Bozell Column: Embarrassing Celebrity Pundits

Photo of Brent Bozell.

Howard Kurtz, the longtime Washington Post media reporter and CNN media-show host, inadvertently defined exactly what’s wrong with our political culture when he was asked in an online chat about actress Sally Field blurting out in her Emmy victory speech that if women ruled the world, there’d be no [expletive deleted] wars. Kurtz said awards shows might not be the best slot for political analysis, "but she said it at a live news event, so in a way Fox was censoring the news."

This is "news"? Sally Field’s incoherent rant, delivered after a series of stammers, is somehow on par as newsworthy with what your average senior diplomat, military officer, professor, public policy expert or congressman has to say on the subject of war?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Expertise means nothing. Fame is all, and grasping a national spotlight for a "zinger," even if it utterly fails to zing, is somehow the political highlight of the weekend.

This is not news. It demonstrates that a key measure we have for punditry in our political culture is fame, not a display of any brains. Field’s emission wasn’t simply underthought, but also deeply sexist. Remove the men from political leadership, and the world would never see another war? Can you imagine a movie star or TV actor mounting a national TV platform to say the world would be so much better off if women couldn’t vote, or serve as world leaders?

At least Field’s remarks were mercifully short. Celebrities usually embarrass themselves at great length. This often happens on Bill Maher’s "Real Time" show on HBO. The rap star Mos Def (real name: Dante Smith), often honored by critics as one of those "socially conscious" rappers, recently unloaded a rant that seemed designed to demonstrate he was almost mentally unconscious. To wit, he claimed:

1. George Washington "and all them dudes" that founded America "was terrorists as far as the Queen was concerned."

2. "The Catholic Church’s stance about child molestation is a form of terrorism in and of itself."

3. Was Osama bin Laden was behind 9/11? "Absolutely not...highly educated people in all areas of science have spoken on the fishiness around the whole 9/11 theory." (Presumably, this includes highly educated scientists like Rosie O’Donnell.)

4. Terrorism is a natural response to murderous American imperialism. "There are valid reasons even to a lot of terrorists' arguments – quote-unquote, terrorists' arguments – about why are they frustrated with colonial presence, imperial presence. The way that this government has pursued its foreign interests has been meddlesome, murderously meddlesome."

5. The American space program is a fraud, too. "I don't believe these [maternal expletive deleted] have been to the moon either."

This man doesn’t need a microphone. He needs medication.

The same syndrome is encouraged online by sites like The Huffington Post, where loons like Sean Penn and Alec Baldwin unloaded bizarre commentaries about the "crypto-fascist scum" running our government, and no one asks what made these movie stars so much more mentally impressive than a plate of mashed potatoes. When they’re not mangling facts, these embarrassing celebrity pundits routinely malign conservatives as evil humans who have no shred of idealism and no fraction of sympathy for the common man.

A few days ago, the actor Richard Belzer unloaded his latest mini-term paper of political science on Arianna Huffington’s wacky blog. "Conservatism is in its last throes if you will," he wrote, " twisting in the wind, dying like communism did because neither philosophy works by definition -- they both operate from the fraudulent premise built around contempt for and control of the people."

This is the same Belzer who appeared on Bill Maher’s show last year boasting that he knows a lot more about Iraq, reading his alleged 20 daily newspapers, than the soldiers on the ground there, since they’re losers, "19 and 20-year-old kids who couldn't get a job." Armed with his superior knowledge, Belzer then lectures conservatives about their contempt for the common American.

Not every celebrity is a nitwit. Some are wise enough to hire political tutors. But it’s all the same to many in today’s "news" media. Anything a celebrity says, no matter how moronic, is defined as news. Liberals use to say it was dangerous to leave the country to a befuddled actor like Ronald Reagan. Some still do even now, when proof of his acumen has been documented for the history books. But they are so fond of truly befuddled actors – like these.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Gee, so Brent doesn't care

Gee, so Brent doesn't care for Sally's speech? I'm flabbergasted, agog with wonderment.

Duh!

 And you don't like Brent's comments. Gee, imagine my surprise!

Some I "gently" agree with,

Some I "gently" agree with, but any chance Brent can bang on celebrities or TV, he'll do it.

I still think most people didn't get Sally's point, or didn't want to.

Sally had a point?

Was it before or after all of that stammering when the exit music started playing? Oh, it was that if mothers ruled the world comment? Of which, you wholly agree with I take it? Hence, your disdain for Brent?

Yeah, that was it. I hate

Yeah, that was it. I hate it when people don't take Sally Field seriously...

Sally Honey

A PROUD AMERICAN

Sally honey, it one pill once a month, oh and by the way don't mix it with anything else...

Boneva

I've read that one of the side effects is "dizziness".  There goes your proof.

Why would anyone care for

Why would anyone care for her speech in the first place? I can think of a number of liberal friends of mine who hate the war who think her statement was absolutely stupid.

Not only did she broadly paint all men as war mongering, hate filled creatures, she also (by implication) said the same of all women who do not or cannot have children.

