, he quipped: "Does the administration go to Hallmark and buy us taxpayers a belated stimulus card?...This is no Muhammad Ali plan (float like a butterfly, sting like a bee). It's more like float like a lead balloon, bite like a flea."

Bloggers at the Family Research Council have been organizing all the "stimulus" silliness in the bill, as are other detail-oriented conservatives. The silly items Obama pushed them to yank – subsidies for contraceptives and new sod patches for the National Mall – are not atypical.

Let’s start with $3 billion for "prevention and wellness programs, including $335 million for "education and prevention" of sexually transmitted diseases. FRC reports that recent government expenditures in this area include a transgender beauty pageant in San Francisco that advertised available HIV testing. Then there was the event called "Got Love? -- Flirt/Date/Score" that taught how "to flirt with greater finesse." Does this strike anyone as a plan to jump-start the economy, instead of someone’s sex life?

The Senate (and the House) somehow think it’s a "stimulus" provision to give an additional $50 million to the National Endowment for the Arts. Kiff Gallagher, a former Clinton staffer, protested to the Los Angeles Times that the arts "get the shaft" in spending battles because their impact seems fuzzy. "But the new president shows that a higher social, empathic intelligence is required to solve hard-core issues."

If we have enough "empathic intelligence," we might imagine how we fix the mortgage-banking mess with more spending on the ballet.

On the tax-cut side, the Senate bill included a tax break worth up to $246 million over 11 years for outside investors in big-budget Hollywood movie projects. "Tax cuts for the wealthy" are okay – as long as the wealthy are making movies. But bad publicity and pork-busting Sen. Tom Coburn pressed the Senate (including 13 Democrats) to scrap the tax break.

The "green" lobby is thrown a pile of bones in the "stimulus" bill, including $10 million for bike and walking trails, $200 million for plug-in electric car stations, $400 million for climate change research by NASA scientists, $600 million to buy new "green" cars for government workers, $800 million for more cleanup of "Superfund" pollution sites, and $1.5 billion for the construction of new "green" school buildings.

Then there’s just plain self-dealing by the Democrats. The Washington Times reported on a $2.25 billion provision in the House bill for the National Parks – almost equal to the National Park Service’s total yearly budget, and a eyebrow-raising increase of almost three times the $802 million the Senate Appropriations Committee put in its "stimulus" bill. The chief lobbyist for the National Parks Conservation Association is Craig Obey, the son of House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey.

There’s a reason why the Obama administration wanted to cram this massive spending bill through the Congress by Abe Lincoln’s birthday. Speed is of the essence: the longer it lingers, the more details emerge, proving this egg is rotten to the core. Republicans are now using those details to build skepticism about this freight train of partisan pork.

Standing in their way are TV news anchors, miffed that the GOP would "turn the cold shoulder" to Obama’s outreach, as Charles Gibson put it on ABC. His man on Capitol Hill, Jonathan Karl, added: "So much for the President's charm offensive. Today it was all partisan rancor and name-calling."

The news media are supposed to be offering us information from Washington. In the case of this "stimulus" bill, it’s the last thing they want to do.

Read commentsFree email alertsTake action

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Want to do something about

Want to do something about this crap?  Write, call, or e-mail your two senators. Tell them to vote NO on this porkulus bill!

Here is the link:  http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm.

Even if you know that your senators are voting no, still write, e-mail or call to voice your encouragement of their efforts to stop this bill.

We can stop this.

jd

I did, last week.

The (D) Bill Nelson...responded that it's a good thing.  The (Rino) Mel Martinez...was kind of hazy in  his response.

I also tried to contact Jeff Sessions (he's on the Budget Committee) after listening to Noel's conference call interview with him yesterday (great stuff)....his site was down. 

 

 

I don't know if I can take

www.theholyrosary.org

"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia

jd~ Already did on Monday

jd~

Already did on Monday and probably will again tomorrow.  Of course, my Senators are Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell out here in Washington so...yeah, not much good.  

