CBS Comes to Obama’s Defense on Vacation Time After They Cue Him Up to Prognosticate on the Economy
Just as criticism builds over President Barack Obama’s plan to spend the next week-and-a-half on Martha’s Vineyard while the economy flounders, the CBS Evening News came to his defense, suggesting he’s been a workaholic compared to his Republican predecessors.
While “Obama has taken 61 days of vacation so far,” anchor Scott Pelley noted over a photo montage of those he cited, “at this point in their presidencies, George W. Bush had spent 180 days at his ranch, where staff often joined him for meetings, and Ronald Reagan 112 days at his ranch. Among recent Presidents, Bill Clinton took the least time off -- 28 days.”
[UPDATE: Knoller tweeted, just past 8 AM EDT on Thursday, August 18, re his Obama count: “My count doesn't include his 20 visits to Camp David - covering all or part of 48 days.”]
Last year: “CBS's Reid Can't Resist Contrasting Obama's Vacation Time to Bush’s”
Preceding Pelley’s vacation count provided by CBS’s White House reporter for radio, Mark Knoller, the newscast ran excepts from Anthony Mason’s interview with Obama conducted in Atkinson, Illinois for CBS’s Sunday Morning.
Instead of challenging Obama on the failure of his economic policies or pressing him to offer any solutions, Mason treated Obama as an economic prognosticator offering valuable insights – as if Obama would ever agree “we're in danger of another recession.” Mason’s questions aired on the CBS Evening News:
> I asked him today about the recent violent swings in the stock market and what message he thinks the markets are sending.
> Do you think we're in danger of another recession?
> The concern last week and the week before was that the market was saying we were closer to it than we thought, and that in fact the markets themselves might cause consumers to pull back and tip us into a recession.
> This has been a scary summer for a lot of people. The stock market, the economy is struggling. Should Congress be back in Washington? Should you be going on vacation?
Speaking of Obama interviews, as I tweeted Wednesday night, this was CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer’s final question to Obama as run on the August 16 Situation Room:
The last time you were elected, you got Sasha and Malia a cute little puppy, Bo. What are you going to get them the next time, if you're re-elected?
And while we are recalling Reagan’s time at his ranch, on Monday night I tweeted a photo of the table and chair Reagan used when he signed his big tax cut bill at Rancho del Cielo – an August vacation day when valuable work took place -- a picture I took with my BlackBerry back in February at the Young America’s Foundation’s Reagan Ranch Center:
Reagan signed Economic Recovery Act 30 years ago. Table he used 8/13/81, displayed @TheReaganRanch Santa Barbara
(Oh, and here’s a picture of me in front of Reagan’s ranch house taken during my trip to attend Reagan Centennial events when I was privileged to get an opportunity to spend nearly two hours touring Ronald Reagan’s mountain top retreat in the Santa Ynez mountains of Santa Barbara County, California.)
Back to the liberal bias – from the Wednesday, August 17 CBS Evening News:
SCOTT PELLEY: Good evening. A lot of economists say that with chronic unemployment, wild gyrations in the stock market, and Americans cutting back on spending, the odds of a second recession are growing. Today, at the end of his Midwest bus tour, we asked President Obama which way he thinks the economy is headed? Senior business correspondent Anthony Mason is in Illinois where he sat down with Mr. Obama this afternoon for the CBS News program Sunday Morning. Anthony?
ANTHONY MASON: Scott, the President said he was happy to be out of Washington and he looked it. He insisted that he's on a listening tour, not on a campaign swing. But in the three-day bus trip across Minnesota, Iowa, and Illinois -- three states he carried in the last election -- the President has been given an earful about the economy. I asked him today about the recent violent swings in the stock market and what message he thinks the markets are sending.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: What I think the markets were reacting to is the fact that the economy has not grown as quick as it needs to. There have been a lot of headwinds -- the European debt crisis, Japan, high gas prices from the Arab spring -- and what a lot of folks are worried about is that the recovery that we have been on is stalling or not moving as quickly as it needs to.
MASON, TO OBAMA: Do you think we're in danger of another recession?
OBAMA: I don't think we're in danger of another recession, but we are in danger of not having a recovery that's fast enough to deal with what is a genuine unemployment crisis for a whole lot of folks out there and that's why we need to be doing more.Story Continues Below Ad ↓
MASON: The concern last week and the week before was that the market was saying we were closer to it than we thought, and that in fact the markets themselves might cause consumers to pull back and tip us into a recession.
OBAMA: What is absolutely true is confidence matters. We should not have had any kind of brinksmanship around the debt sealing. I wish the Speaker had taken me up on the grand bargain to deal with our long-term debt and deficit. We still have the opportunity to fix that....
MASON: Later in the day, I caught up with the President again and asked him about his upcoming vacation.
MASON, TO OBAMA: This has been a scary summer for a lot of people.
OBAMA: Absolutely.
MASON: The stock market, the economy is struggling.
OBAMA: Right.
MASON: Should Congress be back in Washington? Should you be going on vacation?
OBAMA: Well, no, because I think if all we're doing is the same posturing that we saw before the debt limit vote, that's not going to encourage anybody. That's going to discourage people. And the reason I'm out here is to remind people what the expectations of ordinary Americans are. In small towns like this and in big cities all across America, they are saying to their representatives, “stop playing the games and get something done.”
MASON: The President heads off for that vacation on Martha’s Vineyard tomorrow. The White House says he will offer a new jobs and economic growth plan after Labor Day, but the President did not offer any details today. Scott.
PELLEY: Anthony, I have to ask, where did do you that interview with all those wooden palettes behind the President?
MASON: We were actually across the street here, Scott, at what's called the Whiffles Hybrid Seed Corn plant, and we were literally surrounded by seed corn and palettes.
PELLEY: Thanks, Anthony. You'll see a lot more of Anthony's interview with the President this weekend on the Sunday Morning program.
As Anthony mentioned, the President is headed to Martha's Vineyard, the island off the coast of Massachusetts, and this is the place where he and his family will be staying. They'll be there for about ten days. There has been criticism of the President's vacation at this time so we asked White House correspondent Mark Knoller for a comparison. Mark says that Mr. Obama has taken 61 days of vacation so far. At this point in their presidencies, George W. Bush had spent 180 days at his ranch, where staff often joined him for meetings, and Ronald Reagan 112 days at his ranch. Among recent Presidents, Bill Clinton took the least time off -- 28 days.
Pelley then oddly pointed out how a Gallup poll question from back in March documented a decline in the percent of the public who see Obama as a “strong leader.”
- Brent Baker's blog
- Login to post comments






As Anthony mentioned, the President is headed to Martha's Vineyard, the island off the coast of Massachusetts, and this is the place where he and his family will be staying. They'll be there for about ten days. There has been criticism of the President's vacation at this time so we asked White House correspondent Mark Knoller for a comparison. Mark says that Mr. Obama has taken 61 days of vacation so far. At this point in their presidencies, George W. Bush had spent 180 days at his ranch, where staff often joined him for meetings, and Ronald Reagan 112 days at his ranch. Among recent Presidents, Bill Clinton took the least time off -- 28 days. 









Comments
Der Schlickmeister's typical
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:12am.
Der Schlickmeister's typical 'vacation' consisted of a cigar and an intern under his desk.............so why the hell would he have to leave the White House???
Billy Jeff would be the first to admit...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:21am.
...that a day without the Hildabeast around counted as a vacation.
Yeah.........he always had
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:31am.
Yeah.........he always had her out, running around - running her mouth - trying to convince herself, and everybody else, that she was 'important'!!! And he still operates like that............although I think that maybe she's been hooking up with Anthony der Weinerschnitzel's ex lately.........so Slick Willie can keep making his around-the-world-and-doing-good-things-for-humanity tours, and enjoying the life of a multi-millionaire ex-President.
Obama must hate Clinton!!! If nothing else, Billy Boy can be very lucid and off-the-cuff and extemporaneous...and glib....with his mouth, and actually be lucid - whether you agree with him or not. Barry??? This guy can't put together a coherent sentence, much less paragraph, without the aid of the teleprompter............and he proves it every time he is caught in that predicament!!!
