Imagine that John McCain named a young running mate to campaign with him, and this national rookie suggested America had 58 states, repeatedly used the wrong names for the cities he was visiting, and honored a Memorial Day crowd by acknowledging the "fallen heroes" who were present, somehow alive and standing in the audience. How long would it take for the national media to see another Dan Quayle caricature? Let’s raise the stakes. What if it was the GOP presidential candidate making these thoroughly ridiculous comments? This scenario is very real, except it isn’t McCain. It’s the other fellow.
ABC reporter Jake Tapper follows politicians around for a living. On his blog, he suggested Barack Obama has a problem: "The man has been a one-man gaffe machine."
Just in the last few days, in Sunrise, Florida, Obama said, "How's it going, Sunshine?" He did the same thing in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, calling it "Sioux City." Some of his geographic struggles seem calculated. When asked why Hillary Clinton trounced him in Kentucky, Obama claimed "I'm not very well known in that part of the country...Sen. Clinton, I think, is much better known, coming from a nearby state of Arkansas. So it's not surprising that she would have an advantage in some of those states in the middle." But Obama’s home state of Illinois is more than "near" Kentucky – it borders Kentucky.
In Oregon, there was a doozy. Obama said of his long campaign, "I’ve been in fifty-seven states, I think, one left to go." No one in the press made much of this. As former ABC political reporter Marc Ambinder, now with the Atlantic Monthly magazine, admitted: "But if John McCain did this — if he mistakenly said he’d visited 57 states — the media would be all up in his grill, accusing him of a senior moment." If you doubt him, remember how most media outlets noted, then underlined McCain’s error about al-Qaeda being trained and funded by Iran.
In New Mexico, Obama suggested he was like a young Haley Joel Osment in "The Sixth Sense," with the ability to see dead people: "On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes -- and I see many of them in the audience here today -- our sense of patriotism is particularly strong." Fallen heroes in the audience? Is this Barack Potatoe Obama? This is precisely the kind of misstatement that Dan Quayle-bashers would run ad infinitum.
But there have also been gaffes on more serious matters. ABC found that campaigning in Rush Limbaugh’s hometown of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, Obama argued that our military’s Arabic translators in Iraq are needed in Afghanistan: "We only have a certain number of them and if they are all in Iraq, then its harder for us to use them in Afghanistan," he claimed. But Afghans don’t speak Arabic; they speak several other languages. That’s a lot like McCain’s gaffe – except for the degree of media attention, which in the Democrat’s case was virtually nonexistent.
McCain also would have enjoyed more media focus on Obama’s completely muddled analysis of South America last week. He told the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday that he would meet with Chavez to discuss "the fermentation of anti-American sentiment in Latin America, his support of FARC in Colombia and other issues he would want to talk about." But on Friday in Miami, he insisted any country supporting the Marxist guerillas of FARC should suffer "regional isolation." This left Obama advisers scrambling to suggest that these two opposing statements can somehow be put together, that he can meet Chavez and isolate him at the same time.
Sometimes, Obama invents Bosnia-sniper-style whoppers about his personal history. In Selma, Alabama, Obama claimed that the spirit of hope derived from the civil rights protests in Selma in 1965 inspired his birth – when he was born in 1961. He also has inaccurately claimed that the Kennedys funded his Kenyan father’s trip to America in 1959.
While he was making boo-boos in New Mexico on Memorial Day, Obama also (according to CBS reporter/blogger Maria Gavrilovic) talked about post-traumatic stress disorder by claiming he had an uncle "who was part of the American brigade that helped to liberate Auschwitz," and then came home and spent six months in an attic. Gavrilovic didn’t note that the prisoners at Auschwitz were liberated by the Red Army. Obama earlier made the claim on his campaign site that his grandfather knew American troops who liberated Auschwitz and Treblinka (also liberated by the Red Army).
Everyone should grant these candidates a little room for error in the long slog of presidential campaigning. But what about some balance? The same national media that turned Dan Quayle’s name into an instant joke are now working over time to present Obama as Captain Competent.















Comments Policy
Time for Obama to replace
May 27, 2008 - 22:56 ET by FairlightTime for Obama to replace his AI Stepford 6-1892 chip.
Also, NB should routinely issue press releases naming networks that refuse to cover the gaffes.
