As the movie studios gear up for a big Christmas movie season, one trailer that looks like a blockbuster is “The Golden Compass,” which must be trying to cash in on the “Narnia” movies. It has flashy special-effect polar bears in armor and a young heroic damsel in distress facing off against evil forces. The casting is top-notch, led by Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig, the current star spy in the James Bond movies.
But buyer beware: Narnia it’s not. It’s the anti-Narnia. Instead of a Christian allegory, it’s an anti-Christian allegory. The author of “The Golden Compass,” Philip Pullman, is an atheist who despises C. S. Lewis and his much-beloved Narnia series. “I thought they were loathsome,” he said of those books, “full of bullying and sneering, propaganda, basically, on behalf of a religion whose main creed seemed to be to despise and hate people unlike yourself.”
This book and movie is only the first in his trilogy, titled “His Dark Materials,” that gets more and more anti-religious in each book. Pullman hates orthodox religion and “those who pervert and misuse religion, or any other kind of doctrine with a holy book and a priesthood and an apparatus of power that wields unchallengeable authority, in order to dominate and suppress human freedoms.”
If you hear the ring of anti-Catholicism, you’re right. The evil empire in this movie for children is called the “Magisterium,” which is exactly the word Catholics use to describe the teaching authority of the Pope and his bishops. The books are more explicit, in which the evil institution is also called “The Church” and the higher-ups are the “Vatican Council.”
British columnist Peter Hitchens has explained how our secular thought-shapers would love for Pullman to undercut Narnia’s influence on children: “The cultural elite would like to wipe out this pocket of resistance. They have successfully expelled God from the schools, from the broadcast media and, for the most part, from the Church itself.” He writes that while Lewis mocked atheists as joyless, Pullman depicts priests as evil and murderous, drunk and probably perverted, and the Church as “a conspiracy against happiness and kindness.”
Isn’t it a bit perverse to head into the Christmas holiday season hyping an atheist fantasy movie for kids? No doubt sensing this, Pullman and the movie makers have ventured on a dishonest but energetic public-relations campaign to convince the public that this film isn’t really anti-Christian. It’s a plea for open-mindedness and spiritual dialogue. The church is just a metaphor, see.
The movie’s director, Chris Weitz, spins it this way: “In the books, the Magisterium is a version of the Catholic church gone wildly astray from its roots. If that's what you want in the film, you'll be disappointed.” Weitz says they merely “expanded the range of meanings” for the Magisterium, that it’s merely a metaphor for tyranny of any stripe: “Philip Pullman is against any kind of organized dogma whether it is church hierarchy or, say, a Soviet hierarchy.” That would be more believable if Hollywood had a track record of casting a Soviet hierarchy as evil – and if Hollywood didn’t have its own organized dogma of secular fundamentalism.
Nicole Kidman spins it her way: “I was raised Catholic, the Catholic Church is part of my essence. I wouldn't be able to do this film if I thought it were at all anti-Catholic."
The media have played happily along in disguising Pullman’s religion-bashing. On NBC’s “Today,” weatherman Al Roker delighted in making “The Golden Compass” the fall book selection of “Al’s Book Club for Kids.” Pullman appeared on NBC to deny that he was really promoting atheism. He touted letting the reader decide what the author intended, in a “democracy of reading.” The closest he came to atheism was saying the book championed “open-minded intellectual curiosity.” If that sounds like a transparent dodge, it certainly was. He told the students asking questions to think of the Taliban in Afghanistan. But the menace in Pullman’s trilogy isn’t called the Caliphate, and its hideous monsters aren’t mullahs. They are cardinals and priests, and the heroes are an atheist former nun and two rebellious gay male angels.
The atheists may be angry that the movie waters down Pullman’s anti-religious message, but they can take comfort in the fact that many parents (and grandparents and even godparents) will, sadly, buy the hype over this movie and buy this trilogy of vicious anti-religious books for the young readers in their lives. To the Christian book buyer, beware: instead of celebrating God’s son born in the flesh, you’ll be celebrating God being killed so that man can advance to true consciousness.
For those anticipating the wonder of Narnia, you’ll have to wait until next May, when “Prince Caspian,” the second installment, returns magic to the screen.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
“I thought they were
November 11, 2007 - 08:22 ET by bretzysdude“I thought they were loathsome,” he said of those books, “full of bullying and sneering, propaganda, basically, on behalf of a religion whose main creed seemed to be to despise and hate people unlike yourself.”
