In a political act loaded with cultural symbolism, Senator Hillary Clinton endorsed an effort to earmark a million taxpayer dollars for a museum in Bethel, New York celebrating the circus of 1969, the Woodstock music festival. Other senators smelled the pork and successfully voted to remove it.
The tie-dyed, drug-soaked post-war babies that populated that muddy plain are now approaching Social Security age, and the aging hippies that made their way into the establishment want to imbue the notorious excesses of their youth with respectability. The New York Times said the Bethel complex would be "what Cooperstown is to baseball" – a hippie Hall of Fame.
I liked that music. I still do. Then as now, I simply ignored the cultural and political messages. Many others didn’t.
The bohemian worldview of Woodstock Nation is in some ways dominant, and in some ways passe in our popular culture. Hallucinogenic drugs are no longer the rage, but the "free love" spirit of "if it feels good, do it" still runs strong, especially in our entertainment world. And yet, burbling beneath a noisy culture of sexual excess and self-love, there’s a quiet undercurrent in our movies carrying subtle, and even obvious pro-life themes.
Last Christmas, there was "Children of Men," a dark science-fiction look into England, twenty years from now, where human fertility has vanished. One pregnant woman becomes a damsel in grave danger, and then with the birth of her child, a beacon of hope.
Six months later, the small movie "Waitress" followed a lonely waitress with a good-for-nothing husband who decides (against Tinseltown’s grain) to keep her baby. Summer brought the big, crude sex comedy "Knocked Up," a tale of a beautiful blonde who improbably mates with an overweight schlub, a man the world would say is "not in her league." But underneath the crudity, another pro-life story emerges: not only does she keep the baby, she tries to build a marriage and family.
Those two movies were close enough together to represent a tiny trend – and film critics denounced it as an affront to their "pro-choice" beliefs. The women chose life, and that was wrong. To them, it smelled of fear and corner-cutting. They noted the word "abortion" wasn’t used in the scripts. (But couldn’t pro-lifers make the same complaint?)
It showed "the studios’ terror at giving offense," whined the Boston Globe. "Hollywood is No-Choice," was the disgusted headline in The New York Times. "Both movies go out of their way to sidestep real life," since "two-thirds of unwanted pregnancies end in abortion." But what about the one-third of "unwanted" pregnancies in real life that result in real life? They cannot be celebrated?
Apparently not. "I think it's shocking that the subject of abortion as a choice has been so eliminated from the discussion," said one alarmed feminist to The Washington Post. This is quite absurd, since modern movies like "The Cider House Rules" and "Vera Drake" celebrated wise and sympathetic abortionists.
Now comes the little movie "Bella," which won the People’s Choice award at the 2006 Toronto Film Festival. Once again, a single waitress finds herself pregnant, feels that abortion is her only way out, until she spends a day with a man who’s just lost his soccer-star career. In that one day together, their lives are changed forever, and she decides to carry her baby to term. Oh, boy. Here we go again. The word "abortion" is never mentioned in the movie.
Worse yet for the Hollywood elite, the executive producer of "Bella" is Steve McEveety, who was also executive producer of "The Passion of The Christ." He says as "The Passion" showed us how to die, "Bella" shows us how to live.
Movie critics will probably hate it, since it doesn’t even have oodles of sex and profanity in it to keep them entertained. Variety already booed: "Manipulative pic trades in fairy-tale views of New York life alongside briefly sustained emotional confessions."
The makers of "Bella" are different that the average Hollywood moviemakers. They have refused projects they didn’t feel were uplifting. Their religious convictions had led to a desire to make redeeming films. Their company is named Metanoia Films, after the Greek word for "conversion" or "repentance." Those are not Hollywood words. But they are words that can resonate all over the Main Streets of America.
So what does Main Street think of "Bella"? Preview audiences repeatedly have given it standing ovations.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
For all their talk of
October 26, 2007 - 20:48 ET by motherbeltFor all their talk of wanting to be "cutting edge", Hollywood producers are amazingly predictable when it comes to what they want to portray.
Their version would have the waitress and the soccer star "bonding" by his standing by her as she goes through her abortion. To them, that's what "support" is.
To them, it's just not "normal" that someone would inconvenience herself and give up anything for the sake of a tiny life. They think it's not "realistic."