Wait! Wait! Wait!
May 27, 2008 - 22:56 ET by FoolicanOh yeah?! At least Obama doesn't mangle his words, or kill kids or start illegal wars or steal oil like George W. Bush! He's for hope and change! Bush lies and people die! Sure he'll make a little slip here and there, but that's just because he's tired - anyone else would be in his position. But put him in the Oval Office and watch him go! Today is the beginning of a new America. Glory to the party!
B. Hussein
May 27, 2008 - 22:57 ET by wiwfB. Hussein Potatobama?
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Foolican....eh? I hope
May 27, 2008 - 23:05 ET by futbolisgreat1Foolican....eh? I hope you are joking, right?
Can you name any piece of legislation that he created and was passed either in the Illinois Senate or the US Senate?
Can you tell me how many diplomatic missions he has been on?
If Obama is such a great leader and an unifier, how come he hasn't been able to unify the Democrat party behind him?
If Obama can't unite the Democrat party behind him (people that think like him), how can we expect him to unify the country behind him?
If Obama can't work a diplomatic solution with Hillary Clinton regarding the Democrat party nomination, how can he work diplomatic solution with nations and dictators that want to destroy America, Israel, etc, etc?
Have you given any thought to what Hope and Change really mean for Obama?
Or are you just spewing out his mindless message?
As I said, I am hoping that your post was in sarcasm and not real.
The answer is 42.
May 27, 2008 - 23:10 ET by FoolicanIf "glory to the party" didn't tip you off, I don't know what will. But, I would turn those questions towards someone more capable of answering them than I am - Balboa, Syrius, or Shawn, etc..
Foolican, I apologize,
May 27, 2008 - 23:13 ET by futbolisgreat1Foolican,
I apologize, I smelled sarcasm in your post, but I was not sure.
I get into the Obama debates all day long with the crazy professors and educational staff I work with.
It is no lie when people say that many Liberals see him as a messiah and are completly blind to how dangereous he is. It is scary, very scary.
foolican
May 27, 2008 - 23:26 ET by shawn228"I would turn those questions towards someone more capable of answering them than I am - Balboa, Syrius, or Shawn, etc.."
Sigh, I would answer foolican, but alas, futbalisgreat thinks that I have no honor if I did not turn in a family member even if I knew they flew airplanes in the world trade center or they molested children
shawn, go for it, take a
May 27, 2008 - 23:29 ET by futbolisgreat1shawn,
go for it, take a stabb at it. Answer my questions...can you? or will you bring up months old crap.....
while you are at it, you may want to also answer how having about 150,000 soldiers deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan is streatching thin our 3 million member armed forces.
c'mon shawn....
lol futbol
May 27, 2008 - 23:32 ET by shawn228I don't want to derail this thread, I only replied after foolican mentioned my name. I will answer your questions, If you will answer mine. I opened up a forum for you on woodshed, and you still have not answered my call. Kind of embarrassed of your stance?
shawn, shawn.... Maybe
May 27, 2008 - 23:34 ET by futbolisgreat1shawn, shawn....
Maybe you haven't noticed, but I do not post on here all the time, don't have the time.
If you didn't want to derail the forum, why throw out the bait?
don't be such a child....you said something, now reply it.
Furthermore, answer my Obama questions is not derailing the forum, is it?
you always use the "I don't want to derail the forum..." excuse to hide.
I wonder who is the one that is embarrassed.
Shawn, However, I am
May 27, 2008 - 23:38 ET by futbolisgreat1Shawn,
However, I am honored that you put up a whole Woodshed thing surrounding my answer to your question.
You got your answer months ago, no point diving back into it.
Now, if you don't want to derail this forum, respond to the Obama questions.
well futbol
May 27, 2008 - 23:56 ET by shawn228I'm glad you are honored. bt is right, I should not have derailed this thread. I am sarastic, but I rarely do something just to caus trouble. So I apologize to you futbol and bt as well.
I am scared of a Obama Presidency because he will socialize everything. With the exception of universal health care "which I will not debate at this time" I am with conservatives on many spending issues.
However, I'm not sure If I am impressed with the Conservatives either. I don't know if a change in parties in the oval office might be a change for the good.
So I am truly undecided. I will not caus anymore trouble on this thread and move over to the "does America have a right to be pessimitic thread.
Shawn, C'mon, change for
May 28, 2008 - 00:12 ET by futbolisgreat1Shawn,
C'mon, change for change's sake is not a good reason to change parties and ideologies in the government.
A change in party means socialist programs, socialist laws being passed during the next four years.
we must think deep, very deep and understand what the change will be under an Obama Presidency.
C'mon when you have Democrats and Liberals meeting with terrorist groups like Hamas and FARC, you know that the change that Obama will bring to the White House spells disaster for this GREAT! United States of America.
You could be right futbol
May 28, 2008 - 00:14 ET by shawn228I'm not denying that. That is why I am a independent voter and I don't follow one party blindly just because they are my party.
Shawn "I rarely do something to cause trouble" Bull!
May 28, 2008 - 09:58 ET by Dee BunkThis is the kind of crap I've been talking about. As I said I'm not bringing up old stuff - I'm talking about what you did hear and now. It's disgusting.
Too Late...
May 28, 2008 - 09:33 ET by ontherightYou have a knack for it.
Obama lies and democracy dies
And he is right, if you
May 27, 2008 - 23:32 ET by Dan The Man 2And he is right, if you don't turn in a criminal even if it is a family member. You are no better than the criminal and worse in most cases. A persons honor and reputation is the only legacy their children have.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Okay Dan
May 27, 2008 - 23:35 ET by shawn2285000 lives and countless molested children, and there is no honor to turn in a family member. Interesting.
I can understand that you
May 27, 2008 - 23:50 ET by Dan The Man 2I can understand that you don't understand Honor.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Ok Dan
May 27, 2008 - 23:58 ET by shawn228Your right. Can't argue with you since you use so many facts to back up your argument. Have a good night.
Shawn and Dan, The
May 28, 2008 - 00:09 ET by futbolisgreat1Shawn and Dan,
The problem I have turning in an immediate blood relative to the authorities is that we all assume that the authorities are good individuals that will seek justice.
Sorry, while there are many honorable people serving in our justice system, our justice system is corrupt, full of individuals that are pedophiles themselves.
Why would I turn in an immediate blood relative, or my wife, my son, daughter, etc to a system that is not interested in justice, but it is only interested in the law. According to our current system and many of the corrupt cops we have on the streets, if Slavery was around today and it was the law, individuals like Shawn would be saying that I was evil for not turning in a run away slave...why? because our judicial system our courts are court of laws and not court of justice.
don't be so naive Shawn, don't be so naive.
Don't judge my answers without first walking in my shoes and knowing my life.
fut... That is why I got
May 28, 2008 - 00:17 ET by bigtimerfut...
That is why I got s danged frustrated that night with all of this...so many people in this country do not understand at all the corruption in the judicial system from the bottom up and how corrupt it is...I have known that since a very young age, I have learned this is so from my own shoes I have walked in...and I have walked miles.
I know you understand what I am trying to say.
Night ....
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Bigtimer, Thanks BT for
May 28, 2008 - 00:27 ET by futbolisgreat1Bigtimer,
Thanks BT for understanding. Only individuals who have dealt directly with our judicial system understand what I am saying.
I know first hand the great, immense corruption that exist in our judicial system. I know first hand how too many cops are not interested in serving and protecting the public, but rather are only interested in shoving their police powers down the throat of innocent civilians. Once again, many, many honorable members of our judicial system exist, there are many honorable cops, but sadly, today these are the ones that decide to leave the system.
Turning in an immediate blood relative to this corrupt system makes you no better than them.
How many clues did our judicial system have about the 911 terrorists? How many clues did our judicial system get about OJ being a murderer?
Shawn, explain these opposing laws. A woman can murder an unborn baby because that is her body. But this same woman will get a ticket for not wearing her seat belt, even though that is her body, right? I thought women had all rights over their bodies.....
once again shawn, don't be naive.
Dan the Man
May 28, 2008 - 00:06 ET by RESTLESS 1Shawn said he would turn in a family member if they commited a grievous crime. Futbol said he would not. Just wanted to make that clear. I gotta go with Shawn on that.
RESTLESS 1
May 28, 2008 - 00:20 ET by shawn228Thank you for your common sense. :-) I meant what I said before about not wanting to derail this thread.
Looks like futbol has responded to my woodshed. Jump in anytime.
