NBC’s Mitchell Digs Back to 2005 to Locate Beck’s Hate Speech, But Can’t Find Any on MSNBC
There’s no evidence political vitriol of any kind drove Jared Loughner’s murderous rampage, ABC, CBS and NBC all acknowledged, but that didn’t deter them on Monday night from taking up the left-wing line holding conservatives culpable as NBC, incredibly, managed to castigate Sarah Palin and go back more than five years to find an incendiary quote from Glenn Beck – but couldn’t find anything over the line from its own Keith Olbermann or Ed Schultz.
“It was, by all accounts, a lone and very disturbed man who shot that gun on Saturday,” ABC’s Diane Sawyer noted, “but nonetheless, as we all know, a lot of people began asking questions for different reasons. Is this a moment we can talk about what is civility and respect in America?” From Tucson, on CBS Katie Couric set up a story: “We may never know for sure what drove Jared Loughner to open fire here last Saturday, but some, on both ends of the political spectrum, say the vitriolic rhetoric we hear every day was a factor.”
NBC anchor Brian Williams intoned: “Has political speech in this country become too charged, too toxic, and did it play a role in this tragedy?” Reporter Andrea Mitchell contended any link to the shooting is irrelevant: “Whether or not there is any connection between Saturday's shooting and angry rhetoric, it has certainly reignited the debate over political speech between right and left.”
After running a soundbite of FNC’s Glenn Beck denouncing the media for blaming Palin, Mitchell proceeded to regurgitate that very charge: “This map from Palin’s Web site targeted Giffords' district and the others with the iconic cross hairs of a gun sight. Giffords' Tucson office was vandalized that week, and the Congresswoman criticized Palin's map with Chuck Todd and Savannah Guthrie.”
Skipping over everything aired on MSNBC, Mitchell went back to 2005 to discredit Beck: “Beck himself has been widely criticized for comments like this about liberal activist Michael Moore.” Viewers heard audio from Beck on his radio show from May 17, 2005: “I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore. I could just be choking the life out of him. Is this wrong?”
Only at the very end of her piece did Mitchell slip in: “In the wake of the shootings, a liberal blogger on the Daily Kos took down his recent post that Giffords was quote ‘dead to him’ for voting against Nancy Pelosi for Democratic leader.”
On ABC’s World News, Jake Tapper pointed out: “One acquaintance from 2007 said the shooter was liberal and his obsession with Giffords pre-dates Sarah Palin's much criticized map of congressional targets for defeat, including Giffords, by three years. So, from the right, come charges of political opportunism by the left.”
After a clip of Rush Limbaugh castigating Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, Tapper aired a bite of Dupnik trashing Limbaugh:
The kind of rhetoric that flows from people like Rush Limbaugh, in my judgment he’s irresponsible, uses partial information – sometimes wrong information – attacks people, angers them against government, angers them against elected officials and that kind of behavior, in my opinion is not without consequences and I think he’s irresponsible.
Jeff Greenfield, on the CBS Evening News, recalled how “a generation ago some intellectuals on the left were flirting with revolutionary violence espoused by the black panthers and the weathermen. One leading literary magazine put a diagram of a Molotov cocktail on its cover,” but, he insisted in leading into comments from Newt Gingrich and Dick Morris, “these days the harshest words about government usually come from the right.”
Couric ended her newscast by quoting from an e-mail sent days ago by Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords:
She said, quote: “We need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down,” unquote. No matter what the shooter’s motive, this tragedy provides us all with an opportunity to step back, take stock and have a conversation.
From the Monday, January 10 NBC Nightly News:
BRIAN WILLIAMS: We're back now from Tucson with more on the shootings here and the political fallout. A question was raised almost as soon as the news broke. Has political speech in this country become too charged, too toxic, and did it play a role in this tragedy? NBC's Andrea Mitchell in Washington for us tonight with more on that story. Andrea, good evening.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓
ANDREA MITCHELL: Good evening, Brian. Whether or not there is any connection between Saturday's shooting and angry rhetoric, it has certainly reignited the debate over political speech between right and left, with conservative commentator Glenn Beck tonight challenging the media to show leadership and everyone to denounce violence. On Fox News tonight, conservative commentator Glenn Beck accused the media of trying to destroy Sarah Palin.
GLENN BECK, ON FNC: They're desperately using every opportunity to try to convince you that somehow or another, Sarah Palin is dangerous.
MITCHELL: His complaint, criticism that Palin crossed a line when she used gun imagery last year against twenty Democrats, including Gabrielle Giffords.
SARAH PALIN, MARCH 26, 2010: But this BS coming from the lame stream media lately about this, about us inciting violence.
MITCHELL: But this map from Palin’s Web site targeted Giffords' district and the others with the iconic cross hairs of a gun sight. Giffords' Tucson office was vandalized that week, and the Congresswoman criticized Palin's map with Chuck Todd and Savannah Guthrie.
GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, ON MSNBC ON MARCH 25, 2010: The way that she has it depicted has the croshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they’ve got to realize there are consequences to that action.
MITCHELL: After Saturday's shooting Palin's team defended the map on a conservative podcast.
AUDIO OF REBECCA MANSOUR: We never ever, ever intended it to be gun sights. It was simply cross hairs like you see on a map.
MITCHELL: Still, they removed the map from their Web site on Saturday, but today it was still up on Palin's Facebook page. Today, Palin e-mailed Beck to say-
BECK, READING E-MAIL: Our children will not have peace if politicos just capitalize on this to succeed in portraying anyone as inciting terror and violence.
MITCHELL: Beck himself has been widely criticized for comments like this about liberal activist Michael Moore.
AUDIO OF GLENN BECK, MAY 17, 2005: I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore. I could just be choking the life out of him. Is this wrong?
MITCHELL: The issue blew up right after the shooting with the Tucson sheriff's first briefing. He lit up the Internet by blaming the media.
SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: The vitriolic rhetoric that we hear day in and day out from people in the radio business and some people in the TV business.
MITCHELL: In the wake of the shootings, a liberal blogger on the Daily Kos took down his recent post that Giffords was quote “dead to him” for voting against Nancy Pelosi for Democratic leader.
And today, we learned that the day before she was shot, Giffords' e-mailed a Republican friend saying: “I would love to talk about what we can do to promote centrism and moderation. We need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down.” Brian?
— Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
- Brent Baker's blog
- Login to post comments






MITCHELL: His complaint, criticism that Palin crossed a line when she used gun imagery last year against twenty Democrats, including Gabrielle Giffords.
AUDIO OF GLENN BECK, MAY 17, 2005: I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore. I could just be choking the life out of him. Is this wrong?









Comments
Obama's Hate Filled Rhetoric
Submitted by Retired Geek on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 3:28am.
President Barack Obama has a long History of inciting violence, why should anyone be surprised when violence occurs during his Administration?
One of Barack Obama’s tasks at ACORN, where he worked with Madeline Talbott, was teaching community activists how to use “direct action” and be more forceful in demanding change.
The “in your face” style preached by Barack Obama was used by activists to stage sit-ins and demonstrations at banks to garner publicity and support for more bank loans for (sometimes unqualified) poor people.
ACORN Tactics included picketing at the homes of bank executives and calling them racists for not lending to the poor.
"I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face."
Barack Obama
September 18, 2008
“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,”
Sen. Barack Obama
Radnor Middle School in Wayne, Pa., Saturday, June 14, 2008. (AP)
“A Republican majority in Congress would mean “hand-to-hand combat” on Capitol Hill for the next two years, threatening policies Democrats have enacted to stabilize the economy,”
President Barack Obama, October 6, 2010
“We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.”
President Barack Obama to Latinos, October 2010
“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
President Barack Obama March 2010
“We talk to these folks… so I know whose *** to kick.“
President Barack Obama
June 2010
“Punish your enemies”
President Barack Obama
October 26, 2010
"I’m itching for a fight"
President Barack Obama
December 7, 2010
“It’s time to Fight for it.”
President Barack Obama
October 19, 2010
Truth is not hate…Liberals just hate to face Truth.
Interesting. But try for
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 3:39am.
Interesting. But try for context next time. Also, precisely what acts of violence did he incite? Please be specific--name and number of dead and wounded, description of injuries, etc.
Thanks,
Jer
Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 3:57am.
You mean show stats, like the liberal MSM has for all of their poor-mouthing of Palin, Beck, O'Reilly, et al? MDJer, I will respectfully
Submitted by Van Halen on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 4:16am.
Jer,
I will respectfully argue this point with you.
Michelle Malkin at her site today had an impressive list of Liberal hate going back ten years. Many of us link Obama to this list, the ACORN, the Rev. Wright speeches, etc. though I will admit Obama's excellent at keeping the blame from pointing back to him. He always has others do his dirty work for him.
Have a look at the list; it's pretty long so be prepared to be there a while.
