Bozell Column: Tom DeLay vs. Matt Lauer

Photo of Brent Bozell.
  • Bookmark and Share

It was not exactly a plum assignment for a Republican to go on network television to discuss the alleged foot-tapping ways of the soon-to-be former GOP senator from Idaho. But Republicans also could easily see the delight in the eyes of the liberal media when word of Sen. Larry Craig’s Minneapolis airport arrest broke. The press went right back to last year’s smash-mouth Foleygate talking points about how this wasn’t just about the moral turpitude of one member of Congress, but it was about the impending end of the Republican Party, and potential doom for American conservatism.

On Tuesday, NBC’s "Today" show had opened with Matt Lauer asking: "Can the right wing withstand yet another scandal involving one of its own?" (Try imagining Matt Lauer, or any other network journalist out there, asking if "the left wing" could withstand yet another scandal after the breaking news of any one of the endless scandals revolving around Bill and Hillary Clinton.) Ann Curry chimed in, wondering "how does this specter of hypocrisy affect the Party?"

The "Today" show came knocking, looking for GOP interviewees for Thursday morning. Most Republicans locked and bolted their doors. Tom DeLay agreed – and came out fighting.

A viewer could have developed whiplash watching NBC’s two interviews with Republicans that morning. First, Curry pressed Rep. Peter Hoekstra. He’d stated that members of Congress should be above reproach and that a member of Congress pleading guilty to a crime ought to resign. She hit him for his "rush to judgment." Never mind that most everyone rushed to the judgment that Craig was guilty around the moment the news broke that Craig had pleaded guilty.

A few minutes later, it was DeLay’s turn with Matt Lauer, and The Hammer fought back, something wholly unexpected from the Gloomy Old Party these days. Lauer came from a different angle, first listing Republicans caught in scandals (Foley, Abramoff, Vitter), then concluding that almost no one wanted to vote for a Republican president now, and that as a result of a scandal-ridden GOP, the most popular Republican presidential candidate was "none of the above."

Unlike most Republicans who either take to the network airwaves with a look of fright, or worse, that awful congenial frozen smile, DeLay was clearly in a fighting mood. When Lauer wondered if these Republican sex scandals would tar the whole party or were just isolated "bad apples," DeLay ignored the question and got right to the point: "Well, I hate to say this Matt, but you just showed the problem, the double-standard, and you just participated in it. You listed a whole lot of scandals that involve the Republicans, but you didn't mention one Democrat."

Lauer was clearly unsettled by that answer and retorted, "But you didn’t hear me." He repeated the question. Still DeLay would have none of it and continued pounding on Lauer’s GOP-trashing premise: "If you had listed all the Democrats that are having problems right now, it would have been different. You see the Democrats re-elect the people with their problems. Republicans kick them out. If you look at what's going on, it's how you handle it as a party."

DeLay then turned to the unassailable specifics: "You have right now, Alan Mollohan, a Congressman from West Virginia, who is being investigated by the FBI, and the Democrats have kept him on as chairman of the committee that has oversight of the budget of the FBI. You have William Jefferson --"

Lauer was losing control of the interview and interrupted, trying to end DeLay’s listing of Democratic scandals: "So, you're saying it's a positive thing. Is it a positive thing that the Republicans do this, they weed out immediately?" DeLay stood his ground "You don't want me to finish it?" he challenged. Lauer deferred: "No, no, go ahead."

DeLay continued: "Well, you have William Jefferson caught with $90,000 of marked bills in a freezer. And they did put him of the Ways and Means Committee, but they put him on a highly-sensitive Homeland Security Committee." He added the old 1980s examples of Reps. Barney Frank and Gerry Studds, and could have added another dozen had the word "Clinton" been introduced into the conversation.

At one point Lauer claimed "There was an awful lot of coverage of William Jefferson when that story broke, Congressman." I’m sure DeLay wishes he’d had this piece of data available in the memory banks: NBC’s "Today" has never once aired an NBC reporter explaining the Jefferson scandal. All that’s dribbled out are a few 50-word anchor-read droplets.

