Wallace Shows Cheney the Today Show’s ‘Investigate Cheney’ Protest Sign
Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace displayed to former Vice President Dick Cheney how NBC’s Today show on Tuesday had ended Matt Lauer’s interview with him by pulling back to highlight an Amnesty International protest sign (“TORTURE IS A CRIME: INVESTIGATE CHENEY”) in the crowd on the street.
Wallace wondered: “What do you make of that? I mean, I somehow doubt that if Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama were speaking, they would have taken the shot and then suddenly a person with a sign would have been putting their picture up. I mean, simply, do you think there is a liberal bias in the mainstream media?”
Cheney, who seemed to have not seen the video before, chuckled as he repeated the sign’s line, “investigate Cheney.” Out on a media tour to promote his memoirs, Cheney demurred on a chance to condemn NBC News, replying to Wallace’s liberal bias suspicion: “Oh, I think there probably is. But I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it.”
Earlier: “NBC's Lauer to Cheney: You’re the ‘Most Divisive Political Figure in This Country in a Century’”
From the September 4 Fox News Sunday:
CHRIS WALLACE: I don’t know if you’ve seen this. I was watching your interview on the Today show earlier this week and I don’t even know if you’re aware of this. I want to show you – take a look at how it ended.
TODAY SHOW CLIP:
MATT LAUER, TODAY: Thank you for being with us this morning. I appreciate it.
DICK CHENEY, ON TODAY: Well Matt, I’ve enjoyed it.[VIDEO, sign: TORTURE IS A CRIME: INVESTIGATE CHENEY]
END TODAY CLIP
CHENEY. Heh. “Investigate Cheney.”
WALLACE: What do you make of that? I mean, I somehow doubt that if Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama were speaking, they would have taken the shot and then suddenly a person with a sign would have been putting their picture up. I mean, simply, do you think there is a liberal bias in the mainstream media?
CHENEY: Oh, I think there probably is. But I don't spend a lot of time worrying about it. I think those of us right-thinking conservatives find that there are a lot of outlets out there now on the media, on the Internet that give us ample opportunity for our points of view to get across and to be heard. It’s the kind of situation with respect to my own circumstance, there is a lot of people who don't like me, don’t like what I did in public life and disagree fundamentally with my views. It’s okay. It’s a democracy...
- Brent Baker's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
A liberal bias in the mainstream media?
Submitted by KyWriter on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:05am.
Oh, I don't know; is water wet?
Cheney is nails....
Submitted by AgentAmerican on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:15am.
He couldn't care less. Dick is nowhere near letting these bed wetters get under his skin...he's too busy getting under theirs.
Stock Answer and It Shouldn't Be...
Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:25am.
"“Oh, I think there probably is. But I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it. ”
I know that's the stock, dismissive answer from major conservative politicians, but, with the greatest respect towards Mr. Cheney, he should worry about media liberal bias - we all should - even liberals. How can a country run on tainted and distorted information?
Blast em!
Submitted by Tim Graham on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 5:37am.
Agreed. That's why we're here.
He's out of government now. He should just let the media elite have it.
"We have a media that talks about the insanity of pre-emptive war against a nonexistent threat, but is willing to do exactly that against a phantom they call 'climate change.'"
"That's why we're here"
Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:24am.
"That's why we're here"
Tim, thank goodness you are.
Amen!
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:27am.
'
how true
Submitted by kinijane on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:34am.
If we can't depend on truth from the so called media (and we can't) then we
have no way to do the right thing, the liberals and the conservatives. They
have even skewed science, politics and can't report the absolute truth
about anything. Everything has to be sensationalized taken out of context
of normal all for excitement and ratings. They are misleading the American
public, by going out of their way to find people who get on TV spout crap that
they really have no expertize in, therefore most of the public can't make an
informed and educated decision, because most of them won't do their home
work and the media know it.
As the original NP blogger noted, the sign is facing BACKWARDS
Submitted by gopcongress on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:25am.
