Nets Use Romney’s Taxes to Advance Obama’s False ‘Fairness’ Narrative
Hours before President Barack Obama’s third State of the Union address in which he will push higher tax rates on the wealthiest under the guise of “fairness,” pivoting off the poster woman for higher rates, Warren Buffett’s secretary who supposedly pays a higher income tax rate than her boss, ABC and NBC advanced the narrative which confuses tax brackets with effective tax rates.
In fact, Romney pays at a much higher rate than most Americans and most people at Romney’s wealth level pay a significantly higher rate. “Mitt’s millions,” ABC anchor Diane Sawyer teased, “What Mitt Romney’s taxes really show about, wealth, taxes and fairness.” On the NBC Nightly News, Andrea Mitchell referred to “critics of the tax code that favors the rich.”
David Muir, in the World News piece plugged by Sawyer, recounted Romney’s tax payments: “His tax rate? In 2010, about 13.9 percent, perfectly legal under the current tax code which allows Americans to pay a much lower rate, a capital gains tax, when their earnings come from investments, and not a job.” Muir went to a “tax analyst” who dubiously insisted: “If he were a doctor or lawyer with the same salary, he would be paying 35 percent.”
Muir, however, failed to point out how that rate (estimated to be closer to 15 percent for 2011) is far greater than most Americans pay. As NB’s Noel Sheppard noted last week, after accounting for deductions, 97 percent pay an income tax rate lower than 15 percent – a number confirmed in this table posted by the liberal Tax Policy Center.
Journalists have no excuse for their continued distortions since one of their own, USA Today reporter Sandra Block, laid it out quite clearly in an article on the front page of Friday’s (January 20) “Money” section, “Tax bracket vs. tax rate: They’re two different things.” She explained:
Ask most Americans how much they pay in taxes, and they'll probably refer to their tax bracket, a series of rates that ranges from 10% to 35%. By that measure, Mitt Romney's tax rate sounds outrageously low.
But when the Republican presidential candidate revealed earlier this week that he pays about 15% in taxes, he was referring to his effective tax rate, not his tax bracket. And by that measure, he's paying a higher tax rate than the majority of taxpayers.
Under the United States' progressive tax system, income is taxed at graduated rates. An individual's tax bracket, sometimes referred to as the marginal tax rate, refers to the percentage of income that's taxed at the top tax rate — not the rate for the entire amount.
The effective tax rate, meanwhile, is the amount a taxpayer pays in taxes as a percentage of total income. The average effective federal tax rate for American taxpayers is 11%, according to an analysis of 2009 IRS data by the Tax Foundation, a non-profit research organization. For individuals with adjusted gross income of $50,000 or less, the average effective tax rate is less than 5%, according to the Tax Foundation....
While Romney's effective tax rate is higher than the national average, it's lower than the percentage paid by most high-income taxpayers. The average effective tax rate for taxpayers with AGI of $1 million or more is 25%, according to the Tax Foundation analysis.
Last week: “Networks Deride Romney for 'Paying So Little' in Taxes, Ignore That Only Three Percent Pay More.”
Geoffrey Dickens’ “Liberal Media Boost Buffett and Obama's Attack on the Rich” round-up
From the Tuesday, January 24 ABC World News:
DAVID MUIR: ...That 2010 tax return and the estimate for 2011, showing Romney earned more than $42 million over two years solely from investments. Romney did not have a job. Paying about $6.2 million in taxes over two years. His tax rate? In 2010, about 13.9 percent, perfectly legal under the current tax code which allows Americans to pay a much lower rate, a capital gains tax, when their earnings come from investments, and not a job.
MARTIN SULLIVAN, TAX ANALYST: If he were a doctor or lawyer with the same salary, he would be paying 35 percent.
MUIR: And it turns out that Romney's tax rate is a much better deal now than it would have been under Ronald Reagan. The capital gains tax then: up to 20 percent to 28 percent. Not Romney's 13.9 percent. With so much talk in this country now about the one percent, Romney's income puts him in a category even smaller: 0.006 percent....
- Brent Baker's blog
- Login to post comments






But when the Republican presidential candidate revealed earlier this week that he pays about 15% in taxes, he was referring to his effective tax rate, not his tax bracket. And by that measure, he's paying a higher tax rate than the majority of taxpayers.
DAVID MUIR: ...That 2010 tax return and the estimate for 2011, showing Romney earned more than $42 million over two years solely from investments. Romney did not have a job. Paying about $6.2 million in taxes over two years. His tax rate? In 2010, about 13.9 percent, perfectly legal under the current tax code which allows Americans to pay a much lower rate, a capital gains tax, when their earnings come from investments, and not a job.