But no matter. DeLay didn’t budge from the double-standard argument, and within hours was the toast of the conservative movement as news of his performance spread like wildfire through the internet and talk radio.

A few more confrontations like this, and the double-standard will end.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I Repeat: Tom DeLay as Attorney General

If Jorge el Busto wants to be the el presidente of el presidentes put Tom DeLay as Attorney General.

DeLay will have the networks in a firestorm before their corporate owners buckle and Charlie Schumer and Nance Pelosi will be hiding under their desks with Floater Kennedy hiding in the compound.

Come on George Bush, you kicked the stuffing out of Saddam correcting 41's listening to Colin Powell and won the election Lawrence Walsh cheated pop out of.......prove you are Andy Jackson and turn DeLay loose on these fatherless children who got your dad and others with fake investigations.

Mr. President, turn DeLay loose and let us have some real Texas fun!

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

I wish I could agree with

I wish I could agree with the concluding sentence, but unfortunately a few more confrontations like that and the MSM will stop asking Republicans to come on their shows altogether. There is a reason Lauer looked so shocked at DeLay's rebuttal - that's what happens when you allow strangers into your bubble.

You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. - Abraham Lincoln

 "Try imagining Matt

 "Try imagining Matt Lauer, or any other network journalist out there, asking if "the left wing" could withstand yet another scandal..."

Perfect point.  In 30+ years of viewing the various network news shows, NEVER have I heard any so-called journalist refer to the Democrats or any of their factions as left wing.   As far as they're concerned, Left is mainstream. 

 "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." -Muhammad

Unwarranted optimism

Brent, you're kidding me. "A few more confrontations like this, and the double-standard will end." Dream on.

In your book "Weapons of Mass Distortion" you said that the mainstream media would have to start hiring conservatives to balance out their coverage because their monolithically liberal newsrooms were costing them readers/viewers/listeners and they'd have to become more reflective of America as a whole -- not just the Upper East Side -- to survive.

None of this has happened. You've got Robert Novak going around telling conservatives to stay in the closet or they'll ruin their careers -- and he's right.

And you think a couple more DeLay appearances on the "Today" show will change all this? I've got a bridge to sell you down here in San Diego that connects downtown with Coronado, you might've seen it once or twice on TV. I'll let you have it for cheap.

Above Reproach

Seats in the United States Congress are not manna from the heavens.  Representatives are elected by the people. They are not saints appointed by divine intervention.  Our reprsentatives are full of human flaws and failings.

While perfection is a wonderful goal, zero tolerance (any one convicted of a crime as Peter Hoekstra indicated should resign) is the kind of intolerance which can ensure that the Republicans remain a permanent minority party.

The law makes distinctions between misdemeanors and serious crimes - felonies. So do the rules of  Congress.  The Republicans, should observe these distinctions. Adding an extra burden of perfection leads only to minority status.

The Republicans allowed their leadership in the House, Delay, Gingrich and Livingston to be decimated over the years without a single conviction  They were left with a weak and ineffective House Speaker. Finally when another pseudo scandal (Mark Foley) broke they were through. Unless more evidence emerges, Foley will not be charged with a crime.

On the other hand, Patrick Kennedy went through a driving under the influence incident with barely a mention and no calls for resignation.

Speeding over 100mph is some states is a misdemeanor. Using the Peter Hoekstra standard, should a Congressmen cited for speeding this way resign?  Should a Congressman in a state where it is not a midemeanor also resign, because it was a misdemeanor elsewhere, and we are above reproach?

Finally, there double standard in the press will continue so long as Republicans consume their own in horrible embarassment and continue to confront the news media on the double standard. I'm afraid this is one double standard that the Republicans have helped manufacture by refusing to stick by their own members.

The Repbulican leadership should learn that throwing members "under the bus" is not working. No it does not stop the bleeding, it just validates charges made by Democrats and the media that Republicans are corrupt.  Republicans will continue to be attacked in this manner until they refuse to be intimidated.