Everyone needs to call their Senators and others in other states to encourage them to stand up against this monstrosity.

Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July.  Democrats believe every day is April 15th ~ Ronald Reagan

I have a modest little idea

Forget this guy and his bogus "rescue" thing (which, by the way, Juan Wms said was his idea, not Pelosi's). Let's just use our self-interest and help our fellow Americans by doing ncessary things--like get the roof fixed, get a new heat pump, build a block wall--whatever--at bargain rates and start spending a little while helping ourselves. These big giant brains over there aren't coming up with anything that will jumpstart things, so we need our own little programs.

More than the wars is Iraq,

More than the wars is Iraq, Afghanistan, Korean war all NASA projects to this date and on and on.

The only this this stimulus package stimulates is some liberal backer's of Obamis hip pocket.  This is not going help one working man.  On the contrary, this tells the working man to get your butt out there and stay on the night shift for a few more years buddy!

You have got to keep that tax money coming into DC, after all partner, it's not really your money after all. I am damn tired of the whole mess.

I do know one thing, if there are any Republican senators who go along with Obami on this I will do whatever I can to make sure they are voted out of office at the earliest opportunity.  

Some perspective on how much money this is.

If you spent a million dollars a day, since the birth of Christ to today, you will not have spent the amount of money in this bill.

Here's An Idea...

How about instead of throwing money at a "problem" that hasn't been properly scoped or defined, we trim the fat of special programs already in existence?  When times start to get tough, consumers do without the "extras" (dining out, premium gas, another TV, etc.).  When times get tougher, they re-evaluate how they spend on necessities...  Maybe they switch to generic/house brand cereal instead of name brands.  The government needs to do this type of intra-spective tightening too.  They can't keep spending on all the "extras" while the voters are making the sacrifices.  Lower the demand for tax money from the inside and let the people keep their hard-earned money.  Buncha bums...

It disgusts me to no end

It disgusts me to no end that those of us who don't approve of the gay lifestyle are being asked to pay tax money for programs like the gay dating thing. Or pay for NEA, when we don't support what they do. Or pay for STDs and abortions, when it is apparent these people either need to pay for their own bad behavior, or keep their legs closed. Whoever said it above is right. This is just pay off to those folks that got Obama elected. He is not worried about the working man. He is trying to make sure he gets re-elected.

 

Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke

That reminds me

"Programs already in existence"... This reminds me that all agencies must now be authorized, then appropriated...Many more weird-ass programs and gazillions--buckle up.

 

The scope of the federal

The scope of the federal government does NOT include charity. Cut the give-aways that benefit special interests, kick out the illegals, stop the export of abortion money, and I hope to heaven we're not paying for Pelosi's cosmetic surgery.

It is a "Disaster

It is a "Disaster Plan"

It is inefficient spending, with dangerous borrowing levels, targeted at those groups that supported O, Polosi, Frank. Net it is negative for job growth.

Majority of fossil press and too much of public too stupid to know otherwise.

Speaking of disastersp

The President says if this stimulus (porkulus)

package is not passed there will be disaster.   I say

if this package is passed, there will be disaster. 

We need cuts in government agencies and laws.

Let Congress get busy and trim their pork.   Only

problem is, they don't know how.   They only

know how to add and add and add, and we are

paying the price.  Pelosi says we are losing

5 million jobs a month???????   That's intelligent

isn't it?    And she's the author of this bill.   What

does that tell you?

Actually she said 500

Actually she said 500 million jobs a month...but yes there are about 500 million people who are smarter than her who could come up with better bills.

 

www.theholyrosary.org

"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia

Must we always fight

Must we always fight Washington policy wars using preferred Democrat
terms? Today’s example is the "stimulus package," or as ABC touts on
screen during its newscasts, the Obama "Rescue Plan,

After all, who could be against a "rescue" plan??????

Remember when Al Gore called Bush's tax cut plan a "risky tax scheme"????

He who controls the language, controls the argument.