Comments
What is...
Submitted by USMC8411 on Tue, 01/24/2012 - 9:59pm.
o'barry soetoro's tax rate? Does he pay at a higher rate out of FAIRNESS, or does he abide by the evil Mr. Bush rates that he has extended?
Which category does the me-siah fall in? 99% or 1%?
Ok, now...
Submitted by Tuari on Tue, 01/24/2012 - 10:08pm.
add state tax, county tax, city tax, property taxes, medicare and medicaid, social security (which I'll never see), and finally sales taxes. What does the average effective tax rate look like?
Two rich white liberal old women claiming unfairness?
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 01/24/2012 - 10:15pm.
And how much do they pay accountants and attorneys to avoid paying taxes every year? Hypocrites!
MItt pays a heck of a lot
Submitted by rbosque on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 12:58am.
MItt pays a heck of a lot more in taxes than I do. How's it "unfair" that he pays too little? And what does HE get in return? Does he benefit from food stamps and welfare? I can't believe people swallow this BS from the media...!
Compared to who ???
Submitted by AGreer on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 1:29am.
GE pays NO taxes. WH staff and Gov't employees NOT paying their BACK taxes. Pelosi writing LAWS that exempt HER business interests from paying taxes or paying min. wage.
Yes, "fairness" for thee but.....
Everybody needs to pay more!
Submitted by ant on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 2:01am.
Everybody needs to pay more! Everybody!
We need;
-to fund Sesame Street for the Palestinians
- encourage fruit crops in Pakistan
- give China humanitarian aid
- promote oil drillling and refining in Brazil
-send money to Hamas
-teach Africans how to wash their 'junk'
-research rock-n-roll's effect on Socialist countries
-give LaRaza money to paint Aztlan-themed murals
-fund the First Lady's school salad bars
-put Obama's book in Libraries around the globe
-pay for the health-care, incarceration, education and child rearing of foreign Nationals
-educate China's prostitutes
-send a dance troupe around the world to promote peace
-give cocaine to various lab animals so we can know how it affects people
and much,much more...c'mon people..don't give me that crap about having to eat and heat your homes..this stuff's important.
I pay no taxes whatsoever.* Is that fair?
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 2:30am.
I have been paying the max into my Roth 401k since the day they introduced them. Now I am 61 and I pay no taxes at all. Is that fair? Yes. I know it is legal. But is it fair?
* Not really. I am being mr. hypothetical.
Vet.....you're only 61????
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 3:13am.
Vet.....you're only 61???? You're just a friggin' whippersnapper!!! You NEED to bow down to me and defer to my age and wisdom!!!
And, with regards to 'fairness'....................at this point in my life - and probably yours too - the LESS the government can confiscate from me, the BETTER!!! They've been reaming my poor okole for years and years - and I have been self-employed for a long time, so I've also payed a LOT of other people's 'stuff' too.................so, anymore, my mentality is 'f**k um'!!! And especially since Boy Blunder became our benevolent dictator.
Obama versus Me.
Submitted by big.league.slider on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 3:10am.
The Obama's 2010 combined federal tax rate was 26% on $1.7 million income. The Obama's receive free housing, pension, health care, food, travel, etc.
I'm self-employed, and my 2010 federal tax rate (income plus SET) was 32% plus CA state income taxes of 10% on $95K income. I pay for my own pension, health insurance, food, housing, travel, etc.
Why is my tax rate way higher than our President's?
Because you're just 'folks',
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 3:16am.
Because you're just 'folks', and you're a conservative and a Republican, AND you're probably 'white'!!! Any other questions???
Obysmal would tell you,
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 6:38am.
"I won."
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Fairness BS
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 6:45am.
When my mama taught my brother and me to divide a piece of cake fairly, she never taught us that he should get more 'cause he's the skinny one. How can Diane Sawyer look at 47% of the population paying NO federal income tax, and then whine about "fairness"?
Oh, wait--it's Diane Sawyer. She can't count to 187 without getting lost and skipping to "over a thousand".
I sure hope America, on average, is smarter than its talking heads come November.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
FAIRNESS
Submitted by LionKing on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 8:58am.
Anyone in a similar financial situation as Romney will be treated the same -- that's FAIR.
If people want to make millions from capital gains and be in the 15% tax bracket,
then they have to first become successful through HARD WORK and enterprise.
Disclosure: I am not endorsing Romney, only using his success as an illustration of FAIRNESS.