Bozell Column: Eliot's Mess

Photo of Brent Bozell.

For most of this decade, Eliot Spitzer has been one of the liberal media’s favorite public servants. Before being elected governor of New York in a landslide in 2006, he was hailed as the nation’s most powerful state Attorney General, the scourge of high finance. At "60 Minutes" on CBS, he was the "Sheriff of Wall Street." In the pages of Time, he was on their list of "Heroes and Icons" as "The Tireless Crusader."

While Spitzer was toasted by the national media elite for pursuing Wall Street chicanery, he’d also prosecuted at least two prostitution rings as head of the state’s organized crime task force. The New York Times recalled Spitzer "spoke with revulsion and anger" over a high-end prostitution racket uncovered in Staten Island in 2004.

How ironic that the Times would break the story that federal authorities had caught Spitzer on a wiretap, involved with a very high-priced prostitution ring called the Emperors Club. He was suddenly known simply as "Client #9." On a business trip to Washington last month, he registered at the posh Mayflower Hotel under the name "George Fox" (a donor of his) and arranged for a call girl to meet him there in a room on the eighth floor.

Spitzer’s adulterous transaction had a juicy, horrible twist: it ended a few minutes into Valentine’s Day.

The cable news channels kicked into gear, with anchors mostly carrying a tone of disappointment at the wrongdoing. Then the liberal pundits began spinning furiously. Start with James Carville, who quickly suspected a vast right-wing conspiracy on CNN: "I smell a rat here! This thing has gone really overboard. I wonder who is behind the information."

When Wolf Blitzer protested that Spitzer had done something illegal, Carville stepped into overdrive, spinning that that law-breakers make great law-makers: "A lot of people do a lot of things that are illegal. I don't think this strikes at the core of his ability to serve the state. Okay? Just like I think if someone got a DUI. It's a horrible crime. I don't think they need to resign because of that." And then he went back to imagining nefarious conservative leakers.

Over on MSNBC, Alan Dershowitz raged against American prudishness: "Big deal, married man goes to prostitute! In Europe, this wouldn't even make the back pages of the newspaper. It's a uniquely American story. We’re a uniquely, you know, pandering society and hypocritical society, when it comes to sex." Thus, Spitzer’s lying and adultery and illegal cavorting with prostitutes across state lines is all America’s fault. We wouldn’t have hypocrisy if we could just jettison our primitive morality.

Carville and Dershowitz and other liberal adultery-dismissers were quite clear that the worst thing wasn’t Spitzer’s behavior. It was, to quote Carville, "all these moralizing and self-righteous jerks on TV" suggesting Spitzer had crossed an ethical line.

The Democrats were elected in 2006 running against a Republican "culture of corruption," claiming this kind of corrupt financial and sexual behavior was in the DNA of the Republican Party, and with new sheriffs in town it would be a thing of the past. Now it’s not partisan. Then, the networks and the news magazines made Congressman Mark Foley instantly infamous in the last weeks of that campaign for sending inappropriate messages to male teenage pages.

Guess who was a "moralizing and self-righteous jerk" on that scandal? Meet James Carville. On September 29, 2006, there was James on CNN, suggesting the Republican Congress was cooked due to Duke Cunningham in jail, Bob Ney pleading guilty, and "You have got Foley resigning because of that -- because, obviously, not allegations, something untoward with a young male, underaged male." He wasn’t skeptical of a left-wing conspiracy or partisan glee.

On October 4, he repeatedly demanded on "The Situation Room" and on "Larry King Live" that GOP Speaker Hastert had to resign because he’d failed to expose Foley’s behavior. He also mocked Foley going for rehabilitation: "You know, every time these guys go to rehab -- you know, I'm 61 and I went to LSU, I've gotten pretty loaded -- I have never wanted to hit on a 16-year-old boy, as drunk as I got."

But that’s how one treats Republican scandals. How about Democratic scandals? If you rely on the media, you may not even know it’s a Democratic scandal. They are once again practicing the infuriating art of dropping the party label out of their reporting. As the story broke, ABC and NBC couldn’t even mention the word "Democrat" in their Spitzer stories. ABC put a "D" next to Spitzer’s name on a screen graphic. NBC couldn’t even do that.

If Spitzer’s not going to get an "F" on the media’s report card, at the very least they ought to give him a "D" in their story.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I sure hope the worm turns

I sure hope the worm turns with the exposure of the hypocrisy of the Spitzer case.  Between Foley, Craig, and Vitter, the media couldn't tie them closely enough to the Republicans.  Now with Eliott Spitzer and Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick of Detroit, why is it not harmful to Democrats?  Perhaps because the media is careful and selective about including the "D" after their names?

"A lot of people do a lot

"A lot of people do a lot of things that are illegal. I don't think
this strikes at the core of his ability to serve the state. Okay? Just
like I think if someone got a DUI. It's a horrible crime. I don't think
they need to resign because of that.
"
-Carville

Well, James, how about if that person ran on the premise of being a strict anti-DUI guy? Wouldn't you go after his head on the basis of his hypocrisy and his inability to be credible on that issue because of it? (Provided he was a Republican, that is).

Complicty of the Media

The real story in the Spitzer affair is the complicty of the media. Spitzers rise to the governorship would not have been possible without the willing cooperation of a news media that lapped up his press releases and called him the "Sheriff of Wall Street" and a "Tireless Crusader".  A media which took glee in the destruction of prominent people, not because they were guilty, but because they were successful.

Hidden from view by these accomplices was his absolute ruthlessness and lack of perspective.  He intimadated the board of AIG into firing Hank Greenberg. He sued Dick Grasso and board members (except Democrat Carl McCall) of the NYSE over a pay package. 

Where was the critical examination by the press. Why did no one wonder why hedge funds were locating out of New York State and out of his reach. Where was the outrage in 2005 when he said to John Whitehead, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs:

"Mr. Whitehead, it's now a war between us and you've fired the first shot. I will be coming after you. You will pay the price. This is only the beginning and you will pay dearly for what you have done. You will wish you had never written that letter."

Spitzer's rise was aided and abetted by a fawning media. One wonders of the reports at 60 Minutes spend even a millisecond reflecting on the consequences of their actions.

The news media in the United States is the only industry that I can think of which daily gets away with producing a defective product. No other industry, not Wall Street, not Pharmaceuticals, not Detroit could get away with so consistently producing such defective work.

It is a crying shame. It would be great of journlism schools would begin a real examination of the trade. But these schools only fuel the disease. These people in the media cause real lasting damage in their determination to turn facts into a  morality play they call a "story".

 

Spitzer wrote: "Mr.

Spitzer wrote:

"Mr. Whitehead, it's now a war between us and you've fired the first
shot. I will be coming after you. You will pay the price. This is only
the beginning and you will pay dearly for what you have done. You will
wish you had never written that letter." 

 

Wow!!! What a P.O.S.!!! and he was elected by an overwhelming majority?!?

Eliot Spitzer, mook & crook

There is so much more to come out about Spitzer, that will go way beyond his dicktatorial activities.

For instance, get this from John Podhoretz...

Eliot Spitzer, Crook
John Podhoretz - 03.10.2008 - 18:32
The thing is, Eliot Spitzer is a crook. I’m not referring to the current prostitution scandal. I’m not referring to the scandal last year involving his senior aides and the leaking of confidential police information to the Albany Times Union. I’m not referring to the threatening phone call he made to the august John Whitehead, retired head of Goldman Sachs, who had the temerity to question a case Spitzer was building against an old friend of Whitehead’s. I’m referring to his conduct dating back to 1994, when he designed a complex scheme involving loans and real estate and collateralized apartments to evade campaign-finance laws so that his own father, Bernard Spitzer, could pay for his campaign as attorney general of New York state. Millions of dollars. And then, in 1998, running for the same office, he did it again. It’s hard to explain, but basically, Spitzer’s father gave him a lot of real estate. He used it to secure loans totaling more than $8 million. Then his father paid back the loans. He was supposed to pay his father back. He said he did. Then he acknowledged he hadn’t. Then somehow it all went away. I’m not a big fan of campaign-finance laws, but they are laws, and they are supposed to apply to everybody.

The rules don’t apply to Eliot Spitzer, or at least, that’s how Eliot Spitzer has acted throughout his public life. Sic transit gloria mundi

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

I just saw a blurb on MSNBC

I just saw a blurb on MSNBC on the screen that said he spent $80,000 on prostitutes!! Where did he even get that kind of money to throw around????

If that were my husband, I'd kill him for that alone! LOL

I'd be thinking of what I could have done with that kind of money, that he deprived the family of!!

And his wife is standing by him?

Sheesh.

»→ motherbelt

His daddy's a billionaire.

♣ a seal

Well, some of those

Well, some of those occasions were on trips to Florida and DC. They are now talking about looking into whether any taxpayer money was involved.

The plot thickens.

My husband passed away 16

My husband passed away 16 years ago. Nonetheless, if he were alive today and pulled this crap, he wouldn't have made ANY announcement. I would have been the one making the speech. And it wouldn't have been pretty either.

Emperor's Clothing

Spitzer was the Attorney General, the govenor, the "Tireless Crusader", "The Sheriff of Wall Street." 

Lastly he was one of the Emperors in the Emperor's Club.

As it turned out, the emperor had no clothes.

They were all on the floor!

ahh the VRWC...

“Over on MSNBC, Alan Dershowitz raged against American prudishness: "Big deal, married man goes to prostitute…Thus, Spitzer’s lying and adultery and illegal cavorting with prostitutes across state lines is all America’s fault. We wouldn’t have hypocrisy if we could just jettison our primitive morality.

James Carville, who quickly suspected a vast right-wing conspiracy on CNN: "I smell a rat here! This thing has gone really overboard. I wonder who is behind the information." “

...of course it was the VRWC, the defenders of morality. What these "fools" don't realize is the "depth" of our membership. And this "depth" will not be mocked!

v

10 How long will the enemy mock you, O God?
Will the foe revile your name forever?
22 Rise up, O God, and defend your cause;
remember how fools mock you all day long. Psalm 74

Elliot "Shakedown" Spitzer

I remember consulting at a major Investment Bank around the time Spitzer ran a shakedown on Wall Street firms.

This guy would sell his own grandmother, and of course, the MSM would cover for him because he has the "D", not an evil "R"

 

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!