I agree with you about turning in but I still respect futbol
May 28, 2008 - 10:29 ET by Dee Bunkand his reasoning and do not agree with Shawn one bit. I think the way he handled himself was despicable.
Fut is a Catholic Mexican American from a large family and his culture and perspective on family and our government is different for good reasons. At least he is smart enough to know that it's not conservatives against him. He knows that there are racist people on both sides. In addition, he has to face the completely anti-Christian media and political left.
I was not here during the original argument and only know about it because Shawn was shouting it from the roof tops. If I had been around during the original argument between Cool and Futbol I would have stayed out of it. I try to stay out of religious arguments between religious people. I find it disgusting when non religious people jump in to cause trouble.
I agreed with some of what both Cool and Futbol said but remain 100% disgusted by the way I found out about the argument and even more disgusted that it was brought up again.
Gosh Dee
May 28, 2008 - 10:33 ET by shawn228I apologized to Fut and I also apologized to bt. Sigh, I guess I have to handle myself with grace and etiquite like you.
I'm purposely treating you like you treat others
May 28, 2008 - 10:38 ET by Dee BunkI used to give respect to you people only to see you turn around and do disgusting things like this. No more.
Like I said Dee
May 28, 2008 - 10:43 ET by shawn228I apologized to fut and It is not like to me bring up something simply to caus trouble, just like you apologized to balboa for calling him an a-hole.
I'm not asking you for your respect, I'm not asking you for anything.
Too bad Shawn - you are the one that wanted my examples so
May 28, 2008 - 11:04 ET by Dee BunkI told you I wasn't going to bring up the past, only what happens going forward. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE
Don't you dare act like I don't have a right to comment just because you apologized for bringing it up in this thread. My point is much larger than this one issue and has little to do with the fact that you brought it up in an unrelated thread.
I didn't say you asked for my respect. Don't say you didn't ask me for anything. That is a bald face lie. You wanted examples.
edit - and by the way. I won't be bringing up this incident again unless you do. I care about the future that can be changed not the past that can't.
Good God Dee
May 28, 2008 - 11:12 ET by shawn228Comment all you want, I did not say you could not. I just wanted to point out that I apologized and to not make a mountain out of a molehill. If you would take the time to go to the woodshed, where futbol responded, we have worked out our differences and it ended up being civil.
Also I wanted examples of you said liberals are ganging up on people, or how this site is bending over for leftist, or how leftist have a new sense of power.
Your just too focused on my admitted mistake that it is clouding your judgement. Let me know if i am misquiting you.
"The details make no difference to me - it's the concept that does."
edit,
I just saw your edit. Fair enough. Have a good day.
Are you really that dense Shawn?
May 28, 2008 - 11:33 ET by Dee BunkYou can't see how this relates to what I've been pissed about?
I could care less about who you disagree with - it's the trying to rally people against others that I find disgusting. It's one thing if you want to be antagonistic to everyone like Leon. That doesn't bother me nearly as much as someone who takes advantage of respect given to them.
Everyone else here is free to let this kind of thing slide and not comment because of "friendship" but it's not happening with me.
This is a conservative site and IN MY OPINION liberals have no right to rally conservatives against each other. You don't have to agree with me, no one has to agree with me. It's how I feel and my actions are going to reflect that.
No I'm not Dense Dee
May 28, 2008 - 22:02 ET by shawn228I thought it might be end after I saw your edit, but alas, you need to get in the last word.
I mentioned futbols previous thread, which I apologized for. One member took my side. I thanked him and politely told that poster I do not want to derail the thread.
A conservative poster even told you futbol can defend himself, but you told him the same tired baseless claim. I realize with you details, don't matter, but it would be nice to know who I am trying to take my side.
As far as friendships and respect goes. IMO I believe I earned that by debating with facts and backing up my points. I never post and run and I give as good as I get. I do not take advantage of friendships. but again with you details don't matter the concept does.
You have a right to your opinion about what rights liberals have, but i'm not playing by your rules, I am playing by NB,s.
Perhaps you need to take your own advice you gave to me. Lighten up. Have a bath with scented candles, Have a cup of herb tea. You have been taking things far too seriously lately. I have no interest in making a enemy out of you, but as far as I'm concerned your the antagonizer. "I'm sure I spelt that wrong"
Take your own bubble bath Shawn
May 28, 2008 - 22:24 ET by Dee BunkYou are dense and you have a lot of nerve denying that you tried to rally people against futbol. You also did it to Free and you have even done it to me.
