Flashback: Hitchens Gives Finger to Maher’s Studio Audience for ‘Frivolous’ Jeering
The passing Thursday of Christopher Hitchens, at age 62 from cancer, reminded me of one of his finest moments, which occurred on a Friday night five-and-a-half years ago when he gave the finger to the pretentious, left-wing Los Angeles studio audience of HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher.
As he laid out the case for how it’s Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who wants World War Three, not George W. Bush, Hitchens cited how Ahmadinejad “says the Messiah is about to come back.” Maher quipped: “So does George Bush, by the way.” That caused a loud eruption of audience applause and cheering, which led Maher to clarify: “That's not facetious.”
The crowd continued to applaud as Hitchens remarked, about those in attendance who had earlier cheered and laughed as Maher called Bush an “idiot” repeatedly: “That’s not facetious. Your audience, which will clap at apparently anything, is frivolous.” Loud oohs and groans emanated from the audience, prompting Hitchens to give them the finger as he castigated them, “F*** you, f*** you,” while the groans continued.
Vanity Fair has a video compilation of some of the best rejoinders from Hitchens.
Transcript of the relevant portion of the discussion about Iran on the Friday August 25, 2006 season premiere of the weekly HBO show aired live Friday nights at 11pm EDT/10pm CDT:
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS: Who wants a Third Word War? The Iranian President says that one member state of the United Nations should be wiped physically from the map with all its people. He says the United States is a Satanic power. Members of his government, named members of his government have been caught sponsoring deaths squads. He's lied, he's lied to the European Union about his nuclear program-
BILL MAHER: But you know that a lot-
HITCHENS: He says the Messiah is about to come back. Who's looking for a war here?
MAHER: So does George Bush, by the way [audience applause]. That's not facetious [audience applause continues].
HITCHENS: That's not facetious. Your audience, which will clap at apparently anything, is frivolous. [oohs and groans from audience, Hitchens gives them the finger] Fuck you, fuck you. [groans continue]
MAHER: I was just saying what the President of Iran and the President of America have in common is that they both are a little too comfortable with the idea of the world coming to an end.
HITCHENS: Cheer yourself up like that. The President has said, quite a great contrast before the podium of the Senate, I think applauded by most present, in his State of the Union address, that we support the democratic movement of the Iranian people to be free of theocracy -- not that we will impose ourselves on them, but that if they fight for it we're on their side. That seems to be the right position to take, jeer all you like.
- Brent Baker's blog
- Login to post comments






HITCHENS: That's not facetious. Your audience, which will clap at apparently anything, is frivolous. [oohs and groans from audience, Hitchens gives them the finger] Fuck you, fuck you. [groans continue]









Comments
I want to focus on Maher's audience...
Submitted by MightyMouth on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 3:01am.
they are sheeple and scumbags. Anyone who laughs at Maher's jokes is either a drunk or meathead. They are either paid or, like I said drunk New Yorkers. Ooops did i say that about you dipsh*ts in New York? You know what? Screw both coasts. Middle Amercia is about to take this country back!
No, anyone who watches
Submitted by dr-go on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 8:14am.
Maher is a meathead with too much time to waste.
I didn't always agree with Christopher Hitchens, but I will
Submitted by Rush Fan on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 3:26am.
miss his toughness in the face of adversity (including his terminal illness), and his ability to articulate his viewpoint.
G-d bless him.
Hitchens couldn't get it right in this world
Submitted by lrgon on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 3:46am.
" it’s Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who wants World War Three, not George W. Bush."
Christopher( that's a Christian name by the way) Hitchens was wrong about where the real power lay in Iran. Ahmadinejad is not the person that calls the shots in Iran. The person running a good part of the show and rules over the military is Ali Khamenei who is the "Supreme Leader." Khamenei as the Supreme Leader is responsible for delineation and supervision of the general policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Supreme Leader is Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, controls the military intelligence and security operations; and has sole power to declare war or peace.
The next order of power is the 'madman" and Israel hater Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right? No, there is another layer above the president. The political power falls to
The heads of the judiciary, state radio and television networks, the commanders of the police and military forces and six of the twelve members of the Guardian Council are appointed by the Supreme Leader.
As of 2011, the legislature of Iran (known in English as the Islamic Consultative Assembly) is a unicameral body. The Majlis of Iran comprises 290 members elected for four-year terms. The Majlis drafts legislation, ratifies international treaties, and approves the national budget. All Majlis candidates and all legislation from the assembly must be approved by the Guardian Council.
Somewhere in this chain of power is the president.
Ahmadinejad can puff and blow smoke about war with Israel all he wants but the decision to go to war is not his to decide. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran#Government_and_politics
The bigot strikes again
Submitted by Unsane on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 2:02pm.
What's your source, you bigoted, plagiarist Paulbot?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
I wonder about that audience
Submitted by Tatfreak79 on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 6:21am.
It seems they would clap & applaud anything that degrades/mocks/trivializes anything remotely Republican. Can anyone name a right-leaning show that is equal to them in terms of nastiness?? I'm drawing a blank...
Link in Story Incorrect
Submitted by VideoSavant on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 10:40am.
The link in the article for the video of the Hitchens rebuttals/comebacks is incorrect.
I think this one should work: http://www.vanityfair.com/video/2011/12/1329955421001
If not, you can go to the Vanity Fair site and search for Hitchens and you should find the link to the video referenced in the post above.
Audience
Submitted by ladeflippinda on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 11:41am.
A few come to mind, Hannity, Levin, Savage, Ingraham.
I haven't heard any of them
Submitted by Dave the mailman on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 2:41pm.
I haven't heard any of them call someone a c*nt or tell them to suck d*ck. I guess if facts or rational opinions offend you, then THATS the problem.
For any rational person...
Submitted by stage9 on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 4:01pm.
to suggest that Hannity, Levin, Savage or Ingraham are in the same degenerate category as Maher is to completely and utterly jettison all intellectual objectivity for lunacy. Your comment exemplifies beyond a shadow of a doubt how intellectually dishonest liberals really are.
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
I didnt like his atheism, his anti-Reagan rants, or his..
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Sat, 12/17/2011 - 5:34pm.
brutal vicious Kissinger movie, where he pretty much deemed him the devil. But, he did back the Iraq War, he apparently ate whatever he wanted to, whenever, and he had balls enough to STILL smoke onstage-OMG, the Horrors! So, maybe he wised up in his old age, cause I didnt like him years ago. and anyone who could piss off the worst audience in the world, Mahers bunch-is allright in my book!