Hmmm... he didn't actually say that he read them. Just spouting out some atheist talking points.
...and hate people unlike yourself.
November 11, 2007 - 08:51 ET by HypocriteHater...and hate people unlike yourself.
I' ve never heard of this guy before, and I may be wrong, but I'm taking a guess and saying Pullman's probably gay. These are usually the code words for people who are gay and bitter about religion and conservatives.
Didn't quite hit the nail
November 11, 2007 - 09:13 ET by bretzysdudeDidn't quite hit the nail on the head. He is married and has a son. However: clips from his web site tell an interesting story about his life. An excerpt:
There was a girl who took me down to the tall grass at the end of her garden and kissed me. I thought that meant we had to get married, but later, not yet; and I was conscious that that made me more grown-up than I was, and I felt both pleased and resigned at the same time. Oh, is everything decided already, then?
I always liked girls. At one point I wanted to be a girl myself, and I even picked a name: I was going to be Margot. But from the laughter that greeted this announcement I got the idea that wanting to be a girl was strange and embarrassing, and that there were some things I'd better keep to myself.
*gasp* OMG SO HEZ BEEN OPPRESD!
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!He
November 11, 2007 - 09:45 ET by HypocriteHaterAhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!
He's one of those transgenders we've been hearing so much about lately. I knew he had to be one of those special oppressed class of people.
Philip Pullman
November 11, 2007 - 08:48 ET by Dave RPullman hates orthodox religion and “those who pervert and misuse
religion, or any other kind of doctrine with a holy book and a
priesthood and an apparatus of power that wields unchallengeable
authority, in order to dominate and suppress human freedoms.”
I wonder how Pullman feels about the "peaceful" religion of Islam? Funny how he seems to have omitted them, even though this statement describes Islam to a "T."
As for Al Roker, I will be firing up one of my big Webers here shortly. Anyone here care to guess what fuel I'll be using to help start the charcoal?
Nicole Kidman spins it her
November 11, 2007 - 09:33 ET by bretzysdudeNicole Kidman spins it her way: “I was raised Catholic, the Catholic Church is part of my essence. I wouldn't be able to do this film if I thought it were at all anti-Catholic."
Uh huh. So "Birth" worked well with her Catholic values? (Bet you forgot about that one.)
What kind of church did he ever belong to?
November 11, 2007 - 10:24 ET by kdizzydazeWaaahhh!!! I hate Church Waaaahhh!! I hate CS Lewis Waaaahhh!! I hate life because I suck at writing stories and don't have an original thought in my head. Waaahhhh!!!!!
And what is with this - Margot jazz? Reminds me of the Eric Idle character in Life of Brian, "I want to be a woman Stan. From now on, I want you all to call me Loretta." He is a transgender in denial. Wow, I guess they do exist.
"Those who pervert and
November 11, 2007 - 10:34 ET by wiwf"Those who pervert and misuse religion, or any other kind of doctrine
with a holy book and a priesthood and an apparatus of power that wields
unchallengeable authority, in order to dominate and suppress human
freedoms."
I like the way you think, Pullman. Write a book about radical Islam and get back to us.
Signed,
The Real World
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
I read the first book, and
November 11, 2007 - 14:00 ET by nnptcgradI read the first book, and it was an okay story. Very muddled at times though. It would be very easy to make into just an adventure story. I started on the second, and it was just plain confusing and boring as hell. I guess that was when he started to try to hamhandedly put his views in. I never bothered to try the third.
I read far better young adult fantasy that would make far better movies.
Mother nature is a bitch - Ninth Corollary of Murphy's Law
Looks like a very
November 11, 2007 - 15:48 ET by balboaLooks like a very entertaining movie. If you want it to be "anti-christian," then it will be. I suspect if you just watch it as an entertaining fantasy movie, that's exactly what you get.
I don't think children are in danger of brain-washing here.
You are greatly mistaken.