Actually, when comparing these two 'black' Presidents..............one of them is 'big league' in his ability to sell his BS........
and the other one is 'bush league' (pun, anyone???) in his inability to convince people that he is sincere, genuine, honest, or believeable. Can you guess which is which???
Obama never "works".
Submitted by Order270 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:13am.
He's living like a king off the fat of the land.
Awl, come on. Like you
Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:30am.
Awl, come on. Like you haven't rented out the Taj Mahal at taxpayer expense.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
At what cost?
Submitted by stunned on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:35am.
The advance Secret Service details to set up security at each vacation destination cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Crawford ranch set up was a one time deal and they were working vacations with meetings with heads of states visiting the President. Those personal relationships are vital when trying to work out international agreements. We only see Obama vacationing for HIS personal enjoyment and the taxpayers footing the bill.
tired of liberal lies
I say.............forget the
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:37am.
I say.............forget the vacation days, OK??? Let's compute the COST - to the taxpayer - of these 'vacation days'. Bush and Reagan went to their ranches.............and probably kept working, although they were out doing chores and getting some exercise and enjoying their time away from the delusional world that is DC. Barama??? Hell, he hardly even works when he's IN Washington!!! That debt ceiling debate must have really been putting him in a bad mood, because he acutally had to show up somewhere and act like he was doing something!!!
And while we're at it........let's compute the 'golf days' also.
If I golfed as much as Barry.........I'd have a respectable swing , and a better handicap!!! He swings like he throws a baseball.
they would be FIRED
Submitted by Injest on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 3:37am.
“at this point in their presidencies, George W. Bush had spent 180 days at his ranch, where staff often joined him for meetings, and Ronald Reagan 112 days at his ranch."
At this point in President GW Bush presidencies he had gotten us out of a rescission, Unemployment was down to 5.5%, down from 6% and on the way to 5.1% in 2005 and 4.6% in 2006.
At this point in President Ronald Reagan presidencies he had gotten us out of a rescission, Unemployment was 7.5%, down from 9.7% and on the way to 5.5% in 1988.
Oh and had laid the ground work that ended the cold war.
And Obama? Not that much. He has fail to end the rescission, Unemployment when he took office was 9.3% went up to 10% and now with millions of Americans no longer getting UI so they are not counted as Unemployed, Unemployment is stuck at 9.2% and expected to rise!
Oh and lucky US Obama will finally give us his plan to address Unemployment next September!
In a real world an employee this incompetent would not be going on vacation, they would be FIRED!
The Only thing common is Obama
Submitted by Injest on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 4:03am.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: What I think the markets were reacting to is the fact that the economy has not grown as quick as it needs to. There have been a lot of headwinds -- the European debt crisis, Japan, high gas prices from the Arab spring -- and what a lot of folks are worried about is that the recovery that we have been on is stalling or not moving as quickly as it needs to.
Anyone else notice the only thing all Obama's excuses have in common is Obama?
Who did the math?
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 5:38am.
I challenge these numbers, as I believe they are incorrect.
An aside here, has anyone seen Bo? Has the poor dog's useful life as a prop passed and has he been put down?
Bo? Oh yeah, hmmm
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:35am.
Where is Bo? I went to Google, the first two pages of search brought up articles from 2009 only.
Guess Bo is MIA.
Was he thrown under the bus?
Let's have all the politicians in Washington, DC go on vacation.
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 6:35am.
...until 2013 at least. We don't need any more new laws or new spending. So please stay away and create no more harm.
I was curious.
Submitted by Par for the Course on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 6:37am.
A simple search turned up a different number:
"according to Knoller". The article says the following about Knoller:
So, Scott Pelly says “Obama has taken 61 days of vacation so far,” yet Knoller is saying 90 days thru 2010. They differ by about a month, probably considered just a rounding error by the MSM.
Excellent research, PFC
Submitted by ThisnThat on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:18am.
This detailed accounting exposes yet another in a long line of attempts by the MSM to use fudged numbers to advance their phoney message about this POS "president". And of course -- a little Bush and Reagan bashing thrown in doesn't hurt a bit either, does it?
