MRC/NB's Bozell On Clinton's Venture Into O'Reilly's 'No Spin Zone'

By NB Staff | May 2, 2008 - 10:57 ET

Hillary Clinton's recent appearance on "The O'Reilly Factor" was a play for superdelegate support at the Democratic Convention, MRC President Brent Bozell argued on the May 2 "Fox & Friends" in a segment joined by liberal talk show host Mike Papantonio. [audio available here]

Asked about the media and if it will follow up any more on the Rev. Wright controversy, the NewsBusters publisher quipped that, "[u]nless Jeremiah Wright sends a cruise missile back in their direction, no, the networks aren't going to touch this, and the New York Times is going to leave this alone. That's the end of the story, that's the way it goes."

Below is a transcript of some remarks from Bozell's appearance on the May 2 "Fox & Friends":

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
STEVE DOOCY, co-host: Brent Bozell is with the Media Research Center, and Mike joins us from down in Pensacola. Good morning to both of you. Brent, let's start with you. Was it brilliant or not going on "The Factor" for her?

BRENT BOZELL, MRC President: Just appearing was victory for Hillary. Look, I think her strategy is pretty clear at this point. She's moving to the middle, she wants to isolate Barack Obama on the far left of the spectrum. Why? Because she wants to make the case to the super delegates that she can win in a national contest, and he can't. So just appearing was a victory for her.

[...]

DOOCY: Right now as you know, last night in the "No Spin Zone" Hillary sat down with Bill O'Reilly talking about the guys in Iraq.

BILL O'REILLY: You start pulling U.S. Troops out of Iraq, and Iraq's a mess, everybody knows. Iran is going to like that. That's good for Iran. And Iran wants to dominate Iraq for a number of reasons. How are you going to stop it?

SEN. HILLARY CLINTON (D-N.Y.), from "O'Reilly Factor" interview: First of all, I believe that our military has fulfilled all their military missions. They got rid of Saddam Hussein, they gave the Iraqis a free and fair election and they gave the Iraqi government the time to make the decisions that only they can make for themselves. There is no military solution for what we face in Iraq.

DOOCY: You've got Hillary last night on the Bill O'Reiliy "Factor." We're back with Brent and Mike. Brent, I've got to ask you about this. This past week, the past two or three weeks have been absolutely the worst of the Barack Obama campaign. Especially when he finally got around to saying "yeah, that Reverend, he's crazy, I'm going to distance myself from him." At the same time, one day later, the Obamas, Michelle and Barack, both came out and said "it's time to move on, we've decided -- we've changed our whole thinking about that." The mainstream media seems to have taken their cue and have moved on indeed. If it had been Hillary Clinton I wonder if they would have dragged it out a few more days.

BOZELL: That message wasn't to the American people. That message was to NBC News, CBS, and ABC. "Hey guys, let's move on." They're doing it. Unless Jeremiah Wright sends a cruise missile back in their direction, no, the networks aren't going to touch this, and the New York Times is going to leave this alone. That's the end of the story, that's the way it goes.

[...]

DOOCY: The actual substance of what [Hillary Clinton's] saying in terms of immigration and in terms of Iraq, mission accomplished in Iraq? We've done everything militarily?

BOZELL: What she said after the clip you showed showed an extraordinary naivety as far as I'm concerned. She said basically let's pull out and let the Iraqis and Iranians at it, boys will be boys and they'll just settle it between themselves. That's not the way the real world works. Iran will take over Iraq and she knows it very well. It was a terrible answer.

DOOCY: What was that trivia question you had?

BOZELL: When was the last time Barack Obama put himself in front of an interviewer to ask him tough questions?

GRETCHEN CARLSON, co-host: Well, he's going to be on a show this weekend, but I'm not sure, we'll have to decide later whether he gets any tough questions.

BOZELL: I can't think of a single one. I can't think of a single interview.*

*Update/correction from Brent Bozell:

This morning on Fox & Friends, I asked the question: When was the last time Barack Obama consented to a tough interview? Silly me. The answer was last Sunday on Chris Wallace's program.

No, Wallace isn't a hostile interviewer and no, it wasn't a debate akin to Bill O'Reilly and Hillary Clinton. But Chris Wallace does distinguish himself with probing, challenging, devil's advocate questions. Therefore my question should included the disclaimer, "with the exception of Chris Wallace."