No one told you you had to play by my rules. Don't if you don't want to, but don't cry about how I treat you then either. Don't demand examples from me that you know exist.
Just because you let this one go quicker when BT called you on it right away is no reason why I can't jump in after you had harassed me about not having anything to back up what I said. I told you I was done with the past and would point it out in the future if it happened. It happened. Right here and you still deny it.
The only reason you weren't as obnoxious when BT confronted you is because you know darn well this is the kind of thing I was talking about. BT noticed the same thing and wasn't even in our other conversations.
And you are an idiot bringing up the details thing AGAIN. I didn't bring up this example with Futbol AND OTHERS because I didn't want to dwell on the past like you do. Arguments never end with you. You always bring up past ones over and over and over.
I'll deal with you going forward based on how you act and what you say in the future. So by all means act how ever you want. I've been clear about what I expect so don't be crying that I'm unfairly mean to you. It's not going to work on me Shawn. Go rally the newsbusters people to get me thrown out if you want because it's the only way you'll stop me from speaking my mind.
Again Dee
May 28, 2008 - 22:28 ET by shawn228Ok, future, present, now I get it. Can you tell me on this very thread, how I was trying to get someone to take my side.
Foolican mentioned me by name. I took a cheapshot against foot, and for the 100th time "yes that is hyperbole Dee, sound familiar?" I apologized.
I don't want to get you kicked out at all, If you are going to make a accusation on me I will call you on it and I'm sure vice versa.
Duh Shawn! Give it Up!
May 28, 2008 - 23:06 ET by Dee BunkAnyone can see right here at the top of this thread that you Responded to Foolican with that old thread with futbol and were looking for him and others to agree with you against him about turning people in.
Do all that kind of crap you want - but I will be calling you on it. It's nice that you apologized quickly this time (only after BT confronted you)but as I said, it's not your usual M.O. You apologized because you knew darn well that was the kind of thing I was talking about when you were badgering me for examples. I refused to stoop to your level of bringing up past things over and over and over and over and over.
I have every right to bring it up now because you badgered me. And this is current. I'll do it when ever I see it. You really have a lot of nerve. You are by far the worst offender of the kinds of things I was talking about.
Of course they can Dee
May 28, 2008 - 23:30 ET by shawn228I admitted I was wrong. Ok this is getting tired. I'll just wait for you to bust me again.
Hey Dee I couldn't agree
May 28, 2008 - 22:43 ET by bigtimerHey Dee I couldn't agree more...and as far as you getting kicked off here for speaking your mind or anyone complaining about it...you have got to be kidding...you have never been anything but respectful to others, you still are.
Don't worry so much....a lot of us can see the games shawn has been playing...along with a few others.
I am glad you are pointing this out too...this is a place for us conservatives to vent, I usually look forward to it every day if possible...not have liberals here try to get us all to gang up on each other...most of us do just fine expressing our own individual opinions to each other...but that is what liberals do in real life, that is how they secure their own sense of self worth in my opinion.
Btw...I told Shawn long ago I give as good as I get to him, and he has used it ever since...lol.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
well bt
May 28, 2008 - 22:51 ET by shawn228I did not realize I stole that line from you. I guess I pick things up here and there.
I sure would like to know what game I am playing. Unfortunately everytime I ask you, it is the same 2 lines.
1: Not going there Shawn
2: You know what I mean Shawn
I have always told, you I mean no respect. I should stop playing mind games, but in order to stop I need to no what the mind game I'm playing?
shawn... Huh? I do not
May 28, 2008 - 23:04 ET by bigtimershawn...
Huh?
I do not even know what the heck you are talking about with your line one or two, let alone the last statement of yours.
I answer all your questions shawn....at least I think I have if they are worth answering.
What are you talking about mind games...I said the games you are playing attempting to get people to fight here with each other...it was pretty simply stated...what part didn't you understand?
Come on shawn, just let it be, you are a wise person, you know exactly what we are talking about, just post your opinions here on the subject and keep the respect and friends you have here without trying to cause people to go against each other constantly and carry it on.
One real good example is what you did with fut after that gang up debate on him about two months ago, the very next morning you were so happy about the support you got (with the exception of me) you posted a forum thread the next morning wanted more opinions against futbol....just like a post you made to him last night I just saw today saying to him, well at least you aren't a raving lunatic tonight...oh well isn't that precious shawn...get my point yet?