These movies are the brave ones, the ones that break out of the pack.
Good point, Brent! How come
October 26, 2007 - 20:56 ET by wiwfGood point, Brent! How come we can't celebrate the 1/3 of unwanted pregnancies that end in life. Hit the nail on the head. Good stuff :)
Not to mention that there's no comedy when it comes to abortion (unless you're matt stone and trey parker), so knocked up would have been pretty boring :p
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
It's what I think people are looking for MB
October 26, 2007 - 21:02 ET by exLibI think people are looking for movies and entertainment to call themselves higher.
Instead Hollywood and the Media in general is trying as hard as it can to drag people lower and lower.
I was just thinking the other day how we need a couple movies about the US Military where they come out looking like heroes. A movie that shows Saddam as the murderous thug that he is and how the US deposing him was a good thing.
Not a documentary but an action flick to celebrate out modern day soldiers.
BOR mentioned this the other day, that Hollywood is killing itself with all the Lefty-US-is-Bad glicks.
The Hollywood stars,
October 26, 2007 - 21:12 ET by MidAmericaThe Hollywood stars, writers,and producers of today are not artists of the caliber from past generations. They confuse celebrity with talent. They make films that are less entertainment than they are documentaries about their own personal beliefs.
Movie critics will probably
October 26, 2007 - 21:22 ET by balboaMovie critics will probably hate it, since it doesn’t even have oodles of sex and profanity in it to keep them entertained.
That's ridiculous. Critics laud movies that have neither sex nor profanity all the time, and they are often the only ones to applaud small, quiet movies that people don't go to see. They loved Waitress, The Good Girl, etc.
I don't know that this is a pro-life trend as much as a coincidence.
Thank you Mr. Bozell
October 26, 2007 - 21:26 ET by Lame CherryI really want to thank you Mr. Bozell for this as when I saw the name McEveety my eyes came to attention in wondering if Steve is related to Vincent McEveety. He is indeed and that brought a smile to may face as in my teenage years I studied directing and one of my all time favorite directors was Vincent McEveety. I know people have seen the McEveety family of work from Star Trek.........but people will remember a crafting that a group of directors undertook on Thursday nights which McEveety was in the lead which revolutionized television.
Simon and Simon and Magnum were part of this new dimension of television........people will also note that Jameson Parker, Gerald McRainey and Tom Selleck are all very much patriotic, pro gun and pro family Americans.
So while I tend to lay burning coals of scorn on Hollywood often there are enough Kurt Russells, John Milius' and the McEveety family who are wonderful people and wonderful Americans.
The McEveety family is so very adept at telling stories in film that it all happens so smooth and fast that you find yourself smiling how an hour passes..........or like in Mel Gibson's monumental filming of his version of Passion proved what Sam Peckinpah started in The Wild Bunch that 3 hours of action will compress to what seems short to the human mind.
I can not be more pleased for Steve McEveety as his uncle Vincent delighted and inspired me so that I was always walking around looking for camera angles and writing scripts based upon his innovative and time proven methods.
Liberals always laud Speilberg, Lucas etc.... but there are some very astounding directors who uphold American values who are 10 pegs above what those Hollywood snobs turn out which no one watches.
Thank you again Mr. Bozell as the McEveety family has done wonderful work and should be called attention to.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
LC.... Wow... That post
October 26, 2007 - 21:42 ET by bigtimerLC....
Wow...
That post was inspirational.
For me at least.
Since the Hollywood crowd is all about diversity......
October 27, 2007 - 00:20 ET by Scout FinchWhy can't there be a "Bella" alongside a "Cider House Rules"?
Woodstock
October 27, 2007 - 10:39 ET by iveseenitallSpeaking of Woodstock, Bill Clinton's "How Dare You" should have been spoken to Hillary for attempting to memorialize that bastion of "liberal" nonsense. Woodstock was a seminal event leading to the past four decades of decadence and decay in American values. It was nothing more than a bunch of spoiled, lazy young people sitting around naked, having sex, and smoking dope. As millions of other young Americans were leading decent lives, these clowns were wallowing in the mud and becoming media darlings. Now one of their apologists wants to be President of the United States. May this never happen.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"