From what I understand, this is going to have huge problems

From what I understand, there are about 15 blue dog Democrats (Landrieu D-La among them) against the pork in this bill, and that it really doesn't have a shot as is.

When Bush was pushing stimulus - infrastructure - the MSM was?

Following the disaster of the CA enegy crisis of Clinton's last year in office, the pain of the 2003 Northeast blackouts, combined with the pinch of ever rising energy prices and the depressive effect all was having on the US economy and on consumers a lot was going on in Washington. One thing that seemed never to be going on was a national media pushing the Democrats to get on board with the president and to be bi-partisan in getting such things accomplished.

There was some news out there - but never a plea to the Democrats to stop blocking - to work with the other side.

Bush Urges Congress to Act Quickly on Energy Bill 

The bill, of course, was a job creator, an energy creator, a green energy enabler, and an effort for better national infrastructure and for keeping American's energy bill lower. "It" was a stimulus bill.

Imagine a Charlie Gibson or any other MSM TV news anchor, being "miffed that the Democrats would 'turn the cold shoulder'" to Bush's outreach." 

(:~> gary

This bill has so much pork, you can hear it squeal!

I was listening to John McCain on the Senate floor yesterday describing some of the outrageous pork jammed into the so-called "stimulus" package.  And he just mentioned the tip of the iceberg!  This thing is so full of pork that you can hear it squeal!  (Dr. Coburn & Co. did manage to zap out the Hollywood perk, a small victory for us.)   

I don't think my Senators, Mr. Schumer and Mrs. Gillibrand, will vote against it (remember, Democrats never met pork they didn't like).  But get your Senators out there, people, and tell them to vote "NO!" on this turkey. 

Of course it's not stimulus...

Of course it's not stimulus, it's just Obama paying back his campaign contributors.

Rescue ME

Who will rescue the tax payers from ALL the Pork in the Rescue Plan?

 

It is not a Stimulus bill

On going thru the long list of earmarks in President Obama's stimulus plan which the GOP and others  have classified as mostly wasteful expenditures, I discovered a glaring and very  important omission.  I do hope that the architects of the $800 (now grown to $900) billion stimulus plan have not overlooked the need for setting aside at least a  couple of billion dollars (which is a paltry 0.1-0.2 % of the total stimulus budget) for construction of a very large federal penitentiary (or even several, albeit on a more modest  scale, located strategically in various parts of the country) as the integral part of the plan. With such a huge budget to be deployed and spent over a relatively short span of time (which will naturally  render any effective supervision next to impossible), there is enormous scope and opportunity for swindle, graft,  outright stealing (and even plain, "unintentional" ex-senator-type tax evasion) in the execution of various projects.  Therefore, a substantial number of grand jury indictments cropping up, as the stimulus plan gets under way, should be anticipated as a distinct possibility.  We don't want to have another post-Katrina type situation in which the authorities may  be caught napping in finding adequate shelter for a flood of convicted felons who will be suddenly thronging our already overcrowded prisons, do we? And, we have not forgotten what happened  with the infamous oil-for-food to Iraq program which operated on  a far smaller budget and which was supervised jointly by the  bureaucrats in the US and the British governments, have we?   No one can deny that a vast majority of business men and women are honest and hard-working people but even a small  rogue minority is large enough and capable enough for wreaking havoc with ordinary people's lives thru their their shenanigans if they are in the mold of The Wall Street fraudsters. These crooks will, sooner or later, end up spending a major part of their retirement, dressed in orange-colored jumpsuit, in a federal penitentiary. And the $900 billion stimulus plan will be the  bait that will lure them to their ultimate destination. Moreover, the construction and staffing of these penitentiaries themselves  together with ancillary facilities will create a large number of jobs and will give quite a sharp stimulus to the local economies in the manner similar to the benefits that will accrue from  building and upgrading of schools and roads! And the added bonus will be that the  economic stimulus generated by these penitentiary projects is  likely to become self-perpetuating since any hanky-panky during their construction and subsequent operation will result in  increase  of the inmate population which will, in turn, create a need for additional penitentiaries!

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.