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
bt
May 28, 2008 - 23:17 ET by shawn228This thread is getting thin, so I will catch up with you later. Just wanted to say that I started that woodshed because I strongly disagreed with his opinion and he said I must have a disfunctional family. I truly though he behaved like a lunatic the night we debated, and futbol and ended things on civil note yesterday, which you ignored.
Anyway bt, my fight is not with you. Talk to you soon.
Thanks BT - I'm glad I'm not the only one who realizes
May 29, 2008 - 00:46 ET by Dee BunkI'll be on real sparingly for the next few days so Shawn can be real happy.
sigh
May 29, 2008 - 01:46 ET by shawn228When will you get it through your stubborn head, I have nothing against you. You and I actually got along very well for a while.
I will always stick up for myself. A conservative poster who I admire a lot taught me to be nice, but do not suck up to anybody.
Have a good night.
Save it for someone who buys your bull Shawn
May 29, 2008 - 08:31 ET by Dee BunkYou are the biggest suck up I've ever seen.
my goodness
May 29, 2008 - 09:26 ET by shawn228You have some serious anger issues.
I see you're all better after your bubble bath
May 29, 2008 - 11:10 ET by Dee Bunkglad it works for you.
shawn... Give it a f'n
May 27, 2008 - 23:32 ET by bigtimershawn...
Give it a f'n rest with fut...I was there that night when all this happened and things were going very heated up, I also stuck up for futbol when you all were ganging up, I also know you think it is really cool to keep putting the forum thread in you are...
Give it a rest and quit trying to cause trouble, futbol was here long before you and a lot us us respect him.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
ok bt
May 27, 2008 - 23:37 ET by shawn228I will back off, your right I should not have gone off topic. One thing though, I did not realize if you are member longer than others, it gives you more privlidges.
shawn... I used the word
May 27, 2008 - 23:49 ET by bigtimershawn...
I used the word respect.
Not privileges.
Typical lib, try to spin.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
I think if what you say is
May 28, 2008 - 10:36 ET by FoolicanI think if what you say is true, Futbol is very capable of defending himself, and he doesn't need an army of supporters gainsaying Shawn for whatever reason.
wrong foolican - Shawn is the one who purposefully tried to
May 28, 2008 - 10:40 ET by Dee Bunkbring others into it on multiple occasions
FaOOL-I-can
May 27, 2008 - 23:28 ET by kilrodSince both O-Dumma and O-Billary get tired and tell lies, whups i mean "misspeak" on the campaign trail, what about the 3am phone call when it's crunch time for real, reckon you can excuse em then??
(Grins)
kilrod
It could get better!!
May 27, 2008 - 22:57 ET by pbthinkerNot everyone can be the chosen one. I can't wait, until the debates, when we're live, and in color, and millions of witnesses are watching. The MSM will have a difficult time covering that up, won't they?
Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000.
No, but you'll have a reason
May 27, 2008 - 22:59 ET by balboaNo, but you'll have a reason my it was "rigged" for BHO.
Obama is dangerous for
May 27, 2008 - 23:00 ET by futbolisgreat1Obama is dangerous for America. End of story. This man will destroy America.
A bit off topic. I need to write a paper for my Master's program detailing what I consider leadership and write about someone who is a leader.
I have a pretty good idea what leadership means...vision, plan, action, trust, etc....now, I have chosen to write about President George W. Bush. Does anyone know a good book, article, journal to read that will give me a good insight into President Bush's leadership?
I follow politics well enough to know a lot about him, but one of the points of this first Master's class that I am taking is to teach me how to write in APA style, so I have to do quite a bit of research.
If anyone must know, my Master's degree is a Master's in Organizational Leadership. I want to take the next step in my career and I can't do it without a Master's degree.
Any help would be great.
Advice.
May 27, 2008 - 23:08 ET by FoolicanWord of the wise, my friend. Pick someone else.
Mind you, your choice is a brilliant selection, but if you value your Master's Degree, you have to game the system and play along with what they expect. Argue with the professor and your future career may be jeopardized. It hurts like a bullet in the brain but it's the ugly truth.