The sign is facing toward the rear of the crowd, where the people are looking into the studio. This angle means that NBC had to PURPOSELY find the sign, then put it up at the EXACT moment that the interview ended. This is directly orchestrated by the director on staff. The guy in the audience would NOT know that the camera is behind them, so most probably the guy was an NBC plant or was directed by NBC staff to turn the sign around at that time for the camera.
"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
Excellent point
Submitted by Truestar on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 4:58am.
That sign was staged. Is water wet indeed.
And I do get bored and depressed, frankly, when I see the likes of Cheney, of all people, still trying to water down (no pun intended) an answer that should be stated definitively. What does the guy have to lose by stating the obvious??? Is he afraid he might offend people, and they won't respect him? Good god, they'll always think he's the devil incarnate, so he should just say what he really thinks.
Maybe he did...
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 7:48am.
say what he really thinks. I somehow doubt Mr. Cheney is afraid of very many things, least of all offending (certain) people.
Cheney's Bias
Submitted by FaulknerFan on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:37am.
"he should just say what he really thinks."
Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/comment/reply/50115/1556307#ixzz1X52hL17s
I think he really does. But for Cheney there are much more weighty issues than this kind of stunt, which is how he probably sees it, and he just doesn't waste his time worrying about it. Probably never has. But I agree that that media bias is one of the greatest threats to our form of government and society as a whole and should be taken seriously by all our major politicians. If there had been an objective media and they had done their job in honestly vetting Obama we wouldn't be in the mess we are now, both domestically and internationally. Cheney says that there are other ways for conservatives to get their message out but these MSM's still get to a lot of people and can sway elections as they did in 2008. I think the media adds at least 15% to any democrats total vote, certainly nationally. I think also these national politicians on both sides have tacitly agreed to the rules of the game and none of them are much interested in upsetting them. One of these rules is that the left has the MSM.
The next time...
Submitted by GeneralAl on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 7:57am.
The next time Obama speaks on camera, I'd like to hold up a sign that says "Indict Obama for treason and grand larceny"!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
You'd never get in with the sign.
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:22am.
You'd have to come in with an "I heart Obama" sign, write you're new one on the back, and flipnit very quickly before the camera guy realizes ir and Obama's people toss you out.
Of course it was a set up...
Submitted by Mike009 on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:04am.
The network probably planned to show the protesters anyway as a closing shot. That being said, that one particular sign holder likely had to be told to stand in one spot so when the camera pulled back the sign would be visible.
This brings to mind a similar episode where David Gregory did an on the scene report about Iraq war protesters. When he was done, the camera panned to show a protest sign depicting George Bush as a monkey with the slogan "Hail to the Chimp."
But Cheney is right about not worrying about the left wing bias so much - the major networks no longer have a monopoly, as evidenced by their drop in ratings.
I beg to disagree...
Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:28am.
Despite the drop in ratings, they still have millions of viewers and carry a lot of clout and influence.
Mr. Dick Cheney knows...
Submitted by Order270 on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:29am.
...Matt Lauer and Chris Wallace are simple symptoms of the disease. But I suppose it's selling some books. Currently, I'm on the fence about reading it.
BTW: I wonder who was responsible for the commissioning of that so-called protest sign.
Order270
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:55am.
Amnesty International - a group that has been strangely unheard from since 2008. I don't know if it is because they are staying quiet or because the media doesn't report what they say with a Socialist in the WH - maybe both.
I don't understand
Submitted by Chaitealover on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:14pm.
what you mean by including Chris Wallace as a "symptom of the disease?" He showed Mr. Chaney the liberal bias that was exhibited at the end of Mr. Chaney's interview with Matt Lauer, he didn't condone it. It seems to me that, if he agreed with it, he would have either ignored it, or shown it to the audience after his interview with Mr. Chaney had concluded.
He could have shown or asked...
Submitted by Order270 on Tue, 09/06/2011 - 2:47am.
...a hundred different things, but this is what he chose--a chihuahua nipping at his ankles.
Dick Cheney and George W. Bush
Submitted by ohio granny on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:51am.
Dick Cheney and George W. Bush both have more class in their little fingers then any democrat, especially the "won" in the White House now, have in their whole bodies. Of course, you must know what class is to have any and little barry and mooochelle have none.