You simply can't believe anything coming from the MSM -- anything! They're supposed to be the fact-checkers. Instead, it's now the internet that is the nation's main source of fact-checkers, and most of the job is consumed with fact-checking the lying MSM.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Knoller: Leaning Forward... And Taking It?
Submitted by stratman on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 10:05pm.
So, which count of yours, Mr. Knoller, is accurate - the count before the excrement storm for the Pelley puff piece or the count after the excrement storm for the Pelley puff piece?
And can someone give me a precise definition of what constitutes a Presidential vacation day? Or is this not to be transparent and understood except by those in control?
As Usual, I'm sure there is a Floating Definition
Submitted by scottyusmc on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 6:38am.
I'm sure that the definition of "vacation" is adapted to make this the story that it is. The only way these idiots can report news to deflect critisim of BOB is to adapt the meaning of words to suit their agenda.
Look at the pictures
Submitted by Mr. Mike on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:39am.
GW and Ronny are WORKING on their ranches. Look at Obama's picture of him cruising around in his golf cart. There's the difference right there!
Obama spends HOURS on the golf course wherever he vacations.
Comparing Bush and Obama vacation styles and calling it even is absolutely absurd!
Bush and Reagan actually had homes
Submitted by WingletDriver on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:41am.
It's kinda funny, but Bush and Reagan actually had homes they'd go back to on "vacation" and do the menial tasks of running ranches. Has Obama gone back and stayed at his home in Hyde Park? If he has, it hasn't been for days or weeks. Clinton rarely if ever went back to Little Rock to his "home."
Why is it that Republicans have homes that they work at on vacation and Democrats leach off the American people while pretending to be royalty in Martha's Vineyard?
Hey, hey, hey.....give him a break!
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:44am.
He did go back to Chicago one weekend to go out for dinner, and play basketball with his homeys.
And maybe he snuck out for a
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:48am.
And maybe he snuck out for a night at his favoirite men's club............
Yeah... The Ramrod.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:50am.
.
I think it's called the
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 12:22pm.
I think it's called the Ramrack by the 'boyz' inside............
Again I ask...why do the
Submitted by gopsteve on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:43am.
Again I ask...why do the "news" shows even bother booking Democrat guests when the "reporters" and "anchors" are completely willing to go to bat for Obama?
Also, this is just a prelude to the upcoming Obama CBS interview for "Sunday Morning," that ought to be a slobbering love fest!
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/08/17/sunday/main20093499.shtml?tag=...
You're right, steve, this has
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:46am.
You're right, steve, this has all the earmarks of a coordinated offensive.
The re-elect Obama media machine is cranking up.
The vacation criticism has
Submitted by Satchmo on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 7:56am.
The vacation criticism has always been silly. No president gets a vacation. But as for this president, don't we want him to do as little as possible? If so, then let him take all the vacation time in the world.
Sissy to English Translation ----
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 11:12am.
--- pifflle piffle piffle boils and sniffle.
I thought the S2E translator was on the fritz but then I realized when this troll ain't spewing his stupid, he is just another piffle poster that says things that have been said a 1000 times.
It's never a vacation
Submitted by midia on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 8:10am.
Presidents are never on vacation. They have to be engaged all the time. Now-a-days you can do that from almost anywhere. The problem comes with perception. Bad thinking: taking a posh vacation at Martha's Vineyard during the down economy. Doesn't look good at all. So - keep on making those bad decisions!
Exactly. The ranches had all
Submitted by Dingbat on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:01am.
Exactly. The ranches had all the Secret Service and White House Communications Agency (WHCA) infrastructure built in at a 1 time charge. They could also use less Secret Service (and give some leave time) since they were in a known, secured, area. With Obumba, they start from scratch every time and it ain't cheap.
Bush 43, Bush 41, Reagan as compared to Obama, Clinton
Submitted by YahooWatcher on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 8:47am.
Note how the Republican Presidents actually owned a home to go home to while the Democrats had no real "home" to speak of once they arrived in DC. Heck in Clinton's case, he is such a fool someone had to buy a house for him in Chappaqua NY just so his old lady could start calling NY home for her 2000 Senate bid.