Foolican, Well, as I
May 27, 2008 - 23:11 ET by futbolisgreat1Foolican,
Well, as I suspected, you were using sarcasm above...thank goodness.
Anyway, no, I will chose President Bush. In my undergrad I fought professors hard over grades since I knew it was given to me for my political views.
You see, not only am I a Republican, I am a Lation Republican. Liberals and Democrats hate nothing more than a minority that decides to leave the masses and think for him/herself.
but no, I stand my ground, I will write about Bush. I think I can do a lot of good and maybe get some people to think beyond what the media tells us.
that's why i want a good book, jouranl, etc, etc that I can cite and use.
Rush Limbaugh makes the
May 28, 2008 - 00:43 ET by jdhawkRush Limbaugh makes the case today on his radio program that Obama was more than confused about who was "in the audience" on Memorial Day. He concludes that Obama doesn't or didn't know the difference between Memorial Day, honoring our heroes lost in battle, and Veterans Day, honoring all who have serverd in the Armed Forces.
When you read or hear the entire speech, Rush's charge makes sense and the "in the audience" goof fits. The reason is that Obama states later in the speech that we should better support our returning Veterans from the present conflict. In fact, he charges that we aren't doing enough for returning women, in particular, and they have the worst cases of post traumatic stress syndrome. Of course, he offers no proof that this is the case. Given, that women are not in combat units and work in jobs that do not routinely expose them to combat situations. This is a reach.
It is mystifying that this man has made it this far. I have charged him with being a stupid liberal. I regret that. Obama is an imbecile.
I agree
May 28, 2008 - 07:16 ET by 10ksnookerObambi is the quintessential empty suit, the Democrat Socialists in Congress think they can fill the empty vessel with whatever they want, and the public will buy it. Obambi sounds a lot like a combination of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Hugo Chavez to me. Saul Alinksy would be proud of his creation.
Don't know where else to put this
May 28, 2008 - 01:00 ET by harry flashmanWhy is'nt under "Most Popular" on the Newsbuster's site "Illegal immigrants safe under the steeple " no longer available for reading or comment?
What was this thread about?
May 28, 2008 - 01:02 ET by the strugglerWhat was this thread about?
Why?
May 28, 2008 - 01:04 ET by harry flashmanWhy was it taken down? A cardinal or a bishop sanitizing the site?
the struggler
May 28, 2008 - 01:05 ET by harry flashmanI don't know - it disappeared before I could get to it.
Where?
May 28, 2008 - 01:19 ET by harry flashmanEven after Googling the hell out of it, I still can't find the article titled "Illegal immigrants safe under the steeple " - Opus Dei?
Here you go....
May 28, 2008 - 10:16 ET by motherbeltHere you go....
But be warned...the entire Washington Times site is extremely slow today....don't know what's going on there.
Perfect Obama-Clinton ticket
May 28, 2008 - 08:12 ET by ThisnThatSounds like Obama and Clinton really should be on the same ticket. They could both duck all that sniper fire that's killing all those dead people that Obama sees. And Clinton could gather together all of Obama's crazy uncles for a seance with Elenor Roosevelt.
This is the best the Dim party can muster?
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
CAMPAIGN COMMERCIALS
May 28, 2008 - 08:17 ET by ballwana13Turn Barry's many gaffes into campaign commercials as the lame media are so in the tank for him they won't even report on the gaffes or replay them like they would if McCain was saying them. If the McCain campaign won't use these gaffes, the GOP needs to do it.
I would contribute more than a few bucks for these kinds of campaign ads. Here's my slogan for Barry: "Lack of experience, hates America and stupid too. "
Not to paint too grim a
May 28, 2008 - 08:22 ET by Ruths husband BenNot to paint too grim a picture, but the truth is that the main stream media has completely abandoned its objectivity. It has always had a liberal slant but that was somewhat balanced by a desire to be fair. Without the desire, it became a propaganda machine for the far left and therefore part of a totalitarian regime in the making. I believe history will show that the news media failed, and failed miserably, to properly vet liberral candidates in all levels of government in the early part of this century leading to a historical unbalance that could be the ruin of this country. It's ironic that a free press could lead to a less free society.