Neither VP Cheney nor President Bush ever whine about how they are treated. Only the current ocupant of the White House does that. What a small little person he is.
OG,
Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:01am.
While I agree that ignoring your critics can be an attribute in some situations, it's not just about Bush and Cheney. Criticism of them was, by extension, criticism of their supporters and conservatism (even if Bush wasn't all that conservative). Failing to answer critics allows the criticism to stand and be seen as "true" by many independents and those who don't pay close attention to these things - yet, do vote. There are intelligent ways to refute criticism and not be "whiny". Obama doesn't answer his critics, he just blames them for his utter failure.
C Norman,
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:08am.
Entirely my opinion but I don't believe President Bush would have allowed others to fight the Democrats and the media when he knew himself well enough to know that he wasn't an accomplished speaker that people always responded to - especially through the media filter. He still should have found a way but in this case it is not as easy as just standing up for yourself or making a speech. When everything you do or say is a weapon for your ideological enemies then you learn to keep quiet. Conservatives need to find a reasonable and meaningful way to combat this fact - talk radio and a share of the Internet alone are not enough.
Agnostic, I agree that Bush
Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:52am.
Agnostic,
I agree that Bush was not a good enough speaker or rhetorically fast enough to refute unfair criticism with a rapier like wit. He and others in his administration made very little attempt to defend their policies or their characters - depending on others outside of government to do so. However, if one is going to devise policies and implement them, one has to be prepared to defend them. If one is to govern successfully, one has to be respected. Failing to defend oneself causes a loss of respect from almost everyone and leads to disaster. Bush and (to a lesser degree) Cheney both come from the "Old Republican Party" who seem to have the antiquated notion that politics is still a gentleman's endeavor. In this hyper heated political atmosphere (conversely, I call it a "cold civil war"), this quaint notion loses elections and destroy the ability to get anything done. For example, the Democrats and the media were able to frame Republicans as "wanting to destroy the poor", making the Republicans timid about proposing bold new ideas in the way we help the poor become successful. Instead, now Republicans just, in effect, mostly sign on to the failed "anti-poverty" programs of the past and try to limit the amounts of money spent on them. This is just one issue that, by not answering unfair criticism based on lies and exaggeration, nothing gets done and the problems stay and grow. It is repeated through out the whole range of issues. Republicans have to recruit candidates who can think on their feet and defend the causes they espouse. They just can't sit back and hope Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham do it for them.
Quaint Notion
Submitted by FaulknerFan on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:55am.
Right on Chris! This "quaint notion" as you put it allowed McCain to adapt the idea to not say anything bad about Obama and then he was so stupid that he didn't see that he was playing into the MSM and their brothers in arms the democrats hands. This took off limits even saying Obama's middle name and not talking about Rev Wright and Bill Ayers, even though the less Washington oriented - politically sophisticated and feistier Palin did. It also was an intimidation to Bush or any republication to stop the insane housing policy of forcing banks to give loans to minorities who couldn't pay them back. Although the "compassionate conservative" Bush was probably in favor of it. One of the areas where not being a true conservative really hurt him and the entire country for decades to come.
They used to get away with it....
Submitted by Kuso Jiji on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:10am.
...but not anymore. It was a cheap shot at the former VP. We know it, they know it and their declining audience knows it. Matt Lauer proves yet again he is a tool of the left.
Wallace
Submitted by Mister Orange on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:12am.
Someday Chris will go back to reporting the news instead of acting like a republican tool in the War on the Media. These days he spends so much time worrying about the bias of other networks he's missed the favoritism of his own network.
Holy crap
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:20am.
Only a libtard would jump over the media bias of nbc and start pointing the finger at the messenger.
Go back to kos you nut case
Rightie O
Submitted by Mister Orange on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:23am.
Unfortunately for your party it seems even a well respected news man can't recognize bias, even as he reports on it.
Who said he was respected?
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:32am.
I only suggested you are not as bright as either of em. Good luck with your equivalence, I doubt you can articulate any of it.
My party? If only it were mine,
Boudin, I believe that M.O., is a drive by poster.