November 11, 2007 - 16:40 ET by KeithThe movie features adults having "familiars" which are called "DAEMONS" and pronounced like, you guessed it....."Demons". Much the same as Harry Potter took the taint out of satanism and witchcraft and lured a generation of mush minds to "explore" with "alternative religions" like "wicca", this film is designed to break down certain moral viewpoints. You're right that as entertainment it'd be just fine but your wrong in saying that the "anti-christian" aspect is basically a matter of perception. As a writer I can tell you that the position within the script that you give the person or character that you wish to be "beyond judgement" is called the "guardian" position. Obi-wan was the Luke characters "guardian" in that he posessed the "key" to the main Characters inner dilemma. In Lukes case it was to grow from farm boy to Jedi. In "My Best Friend's Wedding", Harvey Weinstein, in living up to a promise made to G.L.A.D. to improve the image of homosexuals, made Julia Roberts gay best friend, the keeper of knowledge thereby removing that characters behavior from the audiences judgement. Here was this heterosexual women going to a homosexual for advice about men! As if women were not DESIGNED to attract and deal with men but SODOMITES somehow are! I'll bet you NEVER thought of how manipulated you were when you saw this movie. And you certainly won't be able to spot all of the ways in which Golden Compass, subverts your childs morality. Think about it, children too young to fight back already IMMUNE to the morality you want to teach them! By the time you get around to teaching your kid say, the biblical definition of "abominaton" and how that relates to sodomy, the kid will have over 100 movies in his DVD database that say, your parents are discriminating against people who just "want to be who they are"! Everything from Penguins isolated by slightly different plummage to sharks ostracized for not "eating meat" (Nemo), to hundreds of other characters unfairly "marginalized" by fascistic societies! Good luck with that kid at that point. I went into that expose on writing to show you how complex these subversives are. And that's the perfect word for them, they're not "revolutionaries" they're not in your face! They prefer to subvert your morals with movies like "The Family Stone" where the Guardian character was actually the two GAY GUYS who were the ONLY people in the film WITHOUT a relationship "dilemma" and were in fact the SOLUTION to everybody elses problems! Not to mention the fact that Sarah Jessica Parker as the lone conservative was ridiculed at every opporutnity even when she objected to Diane Keaton's matriarchial character saying that she "HOPED THAT HER CHILDREN WOULD TURN OUT TO BE GAY"! First time those ridiculous words were ever uttered in the history of the world. Look at the film, see the relationship of the characters and how the two sodomites are "removed from judgement" by being the "keepers of knowledge" and get back to me about "it's just an entertaining movie". You have no idea what these people are doing to you and this society.
Wow...and here I thought it
November 11, 2007 - 16:54 ET by balboaWow...and here I thought it was just a movie. Golly how wrong I was! Run! Run for your lives!!! It's a...girl riding a polar bear!! AIEEEEEE!!!
today class
November 11, 2007 - 17:10 ET bywe will begin with a-priori assumptions, their effect on worldview analysis and how that effects the developement of moral intuition
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
This is all a bunch of
November 11, 2007 - 17:12 ET by balboaThis is all a bunch of nonsense. Brent must have been bored today.
Bal
November 11, 2007 - 17:16 ET byif you are not prepared to even approach the basics then why do you even bother to waste anyones time?
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
Bruce
November 11, 2007 - 17:23 ET by BlondeBal isn't remotely interested in debate, nor its definitions, nor the styles of, etc.
He's only interested in snark and disruptions.
I don't even bother anymore, unless his interruptions (and that's what they are) are particularly offensive or intrusive in an interesting conversation here.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Blonde
November 11, 2007 - 17:31 ET byBal used to at least offer some backing for making assertions, lately it's just some sophomoric oppositional obsfucation. (the Pelosi/Reid tactic)
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
I'm willing to see that you
November 11, 2007 - 18:10 ET by balboaI'm willing to see that you can interpret the movie a certain way if you'd like. But I don't think the majority of people who read the books or see the movie will care and will not be adversely affected, either.
Brent acts like this movie is some kind of threat. It's not.
“The way to stop
November 11, 2007 - 18:31 ET by“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
i am willing (popcorn) to allow you to remain (popcorn) willfully ignorant, your (popcorn) choice. There are some things (popcorn) which act in a subconscious (popcorn) manner and which (popcorn) play roles in developing (popcorn) our ideas of right and (popcorn) wrong. We identify with the hero (popcorn) and accept their motives (popcorn) without analysis just (popcorn) as Keith described. Other things get (popcorn) internalized in other ways (popcorn) that's why subliminal advertizing (popcorn) was banned at drive-ins before (popcorn) you were born.
