Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 21, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brent Baker's blog
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled

Schieffer Dismisses ObamaCare Repeal as ‘Waste of Time,’ Amanpour Baffled by Tea Party: ‘What on Earth Do They Mean By That?’

By Brent Baker | January 23, 2011 | 18:25

A  A
Brent Baker's picture

Two signs Sunday morning of how the Washington press corps are dismissive, disdainful and befuddled by the Tea Party.

On This Week, Christiane Amanpour fretted that though the New York Times has discredited the Tea Party’s rationale (“a new report today in the New York Times, they say that in fact TARP will cost maybe $28 billion to the taxpayer, instead of the $700 billion”), she told Republican Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas “you yourself have been facing, even though you’re a reliable conservative, Tea Party competition in Texas. Are they outflanking you?” Amanpour empathized that Tea Party activists “said that you personally signify everything that the Tea Party is fighting.” A flummoxed Amanpour wondered: “What on earth do they mean by that?”

Over on CBS's Face the Nation, Bob Schieffer, echoing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, asked Senator John McCain about a Senate vote to repeal ObamaCare: “Do you think...that that's a waste of time, that the time in the Senate could be better spent working on something that has a chance of passing?”

Instead of then pressing Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer about what Democrats have to fear about such a vote if they have the votes to defeat it, Schieffer simply cued him up with “what will be the Democratic response?” That allowed Schumer to expound on how they’ll force Republicans to reject supposedly popular elements of it.

From the January 23 Face the Nation:

BOB SCHIEFFER: This morning on Meet the Press, Republican leader Mitch McConnell said he is definitely going to try to force a vote on repealing health care reform, even though as most people, and I'm sure you would agree, there is no chance that that's going to pass in the Senate. Do you think Senator McCain that that's a waste of time, that the time in the Senate could be better spent working on something that has a chance of passing?

JOHN McCAIN: One thing about the Senate, it is not the most efficient organization and I don't think we would be wasting – we need to have a vote on it because we promised the people we would...

SCHIEFFER TO SCHUMER: He [McCain] agreed, you heard him, with what Mitch McConnell said also this morning. There needs to be a vote on repealing health care. If the Republicans do force a vote -- and I would guess that about the only way they can get this done is just to add it on as an amendment to some other legislation -- that seems most likely to me. But if they do that, Senator Schumer, what will be the Democratic response?

From ABC’s This Week, segment with retiring Senators Hutchison, Kent Conrad and Joe Lieberman:

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: Let me turn to you, Senator Hutchison. First of all, in a new report today in the New York Times, they say that in fact TARP will cost maybe $28 billion to the taxpayer, instead of the $700 billion. They say that bailing out the auto industry will cost maybe, in the end, about $15 billion rather than the many tens of billions that were put in. What about you? You yourself have been facing, even though you’re a reliable conservative, Tea Party competition in Texas. Are they outflanking you?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

HUTCHISON: You know, I think the Tea Party has done a good thing in awakening America to the problems that we are facing and saying, we can do something about it. And I appreciate that. I think that if I had run, I would have won. It would have been a tough race, for sure. But I think I would have won because I think my record is good. And it is to be effective and get things done. But I do think there is such a strong feeling that America has not been going in the right direction. And I think people are looking for a change. That's not why I didn't run. It was a personal decision for me. I commute every week. I have two young children and the time was right for me. I'm excited about a new future and excited about turning it over to someone else, but I think that the Tea Party, all in all, has done a good thing for America.

AMANPOUR: And yet they say that, as I said you're a reliable conservative by all indicators, they said that you personally signify everything that the Tea Party is fighting. What on earth do they mean by that? Particularly when it comes to issues such as spending cuts and the things that everybody’s talking about right now.

HUTCHISON: Well, I think that's a misrepresentation of my record. I am a reliable conservative. There are some people who say that, of course. I mean I read the blogs and it gets kind of depressing, frankly, to read those blogs. But all in all, I have support of Tea Party people. I do have the support of many of the leaders of the Tea Oarty. And I don't think there is a Tea Party spokesman that speaks for everyone. But I have a good relationship with the Tea Party. And yes, there are people that think that maybe I fought too hard for Texas in spending areas. But I think I'm elected to support my state. And I have supported every spending cut, every overall spending cut. And I think we're going to have to be doing a lot more of that in the next few weeks, because we all agree -- and I didn't support the stimulus. So I think that was a -- way too much spending. But we all agree now, it must be cut.

— Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

About the Author

Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Brent Baker on Twitter.
  • Medical Insurance
  • Tea Parties
  • Face the Nation
  • This Week
  • ObamaCare
  • Brent Baker's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

How long will they be in denial?

Submitted by Ashrak on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 6:35pm.

Some just refuse to beleive that Americans have had enough and that the Liberty movement is indeed on the march - not to be stopped by Democrats OR Republicans.

That an individual right exists requires that some policy positions be removed from the table of debate.
  • Login to post comments

Outflanking?????

Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 6:39pm.

Are they outflanking you?

Is that Christiane Amanpour using "battle" terminology???

I thought they were going to stop using all those "violent" words!!

  • Login to post comments

No, the right has to stop

Submitted by syvyn11 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 9:31pm.

No, the right has to stop violent rhetoric.   The left can be as mean spirited as they want.

  • Login to post comments

Kay Bailey Hutchison

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 6:45pm.

Lee Harvey Oswald
Henry Lee Lucas

Just can't trust anybody who goes by three names.
But seriously, we Texans have a whole border full of reasons why KBH is a RINO.

  • Login to post comments

Cool---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:10pm.

John Wilkes Booth-Franklin Delano Roosevelt-Barack Hussein Obama. I think you may be on to something! MD
"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Barack Hussein Obama.

Submitted by NeoKong on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:16pm.

.
 

Follow me on Twitter
  • Login to post comments

→ mmm mmm mmm

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:28pm.

Good one.

  • Login to post comments

1/2 RINO

Submitted by Samshile on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:15pm.

She is only 1/2 a RINO. You cant expect any one representative to agree with you 100%. Ill take her over Scott Brown and many others.

Samshile
  • Login to post comments

→ Samshile

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:23pm.

I'll take her over Harry Reid or Scott Brown.  But I'm not much into the RINO scene.  I'd rather we vote them out and get real conservatives i there.

  • Login to post comments

It's rather simple you Liberal mouthpiece hacks

Submitted by IgnatzJFahrquar on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 6:45pm.

1) Republicans maintaining a promise to get/try the repeal AND REPLACEMENT WITH A BETTER SOLUTION of Obamacare.

2) Forcing the hands of the Dims up for re-election in the Senate. Vote yeah or nay and tell your constituents where you stand. Considering the polls showing a majority of Americans want it replaced ... go ahead and continue peeing on them D's.

"Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
  • Login to post comments

The Rasmussen report ishowed

Submitted by jorae on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 6:49am.

The Rasmussen report ishowed their poll for Jan 11 -12 that..

27% want the Health care as it is

28% want the Health care plan with changes.

75% some sort of change but not reapeal.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/

january_2011/75_want_health_care_law_changed

 

The odd part is, that most polls showed 70% or more when the "public option'' was in play. Even Rasmussen admits, the support for the Health reform went down, especially with democrats, when it was removed.

I know the new would say things like  43% of the public does not want the health care, but...you know the news...they kept leaving out why the number were going down..they should have said "support for the Health Reform has droped since the removal of the public option"....so, as we know, they can be quite misleading.

Aug 19, 2010..."The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 57% oppose the plan if it doesn't include a government-run health insurance plan to compete with private insurers"

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/

healthcare/august_2009/without_public_option_enthusiasm_for_health_care

We all hate misinformation...but this poll from a site I would assume you think is conservative, shows alont 57% wanted health care with the public opition.

It is a shame to go off "half cocked" with wrong information.  But other polls shows the same...the Wall Street Jouranl teamed up with MSNBC to do one, where over 70% states the Public Option was important to the reform.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/090617_NBC-WSJ_poll_Full.pdf

 

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693

 

Public debate isn't much fun unless both sides work with the truth...agree?

  • Login to post comments

If the public wanted the public option

Submitted by ckc1227 on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 7:02am.

Democrats would have included it, instead of leaving it out and going out of there way to make SURE everyone knew the plan didn't include a public option.


  • Login to post comments

Not necessarily.  The

Submitted by Jer on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 8:58am.

Not necessarily.  The administration and Congressional leadership were trying to secure the votes necessary for passage, and with the GOP virtually unanimous in its opposition and facing the defection of several "blue dog" Dems, dropping the public option was done with the expectation of bringing the latter on board and hopefully enticing the support of at least a few Republicans.

I've seen polls spanning the past two decades.  The results consistently showed clear majorities backed significant changes in our system of health care.  The "public" option was favored but the margin of support was smaller [i.e. a slight majority] and, as is often the case, depended upon the wording of the question. 

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Really? One word:

Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 10:41pm.

Really? One word: HillaryCare.

  • Login to post comments

Data still say about 57% say repeal and replace or fix

Submitted by TheHistorian on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 7:08am.

The real problem is exactly as Obama said "they will like it once they get it".  People are afraid to kill the plan; they may like some of it.  What I find stupid is that those polled will trust anyone to replace this stinking fish with something else.  Replacing it with free market options is the only way to minimize the loss of freedom.
 

“Liberals tend to put the onus of your success on society and conservatives on you and your family.”

Dennis Prager

  • Login to post comments

Mandatory buying Insurance...from - Free Market silly!

Submitted by jorae on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 9:30pm.

You get part of it right...Yes, most people will want to see how this goes.  The purpose was our "out of control" costs of health care...As one company use to advertise...If everyone bought "just one can" of Blue Diamon Almonds, the company would would be swimming in new sales.  The plan requires you to buy it.  The mandatory part takes the tax payer out of the obligation to pay for people who end up qualifying for Medicaid when they have an accident.  It stops the "welfare".

Example....If you are 28, and your are a passenger in an accident . You don't carry any insurance because your work for youself in your apartment.

COMPULSORY BODILY INJURY: Provides $20,000 per person/$40,000 per accident for anyone injured by your auto in an at-fault accident. It does NOT COVER you out-of-state or on private property (such as driveways and shopping malls or parking lots!) nor does it cover your passengers in an auto accident.

PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION: Massachusetts auto policies provide $8,000 in total benefits under this mandatory coverage. Of the total limit, $2,000 is available for medical expenses as a result of any injury and the balance may be used towards lost wages, substitute services, etc. 

 

1.  You don't own anything, and are totally disable now.

You qualify for MedicAid....and the government pays all your medical bills.

Now, he could have afford the premiums at Blue Cross of $120.00 a month, but he chose not to buy insurance.

So the mandatory part is to stop these things from happening.  And according to Mitt Romney, it cost his state a billion a year.

 

  • Login to post comments

Well being from Texas, can we

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:16pm.

Well being from Texas, can we get someone better that KBH?  We need to be on teh lookout for loons like Debra Medina.  I actually liked her in the debates as she made a lot of good sense, then I looked at her very carefully and she is a loon.  A loon like her idol Ron Paul.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

Schieffy can't count to 21 unless he is naked.

Submitted by drsamherman on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:26pm.

Okay, maybe it would be 20.5 in his case.

  • Login to post comments

Gee babes

Submitted by bolivar on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:35pm.

what don't you understand?   Republicans are actually beginning to show some stones and it is about damn time.  The fact we don't want socialism (any more than already here) in this country might have a bearing too........do I have to go on???

I have no use for liberal thinking - it is just so......passe.
  • Login to post comments

Amanpour baffled?  That's

Submitted by mattm on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 8:43pm.

Amanpour baffled?  That's about as surprising as the "legendary" Green Bay Packers being granted another trip to the stupidbowl by the National Foulball League.

  • Login to post comments

Amanpour baffled? Well,

Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 8:57pm.

Amanpour baffled? Well, that's what you get when you hire a liberal - foreign - foreign correspondent to host a program that deals with mostly US domestic issues and politics. More than most of the out-of-touch elitist MSM types, Amanpour is especially at sea whe  it comes to understanding a grassroot conservative movement. No matter, with the ratings dropping, in six months or so, ABC will  "reassign" Amanpour to doing "special reports" from the Middle East and bring in a new liberal elitist "journalist" to anchor This Week - who will not understand conservatives.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

Curious what the ratings drop is

Submitted by Lipton on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:00pm.

I usually like foreign accents (both male and femaile), but hers is just awful.  She sounds so preachy and "above it all".   I don't care if they replace her with K. Olbermann.  I'd just like to see her gone. 

WHat a stupid idea to bring her in.  The networks don't seem to be developing any talent.  I guess that is what happens when you have no standards.

I'd like to thank Hollywood for renewing my interest in reading.
  • Login to post comments

They have no interest in

Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:42pm.

They have no interest in developing "talent". They're too busy developing liberals.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

FN liberals

Submitted by gfrrman on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:47am.

 

need not apply...if I've said it once, I've said it too many times!  Amanpour, like ALL liberals, will forever be "baffled" by what conservatives do or say.  The reason is that idiots like Old-MAN-poor, Schlitz, Madcow, Tingle Legs, Smile-less, Overlydumb, Schiester, Steffy, Curit, Williams, Vier-ify, Wa-Wa, Whoops!!!, Alf,  Horse Face, Elenor-the SCREEETCH, etc...are STUPID, by DEFINITION.  They will NEVER be able to grasp the thoughts of conservatism because they are STUPIDLY wired to never be able to understand such. "Bafled"....??????  Wth!!!??? STUPID is..............THE liberal "mind".  THIMK!!!!

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy!!!...Winston Churchill

G

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
  • Login to post comments

Amanpour thinks Kay Bailey Hutchison is a reliable conservative?

Submitted by Dave. on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 9:09pm.

On what planet is she talking about, 'cause it ain't this one?

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

KBH = KBGone

Submitted by jon_torlin on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:29pm.

She used to be a lot better than she is now.  Guess she's thinking more and more about retirement after her failed attempt at the governor's primary.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

What happened to Hutchison

Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:51pm.

What happened to Hutchison and Hatch seems to be the common homogenization that occurs to conservatives in the Senate. It must have something to do with what is called the "collegial" atmosphere there - they want fit in to the "club". It seems to homogenize conservative politicians and changes their affiliation from conservatives in the Republican Party to moderates in a sort of Senatorial Party. It's strange, but the Senate doesn't seem to have the same effect on liberal Democrats.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

No effect on lib dems

Submitted by jon_torlin on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:11pm.

That's because the lib dems' minds are already messed up, remember, it's proven to be a mental disorder.  I'm only guessing that it happened to Hatch and Hutchison because they were kinda liberal to start with, so it just grew on there over time.  And both of them are ready for retirement so it's kinda easy for it to affect them.

There are so few conservative Republicans of strong mental fortitude.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

No, when Hatch and Hutchinson

Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 2:12am.

No, when Hatch and Hutchinson were elected to the Senate they were considered part of the new conservatives in the GOP. I don't know how old you are, but a lot of our younger commenters here aren't old enough to remember that Bob Dole was considered "far right" in a time when Gerald Ford was considered a conservative. The lines of ideology have shifted. The mainstream of the Republican Party in the Fifties, Sixties, and Seventies would be considered to the left of those who are called RINOs today. Remembering the bad old days of the GOP prevents me from getting as worked up, as some here do, at any deviation from what is considered conservative orthodoxy today.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

Schieffer is a nobody

Submitted by WarEagle01 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:23pm.

 I think he wants to be relevant, but he comes off sounding just like all the other left-leaning partisan hacks who populate his network.  The only difference is that he is a heck of a lot older and no one will remember him in ten years.

  • Login to post comments

I am so freaking sick of

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:31pm.

this vague crap:

  • THEY SAY
  • SOME SAY
  • IT HAS BEEN SAID

Some would say that this kind of allusion to phantoms whose opinions are touted anonymously are monkeys throwing their crap at the wall and watching for what sticks.  Sounds about right to me.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

This show needs a new host

Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:58pm.

Amanpour will never be able to think like an American.

 

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: "Let me turn to you, Senator Hutchison. First of all, in a new report today in the New York Times, they say that in fact TARP will cost maybe $28 billion to the taxpayer, instead of the $700 billion. They say that bailing out the auto industry will cost maybe, in the end, about $15 billion rather than the many tens of billions that were put in."

 

What great news!  We have only lost tens of $ billions instead of hundreds -- what a great bargain for the US taxpayer.  With logic like that, why would anyone be upset that their mortgage is "under water?" 

 

  • Login to post comments

replying to #6

Submitted by Ciampino on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:05pm.

Republicans maintaining a promise to get/try the repeal AND REPLACEMENT WITH A BETTER SOLUTION of Obamacare

No! No! - the Federal Government has no Constitutional mandate to be involved in health care, that is the job of the individual States. Otherwise we run the risk of replacing one piece of unlawful legslation with an analogous piece of junk.
  • Login to post comments

Ciampino

Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:58am.

IF you want to reply to a certain post, click the "reply" that is located under the post.

It makes the thread go smoother.

Be on the lookout for random acts of journalism from the MSM~h/t Rush

We Are The 53%

  • Login to post comments

I did

Submitted by Ciampino on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 10:50pm.

but somehow I ended up at the bottom of the page.

  • Login to post comments

I'm baffled that such an

Submitted by rbosque on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:21pm.

I'm baffled that such an idiot is even receiving a paycheck!

See that kids!  Hard work and smarts doesn't necessarily cut it. Just be a mindless left-wing drone and misrepresent the facts and you too can get millions from the left-wing "news" media.

"It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country"......Will Durant
  • Login to post comments

MTP

Submitted by grammajane on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:38am.

Over on meet the press gregory was drilling Cantor on the birthers. They have used racisum, Republicans forceing Sr's to eat dog food, they don't care about children bla bla bla. Realizing all that BS is getting quite old, they are now going to drag the birth certificate issue through the media saying conservatives don't think BO is a citizen and make a huge deal about that. I live in a Sr's bldg and have not noticed anyone opening a can of Alpo. Policies are never talked about on these bias shows, just making any conservative look hateful is their main agenda and goal.

  • Login to post comments

Setup

Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 1:01am.

And Abercrombie, the new socialist Governor of Hawaii, can't seam to find Obama's Birth Certificate.

Although, I agree with Rush on that, don't get pulled in, it's probably a setup.

Be on the lookout for random acts of journalism from the MSM~h/t Rush

We Are The 53%

  • Login to post comments

Deliberately Ignorant?

Submitted by Boil It Down on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 2:27am.

Amanpour  seems to be baffled about most things American. Both Schieffer and Amanpour's refusal to acknowledge the reasoning behind the repeal vote demonstrates their stubborn and willful ignorance or blatant dishonesty. It's not as though the reasons have been kept secret. I think most people that saw their shows think it's odd that they know the answers when Amanpour and Schieffer say they don't

  • Login to post comments

Faulty Reasoning

Submitted by wascally on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:23pm.

In the misguided miscreant reasoning of these elitist imbeciles, Congress should never take up any bill or subject unless they first poll the other branches of government and get their approval in advance! Why consider ANYTHING unless you already have the approval in the bag? Does that leftist-required poll also include the Supreme Court? And why doesn't their polling also include We the People? If so, then their own errant line of reasoning would have likely stopped passage of Obamacare in the first place, since polls of the people have always been consistently against Obamamcare?

Oh, that's right! Since the "man-who-would-be-king" progressives are smarter and more competent than the rest of the population, why should they even consider the wishes of mere commoners, also called Americans? They are to be dismissed rather than considered! Just impose their dictatorship by fiat!

And I would also ask these disdainful derelicts another question: Why bother with passing bills at all, since its all a "waste of time"? Why not just pass everything by fiat of the oligarchy? It works well for Hugo Chavez, doesn't it? Why not just dismiss the rest of the Constitution (in addition to Congressional votes) also, since you are so dismissive, nay, destructive, of most of it anyway?

This is symbolic of the truly tyrannical nature of America's progressives. It's who they are! Tyranny has come to America! It's called progressivism! If not defeated, it will destroy individual freedom, free enterprise, the US Constitution, and Christianity. They are not compatible! Progressivism is the enemy of them all! Americans must wake up and recognize this or their freedom will be gone before they even realize it or can stop it!

  • Login to post comments

You've got to give liberals credit. They stick to their agenda

Submitted by Rush Fan on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:29pm.

no matter what facts get in their way. Charles Krauthammer has an excellent column on the Left's lie that Obamacare will reduce the deficit titled: Everything starts with repeal.

  • Login to post comments

When Genghas Khan......

Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 1:20pm.

sent back the head of the emissary of the Jurchens who had been sent to demand the Mongols submit themselves as vassals, do you think they sat around and asked "What on earth do they mean by that?"?

disclaimer: the above example is used for literary purposes only and may not be historically accurate. Nor is it a call to start cutting off peoples' heads and sending them to Ms. Amanpour.

BWA-hahahahahahahahahaha!

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Leno: It’s Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to ‘See, I Told You So!’
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • The Guardian Glamorizes New ‘Assault on Wall Street’ Movie as Justice
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use