Hey, here's an equivalence:
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:40am.
Hey, here's an equivalence: the guy in Florida who tried to run down Katherine Harris with his car, while she was running for office.
Oh, wait, he didn't succeed, so that doesn't count.
\sarc
Jer, you're proving his point.
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:38am.
Obama's remarks are to be taken "in context." In other words the context proves that he was using "figures of speech."
But Palin's remarks are direct incitements to violence?????? No context is allowed to excuse her???
You claim that Obama's blameless because he didn't incite any specific acts of violence.
Oh, wait, guys!!
Jer has proof that Palin and Limbaugh and Beck DID incite this guy to violence.
Let's all gather 'round and hear it!!
Well posted, Motherbelt
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 9:58am.
The double standard is just what this webstie is all about.
Well posted, other than the
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 2:40pm.
Well posted, other than the fact it completely misrepresented my clearly enunciated position on Palin et al and incitement of Loughner.
Jer
motherbelt...Response PLEASE!
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 2:37pm.
"Jer has proof that Palin and Limbaugh and Beck DID incite this guy to violence."
I'm trying to square that comment with my repeated assertions that no one--and especially not Sarah Palin--incited this kook to violence.
I realize you only respond to maybe twenty per cent of the queries I address to you, but, in this case, I think you really owe me an explanation.
Thanks,
Jer
And the crickets
Submitted by Jer on Wed, 01/12/2011 - 6:59pm.
are going freakin' nuts. Motherbelt simply does not entertain questions. Post sheer BS about Jer...Move on...Don't look back.
Jer
First of all Jer, you can
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 01/12/2011 - 10:42pm.
First of all Jer, you can cool it with the snark about me "entertaining questions."
I have a life outside of Newsbusters, and I don't need anyone's permission to leave when I want, which means that I often miss or lose track of replies to my comments
I distinctly recall explaining that to you another time, but it suits you to think I am running from you.
Whatever.
Regarding my "BS" that I posted about you,
I was responding to your saying that Obama hadn't incited any specific acts of violence by his rhetoric.
I have no reason to doubt you when you say you exonerated Palin, but I didn't see those posts. (outside life, you know....)
In the context of the response, I think it was fair to read it as your claiming that the difference was that Obama didn't cause any harm, but Palin and Limbaugh did. That's why I made the "proof" comment. Since I was apparently wrong, I retract it.
Happy now?
motherbelt...
Submitted by Jer on Wed, 01/12/2011 - 11:07pm.
Happier.
I appreciate the grudging retraction.
Regarding the other demands on your time, now that bigtimer isn't around so much, I would say you might very well be the most prolific poster at NewsBusters. Certainly in the top five during my tenure here. So you seem to find quite a bit of time to spend at this site despite your busy outside life. Try checking the Track function sometime. If your avoidance behavior were an aberration, I wouldn't have made an issue of it. But it isn't. You might also consider the option of actually asking my opinon on an issue instead of presuming it.
Jer
Jer, don't presume to
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 01/13/2011 - 10:22am.
Jer, don't presume to lecture me or educate me on "Newsbusters" features. I know all about the "track" function. I just don't consider it my responsibility to use it.
If your avoidance behavior were an aberration, I wouldn't have made an issue of it. But it isn't.
That's right, I'm just a drive-by shooter who posts and runs.
I'm not going to join you in the personal attacks.
Gotta run. ;-)
You don't need to join me.
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/13/2011 - 11:28am.
You don't need to join me. You initiated the personal attack all by yourself, motherbelt, when you posted false claims about me based on sheer supposition.
You are smart and well-informed, and your comments are incisive and interesting. But your smug, if you don't like it--that's too bad, attitude is extremely annoying. If you intend to make and post groundless assumptions about me, be prepared to be asked to explain them, and to be lectured on your customary nonresponse, or for posting lame, snark-laden retorts.
Jer
You want context, Jer? Are you kidding?
Submitted by ThisnThat on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:29am.
Why don't you ask your fellow liberal lunatics to put Sarah Palin's "bullseye targets" map in context, first? Then we might give you an audience. But you don't have the intellectual honesty to do that, do you?
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Context regarding the "bullseye targets" map, TnT?
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 2:46pm.
I've already done so several times, imbecile, explicitly dismissing it as a red herring by Palin's detractors. Do I need to link my posts for you?
Geez, your relentless stupidity is simply overwhelming.
Jer
Well, in all fairness.....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 5:25pm.
....do you expect all of us to remember every post of yours on every topic on every day?
