Bozell Column: McCain, Again a Media Darling

Photo of Brent Bozell.
By Brent Bozell | January 22, 2008 - 19:51 ET

Every four years, the media try to offer the Republican electorate advice on what the GOP should do to achieve victory. Buyer beware: those eager to accept the media’s conventional "wisdom" ought to recognize that these are blueprints for Republican domination of Washington only if it’s a domination by the party’s liberal wing. Currently, the simmering stew of conventional "wisdom" suggests that Sen. John McCain is going to emerge as the obvious front-runner for 2008 because his is the winning message for Republicans.

All the recurring media love for McCain – he’s the only candidate who can go on Fox News and call journalists "Trotskyites" and the liberals all laugh – should remind conservatives why they distrusted him in 2000. His victory in the South Carolina primary warmed the hearts of liberal journalists everywhere. To represent the media giddiness, see Jill Zuckman in the Chicago Tribune. It was "a healthy dose of poetic justice as he beat his Republican rivals and vanquished the ghosts of his 2000 defeat under a barrage of scurrilous smears."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Leftists in the press have always believed that before he stole Florida from Al Gore, George W. Bush had registered his South Carolina victory in 2000 through anonymous phone calls alleging that McCain’s dark-skinned adopted daughter Bridget from Bangladesh was his illegitimate black love child, playing on the inherent racism of those South Carolina Republicans. It didn’t matter that even four years later McCain campaign manager Rick Davis couldn’t substantiate how many of these scurrilous phone calls were actually made, or by whom. The dramatic conventional wisdom had hardened into "fact."

This drama of purging the "ghosts" of 2000 no doubt led to the curious weekend reporting on the Republican contests in South Carolina and Nevada. McCain’s narrow victory in South Carolina was highlighted with joy. Mitt Romney’s massive margin of victory in Nevada was comparatively ignored. The New York Times highlighted that "McCain and Clinton Capture Tough Wins," but published no story on Romney’s Nevada result in the Sunday paper, the same state Hillary won. "All The News That’s Fit to Print" and all that.

There are areas where John McCain can inspire the conservative troops: his valiant military service, his public stands against pork-barrel spending, and his steadfast support for the Iraq war and the "surge" even when it estranged him from his media suitors for a while. I sympathize with his distaste for how arrogant corporations think they can just buy their way through the Washington policy wars. But his campaign "reform" measure wasn’t just aimed at stalling powerful corporations, but at every group or individual that wanted to call out a candidate by name in the last sixty days of an election cycle.

The media won’t remind conservatives of the many stands McCain has taken against their cause. They love his "maverick" stands against GOP orthodoxy. But did you notice what the media thinks of "maverick" Democrats? They aren’t revered. They’re denounced. Ask Joe Lieberman. They wanted him to drop out in 2006 and let fire-breathing leftist Ned Lamont go unchallenged.

Right now, the liberal media and the McCain boosters they’ve hired for their editorial pages are touting how McCain is the face of a reborn Republican party, that’s tossed aside the oppressive old dogma of Ronald Reagan. They say McCain’s the only candidate who can win independent voters, and the rest of the GOP is a pathetic "kingdom of the blind."

But ask yourself this question: Did Ronald Reagan win in landslides by kowtowing to this ageless conventional media wisdom -- or did he win his campaigns going in the exact opposite direction?

The new media have been staunch in defending Reaganism, and noting that McCain’s recent legislative record wouldn’t exactly make Reagan proud. Start with the free-speech-squelching McCain-Feingold bill. Then add the McCain-Ted Kennedy plan to offer widespread amnesty to illegal immigrants. McCain and Lieberman pushed for an onerous new regime of "climate stewardship" to cut energy emissions. Conservatives still remember that the last time he ran for president, John McCain pledged he would apply no litmus test on abortion to his Supreme Court nominees, and his aides whispered to reporters that he wasn’t really that opposed to abortion and would "come around" on gay rights. McCain consistently has voted against tax cuts, no matter what he says on the campaign trail.

The Republican race is up for grabs, a real guessing game. Most conservatives looking at the GOP field remain unexcited, doubting these candidates either can win or will govern as a conservative. But whatever Republicans decide, they should not make their decisions by consulting George Stephanopoulos or Chris Matthews or The New York Times for advice about which candidate is the real conservative.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Florida Listen to Bozell and Reject McCain

"I believe my party has gone astray. I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy." - John McCain

Age: 71

- Graduated 894th out of 899 in his class at the United States Naval Academy

Betrayal, deceit, corruption and John McCain (The U.S. Veteran Dispatch)

"While still married to Carol, McCain began an adulterous relationship with Cindy. He married Cindy in May 1980 - just a month after dumping his crippled wife and securing a divorce."

McCain: I'll Respect Hillary (NewsMax)
The Real McCain Record (National Review Online)

Abortion:

John McCain Supports Embryonic Stem Cell Research (Audio)
McCain Softens Abortion Stand (The Washington Post)

"But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations." - John McCain

Foreign Policy:

McCain falls asleep during the State of the Union Address (Video)
McCain to Close Gitmo: "The first day I am President" (Video)

Global Warming:

McCain and Lieberman Push for New Anti-Global Warming Legislation (The National Center for Public Policy Research)
Senators McCain and Lieberman Propose Energy Tax (The National Center for Public Policy Research)

"No drilling in ANWR, nor in the Everglades, nor off the coast of Florida... To think that drilling in ANWR is the solution to our incredible energy needs is frankly, is not keeping in the reality of what's there, and what it would take to get it out" - John McCain

Illegal Immigration:

John McCain gets a 'D' on his Immigration Voting Report Card (Americans for Better Immigration)

- McCain favors business lobbyists’ desires for foreign workers vs. protecting American workers’ wages and jobs
- McCain’s hopes of giving millions amnesty will saddle American taxpayers with huge costs of $20,000 per illegal per year
- McCain has taken the pro-amnesty position in nearly two dozen votes
- McCain only promises to make 2 million of the 12-20 million illegal aliens go home

John McCain Praises Pro-illegal Protests (NewsMax)
McCain called plan 'amnesty' in 2003 (WorldNetDaily)

"I think we can set up a program where amnesty is extended to a certain number of people, Amnesty has to be an important part..." - John McCain, 2003

Michigan Crowd Boos McCain On Illegal Immigration (Video) (1min)
McCain Voted For Illegal Immigrants To Collect Social Security (UC Daily News)

Marriage:

McCain: Same-sex marriage ban is un-Republican (CNN)

Taxes:

McCain Boasts That He Voted Against The Bush Tax Cuts (Video)
McCain Would Vote Against Tax Cuts Again (The Club for Growth)

- McCain sponsored and voted for an enormous 282% tax increase on cigarettes in 1998
- McCain was one of only two Republican to vote against the $1.35 trillion tax cut in 2001
- McCain was one of only two Republicans to twice vote against permanent repeal of the death tax in 2002
- McCain was one of only three Republican to twice vote against the $350 billion tax cut in 2003

McCain’s Costly Tax on Energy (National Review Online)

- The EPA Estimates Sen. McCain's Plan Would Hike Gas Taxes By 68 Cents Per Gallon
- The EPA Estimates Sen. McCain's Plan Would Reduce United States GDP By As Much As $5.2 Trillion

McCain Rejects Anti-Tax Pledge (CNSNews)

Veterans:

McCain Can't Buy His Way Out of Votes Against Funding for Veterans

- McCain Voted Against $19 Billion for Military Hospitals
- McCain Voted Against Amendment to Provide $2.8 Billion For Veterans' Medical Care
- McCain Voted Against 2005 Amendment to Provide Guaranteed Funding Stream for Veterans' Health Care
- McCain Voted Against Establishing $1 Billion Trust Fund to Provide Improvements to Military and Veterans' Health Facilities
- McCain Voted Against Adding $1.5 billion to Veterans' Medical Services in FY 2007 by Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes
- McCain Voted Against Mandatory Funding of $6.9 Billion in FY 2007 and $104 Billion Over Five Years for Veterans' Health Care


The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

You're right, Mr.

You're right, Mr. Bozell....every four years the MSM's advice to the Republicans is, in a nutshell: Be more like Democrats.

My main fear with McCain is that, as President, he would again be willing to "work with" Democrats......on Supreme Court nominations. I can just picture Juciciary Committee Chairman Leahy, along with Chuck Schumer and Ted Kennedy, sending up a list of "acceptable" nominees.

MB - same thoughts

It goes to my theory that there are no reporters anymore, just agendists, and most people don't realize that the msm(Lsm) is trying to run the country and avoid the business of govenrment. Problem that they don't see, THEY don't have any idea of what the country is, nor how the Constitution works. To borrow a quote, "They think they think, therefore it should be". Too bad that now there are more and more people who have seen what they are trying to do. In this case prop-up McLame, and have him run against THEIR fav.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Agreed, MB

McCain gives me problems. I like the guy, but he does things that just bother me.

  • When McCain talks about cutting spending, I cheer. When he gave his support to the surge and Petraeus, I loved the guy.
  • But on the other hand, he sponsors two bills that were the definition of unintended consequences: McCain-Feingold (which brought more money into the system, not less), and the McCain-Kennedy thing on immigration. In both of those cases, well-meaning and pleasant-sounding ideas unleashed forces he didn't anticipate.
  • And the Gang of 14? I like the idea of breaking the mindless partisanship, but when it happened, I couldn't count how many potential disasters I could anticipate. It tried to put power into the hands of people whose main concern was not the merits of each issue, but simply on prolonging the "centrism" of the Gang. The gridlock partisanship was bad enough, but the Gang's version would have made it worse. It would have been an even more dangerous example of politics for the benefit of politicians. 

What strikes me about McCain is that he's not an executive. By instinct, he's a legislator. He looks for compromise. He wants to work with people across the aisle. And normally, in a legislator, that's a good quality. It would be great, if only the people on the other side of the aisle were also willing to compromise. But there's a harsh reality in today's world. The other sides (Democrats, Chinese, Russians, etc.) don't want to compromise. They take McCain's compromising as weakness. They'll take him to the cleaners. And with Kennedy and Feingold, they already did. We can't afford the Chinese or Koreans to exploit the same desire to compromise. Compromise is a good quality in a legislator, not in an executive.

For me, McCain has the same problem as the three Democrats in the race. They're all senators. Being an executive is simply a different mindset. McCain is infinitely better than any of the three Democrats, but he's still a senator.

KC, I agree. The problem

KC, I agree. The problem with Senators and Congressmen is that they view their job as "passing legislation." How many times have we heard from them when interviewed that it's frustrating that they can't "get anything done." Isn't that why the Founding Fathers made passing laws so cumbersome?

To them, (our legislators, not the Founders) success equals passing new laws.

Considering the fact that most new laws either cost us money or retrict another one of our freedoms, I say the less they "get done" the better!

Completely agree

The MSM would love nothing more than to define the GOP opponent to either Hillary or Obama. They would love for it to be McCain because he is A) very beatable and B) not too bad should he happen to win (by their liberal standards).

Unfortunately, one of the true conservative candidates has dropped out today.

Personally, I think that the only candidate that can beat either Hillary or Obama because of his unerring conservative principles and his passion for the Constitution and it's founding principles, and his ability to convey both, is Alan Keyes. Of course the media are doing everything in their power to try and keep him a secret from the general population. Even FoxNews refuses to acknowledge that Alan Keyes is even in the race at all. Ambassador Keyes came in 3rd in the Utah Straw Poll and not one single national news media entity even mentioned that.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

Alan Keyes is one of the

Alan Keyes is one of the great minds of our generation, but as a politician he is a considerable lightweight. You and I have a better chance of being elected.

With that said, you are spot on about McCain. In fact one of the reasons given by the left for liking John is he would be a "tollerable" Republican.

If you want a politician

Then I guess you have to vote for Romney or Gulianni.

I on the other hand would rather have "one of the great minds of our generation", as you so rightly put it, in the whitehouse.

Imagine where we would be, if the Electoral College voted for the best politician instead of the best minds of their times when selecting Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Adams, etc.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

Well, you have to be a good

Well, you have to be a good politician, if you are gonna get elected. You can be the finest man who ever breathed, but if you can get elected to do the job, then you can't do it! Keyes can't get elected. That's a tragedy. On the other hand, neither can Ron Paul, which is wonderful!

So yes, I will be voting for Romney as my first choice and Giuliani as my second. One of these two will win the nomination, and either of these will win the general.

Brilliant but transparent

strategy by the media. They are trying to create a liberal win-win situation by fixing it so we have 2 liberals running against each other.

Conservatives would be wise to infiltrate the Democrat Party in the same way.

"an endorsement of communism is an endorsement of slavery"

Just one question John

How is that fence coming?So much for your securing the border when you cant even build a fence.Kudos to congress the best money can buy.

Don't forget McCain is THE

Don't forget McCain is THE reason we are not drilling in ANWAR. He cast the vote that killed the bill.

Gary,

I started out with the nicname of "McCan't, but someone  I was talking to said, "McVain". I would suggest that both fit the description, what's your thought's?

"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."

