Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brent Baker's blog
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun

Sawyer Forwards Charge of Tea Party Hypocrisy as Couric Frets: ‘Is There Danger’ Budget Cuts ‘Will Be Too Deep?’

By Brent Baker | January 06, 2011 | 10:26

A  A
Brent Baker's picture

ABC’s Diane Sawyer hit a group of incoming freshmen House and Senate members about presumed Tea Party hypocrisy in accepting farm subsidies and not refusing to accept federal employee health care while CBS’s Katie Couric, with three House members, despaired over the “danger” that budget cuts might “be too deep?” Forwarding liberal talking points, in the pre-recorded segment aired on Wednesday’s World News, Sawyer relayed:

The Democrats have a challenge for the Republicans, saying, if you're going to cut spending, go ahead and start close to home. Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler of Missouri got more than $750,000 in taxpayer subsidies for her farm. Are you ready to vote against all farm subsidies?

Sawyer continued: “And on the promise to repeal health care reform, Democrats ask: Will they be giving up their new taxpayer-subsidized insurance? Only two of them said they would.”

On the CBS Evening News, Couric noted “Republicans say high on their priority list is deficit reduction, starting with major cuts in domestic spending this year. Fiscally conservative freshmen say everything’s fair game.” She then fretted: “But is there danger in your view, Congressman West, that the ax will be too sharp, that the cuts will be too deep?”

(Meanwhile, NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell found it relevant to point out: “For the first time in 64 years, no member of the Kennedy family holds a federal office.”)

From the Wednesday, January 5 ABC World News, transcript provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth:

DIANE SAWYER: But the Democrats have a challenge for the Republicans, saying, if you're going to cut spending, go ahead and start close to home. Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler of Missouri got more than $750,000 in taxpayer subsidies for her farm. Are you ready to vote against all farm subsidies? That's $20 billion by one estimate, at least.

REP. VICKY HARTZLER (R-MO): Well, I think everything should be on the table. And, yes, there's a lot of us farmers that have participated in the program.

SAWYER: Congressman Stutzman of Indiana got more than $100,000.

REP. MARLIN STUTZMAN (R-IN): Yes, I would vote to eliminate farm subsidies. It manipulates the market. And that's the problem here in Washington. The adult conversation, I think, has to be no.

SAWYER: Agree?

HARTZLER: I'm ready to start the discussion and look at it.

SAWYER: Not a yes yet?

HARTZLER: I think we need to make sure everything is looked at before we just pick on the farmers.

SAWYER: And on the promise to repeal health care reform, Democrats ask: Will they be giving up their new taxpayer-subsidized insurance? Only two of them said they would.

REP. PAUL GOSAR (R-AZ): First of all, Congress should not be exempt from rules they pass, and that's exactly what happened here. In fact, I ask everybody to denounce that because we shouldn't be taking that, unlike anybody else in regular everyday America.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE CONGRESSMAN: I'm not taking the health insurance, either.

SAWYER: The rest of you who are now renouncing it, how do you answer this?

 

Story Continues Below Ad ↓


SENATOR MIKE LEE (R-UT): There's a big difference between receiving health insurance through one's employer on the other hand, and, on the other hand, establishing a national regulatory program that tells people where to go to the doctor and how to pay for it.

SAWYER: But the taxpayer doesn't have an option but to support it.
   
LEE: Look-

SAWYER: The taxpayer doesn't have a choice.

LEE: Health care regulation is fundamentally a creature of state law. This is a state issue.

SAWYER: We'll let you know later what each of them decides...

From the CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: ...Republicans say high on their priority list is deficit reduction, starting with major cuts in domestic spending this year. Fiscally conservative freshmen say everything’s fair game.

U.S. REPRESENTATIVE ROBERT DOLD (R-IL): Let's take a look at the Department of Defense so that we send a signal to those on the other side of the aisle that everything has to be at table.

COURIC: But is there danger in your view, Congressman West, that the ax will be too sharp, that the cuts will be too deep?

CONGRESSMAN ALLEN WEST (R-FL): I think if there's an opportunity for us to finally have that honest conversation with the American people and make some of the hard decisions, the hard choices, it's right now because the people understand the dire economic situation that we're in.

— Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter

About the Author

Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Brent Baker on Twitter.
  • Medical Insurance
  • Budget
  • Tea Parties
  • Congress
  • Diane Sawyer
  • CBS Evening News
  • World News
  • Brent Baker's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

Obama voted against raising the debt ceiling

Submitted by Tomorama on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 10:34am.

Any chance they will look up this and give these DETAILS to the populace considering it is also RELEVENT?

Every story from a leftists view.

NEVER, "the Republicans are making a great point about".......

 

Every FN story.

 

Nah no bias in the media.

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

Why now?

Submitted by KC Mulville on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 10:38am.

What does it say about media coverage when, for the last two years, the Tea Party has been campaigning for precisely these cuts ... but all of a sudden, the media is skeptical? Why are they suddenly asking questions about policies that the Tea Party campaigned on (and that the public overwhelmingly approved)?

It says that the media were hoping that the Democrats would win, and the media wouldn't have to deal with the Tea Party at all. Now, they're forced to deal with these cuts as impending reality, and they're nervous about it. 

  • Login to post comments

Nice try Diane.

Submitted by NeoKong on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 10:54am.

It's apples and oranges.   Asking the Reps. to renounce their healthcare plan is silly because it has nothing to do with Obamacare. They are simply like the 90% percent of this country that have good employer based health care that they are happy with.  What she is suggesting is like asking them to forgo their salaries too or they're hypocrites.

As far as the farm subsidies go that money does not go to layabouts who provide nothing in return.   It takes alot of hard work to be a farmer and it is a lifestyle many could not handle.  If Sawyer wants to get cute and demogogue about limiting farm subsidies then let her go all the way and talk about union bailouts, TARP, seizing auto companies and propping up those worthless windfarm projects.

Those Reps. should have known that a leftist d- bag like Sawyer was only looking to ambush them for a snarky soundbite.   When will they ever learn...?

Follow me on Twitter
  • Login to post comments

Farm subsidies should go

Submitted by ckc1227 on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 1:08pm.

I don't care if they are layabouts or not.


  • Login to post comments

Re Diane Sawyer...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:06am.

I just watched a rather lengthy airing of Sawyer recounting her background, growing up in Kentucky, the daughter of a schoolteacher and a farmer.  Her dad was a man of deep convictions and a strong moral code...steeped in Republican politics...she went on to spend years working with Richard Nixon.  It was very moving, very impressive.

There is one thing that is crystal clear:  Diane Sawyer is not a leftist douchebag.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

No

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:17am.

She's just a douchebag.  No orientation required in her case.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

She may not have started a

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:41am.

She may not have started a leftist db but it is what it is; and she is.  Nothing more than a mouthpiece.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

Beg to differ Jer

Submitted by Tomorama on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:46am.

Happy New year Jer, she actually is a leftist douchebag and in fact she is the new Massengil spokesperson....

Listen to her own words when she is on a panel show, ALWAYS from a leftist view.

Her former life may have been Conservative like, but she is far from that now.

Remember, the Sarge supposedly was a Conservative himself as was Huffington.

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

Happy New Year, ToMorama..

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:54am.

Something tells me Sarge was always and will continue to be a douchebag.

Sawyer never has been.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

You must have a thing for

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 12:25pm.

bleached blond hag douchebags.  You keep ignoring the evidence.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

The evidence suggests you

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 12:29pm.

The evidence suggests you have a curious fixation on douchebags.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Just as a point of fact (have you heard of them?)

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 1:05pm.

You sir,  first brought up the term in the top of this thread.  So clear the head and try to base your words on some semblance of reality if possible.

In fact you introduced the term twice in this thread.  So WAKE up.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Facts, hbnolikeee?

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 1:15pm.

I've heard of 'em.  I'll let you familiarize yourself with one while you simultaneously hone your reading skills.  Check NeoKong's post above my initial one, genius.  Yeah, that one...the one which introduced the term.  It was the comment I was addressing.

Then go back to sleep.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Qualifier

Submitted by jdlybrand on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 1:24pm.

Make that a drunken, leftist douchebag.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrLiBp4nxyg

 

"What a revoltin' development this is!"

Chester Riley

  • Login to post comments

Ho-hum...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 1:45pm.

Apparently, hbnolikee has chosen to go back to sleep rather than concede his amateurish blunder.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

You don't think

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:08pm.

I live to answer your nonsense.  HO HUM my keister!

As is your way, you speak without facts.  How sad.

Actually let me restate: "You just don't think."

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Perhaps removing

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:06pm.

your head from your butt for a second.  Note that the first mention of douche is msg#5  and again are yours.

You're the one that fixated on the word. As your repeating it in #5 and then issuing it in #9.

Try to line up your facts before you speak.  It makes it easy to walk when your foot isn't in your mouth.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

JER JER JER - HO HUMMER

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:17pm.

Guess it's nappy time again.  Where'd you go?  Did yah wet yourself? Did your depends fail you?

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Your SARGE remark.

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:12pm.

You lie!

"Something tells me Sarge was always and will continue to be a douchebag."

Who called Sarge a douchebag?  Hmmm, must be the self proclaimed genius.

Wake up!

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Easy, son...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:31pm.

You seem to lose more brain cells with every keystroke.  Soon, you'll be posting complete gibberish.

NeoKong first labeled Sawyer a "leftist d-bag", which I interpreted as "leftist douchebag" in my response.  I suppose it is conceivable that he actually meant "dirtbag", which would be just as offensive and just as inappropriate.

You chimed in with an endorsement of the Sawyer as douchebag meme.

Tomorama also picked up on it up and insisted Sawyer was indeed a douchebag and commented that Sarge Schultz had once been a conservative (Sawyer having been raised as a Republican and worked for Nixon.)  I replied that while Sarge had always been a douchebag, Sawyer never had.

Hope that helps.

Now, I would suggest you move on before making a complete ass of yourself.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

OK Pops

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:34pm.

However, the line in msg#8 is the following:

"Remember, the Sarge supposedly was a Conservative himself as was Huffington."

Where is the word in question?  Duh!  No where in msg#8.  Appears to be your delusion, POPS.

As far as suggesting my movements,  I have a movement for you but have flushed it and perhaps you'd care to wait for another, putz.

Seems like you're the one that needs to shuffle off.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Read it and weep, son...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:40pm.

#8 Beg to differ Jer

Submitted by Tomorama on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 10:46am.

Happy New year Jer, she actually is a leftist DOUCHEBAG [emphasis added] and in fact she is the new Massengil spokesperson....

Listen to her own words when she is on a panel show, ALWAYS from a leftist view.

Her former life may have been Conservative like, but she is far from that now.

Remember, the Sarge supposedly was a Conservative himself as was Huffington.

It is no longer a case of media bias, it is now strictly a working relationship.



Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2011/01/06/sawyer-forwards-charge-tea-party-hypocrisy-couric-frets-there-danger-bu#comment-1408844#ixzz1AHmh6GnE

 

 

I believe that is message #8 and the word "douchebag" contained therein.  Please continue with your "movement".  You're beginning to bore me.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Just back from a movement. You've been flushed.

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:17pm.

However.  The word in #8 was to Sawyer, not Sarge.  Sad that you keep missing that.  Bet you were bored in school too.  Having to read and understand the words and their context must have bored you a great deal.

No where except from your "learned" hand is Sarge referred to as a Douche.  

So move on Pops.  Your depends need emptying.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Keep on digging that hole, son...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:24pm.

hbnolikeee:  "http://Where is the word in question? Duh! NOWHERE IN MSG#8. Appears to be your delusion, POPS."

You'll completely disappear any minute now.

Geez, you are simple.  As well as a liar.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Simple, really

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:35pm.

And where did you attend school?  The Osh Kosh School of Dipsticks? 

And please do show me my "lie".  If you don't... guess who is the documented (right here) liar.

One last time POPS:

"However.  The word in #8 was to Sawyer, not Sarge.  Sad that you keep missing that.  Bet you were bored in school too.  Having to read and understand the words and their context must have bored you a great deal."

If you don't see it now, you're truly beyond help.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

hb...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:45pm.

You flatly stated the word [douchebag] appeared nowhere in message #8.  Please reread message #8 and tell me if you still stand by that assertion.

Geez...I feel like I'm dealing with a four-year-old.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Nixon

Submitted by EllisWyatt on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 1:11pm.

That's great. Her DAD had strong moral convictions and was steeped in GOP politics.  Many children take a different path in life than their parents did.  And working for Nixon does not exactly strengthen one's credibility.  He created the EPA.  He established fiat currency.  He established wage and price controls.  Ms. Sawyer fits right in there.

"Elections have consequences" ... unless the Republicans win

"Dissent is Patriotic" ... when it's against conservative policies.

  • Login to post comments

Oh Please!!! Yet again

Submitted by Scuba Dude on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 1:25pm.

Oh Please!!!

Yet again defending the liberal to the death. 

You might want to peruse her profile and see how wrong you are.

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so." President Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Sawyer Not Only Right To Left Conversion

Submitted by stratman on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:36pm.

From Wikipedia - Hillary Clinton:

  • "Raised in a politically conservative household,[6]..."

  • "... served as president of the Wellesley Young Republicans;[17][18]..."

  • Rodham attended the 1968 Republican National Convention in Miami. However, she was upset by how Richard Nixon's campaign portrayed Rockefeller and by what she perceived as the convention's "veiled" racist messages, and left the Republican Party for good.[23]"

  • "Returning to Wellesley for her final year, Rodham wrote her senior thesis about the tactics of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky under Professor Schechter (years later while she was First Lady, access to the thesis was restricted at the request of the White House and it became the subject of some speculation).[25]""

That's what I would call a hard Left turn, Jer.

  • Login to post comments

strat..

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:56pm.

I'm well aware of Hillary Clinton's background.  But the issue--and what I objected to--was labeling Diane Sawyer a "leftist douchebag".  I do not believe that to be an appropriate description.  Do you?

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Yes.   Yes, I do.

Submitted by 98ZJUSMC on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 7:55pm.

Yes.

 

Yes, I do.

  • Login to post comments

IMO

Submitted by stratman on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 7:58pm.

I wouldn't refer to Sawyer as a "douchebag", she not having sunk to that level IMO.  However, the threshhold for identifying "douche-ness" may be lower for others and is their prerogative. 

You disagreed.  Well and good, discourse being such.  Your persistence, however, seems fruitless.  IMO, your posts today seem a little unusually harsh in their tenor, as if something else is going on.

  • I would not appreciate the descriptor if Sawyer were my relative, wife or friend.

I do agree she is Left of Center (degree unknown), regardless of her upbringing, and am tired of the bias and all around sloppy "journalism".

The nature and fate of the Left do not rest on your shoulders.  Keep fighting the good fight of facts but don't be rope-a-doped by opinion.

  • Login to post comments

There is one thing that is crystal clear:

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:06pm.

There is one thing that is crystal clear, Jer: Childhood background means very little to political affiliations and beliefs.

Need an example, Jer?  Ok, I offer myself as just such an example.  I was born and raised in Minneapolis, a rather liberal city, wouldn't you agree?  I attend public school, operated and regulated by liberal teachers, administrators and school board. My father was was a union employee for the City of Minneapolis.  My mother is a life long democrat, although I must admit that she doesn't always vote along party lines. My step-father, who became my step-father and lived with us when I was 11, was a hard core liberal who was a big supporter of unions. Yet, despite this rather liberal background, I am nether a liberal or a member of the union.  I am a Conservative who's a registered member of the Minnesota Independence Party. I have never been a member of any union, and I have even refused offered employment at union-only jobs.

So, Jer, tell me, just what does childhood background have to do with political beliefs and/or affiliations?  The truth is, childhood backgrounds can not, and should not, indicate someone's political beliefs and affiliations.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Cobra, I've got a similar

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:15pm.

Cobra, I've got a similar background story.  Millions do.  That's not what this is about.  Very simply, do you believe it appropriate to call Diane Sawyer a "leftist douchebag"?  Let me put it this way:  I'm not a particular fan of Ann Coulter, but I would never refer to her as a "right-wing douchebag".  I just think it's very offensive and very inappropriate.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

So, it's the douchebag" lable you reject.

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:24pm.

Ok, so it's the "douchebag" label that you find offensive. But, if that is true, then why did you even mention her background?  Why not just say that the term itself is offensive?

It looks to me that, instead of objecting to the term itself , like you just claimed, you were rejecting the application of that term to the lady in question  because it followed the term "leftist."  It seemed to me that you were trying to eliminate the "leftist' part of the statement and not the "douchebag" part. Why else would you try to establish "conservative" credentials for her "background?" The part you seem to find offense with is the "leftist" part. I wonder why that is?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Cobra...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:26pm.

Would you please answer my question, and then I'll elaborate further.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

What question?

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:42pm.

What question, Jer?  The comment I was replying to didn't include any questions directed at me. They were all statements.

On Edit:  Opps, sorry, there was a question.  Yes, I find the term "douchebag" offensive and, therefor, completely inappropriate. As to the "leftest" label, yes, that IS appropriate. So, please, go ahead and elaborate. For example: please tell me WHY you feel it is necessary to include "leftist' in your explanations as to the inappropriateness of the statement? What, exactly, do you find inappropriate, the "leftist" label or the "douchebag" lable?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Not trying to be too picky, Cobra,

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:51pm.

Not trying to be too picky, Cobra, but the question is:  Do you believe it is appropriate to call Diane Sawyer a "leftist douchebag"?

Jer

  • Login to post comments

YES AND NO, JER!

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 7:01pm.

The answer is; YES AND NO, JER!  No, calling someone a "douchebag" isn't appropriate, but YES, calling Sawyer a "leftist" IS appropriate!

 

Here's what you're doing, Jer:  you're trying to obscure the question of appropriateness by including two separate terms and asking if they, combined, are appropriate.  That type of compound question is, itself, inappropriate as we all have different opinions as to each term in and of itself and how appropriate it is to apply them individually to a person or situation.. By asking a compound question like that, you're creating a strawman argument type of situation. Why don't you just ask me if each term is appropriate in and of itself? 

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Cobra...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 8:27pm.

I find the "douchebag" label very offensive and inappropriate and the "leftist" label largely inoffensive but still debatable as far as appropriateness. 

I honestly do not know where Sawyer currently stands politically.  But the notion that she is some sort of Michael Moore/Sean Penn/William Kunstler far left progressive seems highly unlikely and unsustainable, although she may very well be a center left or moderate liberal at this stage of her life despite her Republican upbringing and association with Nixon.   Again, I really don't know.  [Are you aware of any affirmative statements or other material evidence of her ideology?]  

So, yes, it was primarily 'douchebag' with which I had a problem, and less so with 'Leftist' although it too seemed a bit off the mark especially when conflated with douchebag..  Just plain "liberal" would have been far more palatable.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

What Jer, are you offering installment plans now?

Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:36pm.

LOL

  • Login to post comments

Help me, SoL...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:46pm.

It's like this thread has slipped into the Twilight Zone.  hbnolikeee insists the word "douchebag" never appears in message #8.  Cobra can't find the question in a four-line post.  And I'm beginning to hear weird voices from behind my computer screen.  What the hell is GOING ON????

Jer

  • Login to post comments

I answered the question, Jer.

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:48pm.

I answered the question, Jer.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Okay, Cobra...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:54pm.

Thanks [and disregard my last post up above.]  I'll be back in just a few minutes and answer your question..  Promise.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Hey Dumocrats

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:14am.

Take your challenge and shove it.  "YOU LOST, WE WON, DEAL WITH IT!"

And Sawyer, you hag, get lost!

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Jer, that may be her

Submitted by inquiringmind on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:26am.

Jer, that may be her background and she may not be an Olbermann but she usually approaches her questions and thinking from the left.

I would not have guessed that was her background based on her thinking today.

  • Login to post comments

Kentucky is proud of...

Submitted by KyWriter on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:49am.

...a lot of things: great bourbon, fast horses, rich history (both Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis were born here). As for Diane Sawyer,...er...uh...well, uh....sorry 'bout that.

At least we can't lay claim to Katie Couric.

  • Login to post comments

As a native of the

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 12:07pm.

As a native of the state along the southern border of the great commonwealth of Kentucky, I can assure you Tennesseans would be very honored to have had the Sawyer family as fellow residents. The citizens of any state should feel likewise.  The family epitomizes all that is good about this country.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Wow

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 12:25pm.

Put down the crack pipe dude.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Good evening Jer

Submitted by cocodrie on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:45pm.

Are you suggesting that she is the black sheep of the family?

 

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

  • Login to post comments

Maybe so, cocodrie... Her

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:53pm.

Maybe so, cocodrie...

Her parents--especially her dad--were very, very, impressive.  She had a lot to live up to.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

I didn't know political beliefs were inhereted, Jer!

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:15pm.

Are you REALLY claiming that political beliefs are, somehow, inherited Jer? Are you REALLY claiming that someone who is from a "Conservative background" is, and will always be a Conservative? You've GOT to be joking!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Good God No! Cobra...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:17pm.

See my response to your post above.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

I'm trying to understand

Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:29pm.

I'm trying to understand Couric's worry of "deep budget cuts". We all know the size of government and spending has increased significantly in just the past two years alone, so even "deep budget cuts" would bring us back to a place closer to normal. Granted, I didn't go to journalism school, but I have to wonder why they never consider tax increases as "deep budget cuts" to the earners of this country.

  • Login to post comments

Well it's really quite simple

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 3:41pm.

The money that you earn by the sweat of your brow belongs to the Government and what they let you keep is the cause of deficit, not that they're spending like drunken sailors (no offense meant Navy folks)

 

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

I think I got it, hbnolikee.

Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:35pm.

I think I got it, hbnolikee. So if the money I with-hold from Obama I use to buy food or a toy for my nephew I am just being selfish. So then I can expect Katie Couric will now be signing over her checks to the Fed, it would be the patriotic thing to do.

  • Login to post comments

bEEN aROUND

Submitted by kilrod on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 4:14pm.

 

Amendment 28 Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives of the United States, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives of the United States that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.

If an unborn child cannot trust you, why should I,?? 

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • National Media Skip Over Charges U.S. Ambassador Abused 'Minor Children'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use