Don't Tax Me, Bro.
Forget vacations, how often
Submitted by rbosque on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:05am.
Forget vacations, how often has this idiot gone and played golf every time there's bad economic news? You'd think for the sake of appearance that he'd ACT like he's working on the problem.
Now, how about a count on the
Submitted by ant on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:29am.
Now, how about a count on the travel and expenses of First Ladies? Someone needs to remind MO, noone elected her.
The Difference
Submitted by John21 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:33am.
The difference in vacation times is the cost. Mr. Reagan and Mr. Bush went to their homes, and yes I am sure that the had to put in additional security items. Mr. Obama's vacations are only at the most expensive spots on the planet and require a following of hundred to pamper them.
Mr. Reagan and Mr. Bush had meeting during their vacations that solved problems or created opportunities for the American people. Mr. Obama's vacation have provided nothing but "photo ops" for his PR department (the media) and deals with elitists and unionist, at a cost to the American people.
I know that you will continue to provide propaganda for the Obama administration (you can't help yourself) but do not insult the intelligence of the American people while doing it.
How about a permanent vacation
Submitted by ohio granny on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 10:30am.
If we can keep little Barry out of Washington until Jan.2013 we will all be better for it. As long as he is not in Washington (but still in the country) he can not do quite as much damage. So I vote to keep him in Martha's Vineyard until his term ends and we have a new president who actually believes in WORKING, not just TALKING.
Excuses, excuses!
Submitted by Mary Louise Turner on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 11:57am.
Ears is running our country into the ground and the lame brains in the make believe media still make up excuses for him. Defending a man who spends more time on the golf course than in the Oval Office, who has endless vacation time and who has no clue about foreign policy is totally unacceptable, but the MBM still refuses to criticize him. And they wonder why their ratings and circulations are going down the tubes...
God Bless Ronald Reagan, God
Submitted by marpel on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:27pm.
God Bless Ronald Reagan, God Bless George W. Bush and God Bless Rick Perry.....
"Deep within my heart lies a memory. A song of ol' San Antone..."
...the man in the Whitehouse
Submitted by vrwc13 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 2:37pm.
We would currently be better off if ALL his days since his coronation had been vacation...
v
The burden of life is from ourselves, its lightness from the grace of Christ and the love of God. - William Bernard Ullanthorne
vrwc---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:06pm.
Good one; especially the coronation bit.
MD
Entitlement...
Submitted by vrwc13 on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 9:34am.
...funny thing happened on my way to respond. The word "Entitlement" popped into m head and I found this:
In a casual sense, the term "entitlement" refers to a notion or belief that one (or oneself) is deserving of some particular reward or benefit[1]—if given without deeper legal or principled cause, the term is often given with pejorative connotation (e.g. a "sense of entitlement"). Wiki
It goes on to:
Narcissists hold unreasonable expectations of particularly favorable treatment and automatic compliance because they consider themselves special. Failure to comply is considered an attack on their superiority, and the perpetrator is considered an "awkward" or "difficult" person. Defiance of their will is a narcissistic injury that can trigger narcissistic rage.[3] Wiki
...it all seems to fit. the man in the Whitehouse loves the entitlements but has no clue on what he is doing.
v
The burden of life is from ourselves, its lightness from the grace of Christ and the love of God. - William Bernard Ullanthorne
Big Difference!
Submitted by billwhit1357 on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 2:45am.
There is a big difference between past Presidents vacation times and Hussein vacation times. Past Presidents were True Born Americans, who loved America and was doing a good job on the Economy and most other things. Hussein has done nothing but made things worse in America, made Racial lines worst than they have been in the last thirty years, and is spending taxpayer money like he is "N" rich! No, the man is a Loser and deserves no vacation and he certainly deserves no ReElection! I was a Democrat until the Fake American, B. Hussein Obama, came on the scene. I cannot support someone so obviously AntiAmerican, AntiChristian, and a Racist! Anbyone But Obama in 2012!
"N" rich?
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 8:09am.
"N" rich?