It seems like only yesterday when Enron and Worldcom collapsed. Throughout these ordeals our national media labored long and hard to paint Worldcom’s Bernie Ebbers as the face of Capitalism Corrupted while connecting the dots between President Bush and Enron’s "Kenny Boy" Lay, in the effort to demonstrate that corruption in action.
Now it is not a couple of business behemoths in trouble; it’s the entire economy that is teetering over a credit crisis brought on in part by corrupt government-sponsored enterprises and liberal politicians. So where are those same journalists now?
They’re out there finding fault only with the evil private sector. The mushrooming federal government and the stewards of its never-ending expansion cannot be questioned.
Take, for example, CBS’s "60 Minutes," with a Steve Kroft report that blamed the entire debacle on something called credit default swaps. Kroft couldn’t find even a single precious CBS minute to focus on Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or its most powerful Democratic supporters in Congress like Rep. Barney Frank or Sen. Chris Dodd, or the biggest recipients of their corporate campaign largesse, the second largest being a certain fellow from Illinois currently running for the presidency of the United States.
Financial expert James Grant spun it exactly the way CBS – and the Democrats (or am I repeating myself?) – wanted, a focus on Wall Street crooks. "I will call it a criminal neglect and incompetence, the people at the top of these firms chose to look away, to take more risk, to enrich themselves and to put the shareholders and indeed the country itself, ultimately the country's economy, at risk; and it is truly not only a shame, it's a crime."
You need only change a couple of words in that statement and you echo precisely what millions of Americans believe about their elected officials right now.
Steve Kroft concluded: "We requested interviews with top executives at Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and AIG. They all declined." So why didn’t CBS request any interviews with top executives at Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac? Because doing that would step on a few media toes.
It would have been enjoyable to see CBS grilling Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd, one of the profligate "Kenny Boy" figures in the current fiasco. The New York Post reported employees called his mansion "Mudd Manor," where he still resides, "an opulent Washington, D.C. mansion replete with expansive gardens, servants' quarters and a home theater." He’s the son of long-time CBS and NBC anchor Roger Mudd.
Then there’s Fannie Mae executive vice president Beth Wilkinson, who Forbes.com reports was making $3 million per year in salary and bonuses as Fannie Mae collapsed. She resigned when the government took over on September 20. On June 16, 2006, the New York Times reported her naivete on the way in: "Ms. Wilkinson, for example, knew nothing about the mortgage-backed securities at the core of Fannie Mae’s business." But on her way out, her cluelessness no longer in doubt, nobody questioned how this woman was qualified.
No one in the media would be so rude as to note that NBC reporter David Gregory is married to Wilkinson and her ill-gotten millions. Gregory even discussed Fannie Mae on the August 10 "Meet the Press" without disclosing his family tie.
Once again, we have to shake our heads as the "mainstream" (how I hate that term!) media work like a grubby protection racket for their friends and ideological allies. At the very same time liberal media elites mock John McCain for declaring the economy was "fundamentally sound," they ignore statements like Barney Frank’s line in 2003: "The two government sponsored enterprises we are talking about here, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not in a crisis."
Bill O’Reilly was mocked in media circles for calling Frank out for his "brilliant" mismanagement. But the more scandalous interviews are the network people who interviewed Frank and Dodd and treated them as Masters of the Congressional Universe, instead of the boys who dawdled while Hurricanes Fannie and Freddie rolled into Washington and drowned the financial system. There was no "Heckuva job, Barney" on the network sets.
On NBC, Matt Lauer asked Sen. Dodd penetrating questions like "Did Barack Obama play a major role in the legislation that you're gonna get a chance to vote on this week?" On ABC, Diane Sawyer was even more ridiculous with Dodd, replaying giggly clips of Stephen Colbert saying the financial brink is getting "brinkier." Who said these shows were serious programs holding the government accountable?
No one on these chucklehead programs dared to ask a classic Tim Russert-style question putting Frank’s and Dodd’s misdeeds and misstatements into a text box. When it comes to corruption and the Democrats, the networks see no evil, hear no evil, and definitely speak no evil.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
past, present, future
October 7, 2008 - 23:56 ET by nicholas nicklebyAt the very same time liberal media elites mock John McCain for
declaring the economy was "fundamentally sound," they ignore statements
like Barney Frank’s line in 2003: "The two government sponsored
enterprises we are talking about here, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are
not in a crisis."
Just to be clear, you're comparing a statement McCain made (at 9am, wasn't it?) when the crisis was already acknowledged by some people (and, indeed, it was acknowledged by McCain 2 hours later, right?), to a statement Frank made 5 years before the crisis blew up? So, you're saying that McCain--failing to see what was going on around him at that very moment--is no more culpable than Frank, who failed to see what was going to go on five years in the future?
Honestly, I hate to be nostalgic, but when I was younger, the conservatives thought things through a little more before they said them.
[Edit: that last line is not entirely fair--it's not really this post that has me thinking this (although there are a few posts on this site that do make me think that conservatives were more thoughtful when I was younger). In fact, I've been reading some of other con-blogs around the internet, but that's not even why I'm thinking this really. I'm thinking that conservatives used to be more thoughtful because the McCain campaign seems so focused on narrow tactics that it never built a strategy--they never really thought things through. (Though, this is possibly partly due to the disparate elements in the current Republican-conservative camp.)]
Nothing further to add
October 8, 2008 - 00:23 ET by JWFBrent speaks. I grok. I wish others would as well.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
As usual, yeoman's work,
October 8, 2008 - 06:35 ET by motherbeltAs usual, yeoman's work, Mr. Bozell. Thank you.
I almost spewed my coffee at this:
No one in the media would be so rude as to note that NBC reporter David
Gregory is married to [Fannie Mae VP] Wilkinson and her ill-gotten millions. Gregory
even discussed Fannie Mae on the August 10 "Meet the Press" without
disclosing his family tie.
I did not know that. I have never, ever seen that mentioned anywhere! I'll bet no one else has either.
That is just outrageous. He should be barred from EVER reporting on or discussing Fannie Mae. But he won't. He can be impartial, you know. After all, he's a journalist!!
I'm with you mother, I
October 8, 2008 - 07:50 ET by HypocriteHaterI'm with you mother, I didn't know that about Gregory either. My first reaction was "no sh*t!".
Surprise! The MSM has been covering for Dems for years!
October 8, 2008 - 09:28 ET by Mary Louise TurnerDemocratic scandals have been cleverly buried by the MSM for a long, long time. Let's turn back the clock, shall we? When Mr. Clinton was impeached in 1998, the media bent over backwards to defend this clown's repulsive behavior and punish the Republicans for daring to hold him accountable. They'll do it again with the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac scandals and other corruption involving the Anointed One and his pals. The Republicans will be held guilty and pay the price at the ballot box (as in 1998). Disgusting, isn't it?
This is why David
October 8, 2008 - 09:39 ET by HockeyKidThis is why David Horowitz's efforts to promote an Academic Bill of Rights is so important. These leftists are indoctrinated, molded, and launched in our university system. The politico wannabes go off to law school, and the "change the world" crowd leaves J school to find work at a paper or network. Years later, the now-established "reporters" and "anchors" are thrilled that their college buddies (or wives, relatives, etc.) are doing well in the public sector now! Of course they'll give them a good interview! School buddies! The rumors that have been floated about the potential impact of Skull and Bones have nothing in comparison to the network of communists sprouted by our institutions of "higher learning".
The only defense is to teach them young, and fight for their right to have opinions, not just leftists stances.