 

Right on, Allanf

Right on, Allanf. Old time radio guy Bob Grant used to say, "They fold like a cheap camera". Republicans eat their own instead of standing together against their real enemies-the "liberals". It's their biggest failing.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

The Craig issue is an

The Craig issue is an extremely difficult catch-22 for people like myself.  When a party positions itself as adhering to higher standards and moral accountability, sometimes it is difficult to draw the line between acceptible and unacceptible behavior.  This particular case dives straight into the gray area of where some (me) draw that line.

I have to admit that my initial knee-jerk reaction was to run Craig out of town.  Regardless of which side of the story you believe, the mere thought of someone giving the "secret handshake" in an airport bathroom wreaks of objectionable odor.  I have since regrouped and tried to reevaulate the sitation from both sides.

The unfortunate truth is the MSM will take the angle that makes the GOP look as hypocritical as possible, regardless of our fighting back or not.  Whether we've helped them or not in manufacturing this double standard is not really my concern.  This is not a level playing field so we shouldn't even factor the media into the decision.

So the fact of the matter is that we are all branded by the decisions we make.  The decision Craig made was a horrible moral decision and I have no problem holding him to a higher standard than that of a Dem.  The issue is not fair or unfair, but rather right or wrong.  Craig would obviously get a pass if he had a "D" by his name because they have carved out a platform that allows for greater moral flexibility.  In the end, I choose to remain in the vertebrate classification instead of fighting a no-win double standard.  That is choosing integrity over political prowess - something the other side knows very little about.

You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. - Abraham Lincoln

You're willing to

You're willing to believe this airport toilet cop over Senator Craig? How does that work I wonder?

Protest Craig's conservative abandonment - vote Democrat in 08'

Call me gullible, but all

Call me gullible, but all I'm going by is the police report and Senator Craig's flimsy "I use a wide stance when going the bathroom" defense. Is there some better reading on this topic that I am unaware of?

You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. - Abraham Lincoln

Going to believe a police

Going to believe a police officer over a politician, who has more to lose?

Right or wrong on the cop's part...Craig didn't tell anyone about it, which seems a bit fishy. Every time I've gotten a ticket that I thought was unjustified, I didn't keep quiet about it.

I don't think Craig should resign, nor do I think Republicans should be quick to throw fellow republicans under the bus. And I think he is being mistreated by the press because he has an R next to his name. He didn't commit a felony, what he did was embarressing at best...but the fact he wants to keep it a secret, makes him a high target for blackmail. Its the secret keeping that is getting him in trouble...Nixon, Bill Clinton, and Craig have something in common...its the cover up that got them in trouble.

CV, that's the part I

CV, that's the part I keep going back and forth on - how he handled the situation.  If I had my blinders on and only examined the details pertinent to the incident, then I have no problem with a reprieve and would hope he keeps his nose clean. 

But trying to sweep it under the rug brings a series of new questions to the table - Why admit guilt for the sake of expediency?  Is this the first time Mr. Craig has taken part in this type of activity?  Will new accusations arise now this is public?  Will his mere existence be too much stench on the party leading up to election time?  I realize hypotheticals are no grounds for indictment, but I just get a sense of where this one is going and I'm not too encouraged about the outcome.

Like I said, this one has me straddling the fence a little.  I surely don't want to give the MSM or libs automatic justification everytime an unflattering story surrounds a Republican.  But I also don't want to keep a bad apple in the bunch for the sake of political warfare.  I'll keep my "objective" hat on and retain the right to change my mind if any new details unfold.

You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. - Abraham Lincoln

I watched the Delay-Lauer challenge as it aired...

And my heart literally swelled with pride at Tom Delay finally dishing it back to one of those Democratic-appeasing left-wing journalists.

It was truly wonderful. Granted, he should have answered the questions Matt asked and went into his double-standard tirade at the end, but it was still great to watch.

Ksimm, you are wrong; DeLay

Ksimm, you are wrong; DeLay handled the problem in the correct manner.  If he had done as you say, the segment would have been edited so that the only part shown would have been where he answered Matt Liar's "have you stopped beating your wife" type question.  The way DeLay did it insured that his point would have been seen and heard. 

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan