Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 25, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brent Baker's blog
  • Taranto: ‘Obama Presidency Has Given Liberal Media Bias a New and Dangerous Form’
  • Fox's Ed Henry: Colleagues Cheered Me On When I Grilled Bush Administration - They Don't Now
  • Bozell Column: The 'Assassinate Wall Street' Movie
  • Paul Krugman’s Flagrant ‘Austerity’ Double Standard
  • WashPost's Milbank Mocks Nikki Haley, 'Reached Out to' 'White Supremacists'
  • Networks Give Three Times More Quotes to Supporters of Gay Scout Admittance Than Opponents
  • State Dept. Official Who Altered Benghazi Talking Points Promoted; Only Fox Covered
  • MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Gushes Over Obama Speech, Claims the President is ‘Reining In His Own Power’

Top Newspapers Warn Debt Deal’s Spending Cuts Will ‘Weaken’ and ‘Undermine’ Economy

By Brent Baker | August 02, 2011 | 23:14

A  A
Brent Baker's picture

Remarkable uniformity amongst some major national newspapers on Tuesday as they simultaneously worried about how the supposed spending “cuts” in the debt-ceiling deal will harm the economy.

As USA Today put it the top of the “cover story” for the “Money” section: “Spending cuts could further weaken economy.”

Echoing that theme, from the Washington Post’s front page: “Deal risks undermining fragile growth”

On page 2 of the August 2 Wall Street Journal: “Deal Seen as Mild Drag on Economy”

And, from a Los Angeles Times front page plug for an interior article: “Deal offers little to boost economy”

Inside, that story carried this headline (at least online): “Debt ceiling deal casts a bleak light on the future”

Online, USA Today changed the print edition’s “Spending cuts could further weaken economy,” to : “Spending cuts could face headwinds this year: a weak economy.”

About the Author

Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Brent Baker on Twitter.
  • National Debt
  • Economy
  • USA Today
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Washington Post
  • Brent Baker's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

It's The Debt Stupids

Submitted by HardRightTurn on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 12:38am.

And the spending. Not the cuts. And the strangulating regulation. And Obamacare. And the threat of tax increases. And...

STUPIDS!!!

To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html

  • Login to post comments

Hmmm

Submitted by hayate1 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 1:07am.

In an economy driven by consumer demand I wonder how cutting back on spending money could possibly have a positive impact on jobs?

"Facts are not decided by how many people believe them. Truth is not determined by how loudly it is shouted."

  • Login to post comments

Question

Submitted by ckc1227 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 1:58am.

What part of this bill forces consumers to cut back on spending?


  • Login to post comments

Moron!!!

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 7:20am.

Govt. spending will not see to that end. Remember, the jackass in chief already admitted that there are no "shovel ready" jobs.

Back under the bridge troll.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Probably not...

Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 1:21am.

Maybe they're talking about the government-fueled economy of the Washington DC area - they're about the only place that's been booming in the last few years.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

What 'spending cuts' are these people talking about?

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 7:09am.

There are no real spending cuts going on here, and there will never be any - not from this BS 'deal,' anyway.

This is nothing more than clumsily repackaged, Business as Usual, smoke-and-mirrors BS, designed to fool the stoopid zombie American Idol-hypnotized dumbMass sheeple into thinking this is going to somehow reduce our budget deficit, and all is going to be right with the world.

It isn't even going to put a barely perceptible scratch in it, much less a visible dent.

All it really is going to do is increase it by a very immediate $2.2 Trillion (there is a coming election to be bought, after all) and then it will go far higher after that.

And to top it all off, we are still facing a downgrade, as this congress is unwilling to demonstrate that it has any intention whatsoever of dealing with the insane government spending that has been sharply increasing for decades.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Yup

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 7:16am.

They have simply slowed the rate of growth of spending, and only a fraction at that, but certainly spending is still increasing.

And the baseline moves ever upward...

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

R1,

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 7:28am.

Love the tagline. 

LOL - It's so...you. 

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Yeah, Dave

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 7:48am.

Someone on FB had posted a link to an interview with Ted on the Austin NPR affiliate. If I can find it, I may post it here. Ted was on fire, and that was the "pull quote" as far as I was concerned.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Way worse then that Dave

Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 8:50am.

These cretins have just foreclosed on our legislation process. Everyone should go that their Reps, and Boehner and McConnell, and thank them for stealing more of our money, future, and liberty. But at least we get a "vote" on the BBA, well as long as it doesnt interfere with anyones re-election that is.

I should apologies, I had sincere optimism that the leadership on the Right had honest to goodness problem solving intentions in their hearts. Looks as though, the only problem they were intent on solving was how to by-pass the American folks to steal more of our money, and to protect their re-election campaigns.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Thanks Boudin

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 9:59am.

I wasn't nealy pissed off enough about this deal yet. Your link put me over the top.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Had my suspicions too

Submitted by jon_torlin on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 10:55am.

I had my suspicions about Boehner when he went and played golf with DuhOne(It's called consorting with the enemy) with Gov. Kasich,(where is he in all this in relation to them??) that we wouldn't see anything significantly helpful to the American people, and the suspicions got more solidified thanks to that now infamous phone call from Boehner calling Rush about his "plan" to which there was a less than enthusiastic response on Rush's part(and if you lost him, you lost a lot of voters).

I had high hopes as you did, but those were dashed when the events I described above occurred.

It's times like these that I wish that movie Eagle Eye was real.  Now there's a way to deal with Constitutional enemies.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Ron Paul is not Presidential

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 8:38pm.

Ron Paul is not Presidential material, but dang if I am not agreeing with him more and more. He is probably spot on in his estimation of the severity and implications of this law.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

The liberal media is lost to

Submitted by deerjerkydave on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 4:37pm.

The liberal media is lost to the fact that Obama has raised Federal spending by a massive 28% in just 3 years. By their logic our economy should be booming right now. That was the hope and change they were expecting to see under Obama's reign. So far it has fallen flat on its face. Reaganomics looks pretty good right now stacked up against Obamanomics.

------------------------ 

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined.  Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James Madison
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: Obama Can Close Gitmo By Making it a Government-Funded Solar Company
  • Charlie Sheen Changes Name to Carlos Estevez for Upcoming 'Machete Kills' Film
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use