CBS Suppressed Public Support for Arizona Law But Eager to Hype Public Disagreement with Wisconsin’s Walker
Last May when a CBS News poll first asked about Arizona’s immigration enforcement law and found majority support for it (52 percent), the CBS Evening News didn’t report the finding. Two months later, when backing jumped five points higher, the newscast gave it a sentence. And a month after that, when those favoring the Arizona law had risen to 59 percent in August, the evening newscast ignored that number and instead focused on how “Americans oppose building a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero,” a story the network used to castigate Americans, pivoting to how that opposition and “controversies over new mosques in Wisconsin and Kentucky have led some to question is America becoming Islamophobic, a prejudice against Muslims?”
Now, with a CBS News/New York Times survey finding the public in sync with the CBS newsroom, and out of sync with conservatives, Katie Couric trumpeted in teasing Monday’s program: “Our new poll finds most Americans oppose cutting the pay, benefits and union rights of public employees.” She soon announced: “In a CBS News/New York Times poll out tonight, 56 percent of Americans say they oppose cutting the pay and benefits of public workers to reduce state budget deficits and 60 percent oppose taking away collective bargaining rights.”
Reporter Dean Reynolds emphasized “our new poll indicates [Wisconsin Governor Scott] Walker and like-minded Republican governors do not have public opinion on their side.” He repeated and expanded upon the numbers: “Added to the 56 percent who oppose cutting pay and benefits and the 60 percent who say government union workers should keep the right to bargain as a group, is the finding that more Americans think the pay and benefits of public workers are about right [36%] as opposed to those who think they're too high.”
Reynolds was also pleased to report “our poll found that when it comes to closing budget deficit the people actually do prefer paying higher taxes [40%] over reducing benefits [22%] or making specific spending cuts.”
Back on May 25, a CBS News poll was released which had asked:
As you may know, the state of Arizona recently passed a law that gives the police the power to question someone they have already stopped, detained, or arrested about their legal status in the country. The law requires people to produce documents verifying their status if asked. Do you think this law goes too far in dealing with the issue of illegal immigration, doesn't go far enough, or is about right?
“About right” answered 52 percent and 17 percent replied “not far enough.”
Couric didn’t utter a word that night about that discovery as she led the May 25 CBS Evening News:
Good evening, everyone. It’s been the dream of generations of Americans, that their children would have a better life than they did. But that dream apparently is fading. In a new CBS News poll, 61 percent say the country is heading in the wrong direction and half say they expect the future to be worse for the next generation. When the public is unhappy, the government often gets the blame and the President’s job approval rating has fallen to 47 percent. Those are the numbers, now listen to some of the people. Here’s Anthony Mason...
(More than six weeks later on a Saturday night, July 10, the CBS Evening News offered a sentence: “A recent CBS poll found a majority of Americans, 52 percent, support the law.”)
By mid-July, in the CBS News poll released on July 13, support for Arizona’s measure had jumped by five points to 57 percent. Couric went with how “as this crisis in the Gulf enters a 13th week, a CBS News poll out tonight finds more than half of Americans disapprove of how President Obama is handling it.” Dean Reynolds squeezed in one sentence about Arizona: “The administration’s opposition to the tough new Arizona immigration law goes against the national grain, too, with 57 percent believing the law has it about right in dealing with illegal immigration.”
By the time another CBS News poll was released on August 25, support for Arizona was up to 59 percent, but the CBS Evening News skipped that finding and decided to lecture viewers about their misguided view of the Ground Zero mosque. An August 26 BiasAlert, “CBS Uses Opposition to Ground Zero Mosque to Lecture About 'America Becoming Islamophobic,'” recounted:
“A CBS News poll out tonight finds that seven of ten [71%] Americans oppose building a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero,” fill-in CBS Evening News anchor Jeff Glor announced Wednesday night, but instead of exploring why most think it’s inappropriate to build there, Glor pivoted to how that and “controversies over new mosques in Wisconsin and Kentucky have led some to question is America becoming Islamophobic, a prejudice against Muslims?”
Story Continues Below Ad ↓
From the Monday, February 28 CBS Evening News:
KATIE COURIC: Now to those protests in Wisconsin over plans by the Republican Governor to cut the compensation of public employees and limit their right to negotiate with the state as a group -- which is known as collective bargaining. In a CBS News/New York Times poll out tonight, 56 percent of Americans say they oppose cutting the pay and benefits of public workers to reduce state budget deficits and 60 percent oppose taking away collective bargaining rights. More from Dean Reynolds.
PROTESTER: Scott Walker has got to go!
DEAN REYNOLDS: The Madison protests are not slowing down but Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is giving no ground.
GOVERNOR SCOTT WALKER: The facts are the law is on our side. We have a right to do this to the statutes and that's what we're doing.
REYNOLDS: He may have the law but our new poll indicates Walker and like-minded Republican governors do not have public opinion on their side. Added to the 56 percent who oppose cutting pay and benefits and the 60 percent who say government union workers should keep the right to bargain as a group, is the finding that more Americans think the pay and benefits of public workers are about right [36%] as opposed to those who think they're too high [26%]. The demand from conservatives for union sacrifice has been a staple of news coverage for weeks, augmented lately by corporate donations and ad campaigns.
RADIO AD: Our state budget's in big trouble and it's only fair that everyone pays their fair share. Government workers, too.
REYNOLDS: That's an argument that resonates with some.
WOMAN: Everybody has to make some concessions because nobody wants to pay higher taxes.
REYNOLDS: But our poll found that when it comes to closing budget deficit the people actually do prefer paying higher taxes [40%] over reducing benefits [22%] or making specific spending cuts [20%]. That surprised New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a Republican and strong advocate of big benefit cuts for government workers. He was skeptical about our poll's findings.
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: I understand for you guys it's an entertaining story and you want to keep it going so I'm sure you word it had poll in a way that kept it going.
REYNOLDS: But this is the second major national poll in a week to find that the public has less appetite for limiting the rights and benefits of unions than many of the politicians they elected.
— Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
- Brent Baker's blog
- Login to post comments






GOVERNOR SCOTT WALKER: The facts are the law is on our side. We have a right to do this to the statutes and that's what we're doing.
REYNOLDS: But our poll found that when it comes to closing budget deficit the people actually do prefer paying higher taxes [40%] over reducing benefits [22%] or making specific spending cuts [20%]. That surprised New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a Republican and strong advocate of big benefit cuts for government workers. He was skeptical about our poll's findings.









Comments
Ahem, Miss Couric.
Submitted by Ashrak on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 11:31am.
The Wisconsin poll, the one that actually carries authority, last November found quite the contrary.
I am always skeptical with
Submitted by StillRight on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 11:31am.
I am always skeptical with polls taken by the MSM and newspapers. Who are they poling, their viewers and readers? If so these polls could be skewed liberal. I trust Rassumusen the most.
.
Exactly
Submitted by ArcherB on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 12:00pm.
I would like to see EXACTLY how the poll was written and the demographics of who was asked.
For example, the poll question could have been worded like this:
After years of the press telling us how underpaid school teachers are, of course people are going to say no.
Also, who did they poll? Did they get their phone list from the ACLU or SEIU? Did they poll exclusively in Detroit Michigan? Did they send out a reporter with a clipboard to the actual protests at the Wisconsin capitol?
Finally, what were the true answers? For example:
35% may think that teacher pay is fair, but benefits are too high.
20% may think that teacher pay is too low and their benefits should be increased.
45% may think that pay is too high AND the benefits are too lavish.
The MSN can spin this to say that 55% of those polled think that teachers are not overpaid or benefits are not excessive.
These things are important to know because it is possible to get any results you want from any poll you want if you ask the right questions, ask the right people and spin the data to get the preconceived results.
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary."
--Ernesto "Che" Guevara
I don't buy this poll for one
Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 11:46am.
I don't buy this poll for one second. Patriots know full well that this union pandering is unsustainable, and on the other side a lot socialists have to be seething in class warfare envy as they see their wages remaining stagnant or dropping while teachers and their 32 hour work week and 36 week schedule protest that they aren't getting even bigger raises.
If there really was support for these union goons the MSM would be blanketing the airwaves with poll after poll showing support for the protests.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
The hidden question
Submitted by dmntd1 on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 11:53am.
The next question they should have asked is "do you, a friend or a family member work for, or are attempting to get employed by, a state agency?"
We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.
These unions will cave pretty
Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 11:57am.
These unions will cave pretty soon because all of these protests seem too much like work for them.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
OK, I have a question that I
Submitted by jdhawk on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 12:01pm.
OK, I have a question that I am sure CBS will jump on and have the results out immediately, if not sooner:
Teachers in WI get a month off during the school year and three months off every summer, and get paid 50% (including pay and benefits) more than the average WI worker, but 2/3 of the kids they teach can't read at proficiency level. Should their pay, benefits, and the means to negotiate the same be brought in line with private workers?
I am holding my breath here . . . .
I am turning blue . . . .
Ah, forget it . . . .
BUT!!...
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 12:10pm.
Here's the REAL poll question that should be asked the voters:
Considering that the state does not have the money to pay for government employees PAST contracts do you support raising taxes to cover all past and future agreements?
Very close
Submitted by ArcherB on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 12:21pm.
Let me modify that a bit:
Considering that the state does not have the money to pay for government employees PAST contracts, are you willing to pay more in taxes to cover all past and future agreements?
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary."
--Ernesto "Che" Guevara
right
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 12:53pm.
what I meant;what you said : )
Brent.. those poll results are tainted.
Submitted by Gary Hall on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 12:32pm.
Somewhere in that timeframe you mentioned was a national poll conducted by the Pew Polling for the People and the Press [safe to say, a liberal org.] Their poll was conducted after the liberal Democrats, liberal pundits, and national media had come out and labeled the AZ bill as intolerant and racist. As well, President Obama and AG Eric Holder had gone public in their divisive rhetoric against the bill and those who would support it. Numerous city governments across out country were in discussions of passing boycotts against the State of Arizona.
At this point in time the MSM labeled name of the bill, "AZ Immigration bill"([was actually an "illegal immigration enforcement bill) had become tainted.
Just the same, the Pew poll found that that 59% of adults polled in a national survey gave their overall approval to the law, which opponents charge is unconstitutional and a mandate for racial profiling.
Most telling, however, is that within the bill (not reported by the MSM) is that when the same folks were asked for their views of the specific language of the the two most contentious sections of the law, it found that (from LAT's on-line blog post - not in print edition):
Seventy-three percent said they backed a measure requiring people to produce documents verifying their legal status if police ask for them, while
67% approve of allowing police to detain anyone who cannot verify that they are in the country legally.
These numbers - in the 70% range - are not unusual, as most all straight polling on the issue of illegal immigration consistently finds that around 65% -75% of the broad population is generally in line with the views of Tom Tancredo and Lou Dobbs when it comes to how we should actually deal with the issue of illegal immigration. However, once again, if a poll uses the label of a Tancredo or a Dobbs, the numbers will drop like a rock -- as the MSM has severely tarnished the broad public's view of these gentleman American activists. The MSM successfully, via wildly unethical biased news reporting, shaped the general view of the public on this issue by labeling the measure racist, etc., and by not sharing a balanced and accurate view of what the bill set out to accomplish. They further taint the atmosphere by not reporting back to the people how the people actually feel about an issue.
Oh - bonus. That same Pew poll found that "just 25% support President Obama's immigration policy."
Didn't see many headlines hyping up that number, did we?
(;~/ gary
Wlaker will lose this very
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 4:02pm.
Wlaker will lose this very shortly unless he destroys the opposition now. His BS about what he is going to do "next" week usless. I'm hope I am wrong but I cave the Wis. repubilcans caving in Saturday and then sspout soome nonsesne about how a bi-paritisan compromise has been wokred out.