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:57am.
Mister Orange? Moooshelle Obama? Hadn't made that connection til just now.
Or, he's just another ignorant lefty from Kos or DU, who assigns a party to everyone, because he's one of their "party faithful".
yep, a new troll
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:19pm.
been posting for 3 days, account is a few weeks old.
I wonder if Dave has welcomed him yet?
We Are The 53%
Mister Orange
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:24am.
I must admit I no longer watch the news on any station and have never watched FOX news. Could you please enlighten me on the favoritism of the FOX news? I've asked before but only got responses dealing with talk shows or pundits and not the news program itself. I have no doubt that you are quite possibly correct since there are so many obviously liberal news members (there seems to be an occasional revolving door between the Democrat Party and the media) that a station would end up catering to the right just to capture the market share.
Just curious
Submitted by creekrat on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:34am.
If you watch no news, including Fox, why are you here ? This is a site to point out the hypocrisy in media, and there is plenty of it !
creekrat
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:56am.
Mostly because they all have Internet sites now. Also, media encapsulates more than just what shows up on television news.
Oh, good grief
Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:00am.
So, Wallace asks one question from the right and that makes him a Republican tool? How many questions from the left are asked daily on the MSM? What does that make them? Oh, forget it. You're obviously the wrong person to ask.
Nice try Dead Zippers.
Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 1:08pm.
Go back to ignoring the subject line. You still can't get it right after what, 4, 5 accounts now?
He knows
Submitted by Tjexcite on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:34am.
That in the end the gnat nosie of the LSM will be nothing but a wisper in a crowd. All one has to do is look at the apprval number of Obama and Bush after 2004. They both fall in a mirror yet the media still love Obama and the people know that and see right though it. The curtain has fell off.
Does a bear ....
Submitted by Richard.Halavais on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:46am.
Does a bear defaecate in the forest? Well, not a Polar Bear and the Internet blogs and Fox news are the Polar Bear exceptions to liberal media bias. Give yourself nightmares and think about how bad it would be without sites like this and Fox. Liberal news readers are the bottom of the failed pyramid of dumb people who were pushed ahead by our failed educators in an equally failed effort to spare their little egos. Put them all on a desert island and let them preach to themselves, and that's what their constantly lowering rating are doing.
Ah,
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:52am.
Perfectly said
Good grief
Submitted by StarAZ on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:47am.
Cheney Cheney..who needs to hear from this guy again? Just because I disdain Obama doesn't mean I started respecting Cheney or am even remotely interested in his sly murmurings.
"It’s okay. It’s a democracy..."
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:49am.
It is for now, but for how much longer?
I like VP Cheney, but it is time for some on the right to shove back hard. Nice ain't going to get it with the loony left.
Brent Baker
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 1:27pm.
Thank you for being the first to use a sound equalized video! Finally, the NB lead in audio is not 10 decibels louder than the main video content audio.
Good job to whomever fixed this issue.
Ya Think?
Submitted by telecaster on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:28pm.
At this point anyone who would ask whether there existed a liberal bias in media is either brain dead or been living under a rock. Liberal bias in media is reality. The real question is 'How can we confront the pernicious effect of liberal bias in American media?" The liberals are controlling the message people, so preaching to the choir or venting like I often do here may make us feel better but it isn't fixing the problem. It's not just a matter of fighting fire with fire by creating more FOX like successes. The very least we should be able to expect from the media is disinterested, evenhanded, un-slanted reporting, something true journalists used to consider their raison d'etre but which most of the the current crop of "journalists" are abjectly incapable of providing largely because they're highly paid liberal cheerleaders. Being an unemployed 55 year old I don't have all the answers but it seems to me if those capable of creating unbiased internet and broadcast news sources with smart, articulate content (i.e. capital and talent) got interested and got busy they could eventually balance the scales a bit. Just sayin'. People are surrounded daily with the liberal mantra in TV, movies, schools and mainstream media and this becomes reality for them, which makes anything that may challenge that reality sound alien. You almost have to force people to consider another viewpoint once the political/philosophical cement has set and it sets pretty fast when the only drying agent is MSNBC, Chris Matthews and Bill Maher. Hard to do that when these clowns are just about all there is on the tube.
how can we confront...