Geez, B.
November 11, 2007 - 18:40 ET by BlondeYou slayed me with that one!
OMG. That was so over the top I am still not believing it. Excellent.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
The bottom line is no one's
November 11, 2007 - 19:25 ET by balboaThe bottom line is no one's coming out of that movie with some deeply embedded idea that religion is bad.
"Willing to interpret the
November 11, 2007 - 18:52 ET by AJ"Willing to interpret the movie a certain way"? No offense, bal, but that goes 100% against the intentions of a piece of literature including film scripts. When you write a story and you interject religious/social/political undertones, it is not "open for interpretation". The final purpose of the story may be to "open your mind" but the actual story is not-- cannot be vague like that. It isn't a good story if there is no moral or call to action. That is writing 101 stuff.
And yes, it is a "threat" if it is media that is being broadcasted to the general public and people are buying into it. Hmm... where have we seen that before. Oh, we call it the "mainstream media".
The core of the movie
November 11, 2007 - 19:23 ET by balboaThe core of the movie remains the same: defeat the bad guy. Do you honestly think the majority of the people consider the bad guy anything but bad? Do you think little most people come out thinking, "Wow, the church is a bad thing"?
The moral or call to action is "defeat evil." Not "the church is bad."
Just as with Narnia, no one's coming out of the theater thinking "Wow, religion is so awesome!" They come out thinking "Good movie / bad movie."
Oh, for the love
November 11, 2007 - 19:31 ET by bretzysdudeOh, for the love of...
Look, it will be clear that they will define what "the evil" is. They always have in these kinds of movies. To think that it will be presented in generalized terms is thinking very wrongly.
So you think this movie is a
November 11, 2007 - 19:32 ET by balboaSo you think this movie is a piece of propaganda aimed at derailing religion?
Hollywood itself is that.
November 11, 2007 - 19:35 ET by bretzysdudeHollywood itself is that. Not just this movie.
Sheesh...you guys could find
November 11, 2007 - 19:38 ET by balboaSheesh...you guys could find a threat to Christianity in a box of Cocoa Puffs.
It's a movie. 99.999% of people that see it will think the same thing and not be adversely affected at all...unless they read Brent's "column."
Sheesh...you
November 11, 2007 - 19:47 ET by Blondefind something inane to say about everything.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Yeah, bal, you gotta watch those demonic Cocoa Puffs.
November 11, 2007 - 19:51 ET by Dave RAfter all, there's a demon in every puff. :-O
-Sorry, Bal. I just had ta. LOL.
The sad things is that we
November 11, 2007 - 20:32 ET by CortillaenThe sad things is that we aren't being paranoid. When a large segment of the country, backed by the power of the entire MSM, the Democrats, and people like Soros, wants to obliterate Chirstianity, taking things like this as threats and attacks is very reasonable.
www.rhjunior.com/CC/ Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
Absolutely absurd. This is a
November 11, 2007 - 20:34 ET by balboaAbsolutely absurd. This is a movie, a fun movie for kids (it looks like), and that's what they'll get out of it, not your paranoid delusions.
The worst possible outcome
November 11, 2007 - 21:20 ET by CortillaenThe worst possible outcome is that the children do not realize this is an intentional attack on Christianity. Anyone know the best way to change commonly held perceptions in the public? Expose children to said perceptions repeatedly from an early age. If the movie was just a movie, I wouldn't have a problem with it. The issue here is that it is part of a concerted effort to undermine and destroy Christianity in this country. The author of the books is a militant atheist, and the timing of the movie's release is a thinly-veiled ploy. If you want to think it's nuts, go ahead, but I've read the whole trilogy, and the "evil Christians" theme is quite prolific. I actually like his writing; he's a good author, and would be much better if he'd get his head screwed on straight and quit with the hardcore anti-Christianity stuff.
www.rhjunior.com/CC/ Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
Just a book. Just a movie.
November 11, 2007 - 21:34 ET by balboaJust a book. Just a movie. This is just as looney as people who think Harry Potter is evil.