Both describe the man

Both describe the man perfectly. It's all about his self aggrandizement. Was watching a deal on the Military Channel. They were interviewing the guy who was the best pilot, and leader in Viet Nam. Several other pilots including McCain were interviewed. Don't remember the exact words, but the ace pilot clearly did not hold McCain in high esteem!

I feel bad trashing the guy. He is a genuine card carrying hero. If you notice, he has trouble raising his arms, due I'm sure to his torture by the VC. So I'll give him props for that.

But his after life, his years as a "maverick" will come home to roost soon.

It is getting a little old

These bought and paid for congressman that have sold us out.God forbid we become less energy dependant.Or they support the rule of law.

In a few days, we will be

In a few days, we will be calling McCain, McLoser. There are only two problems with that:

During the rest of the campign, McLoser will be fighting for the dimocrats to win.

During the next Republican presidency, he will fight the president tooth and nail like he has done to President Bush.

The sad news is that Arizona keeps voting him in as one their two senators . . .

McCains own Maricopa County AZ repubs dislike him

The county also gave an indication of who the party faithful is supporting as the Republican nominee.

Here are the results out of 721 ballots cast:
Overall Votes (662 Votes):
#1 - Mitt Romney - 28.4% (188)
#2 - Fred Thomson - 18.3% (121)
#3 - Ron Paul - 17.4% (115)
#4 - Duncan Hunter - 14.0% (93)
#5 - John McCain - 12.1% (80)
#6 - Rudy Giuliani - 5.0% (33)
#7 - Mike Huckabee - 4.8% (32)
Most Acceptable (1781 Votes):
#1 - Fred Thompson - 20.8% (370)
#2 - Duncan Hunter - 20.1% (358)
#3 - Mitt Romney - 20.0% (356)
#4 - Rudy Giuliani - 13.2% (235)
#5 - Mike Huckabee - 11.6% (207)
#6 - John McCain - 7.6% (135)
#7 - Ron Paul - 6.7% (120)

Most Unacceptable (1949 votes):
#1 - John McCain - 21.9% (427)

#2 - Ron Paul - 20.3% (396)
#3 - Rudy Giuliani - 18.3% (357)
#4 - Mike Huckabee - 17.4% (340)
#5 - Duncan Hunter - 8.0% (156)
#6 - Fred Thompson - 7.8% (152)
#7 - Mitt Romney - 6.2% (121 )

JFK was more conservative than any of the remaining RINOs.

Have any of you noticed that John F. Kennedy was much more conservative than Sen. John McCain?

In fact, he was probably more conservative than any of the remaining "republican" candidates.

Sunk far as a party, we have.

None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe

Guys, we gotta get off of

Guys, we gotta get off of this doom and gloom bull$hit!

The party is not sunk, conservatism is not dead, in this country, or others. Look at all of the foreign nations that have elected conservative (for them) leaders. We have a pretty good amount of conservatives in Congress. I know my Congressman is dead on conservative.

All you guys looking for the perfect candidate or should I say the perfect man, are chasing a myth. I take it most of the Republicans here feel like me and most of my friends, if I could vote for W again, we would. But he ain't perfect. On a couple of occasions the people had to loudly let our feelings be known. And we got results.

Once in office, do you honestly think Hillary will care what the peasants think or feel? Mr Helm, and everyone else, we are at one of the most troubling times in this nation's history. You could rate this right up there with the founding of the Nation itself!

We have untold thousands in this country and others who's every waking moment is spent in the pursuit of finding a way to destroy this Nation, killing as many of you and me as they can along the way.

The dimocrats are clueless on how to win the war, or for that matter, keep the homeland safe!

Our border problems are totally out of control. WE have 20 million illegals here soaking up the good life. They bring with them, crime and diseases that haven't been seen in decades. We have Mexicans shooting at our border gaurds daily. The Coyotes and the drug dealers have taken over the border towns on the Mexican side.

No problem, the dims (and McCain) want completely open borders. They want to accommodate our new "guests", take care of their every need. All on YOUR dime!

The Nation's economy is at a point. It certainly isn't bad, the R word isn't needed. But we are at a juncture. A very dangerous juncture. So, do we elect someone who has tons of real life executive experience not only in government, but in real world big business? Or...........

........You can have what's behind door number two! A dimocrat who has never made payroll, never been the one absolutely responsible for a project whether it failed, or did well. Can you look me in the eye, and tell me you trust an economy that's in the tens of trillions of dollars, to someone who has never run a lemonade stand?

Brilliant.

If we want to start some super dooper conservative third party, you won't have success by running for the highest office in the land. No, you have to form the party, and attract qualified candidates to run for Congress. Then after a time when you have a real party, you start trying to win the Presidency. Won't work any other way, the other two parties will see to that!

So for now, voting for our nominee, be it Rudy or Mitt, is the only course of action that will not kill this great Nation! And believe me, I am not engaging in hyperbole. The situation is this dire!

Gary, I love your optimism.

Gary,

I love your optimism. I think what gets everyone down is we absolutely know how this country should be run, what would be best for all the citizens. We see everything slipping left. Our own party moving to the left, while the Democrats slide off the clif. I agree that our side even with our lousy leaders is still better then the left but..we can do so much better. It's like going into a Ford dealership and wanting a Ford truck, they tell you no trucks, then no Fords, then no cars other then a Yugo. Yes its still better then walking but we can do better.

There is a better vision then the RNC gives us. We want more then Democratic lite.

While I will vote for almost anyone with an R beside their name over a D, we perpetuate the big government, big spending, entitlements (left for future generations to elect current officials). I know I sound like a election slogan, but we can do better.

I know there is a very real danger in terror, (I lost a dear friend in the WTC), and both my kids still live near NYC. I worry about them. I will pull for Mitt or Rudy, after that I don’t believe they are elect able.There will be too many conservatives that will sit it out, (I know it, the Dems. know it, and the MSM knows it) that is why they are pushing Mc Cain. WithMc Cain they have a win-win. If he gets in, they think they can(work/manipulate) him but odds are if he gets the nomination there will be enough right wingers sitting home, (like the last election) not to win.

We (I am speaking for a large % of the conservatives) are just fed up with the current RNC. After this last disaster of an election, did the RNC do ANY THING DIFFERENT? No, they put the same people in the same places. That would have been a great time to shake things up, put some new young faces in the positions of power. Did Bush make a stand against earmarks, no. Did the Republicans in the Senate or House, No. Its just business as usual and the country be dammed. Did they start working on a fence? NO. Where are we now 8 miles?? B.F.D.

We have gotten away from what America is, the land of opportunity. Not the land of entitlement, or.. of what have you done for me lately, or what is in it for me? I believe in America, where all it takes to get ahead is, dam hard work.We have a working (non working) example of where the left wants this great countryto go its called France, with all of their problems and un-employment.

I think that is why Ron Paul is getting so much money, he is a loon but.. a part of his platform resonates with a large group of Americans. I like a lot of the Libertarian ideas. My guess is that a lot of Republicans have a lot of Libertarian beliefs.

What you are seeing in a lot of these post is frustration with Bush, the RNC, Congress and the Senate. Worse, is their reluctance to change. We need (as my Grandfather would say) a little talk, after dinner, with the RNC. I can’t number how many letters I have sent to the RNC, and all of its leaders. I think I would get the same response if I sent them to my lab.

Gary I'm not saying its right, that is just the feelings of many here. We can do better, thats all. 

 

 

 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

USA, you're right, they

USA, you're right, they don't listen at all. It's like those political interview shows...no matter what they ask the politician, he/she talks about whatever he or she wants to talk about.

Regarding letters: absolutely ignored. Case in point:

When my Senator, Allen Specter (Heaven help me) trotted off to Syria for a little free-lance diplomacy, I sent him a scathing letter saying in effect "How dare you undermine our President and State Department by trying to negotiate outside of channels on your own!!

Weeks later, I got a (probably "form") letter back thanking me for my interest, how important the Middle East, yada, yada, yada, and saying (paraphrasing) I am so concerned about this that I went to Syria to try to establish.....

this, after I raked him over the coals for doing exactly that.

They don't read, they don't care, they do what they want.

 

 

When the money is not

When the money is not coming in they scratch their empty heads and wonder what happened?

I don’t know what we can do, they lost the last election, no change, they have less money coming in. no change. We write letters, we blog, I don’t know..

You know some of them read these post, look at Rush he is always reading these, he is always quoting The American Thinker or the American Spectator, I think he is puzzled as well. I think that the RNC is buying the BS that the MSM puts out. Its as smart as being the head coach of the Patriots, asking the head coach of the Giants how they should win the Super Bowl.  

 

 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

As an engineer I don't see

As an engineer I don't see the glass half full or half empty, I see the glass too big!  On one hand we see the MSM has been successful at hoodwinking the electorate yet again by deselecting candidates they don't want through negative or no press coverage.  We clearly under estimated their residual strength, dying as they are in the ratings themselves.  They may yet be successful in influencing the general election.

On the other hand, we now have an opportunity to rebuild the RNC to our liking.  Let us contemplate the unthinkable and unacceptable if a Democrat, either Hillary or Obama win the WH with a Dem majority in Congress.  It took 50 years for the Dems to run the country into financial pickle by the time Carter took the WH.  After 4 years of his incompetence on top of the Dem controlled Congress, the financial state of the economy was in shambles at that point the electorate had their fill of the Dems thus setting the stage for the Reagan Revolution. 

This time around, the Dems won't have 50 years, actually, they have around 9 years max.  Why 9 years?  In 2017, the balance sheet on Social Security goes in the red for receipts covering pension payments, at that point the national debt begins to be paid down given that SS holds half the national debt.  The Dems will be faced with a budgetary crisis of epic proportions, choose to protect the sacroscanct SS in it's entirety thus sacrificing all their other vote buying scams or cut SS benefits and raise taxes inciting an electorial revolt at the following elections.  This is why the Dems are desparate to kill the Bush tax cuts and not index the AMT both of which can be achieved by doing literally nothing and keeping silent, they know what is coming, Bush tried to head off the disaster but the Dems couldn't let Bush take the credit for fixing the problem.

Taking the principled stand warning the electorate over the important issues while it may not win 2008 will in the long run sweep the country thereafter.  Time is on our side, this is a war and there are many battles in a war, losing some battles doesn't lose the war.

Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.

Gary,

I honestly do understand your point.

My problem is that I no longer see any real, measurable difference between the democrat and republican parties.

Bush II has been a disaster for both his party and the conservative movement. Even more than his father. If we continue to vote for the Bush's of the world, that is all the republican party will be sending us from now on.

We have been taking this garbage for twenty years now. The conservatives keep saying that it will be different "next time."

Well, "next time," as I see it, has arrived. What are we going to do? Wait another four years when things are worse and then do something about it? We are rapidly running out of chances.

A McCain or Huckabee presidency would be every bit as destructive as a democrat one.

I am am not sure a Romney presidency would be any better.

None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe

Michelle Malkin has a great

Michelle Malkin has a great take on McCain's supposedly seeing the light on immigration: The Geraldo Rivera Republican.

She says of McCain's turnaround (“I got the message,” he told voters in South Carolina. “We will secure the borders first.”) on the illegal immigration issue:

This is cynicism on steroids with a speedball chaser.

Nice turn of phrase there. I would have called it pandering on stilts.

I like both lines..   These

I like both lines..

 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

He got it.. after millions

He got it.. after millions of phone calls, faxes, e-mails.

The one thing that almost all of America gets, but Mc Cain, Bush, the RNC and the whole Democratic party does not.

Immigration is THE perfect example of the disconnect between Washington/or the RNC, and big business and the rest of us.  All of America sees it as the destruction of this great country. The RNC  see it as the ticket to stay in office (the country be dammed.) That is why entitlements do not matter, that cost will be passed on long after this batch of SOB’s are dead and my kids and grandkids will have to pay.

Once a entitlement gets put into action, it never never never leaves or gets smaller.

All we want is a G.D. fence, and we cant even do that!

Punish the employer, the jobs will dry up, they will get outthe same way they got in, on their own. Don’t tell me it will not work. It will just the politicians don’t want it to work they don’t see 12-20 million people draining everything from schools to hospitals they see VOTES, and money from business. THAT IS ALL. The country be dammed.

 

 

 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

Michelle Malkin

I just read Michelle's article!! Again Michelle nails it!! I immediatlly forwarded her article to all the people in my address book!! Michelle is brilliant I just love reading all she writes and enjoy her when she stands in for some of the Fox commentators. 

A PROUD AMERICAN

McCain has behaved like a jet jockey

McCain has behaved like a jet jockey throughout his career. At almost every opportunity along the way, he has taken the low road. Major battles with the Left have been avoided or circumvented by McCain and his Gang of 14 in favor of  lame compromises. Significant debate has been avoided, allowing the Senate and House to hide their political positions from the American people. We need these battles to preserve our freedom, and from what we've seen of late, our leadership's best isn't good enough.

McCain is the most qualified

McCain is the most qualified imho, but his just-below-the-surface rage troubles me.  Maybe that anger comes from an honest place and is just what is needed in a leader.

McCain is cooperating now

McCain is cooperating now with Mexican Nationalist.  I do not care what kind of hero he was in Vietnam. 

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/john-mccains-open-borders-outreach-director-the-next-dhs-secretary/#comments