Submitted by kata on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:40pm.
I don't think we can. I've never seen a spontaneous political conversion :)
Take back our classrooms or take our children out of them. Flowers die or flourish starting at the roots.
Connecting the plots @ NBC!
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:51pm.
So who would be responsible for allowing that stunt? That would be the Executive Producer of the Today show: JIM BELL. He runs the show day to day. Nothing can get on without HIS say so.
His address is: NBC News, 30 Rockefeller Plaza , New York, NY 10112.
So, who is James Febles Bell IV? Well he’s Class of ’89 at Harvard doncha know. A meathead on the Harvard football team too.
To give the conclusion first, just to save time:Just look at the milieu these people inhabit. The default position is that Republcans and conservatives are scum, and that Cheney should be tortured then murdered.
JIM BELL is married to Angelique Febles Bell a former Associate Producer, NBC. 1990 – 1995 (5 years)
Education: BA, Journalism and English, 1986 – 1990. New York University –
Huge commie Professor Howard Zinn went to NYU too. Remember Zinn. It’s important.
The happy couple live the life of luxury in Greenwich Conn. Interestingly the Bells sold their house in Greenwich on 11/13/2001 to Mrs Bells parents for $850,000. On 5/29/2002, the parents sold the property to Traditional Building & Design Llc for $907,500.
Okay a $57,000 profit for mom and dad. However a year later Traditional Building & Design Llc then sold it on for...$3,350,000 on Sept. 9, 2003. Weird or what?
Though JIM does have a thing for Real Estate: First section of the Sunday Times: "Real Estate. It's just juicy. I think a lot of people grab that real estate section to see what's going on out there. It's a little bit of fun, fantasy -- a little bit of everything."
http://www.mediabistro.com/articles/cache/a9800.asp
Which bring us to 2009. Angelique Febles Bell is a busy mom, and gets involved in all sorts of quasi-political/charity work. Though NEITHER seem to contribute directly to the Democrat party – don’t make me laugh by asking if they give to the Reps.
Check this story out though…
GREENWICH -- While most people had to tune in to the season finale of NBC's "30 Rock" to see Matt Damon Thursday night, 500 residents watched the actor live at the Hyatt Regency Greenwich.
Damon was honored for his work with Westport-based Save the Children at a fundraiser organized by the agency's Greenwich Leadership Council….
The event Thursday was hosted by Ann Curry, anchor of NBC's "Today Show," who also has worked with Save the Children. Curry brought along colleagues Kathie Lee Gifford, a Greenwich resident, Hoda Kotb, Meredith Vieira and Jenna Bush Hager, President Bush's daughter, who has been working as a "Today Show" contributor.
The event was co-chaired by town resident Angelique Bell, a member of Save the Children's Greenwich Leadership Council whose husband, Jim Bell, is executive producer of "Today."
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/article/Matt-Damon-honored-for-cha...
A photo of Mrs Bell and the Matt can be perused @
http://www.fairfieldcountylook.com/gallery.php?id=235
Damon is a huge Amnesty International guy. So, could be the link between Damon and the Bells be Howard Zinn? This little tidbit happened a few months after Angelique hosted Matt!
NBC's Today show promotes prominent 9/11 truther
By: Mark Hemingway | Weekly Standard | 12/09/09 5:00 AM
NBC's Today show had venerable leftist Howard Zinn on -- and the appearance was not without some controversy. Zinn was promoting a documentary he produced called "The People Speak" which "depicts pivotal moments in American history from ordinary people. Bringing it to life are a host of noted musicians and actors, including Viggo Mortensen, Bruce Springsteen, Danny Glover, Marisa Tomei and Matt Damon, one of the producers of the film."
(For what it's worth, Damon grew up next door to Zinn in Boston -- which is why his supposedly super genius character in the Oscar-winning Good Will Hunting recommends Zinn's A People's History of the United States in the film -- a book that is a Freshman history assignment at best and ahistorical lefty claptrap at worst.)
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/nbc039s-today-s...