What's so worthy about her speech?

Dutch

"Not only did she broadly

"Not only did she broadly paint all men as war mongering, hate filled creatures, she also (by implication) said the same of all women who do not or cannot have children."

Good point.  And as a female with no children as of yet, I fully expect NOW to come stampeding to my defense.

</sarcasm off>

 Well,  I've never

 Well,  I've never watched the emmy's, not once.  And I am supposed to pay attention to what a prestigious GED winner has to say?  I don't think so. And the meanest dadgummed thing in the world is a pissed off mother.  We'd be in constant war if mothers were in charge. And who needs those spit face washes all over again?  I know y'all remember those.

Just another of a long line of nutcase Hollywood has beens spouting off.  What in the world did she win an emmy for?   

...it was for her

...it was for her anti-American views - like all of these "awards"

Say, when was the last time a pro-Bush entertainer won an academy award - and then proudly proclaimed it on TV without censorship? a Grammy? An Emmy? People'schoice...?

QUITE A COINCIDENCE ISN'T IT?!?!?!?!?!?!

Pro bush entertainers

Not acting but music.

" When the Ramones were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2002, Johnny took to the microphone (with huge brass b***s) to offer his thanks, saying "God Bless President Bush, and God Bless America."

http://news.bbc.co.u...

"I don't find anything punk about promoting higher taxes and more handouts to people," Rizzuto says.

you found one!from

you found one!

from 2002!

I stand un-corrected

The Emmys as "news event"

Regarding the Emmys as a "news event":  The primary purpose of the Emmys is to be an award show.  There is some news value if you count entertainment news as news, but its major reason for being is to honor the best (allegedly) in television.

Fox also has to answer to the FCC for obscenities on the air, and to the affiliates who would also be fined.  You can argue the merits of FCC regs, but they are the rules that were in place and Fox had a duty to follow them.

In any case, the basic message of the speakers got out, and that's should satisfy all but the most extreme interpretations of the First Amendment.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

More than that, most of

More than that, most of these awards shows have gotten wise to using the show as a pulpit and have taken steps to prevent it. Presenters and nominees are told ahead of time that if you go off on any political rants, we're going to cut you off. Fields knew she would be cut off, but felt she was important enough that they wouldn't. She was wrong.

CNN

CNN showed her rant un-bleeped Monday night. Why did they do so? I have no clue.

News?

I'm sure you've heard liberals defend the media by claiming that America needs to be informed on the issues, so they can vote responsibly. How is a telecast of celebrities congratulating themselves going to make me a better voter? This was mere entertainment, nothing more. It has no value whatsoever.

If an actor wants to sit down and write an analysis of some issue, fair enough. But the public will be persuaded by their reasoning, not their celebrity. Any citizen can offer their opinion in the public conversation, and that's fine. But a major media news organization shouldn't notice and advertize an opinion simply because it comes from a celebrity. If the argument is strong, by all means, bring it to public attention. But do the same for doctors, bank presidents, cops, or other people who can offer experienced and trained perspectives. That's what we need to hear ... not the Valley Girl giggles of the Hollywood clique.

Pop Quiz

What do the following people all have in common (besides lecturing us on foreign affairs, domestic policy and environmental impacts)?
George Carlin
Leonardo DiCaprio
Cameron Diaz
Whoopie Goldberg
Kanye West
Bruce Springsteen
Billie Joe Armstrong (of Green Day)
Cher
Eddie Vedder (Pearl Jam)

Give up?

They're all high school dropouts

The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.
Hannah Arendt

According to ABC News

ABC News' exit polling in the 2000 election showed Al Gore winning over 80 percent of the high school dropout vote.

4 years later, the gap had narrowed, but Kerry still beat Bush in that demographic. And according to CNN, more college graduates voted for Bush in 2004 than for Kerry (this number doesn't include postgrads).

How do you use the word emmy

How do you use the word emmy and news in the same sentence? You delcare the Emmy Awards to be a live news event. I never thought of an award show as news. By whose standard is it classified as news?

Gee, Sally, think the world

Gee, Sally, think the world would be better off if this "Mother" ruled it?  I suppose she wouldn't start/fight "no  g/d wars", huh?

 

Texas Mom Arrested for Allegedly Setting 3 Daughters on Fire

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,297122,00.html

 

 

 Glenn Beck discussed this whole "Sally Field was censored!!!" crap on ABC Radio

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3618763

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3618017

I believe it's trying to be spun that it was her remark about the war, and NOT her cursing ...

PS

Anyone else wondering if these celebrities intentionally "self"-orchestrated remarks they might try to slip past the guy with his finger on the mute button so that Fox could be hit with stiff fines for NOT hitting the button?

Not a "Live News Event"

The Emmy ceremony isn't to this observer a "live news event", it's a ceremony-however, the results of the ceremony ARE news, and should be reported as such.

Kurtz would have a point if the Emmy ceremonies had been produced by Fox News.