Some of us aren't as enamored of your posts as you are and may choose to skip 7 or 8 of them. And, sometimes, we don't get to read every post every day on NB.
Some of us, speaking personally, can hardly remember our own posts.
Be patient with us who are relentlessly stupid, Jer.
"Oh, by the way. I was being sarcastic."
-Homer Simpson
Of course not, cowboy...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 5:42pm.
But I've posted my view [exonerating Palin] several times in the past few days, and I would think one would at least make some effort to determine what my opinion actually is before making and posting erroneous assumptions. However, TnT has been engaging in this type of naked speculation--attributing to me opinions that he wants desperately to believe I must possess just by virtue of my "liberalism". It is the quintessential smear by generalization and stereotyping, and I'm tired of it.
So...I wasn't particularly surprised by TnT's comment. I was by Motherbelt's.
Jer
Precisely the ones we're all
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 2:49pm.
Precisely the ones we're all here debating right now Jer.You've already been given the names, number of dead or wounded, list of injuries, etc.
The only thing is, libs haven't got.... A CLUE or a CONSCIENCE!
Obama's inflamatory, oftimes racist rhetoric along with his manifesto, which includes destroying all hope of a future for most Americans especially the dregs of society like Laughner, under the lie of fundamental transformation, makes him as culpable in the murderous mayhem of the other day, as if he had pulled the trigger himself.
He can hide behind the bigoted douchebags of the lame street media, blaming conservatism, Sarah Palin, etc., but us real Americans know the truth behind what is destroying our country from within............and that is only one person, Barack Obama.
Barack_Must_Go.....
What's the Difference?
Submitted by IrateNate on Wed, 01/12/2011 - 2:46pm.
Jer,
I gather that, from your comment, that you subscribe to the "no harm, no foul" school of thought. I also gather that you must believe it OK to yell "FIRE" in a crowded theater, provided no one is killed or injured as they rush to the exit?
Please refer to this "target map", published by the Democratic Leadership Council in 2004:
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253055&kaid=127&subid=171
Can you explain how this is in any way different from the map Palin's PAC published in 2010? Other than the fact that Saturday's violence by this deranged lunatic did not occur in one of the states targeted on the DLC's map.
Assume that New Mexico was the site of Saturday's attack. Do you believe the liberal media would cite the DLC's "irresponsible use of violent, inflammatory imagery" as the cause?
My guess is they would still assume the crazed gunman had to have been an avid Beck follower.
Your thoughts?
The JournOList media have
Submitted by Van Halen on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 4:09am.
The JournOList media have drawn a line in the sand with this tragedy. As have the Democrats. Never can they regain their credibility after this. Never can we work with them in any capacity again. Liberalism must be defeated at the ballot box every year until it is just a sad memory.
Turn off your media. Can you honestly say you don't watch MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS or read Time, Newsweek, the WaPo or NYT or LAT?
I can.
I don't click on their sites. I don't click on links to stories that carry me to their sites. I stay away from them entirely. Because I learned years ago that they don't report the news, they are nothing but Leftist lies and hate. And many people have left them. Soon, many of them will be gone. Thank God.
Here-Here Bravo
Submitted by The_Pumpcrop on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 10:23am.
My friends and myself do not watch any of these, and we went a step further. We sent each one an Email TELLING them we will no longer watch AND get others to do the same. We let them KNOW (and maybe a dig that we do watch FOXNews though...)
It really doesn't matter because if they only have 500 watching they are still going to be on air. The thing about needing opposition to stay healthy is true, but when the opposition are nutcases, liars and weasles, where is the health in that? Maybe if they get a slap of reality, they AND Hollywood, perhaps they'll try to stay closer to truth and entertainment, instead of their paranoid fantasies and propaganda.
"Apes can't train wolves, so how is Hollywood getting away with this?".... Macco
Reporter Andrea Mitchell
Submitted by Van Halen on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 4:27am.
Reporter Andrea Mitchell contended any link to the shooting is irrelevant: “Whether or not there is any connection between Saturday's shooting and angry rhetoric, it has certainly reignited the debate over political speech between right and left.”
Translated: The JournOList media can't find any connection to link the murders to the Right Wing, so we'll just do it anyway, placing special blame on Sarah Palin whose life we seek to destroy.
A telling statement by Andrea
Submitted by Reaver on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:33am.