"It's just a movie,"
November 11, 2007 - 22:26 ET by Cortillaen"It's just a movie," appears to be the entire basis of your argument. I think my explanation has thoroughly destroyed the viability of that. If you'd like to refute any of my claims or arguments, go ahead, and we can make this a real debate, but you've just said the same thing several times so far. Stubbornly clinging to an assertion that has already been decried doesn't support your view very well.
www.rhjunior.com/CC/ Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamotom Musashi
OK...
November 11, 2007 - 22:56 ET by balboaThe worst possible outcome is that the children do not realize this is an intentional attack on Christianity. Anyone know the best way to change commonly held perceptions in the public? Expose children to said perceptions repeatedly from an early age.
Again, what are they being "exposed" to? A movie about some good people battling bad people. And what "commonly held perceptions" are being changed? Nothing is changing.
If the movie was just a movie, I wouldn't have a problem with it. The issue here is that it is part of a concerted effort to undermine and destroy Christianity in this country.
You perceive it to be a "concerted effort" because the movies don't agree with your ideals. If this is such a "concerted effort," how did Narnia sneak through? The author is an atheist. Because he wrote this book, is he trying to change everyone to reject Christianity? Or is he stating an opinion through his story? What are the odds that his series of books will ever do the damage you are afraid they'll do? ZERO.
The author of the books is a militant atheist, and the timing of the movie's release is a thinly-veiled ploy.
OR it's the smart release of a children's movie during one of the top children movie-going times of the year. I doubt the author of the book has ANYTHING to do with the release of his movie anyway. Authors rarely have any say in anything to do with a movie made of their work.
If you want to think it's nuts, go ahead,
I do.
but I've read the whole trilogy, and the "evil Christians" theme is quite prolific.
But is anyone going to be harmed by reading these books or seeing this movie? Is Christmas going to disappear suddenly? No. No it's not.
I actually like his writing; he's a good author, and would be much better if he'd get his head screwed on straight and quit with the hardcore anti-Christianity stuff.
Fair enough. I'm definitely going to see this movie now, since Brent is so afraid of it.
"You're right that as
November 11, 2007 - 17:16 ET by ckc1227"You're right that as entertainment it'd be just fine but your wrong in
saying that the "anti-christian" aspect is basically a matter of
perception.As a writer I can tell you that the position within the script that you
give the person or character that you wish to be "beyond judgement" is
called the "guardian" position."
But, being a writer, what you fail to understand is most movie viewers don't analyze characters with the depth that you do. Most of us are just there to be entertained.
Actually, the less you try
November 11, 2007 - 21:59 ET by CortillaenActually, the less you try to analyze the movie, the more likely it is to impact your perceptions and beliefs. If you just watch the movie for entertainment, you will likely imerse youself in the main character's travails to some extent. This tends to cause one to identify with that character. In any relationship, the weaker personality (the one most susceptible to change) will allign more to the stronger personality than vice-versa. In movies, the characters are all infinitely strong personalities since they are predefined and unaffected by the watchers. When you identify with a character, it causes the same effect as having a relationship with them, albeit over a much shorter time. Since the character's personality is static (compared to the watcher's), the only effect this relationship has is the watcher's personality alligning more to that of the character. Hollywood understands this perfectly; hence the constant stream of liberally-inclined characters. The more exposure you get to these characters, the more heavily influenced by their world-view you become. To be frank, I think my dislike for movie theaters has kept me from being brainwashed.
Believe it or not, a good portion of anime (yes, I am an anime nut) out there is somewhat conservative in nature. One of my favorites, Yu Yu Hakusho, embraces a massive range of conservative values: Results only come from dedication and hard work, sometimes you have to fight to protect what's important, evil is very real but often veiled, you can't judge people by appearance or words, humanity may have a lot of bad qualities but isn't irredeemable, and the only one who decides your life is yourself. If you can get by the non-treatment of religion (a classical Japanese afterlife is used, often to comic effect), it's a great show.
www.rhjunior.com/CC/ Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
To be frank, I think my
November 11, 2007 - 22:16 ET by balboaTo be frank, I think my dislike for movie theaters has kept me from being brainwashed.
How mushy do you think people's brains are? If there are all these people going to movies that are subliminally being subjected to all this liberal propaganda, then how come the last two presidential elections have elected Republicans? I mean, I know we subverted the country into regaining Congress, but why not the White House?
The issue is that when
November 11, 2007 - 22:48 ET by CortillaenThe issue is that when people watch something just for entertainment, the mental barriers known as logic, reason, and common sense are often relaxed. No one wants to watch a movie while evaluating its intellectual honesty and the validity of its points, hence the phenomenon I described above.
Thankfully, there are still quite a few people who are capable of deciding things for themselves and can analyze the views given by the media, discarding those that are unfit to be maintained. However, liberal voters are pushing ahead thanks to the liberal take-over of many universities; again, bombard the youth with your view enough, and many of them will start to agree with you. Even the Soviets figured that out.
"...then how come the last two presidential elections have elected Republicans?" That might have something to do with the previous president, a Democrat, being exposed as a pathological liar and the blatent corruption flowing in the veins of Washington. Enough thinking people had enough of that corruption to swing to the other side. It's a struggle to see which party is more corrupt when you only have the media to go on. With the rise of alternative media, the truth is being disseminated at a volume previously unheard of. This will hurt plenty of Republicans, but the Democrats, long used to hiding in the shadow of a MSM running interference, will be hurt more in the long run.
Answer me this: If the vast majority of the media and entertainment is slanted to the left, how have conservative values managed to remain on roughly equal footing in elections?
www.rhjunior.com/CC/ Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
easy Cort
November 11, 2007 - 22:54 ET byBal probally thinks Farenheit 911 is just another historical narrative
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
Great book. Is that
November 11, 2007 - 23:01 ET by balboaGreat book. Is that subversive too and I just didn't know it? Dang, this stuff is everywhere...
book?
November 11, 2007 - 23:08 ET bythat's 451 try again
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
Oops. :-) Never saw
November 11, 2007 - 23:42 ET by balboaOops. :-)
Never saw Fahrenheit 911. Not my thing.
Answer me this: If the vast
November 11, 2007 - 23:00 ET by balboaAnswer me this: If the vast majority of the media and entertainment is slanted to the left, how have conservative values managed to remain on roughly equal footing in elections?
Because the media doesn't have NEARLY the effect that you think it does?
Right, the media doesn't
November 12, 2007 - 10:01 ET by CortillaenRight, the media doesn't make an impact, just like nobody will vote for HRC just because she's a woman. This country is full of idiots, Bal, just waiting to be told what to do. The media obliges.
www.rhjunior.com/CC/ Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
I didn't say it doesn't
November 12, 2007 - 10:24 ET by balboaI didn't say it doesn't make an impact.
"Looks like a very
November 11, 2007 - 17:06 ET by ckc1227"Looks like a very entertaining movie.
If you want it to be "anti-christian," then it will be. I suspect if
you just watch it as an entertaining fantasy movie, that's exactly what
you get.
I don't think children are in danger of brain-washing here."
I tend to agree. Same with the Narnia flick. I doubt most people realize it is a pro-Christian film until someone tells them it is.
Yup. I never realized that
November 11, 2007 - 17:11 ET by balboaYup. I never realized that the Narnia books were "pro-Christian" until I had read them many, many times. Didn't change how I felt about them.
yup
November 11, 2007 - 17:18 ET bylooks flat to me, don't give me this round stuff, how absurd.
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
Good one!
November 11, 2007 - 19:32 ET by bretzysdudeGood one!
"Yup. I never realized that
November 11, 2007 - 17:25 ET by ckc1227"Yup. I never realized that the Narnia books were "pro-Christian" until I had read them many, many times."
Me neither. I remember they used to show "The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe" cartoon on television about the same time every year back when I was in school. The next day all the kids would be talking about how cool it was, how much they liked it, etc. Never once did I ever hear any of them mention the religious aspect.
Now, that's not to say there isn't one, but unless you know about it ahead of time, most aren't going to see it.
Or maybe it's that I went to a school full of heathens, lol.
It's easy to see if you
November 14, 2007 - 22:15 ET by Lord ElicaniIt's easy to see if you recognize the faith and beliefs of both Lewis and his good friend Tolkien.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet?
Who cares?
November 11, 2007 - 17:43 ET by steveba4If you think you'll be offended, then don't go see it.
steveba
November 11, 2007 - 17:49 ET byi probally won't see it because i care now if you don't care why did you comment? (the steveba doth protest too much)
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts