CBS Takes Up White House Quest to 'De-Legitimize' Fox News, 'Irony' FNC Enabled Attack

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

“They report and the White House decides it's not fair. The President's feud with the Fox News Channel,” Katie Couric teased at the top of Friday's CBS Evening News in the first broadcast network newscast foray into the subject. Plugging the story before an ad break, she flipped the emphasis on which party is acting unfairly: “The White House singles out and freezes out the Fox News Channel. Is that fair?” As if both parties are equally at fault, Couric asserted: “We've never seen anything quite as intense as the feud between President Obama and the Fox News Channel.”  

Veteran reporter Jeff Greenfield, who re-joined CBS after stints with ABC and CNN, didn't offer any hint of how in the tank for Obama CBS and the rest of the media have been and so anything less than effusive coverage stands out, but he at least noted: “MSNBC in prime-time has its own lineup of commentators -- all of whom are on the left side of the spectrum, some of whom met with the President Obama at the White House this week.”

Greenfield saw “irony” as he suggested FNC, by charging the rest of the media are on the left, enabled the Obama White House's line of attack:

What gives this dust-up special irony is that Fox News' success comes in no small part from its ability to convince its viewers that the “mainstream” media are slanted to the left. Now, the White House is arguing that the Fox News network is not a real news organization at all...

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Greenfield concluded by painting FNC's popularity and success as its bane:

So why is the White House out to “de-legitimize” Fox? Not because it has opinions, but because its opinion voices are so hostile to Mr. Obama -- and because Fox News is, as it's been for a decade, by far the most-watched of the cable news networks, including a fair chunk of Democrats and independents. And by the way, since Mr. Obama has been President Fox's ratings overall have increased 13 percent -- actually, just since this summer. So. if Fox is feeling any pain from the White House's stance, Katie, it is crying all the way to the bank.

Greenfield's pretty innocuous piece -- though it certainly lacked much outrage over the White House's efforts to discredit a news outlet -- on the Friday, October 23 CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: Politicians and the media have long had a contentious relationship. It's part of the American system, but we've never seen anything quite as intense as the feud between President Obama and the Fox News Channel. Our senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield tunes in to that.

JEFF GREENFIELD: After months of taking incoming fire from the prime-time stars of Fox News-

QUICK CLIPS OF GLENN BECK, BILL O'REILLY AND SEAN HANNITY

GREENFIELD: -the Obama White House is firing back, charging that Fox News is different from all other news.

ANITA DUNN, WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR, ON CNN: Fox News often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican party.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, IN NBC INTERVIEW: If media is operating basically as a talk radio format, then that's one thing, and if it's operating as a news outlet, then that's another.

GREENFIELD: And the White House has gone beyond words. Last September 20th, the President went on every Sunday news show -- except Chris Wallace's show on Fox. And on Thursday, the Treasury Department tried to exclude Fox News from pool coverage of interviews with one of its key officials. It backed down after strong protests from the press.

CBS NEWS WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT CHIP REID: All the networks said, that's it, you've crossed the line.

GREENFIELD: Tension between Presidents and the press is as old as the Republic. FDR was so incensed by the war reporting of one New York Daily News correspondent he tried to present him with an Iron Cross from Nazi Germany. John Kennedy tried to get New York Timesman David Halberstam pulled out of Vietnam; and Vice President Spiro Agnew's assaults on the network press are legendary.

VICE PRESIDENT SPIRO AGNEW: We have more than our share of the nattering nabobs of negativism.

GREENFIELD: What gives this dust-up special irony is that Fox News' success comes in no small part from its ability to convince its viewers that the “mainstream” media are slanted to the left. Now, the White House is arguing that the Fox News network is not a real news organization at all, and that has brought some mainstream media voices to its defense. Here's ABC's Jake Tapper at a recent White House briefing:

AUDIO OF MALE VOICE OF SOMEONE OTHER THAN TAPPER: He was putting it in context and it made it sound like that was evidence of them not being a news organization.

GREENFIELD: There's no question that Fox's prime-time voices come from the right. Moreover, its owner, Rupert Murdoch, is a staunch conservative and its first and only CEO, Roger Ailes, is a veteran of Republican media wars. But MSNBC in prime-time has its own lineup of commentators -- all of whom are on the left side of the spectrum, some of whom met with the President Obama at the White House this week.

So why is the White House out to “de-legitimize” Fox? Not because it has opinions, but because its opinion voices are so hostile to Mr. Obama -- and because Fox News is, as it's been for a decade, by far the most-watched of the cable news networks, including a fair chunk of Democrats and independents. And by the way, since Mr. Obama has been President Fox's ratings overall have increased 13 percent -- actually, just since this summer. So. if Fox is feeling any pain from the White House's stance, Katie, it is crying all the way to the bank.

CBSNews.com online version of the story.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

As if both parties are

As if both parties are equally at fault, Couric asserted: “We've never
seen anything quite as intense as the feud between President Obama and
the Fox News Channel.” 

 

Now, assuming Mrs. Couric is speaking in terms of political/media feuds, than according to the 8-figure salaried, prime-time news anchor of the Columbia Broadcast System- the Tiffany Network- the attacks by the White House on Fox News are more intense than anything the Nixon administration did in the 70's. 

hmmmm.....

Catie Commie

Probably wishes she could act as a stand in for Michelle at bed time. This little twit could not spell journalist without the aid of a teleprompter, it's something she is proud that she and B-Daddy have in common, that and looking up to Mao.

 

I have long maintained the

I have long maintained the reason most women voted for Obama was sexual desire for him, either recognized or not, repressed or not. Many fantasize about that. When he looses that power over them, his support will fall to the standard 30% radical vote level.

This is NOT a feud!

This is NOT a feud!

This is a vendetta by the White House because Fox insists on covering news, and won't join their Ministry of Information.

A feud involves both sides attacking.

But you can understand how the White House guys might consider it an attack for Fox to report unfavorable stories about the President and his  hand-picked advisers.

Yep, MB

And the White House means to do something about it too. I dont think these thugs are going to give up.

Also I dont even think it matters anymore. If the folks get a chance, these guys are finished. The only thing left is how much Time they do. 

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

a minor correction

Ministry of Dis-Information

 

fixed 

Katie, whose ratings suck

Katie, whose ratings suck when compared to FoxNews, was in the middle of her propaganda - er, I mean story when she got an email from the White House correcting her. It read:

'Katie, you ignorant slut! Don't ever make it look like WE are the ones causing the problem here! Remember, it's always FauxNews! Always!

Repeat After us, Katie - ALWAYS!

A copy of this letter is being sent to your superiors. You may carry on.

Hope and Change!'

 

And why

And why. BSE5150, would he. the One, send a letter to her superiors when he would be sending it to himself???  Then again, he does love the sound of his own voice!  ;)

Check you sources

I think that's "Jane, you ignorant slut!"

But I get the sentiment. 

So you think he should have

So you think he should have called Katie Jane????

We all know where the line comes from.

And I would imagine the letter also included this admonishment:

Better not to call attention to this, Katie....go back to doing hatchet jobs on 6-figure-bonus executives....earn that $15 million salary of yours!

The old, "She was asking for

The old, "She was asking for it, wearing what she was wearing." defense.  Good ol' liberals, so predictable.

What happens to Couric when

What happens to Couric when this contract runs out? Greenfield is a journeyman who talks much and says little.

"What gives this dust-up

"What gives this dust-up special irony is that Fox News' success comes in no small part from its ability to convince its viewers that the “mainstream” media are slanted to the left."

I think that this is my favorite Greenfield quote in this piece.  Earth to Jeff; the mainstream media has always been slanting to the left.

Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.

Roger Ailes of Fox News For President 2012?

Chickaboomers got a poll up Should Roger Ailes of Fox News run for
President in 2012, there is a Glenn Beck for his VP option GRIN.

poll is in the top right hand corner.

http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/

Katie the crock

Couric dreams some day of having her prime-time ratings be as high as FoxNews' lowest ebb in the day.

But CBS is apparently trying to nudge its way into teacher's pet status by backing-up the Obunghole WH on this.  Not sure how MSNBC will react to having its special butt-kissing position challenged like that.

[Perhaps the remark's a bit heavy on the scatological metaphors, but this story just reflects what stinking sh'theads the Socialist administration and the Leftist presstitutes have become.]

katie crock

kono---

scuse the non-caps, i am typing w/one hand -finger- actually and will have a problem using upper part of keys for a while.

anyhoo, if an administration slings shi-, communicates caca, perpetuates poop, maneuvers entirely within the manure field, analyzes all material through an anal aperture, and is congenitally incapable of certifying anything but crap, then you have pointed out nothing more than a blinding glimpse of the obvious, and are to be complimented.

i hereby do so.

cheers.

md - normally capitalized

 

 

Presstitutes

Oh I am going to use that one, very good!

Where did Greenfield get his journalism degree?

The beauty of this piece is it shows how the press has no clue what its roll is, in our society.  The press lost this perspective sometime last year.  They made a decision that they wanted a Democrat in the White House to go along with the Democrats they helped elect in the House and Senate.  Barack Obama helped solidify their decision by allowing them to look at "their place in history" foregoing their responsibility to the country and doing everything they could to elect him. 

 It makes no difference what Fox News things about the rest of the media, since the rest of the media and the White House say that Fox News doesn't know what it's talking about, what makes a difference in the constitutionally protected free press we have and the idea that the government should not be able to control it.  It took the White House trying to shut out Fox News to wake up the Washington Bureau, it will take "minders" in CBS News to take up Katie and Jeff.  

Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.  

Jeff's creds

U. Wisconsin-Madison, B.A.; editor-in-chief of Daily Cardinal (student newspaper)

Yale Law, LLB

FOX should publish the list

FOX should publish the list of MSM "journalists" that sought employment with them and were refused. I think Greenfield may be on that list.

Katie "Prestitute" Couric

Katie is so frustrated that she is not allowed to act as a stand in for Michelle at bed time, she's been practicing, she's gone through just about every guy at the network to refine her technique.

If only Michelle wasnt so jealous. Katie and B-Daddy have so much in common. They bote hate white people, I mean Katies willing to be spanked by B-Daddy for being white, she reads up on and can quote Mao, she fantasizes about killing Glenn Beck, oh the list goes on and on.

Maybe, maybe if she trashes Fox news like B-Daddy wants, maybe then Michelle will invite her over for one of the after hours "Special" parties, maybe then she can have her dreams fufilled.

Keep up the good work Katie! I am sure you will be taken care of when B-Daddy "Processes" the press after the power grab is complete.

 

Government Tyranny

SilverFox

I actually think the democrats are worse than the republicans when it comes to scare tactics & power, although both are bad.

 

There's a book everyone needs to read. It's a new, underground book about a small town in America that finally stands up to the D.C. corrupt politicians & ends up starting the 2nd American Revolution. It's a modern day version of the colonist & what they endured.  It's enlighting & tells each of us what we alredy know & that it's time for a drastic change. Just read it & see what's coming next, after the media is forced to submit to federal tyranny.

www.booksbyoliver.com

 

I can't tell if you're

I can't tell if you're trying to be helpful or if you are "planting" evidence of "inciting rebelion".

Stockholm Syndrom.

With a Chicago swist.

We're in new teritory. Interesting. 

 

Hi. My name is John Q. Public, but some just call me racist.

Fox convincing us?

the funniest part is about how Fox is successful because it "convinced" viewers that the rest of the MSM skewed left. yeah, because we wouldn't have noticed otherwise, right?

Katie needs a good

Katie needs a good spanking. And some discipline.  Then someone needs to upload the video.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.

What she really need is to

What she really need is to be unemployed. I can't believe that CBS is paying her around 15 million a year.  

Semper suprene nitens

OBAMACARE: If it ain't good enough for my Congressman then it ain't good enough for me.  

 

I saw this last night.

I saw this last night and Greenfield did a pretty good job of summing up Obama''s War on Fox and the obvious hypocrisy involved.  He even mentioned MSNBC and the far left bias of it's opinion commentators and how this obvious bias didn't prevent Obama from appearing on MSNBC.  

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Discovered con job

Alinski tactics for radicals are out and recognized for what they are. The radicals better get a new plan because Rush, Breitbart and Beck are onto them and turning the technique back on them. When the victim is onto the con, you'd better give up trying to trick them or they will kick your ass. Obama is a 1 trick pony and knows no other method. His ass is in the process of getting kicked on an historic level. Racism, racism, racism, will be their final, pathetic defence. It has lost it's bite and is rapidly becoming a joke and a catchphrase.  

The MSM template is to

The MSM template is to present this story as the Whitehouse going after the unfair and evil Fox News Channel.  Totally absent is any analysis of the stories presented by Fox and the fact that the Whitehouse has not attempted to dispute them.  The networks have to jump on the anti-Fox band wagon to divert attention from the fact they have show absolutely no curiousity about any story that could be potentially damaging to Barack Obama.  If I watched only the network news, I'd know absolutely nothing about Van Jones, Anita Dunn, or any of the other assorted freaks in the Obama adminstration clown car of radicalism.   CNN can devote time to 'Fact Check" a comedy bit on Saturday Night Live but can't spare a single person to investigate charges that the adminstration is infested with socialists who have vowed to destroy our way of life.  That the MSM is putting their ideology ahead of the truth is the real crime here.   

Washington Post

When the Washington Post dug into the Watergate Affair, they were seen as doing serious investigative journalism. The only journalists doing any serious investigative journalism about The Obama Administration, is Fox News! The other news channels have been forced to follow on a few individuals, groups and issues such as Van Jones, Acorn and the Czars.

I see Glenn Beck in particular as a commentator/investigative journalist on the national level. Why hasn't 20/20 or 60 minutes done this sort of work over the last 2 years?

Oh I forgot, their managers were pushing the Liberal Agenda instead and pushing for Nationalization of business, industry and healthcare.

 

 

60 Minutes?

Last Sunday their lineup consisted of a feature on H1N1, breaking news there, a machine that "may" someday offer treatment for cancers, and a hard-hitting investigative piece on......Drew Barrymore!  Talk about news!!!  Fluff, more fluff and something that may be science. 

I'm sure that Edward R. Murrow is just so very proud of CBS.   

60 minutes still

I switched to Curb Your Enthusiasm after about the 50th Obama "get" over at 60 Minutes. My jaws hurt from yawning.

       obama is

       obama is looking more like a wanna-be dictator. I think Hitler started this way.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

What's to believe?

I don't believe anything else they say, why should I believe they even know what a news "outlet" is, if a station is one or not, if they are qualified to make these distinctiions, or if we should care what they say one way or the other. This whole thing is some sort of diversion--we are probably screwed over something we don't know about yet.