A telling statement by Andrea Mitchell - Whether or not there is any connection between Saturday’s shooting and angry rhetoric we, your betters in the media, want to make this a debate about angry right wing rhetoric while leaving the left completely unexamined. The goal, as ever, to define right wing speech as hate speech and set up the left and the leftist media as the arbiters of what is and is not hate speech. From the first shot on Saturday the media’s attitude has been – How can we exploit this tragedy for political gain? Just when I didn’t think the media could sink any lower they manage to hit a new low.Any Link Is....
Submitted by GeneralAl on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 6:44am.
Any link to the shooting is irrelevant but who cares? We can keep it going long enough for it to become etched in the minds of those with weaker personalities, like the "starve the children and poison the water" mantra of 1995. This is the classic Liberal idea of never wasting a good crisis! Such mature leadership!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
Andrea Mitchell's Husband may be more culpable than anyone...
Submitted by Fenwick on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:08am.
After all, with all Alan Greenspan's involvement with "currency" and such with the Federal Reserve, it must have sent this nutcase over the edge!!!
/sarc
Real Americans need to
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:16am.
Real Americans need to concentrate back on saving Anerica, as we have known her, from those in Washington and beyond who want to destroy her, in turn destroying us as a society.
What happened the other day was terrible, but if we let it consume us we've learned nothing and the enemy wins.
The president and democrats have a vested interest ( spotlight off their colossal failures ) in perpetuating their misguided fears and lies for as long as We the People allow it.
That not only wouldn't be fair to those murdered or maimed, it's not fair to us, our children, and their children.
The new beginning ( Republican win ) is only postponed for a week, not lost forever.
It's time to get back on track and move forward in continuing to take our country back from those in Washington, who only wish her harm.
Barack_Must_Go.....
My liberal wife became aggrevated at me because of this...
Submitted by NavyBuckeye on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:22am.
We were watching the news together yesterday when they (she watches NBC) started talking about the Tuscon Tragedy (as the "catchy" phrase they came up with). I happened to ask aloud "I wonder if they are going to apologize to Sarah Palin and the Tea Party? Since this guy has nothing to do with them. And his rage stems from some delusional attachment to words and Mrs. Giffords non-response to him at her rally in 2007."
My wife looked at me with disgust and said "This is not the time for that, this is a tragedy and our hearts should go out to the families. Stop trying to politicize this event"
I was dumb founded.
Then the news went into the lets try to link this as close as possible to Palin mode.
I looked at her and asked "What are they doing here?"
She said with a straight face "Tring to inform us impartial viewers of the facts."
I replied "Then they should talk about his Democrat status, his disdain for our government, his love of Mein Kompf and the Communist Manifesto as well as his belief that 9/11 was an inside job. His hatred of G. W. Bush would be good too. Oh and once again it would be good to talk about how none of this previous information had nothing to do with this rampage. Oh wait those are facts and therefore deemed not sensational"
How was the couch last night
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:11am.
How was the couch last night NavyBuckeye? :-)
It is truly pathetic that the LSM or as some call it the MBM (Make Believe Media) just will not let go of this meme.
The backlash I would like to see is papers like the NY Slime go into bankruptcy and all at DMSNBC find themselves on the unemployment line.
No couch for me. Never.
Submitted by NavyBuckeye on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 2:44pm.
Scuba I will never sleep on the couch. I have told my wife this many times. I have told her that if we argue I will sleep where I feel like it. She has tried to get me to go to the couch a few times. I always say the same few things and in no particular order:
1. I'm not the husband you see on commercials today. Don't try to play me like one.
2. Didn't your mom burn her bra so that you could sleep on the couch? (This is my favorite, you talk about a spinning top!!!)
3. This is 20XX you wanted equal rights now you have em. Here's a blanket and the pillow. How does it feel to be equal?
I am an oldschool alpha male that doesn't play the PC game, not even with my wife. I respect her don't get me wrong (and I love her to death, it's the only way I can even deal with her liberal dogma) but I also let her know that if she wants to be this uber cool, sheik woman of the new millenium then she needs to be a big girl and deal with what her ilk have brought about. I am a gentleman though when she's not spouting her leftist meme.
~Navy
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 5:49pm.
I don't know if she's ever let on, or if you've already realized this, but she respects you for acting like a real man even when it makes her mad. It may be one of the reasons she married you. No woman, in her heart of hearts, wants a man who can be browbeaten. I bet she looks at the wimps all her friends married and knows she's lucky.
Of course, Mitchell
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 8:42am.
Of course, Mitchell intentionally took Beck's comment way out of context as usual.
Two years running roughshod
Submitted by octavioj on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 9:39am.
After two years of running roughshod on the country it is time to pause and take stock? There is a reason why the election went the way it did and Republicans made gains at the federal and local levels. Are all of these gains "fabricated"? Did the media even think they are complicit in elevating the anger? There was a reason why the media credibility was so low before the election and it was not because of heated rhetoric, but rather because of dishonesty. Did they ever think of that?Obama's Long History of Anti-Semitic "Friends"
Submitted by Retired Geek on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:12am.
Gabrielle Giffords, the target of the mass killing, is ‘the first Jewish female elected to such a high position in the US government.
Barack Obama has a long and sordid history of supporting and advocating for anti-Semitic groups and 'Jew Haters' like Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
The National Action Network, while under the personal leadership and supervision of “community organizer” Al Sharpton, screamed racial and anti-Semitic epithets, and arson threats that were later put into effect, at a Jewish-owned store in Harlem.
“Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of Islam and Muslims...”
Jesse Jackson
"God will destroy America by the hands of the Muslims....God will not give Japan or Europe the honor of bringing down the United States; this is an honor God will bestow upon Muslims."
Louis Farrakhan
"The Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great man."
Louis Farrakhan
Jared Lee Loughner like Louis Farrakhan is an admirer of Adolph Hitler.
Louis Farrakhan is one of Barack Obama's 'Spiritual Advisers' and Louis Farrakhan was the one who declared Barack Obama the 'Messiah'.
Barack Obama helped award Louis Farrakhan a 'Lifetime Achievement Award' in his 'Racist' church led by Jeremiah Wright.
“The Israelis have illegally occupied Palestinian territories for over 40 years now. Divestment has now hit the table again as a strategy to wake the business community and wake up Americans concerning the injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians have lived because of Zionism.”
Jeremiah Wright
Personal Chosen Mentor of Barack Obama for over 20 Years.
Why is anyone surprised when violence against Jews occur during the Presidency of Barack Obama?
Truth is not hate…Liberals just hate to face Truth.
"Has political speech in this
Submitted by phryingphish on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:28am.
"Has political speech in this country become too charged, too toxic,...?"
Is anything more "Toxic" than "As for me, give me liberty or give me death!" If the Libs had their way in the 1770's we would still be singing "God save the Queen". (Yes, I know it was "King" at the time.)
Funny though, in the 60's the libs were running around, throwing bombs, raising their fist in the air, killing cops, calling them pigs, just to get the reaction they are claiming the Conservitives are trying to get now (Lie). As I have always said, if you want to know what the Dems will do, just listen what they are saying the Conservitives will do.I'll cool my rhetoric
Submitted by sam12663 on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:53am.
when I see civility come from this adminsitration.
This administration, led by President Obama himself, has been at the forefront of the divisive rhetoric from day one. I expect the type of commentary we are seeing from the liberal media, but for the President of the United States to degrade himself, and the office, with his use of divisive speech is unprecedented. While running for president, I can see attacking, respectfully, your opponent. However, Obama has never stopped campaigning, and his rhetoric has gotten more and more angry and partisan.
If President Obama promotes any partisan rhetoric into the speech he will give at the memorial service Wednesday, the gloves will come off and the war will rage on. He has a chance to show true leadership, of all the people, which is something that we have seen so very little of out of this man. He must use this opportunity to lead by example and put a stop to the liberal media denigration machine. This moment may very well define his future.
By the way MSM;
Don't tell me to watch my P's & Q"s while you continue to vilify me.
The Prog/Libs
Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 5:32pm.
want us to "cool our rhetoric" only because it's effective.
I knew that all of the
Submitted by marpel on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 3:22pm.
I knew that all of the weasels and reptiles from the left would be slithering around just aching for a conservative or conservatives to blame when this happened. Well, they're out in full force. The minute I saw that reptile who calls himself the Sheriff of Pima County, start blaming conservatives for this horrible incident, light bulbs would go off in every other liberal's head...Conservatives were to blame.
So, how do they explain that the Federal Judge who was killed was a Republican? When this eggheaded jackass shot the Congresswoman, was he a conservative? Did he suddenly turn liberal when he shot the conservative judge?
Tell me, Andrea, in all your "holier than thou" wisdom, what it all means???? You heffer...
"Deep within my heart lies a memory. A song of ol' San Antone..."
2005 AD? The Mummy could go back to 2005 BC if need be
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 5:33pm.
Say hi to Imhotep for me, Andrea.
And please, get rid of that hideous wig, will ya?