"Whatever Michelle Says Is The Message." –
Senator Barack Obama October 1, 2007, Chicago HQ
Seriously. If this is the
May 28, 2008 - 09:16 ET by Cureboy675Seriously. If this is the best that people can come up with to criticize the guy: A slip of the tongue about 57 states, saying "fallen soldiers" when he means "brave soldiers". If that is as good as it gets...Then I won't be losing any sleep. Let's see: Making us indefinitely referee a civil war that kills an average of two American soldiers a day (not to mention $40 million a day)...Or a guy who slips and says 57 instead of 47. Hmmmmmmm.
Ok, you want to talk about
May 28, 2008 - 09:22 ET by FoolicanOk, you want to talk about his policies? Let's talk about his policies.
Name at least one of his accomplishments.
Ironic isn't it?
May 28, 2008 - 10:19 ET by LastlibertarianNormal
0
All of these alleged conservatives rally around a man that has plunged the
country into massive debt. Has killed 5000 Americans on a bogus war justified
on flimsy evidence. Has furthered the "Great Society" policies by
holding the country financially responsible for natural disasters like Katrina.
Has failed to understand the concept of a border in regards to illegals. One
who has bitten the hook on the dubious science of global warming. A leader that
coward in a bunker a 1000 miles from any danger on 9/11. One that makes the claim that
the Israeli’s (Jewish ones anyway) are “special” and are no doubt part of his
reasoning for sending “less special” Americans into war, death and debt. His
middle east meddling seems more the work of a self imagined messiah than a
stable sane man.
Obama can't be any more left than Bush.
YEAH! You tell em,
May 28, 2008 - 10:19 ET by mofosesameYEAH! You tell em, Lastlibertarian! Making stuff up is fun!!
GEE...........last, tell us
May 28, 2008 - 10:27 ET by charlietexasGEE...........last, tell us how you really feel......you hate Bush, you hate capitalism, you hate our troops. everyone is stupid except you. It must be nice to live in your world. Say hi to keith oberman for us.
Excuse me...
May 28, 2008 - 10:33 ET by FoolicanDo you even know what a Libertarian is? Better yet, did you read his post at all? Or are you simply going to make ad-hominem attacks becuase it's much easier to squash the opposition that way? You're really no better than the folks on DailyKos by doing that.
Having an opinion is one
May 28, 2008 - 10:40 ET by mofosesameHaving an opinion is one thing but making up facts is another.
Libertarian
May 28, 2008 - 10:58 ET by CobraMan"Do you even know what a Libertarian is?"
Oh, please! A "Libertarian" doesn't even know what a Libertarian is! How can you, or anyone else, define what constitutes a Libertarian as that definition changes from person to person? Why don’t you regale us with your incredible intellect and define Libertarian for us?
"Better yet, did you read his post at all?"
I read it and it sounds like the liberals at the Daily Kos and the Democratic Underground have let loose one of their members. Bush killed 5000 Americans? I don't think so. H e hides in a bunker? Get real! Jews are the reason we're in war? That's just plain stupid!
I'd be very careful in calling this troll a Libertarian if I were you. If this is indicative of what makes a Libertarian, then thank God that the Libertarians have even lesser numbers than the members of the Green Party. I don't think the mental heath industry could handle insanity like this in great numbers.
I agree CM
May 28, 2008 - 11:31 ET by wizardjrMost of the 'Libertarians' I've run across are either anarchists or Marxists. I know that's a bit of a dichotomy, but it's what I've observed. The anarchists want what stage 5 Marxism (true Communism) is: complete anarchy. The difference is that stage 5 Marxism is altruistic, none of these people are. The Marxists in Libertarian clothing really want Fascist Socialist government so they can dictate to the rest of us (i.e., Anthropogenic Global Warming).
Lastlibertarian, I hope you
May 28, 2008 - 10:46 ET by bassndudeLastlibertarian, I hope you jest. If not, then your a lier on several levels. Have you ever done anything to protect and defend this country? Or are you just another one of those loud mouth morons?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
And he at least recognizes
May 28, 2008 - 11:18 ET by NL207And he at least recognizes the threat posed to Western Civilization by Islamic Jihad. You don't particularly like his policies in this matter, but you offer no substantiative alternative other than stick our heads in the sand and ignore these Pirates while they spread their theocratic tyranny across the face of the planet.
If you think Obama can't be anymore left than Bush then you haven't been paying attention to Obama's limited record in the Senate.
If you think Obama is a reasonable man, you haven't been paying attention to the friends and advisors he keeps.