The History Channel is OWNED by NBC.
NBC-Owned History Channel to Air Leftist Howard Zinn's 'The People Speak'
By John Nolte | December 09, 2009 | 14:05
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-nolte/2009/12/09/nbc-owned-history-cha...
Just as additional background, at the moment Mrs Febles Bell is embroiled in a public spat with a Republican Marianna Ponns Cohen in Greenwich involving education: Here’s the link, and a couple of posted responses…
http://christopherfountain.com/2011/02/03/school-board-politics/
Angelique Febles Bell
February 3, 2011 at 9:32 pm
Steve Anderson is the coach of my son’s basketball team and he is a smart, kind, good, fair man. Think I met him the first time when I was on the RISE Task Force a few years ago. He’s a good egg.
I also know Marianna Ponns Cohen because our children went to Parkway school together for a number of years. As Bob Horton has reported, her school-aged children now attend private school in town, even though she says she will run again for a position on the school board.
Steve Anderson’s children attend Greenwich Public Schools, so I know this: Anderson walks the walk — it’s his kids’ education and lives that hang in the balance. He’s got something real at stake here.
I’d urge your buddy of 55 years to examine the motivation of Ponns Cohen.
Marianna Ponns Cohen
February 9, 2011 at 10:24 am
“As Bob Horton has reported, her (Mrs Febles Bell) school-aged children now attend private school in town, even though she says she will run again for a position on the school board.
Steve Anderson’s children attend Greenwich Public Schools.”
As Ms. Bell, well knows, I had to pull my children out of the public schools because of certain retaliatory actions under the prior school administration. Also, if the public schools are in such fine shape, why does she not walk the walk? Ms. Bell’s three of four children attend Brunswick School, a private school.
My answer to Ms. Bell is that it is precisely because I have “no skin in the game” that I can analyze matters impartially with a view to what I consider to be in the long-term best interest for the students of the Greenwich Schools and the Town. Let me also remind everyone that historically many Board members over the years have not had children in the schools while they served. Ms. Susan Ellis, Mr. Michael Bodson now, Ms. Ginny Gwynn, Ms Colleen Giambo.
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
Great job exposing the spider
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:31pm.
Great job exposing the spider web of connections and activities. Unfortunately, is it entirely unsurprising.
thanks Strat... I didn't
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Tue, 09/06/2011 - 5:40am.
thanks Strat... I didn't intend too, but once I yahooed Jim Bell I kept getting other little tidbits --- so TWO hours later... well you saw the result!
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
Liberal Media Bias
Submitted by pbthinker on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:38pm.
Here's what annoys me about that, those things just don't happen. Someone, somewhere, knew that sign was there a purposely allowed it to be shown. There are so many people involved, cameramen, producers, etc. that you just don't have this sign pop up, so the fact is it was intentional.
So let's just stop pretending, MSM, let's remove all the pretense that your objective and move on. I know you're biased and I don't watch you because of it. There are a few, in the unwashed masses, who really want to believe we have a free press in this country. They want to believe we have a press that is on the lookout for all of us, making sure all the politicians, both Democrats and Republicans, are doing the right things for the people. Well, it's very clear that our "free press" is little more than the propaganda arm of the liberal left and the Democratic Party so let's just get that oout in the open. Thanks MSM.
Edmund Burke
Submitted by Avitar on Tue, 09/06/2011 - 1:21am.
All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing:
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing:
The strike for freedom involves delivering a swirt Kick to Chris Wallace's butt.
Edmund Burke
Submitted by Avitar on Tue, 09/06/2011 - 1:31am.
Edmund Burke-
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing: "
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing:"
Me-
"The cause of freedom involves delivering a swift Kick to Chris Wallace's butt."
I'm sorry but when you drop a dirty trick like that on a guy who is running for nothing and is being kept alive by a pump in his chest there is no way that is legitimate journalism, it is pure hate speech.
Reason number 10,008 on why Conservatives should...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 09/06/2011 - 1:55am.
not watch nor go on ABCCBSNBCCNNMSNBC and HLN when "Joyless" Behar is hosting.