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wallace

What I like about Chris Wallace is that he asks tough questions, but he allows the person to answer. But you know you're in trouble when he starts a followup with: "With all due respect, senator ... "

ah, those NY senators

...yet Sen. Schumer will still not answer the question!

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

Hillary

I'm glad Hillary did that interview because it's a shot in the arm for Operation Chaos. She still has crazy plans for the country, but when you contrast her warm appearance with BOR to the chaos around Obama, it made her image look stronger to the casual viewer.

Also Obama made such a stink about going on Wallace's show to "confront" Fox while Hillary took a much more upbeat approach. She's clearly given up on pandering to the Koskids and wants to ay least look like a centrist.

As much as I hate Hillary, should would be better president material than Obama.

And yeah, if she wants to stay alive she needs to do more things like this. Was talking to my MIL last night who lives in NC - she said she wanted Obama to win because he was the only one who grew up rough and wasn't a spoiled brat. When I told her he went to Harvard and is now a multi-millionaire, she acted like she'd never heard that before. So Hillary has a long way to go if she wants to get her message to the sheeple.

Obama never lived lower

Obama never lived lower than a middle-class existence except for any slumming of his own accord while seeking out the true "black" experience as a teen or young adult. 

Some examples of Obama's good life:

  • Barry lived in a brick home with electricity in Indonesia with his stepfather, in contrast to the mud, thatch and corrulgated tin roofed homes without electricity in the village/town.  The family then moved to an upper class neighborhood where foreign colonialists lived.

  • Barry was an overweight child in Indonesia.  While obesity in America can occur in low income families, overeating was not a luxury to most Indonesians.  The children in Barry's town teased him because his family's well-off situation allowed for a bounty of food as compared to most of his classmates.

  • Barry lived in Hawaii during his adolescence and teenage years with his grandparents.  His grandmother was an executive at a bank making good money.  Barry attended the prestigious school on the island.

Growing up, Barry never had to worry about his next meal, a roof over his head, a new pair of shoes or medical care if sick.  Never.

It is a fallacy that Obama grew up poor or rough.  Any such fantastical thinking is part of the comic book hero mythology of Obama's sycophants. 

RRAM Tough! 

Well, candance...just so

Well, candance...just so long as you continue to "hate" her, I suppose a back-handed compliment for Hillary is excusable.

Jer

Chris Wallace gets my vote

I think the better executed interview was the Wallace/Obama one compare to the one between O'Reilly/Clinton, although neither pursued follow-up questions. (maybe next time) The O/C interview was too deferential and too much about Bill.

Also, I'm going from memory, but didn't Hillary use a similar phrase to 'you're wrong and let me tell you why' - an often used O'Reilly phrase? Is Hillary a Factor viewer???

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

Chris Wallace is clearly

Chris Wallace is clearly the consistently superior interviewer, although O'Reilly is occasionally impressive and peformed solidly in Part II.  There was minimal "deference" [as was on embarrassing display during his Bush and Condi Rice interviews]; but, I believe the "you're wrong and let me tell you why" (or similar) language by Hillary was in response to O'Reilly's self-righteous lecturing during the "sanctuary cities" exchange.

Jer 

first date jitters

I will say that Part 2 was better than Part 1 - got that "first date awkwardness" out of the way.

Also, the President (regardless of which party) should be accorded some decorum and treated with respect. [I didn't see the Condi interview, so I'll take your word on that one.] I just found it amusing that Hillary used O'Reilly-type verbiage.

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

respect...yes.  fawning

respect...yes.  fawning behavior...no.

Jer

Hillary

She handled herself well; I was surprised. It pains me to say that I’d rather have her be President than the great pretender, obama.

Clinton

You've all heard by now about the Clinton superdelegate who jumped ship to support Obama?

Well....

Fox News is reporting that he endorsed Obama months ago and it was really a nonstory, but Obama's people released it this week to give the impression that Hillary was still losing, hoping to scare people away from defecting to her.

So much for staying above petty politics.

Sham

Watched part of Part II--it was silly and hardly an interview when no backup questions were ask- small topics and no substance. Must agree they are alike --vacuous- disingenious and prone to emotional diatribes.