ABC, CBS and NBC on Tuesday night all aired stories on President Barack Obama hobnobbing with the wealthy during a recession, at Manhattan fundraisers to be attended by the very Wall Street players he's condemned. But only NBC's Chuck Todd served as a mouthpiece for self-serving rationale which painted Obama as a victim of an image of perfection susceptible to “any speck of mud,” as Todd relayed from outside a Manhattan hotel:One Democratic strategist said that part of the President's problem is simply his own expectations. Some of the rhetoric he said on the campaign trail made it seem as if he was coming into office in a clean white suit. So now any speck of mud -- like raising money from Wall Street donors -- shows up a lot clearer than if he came in just as another politician wearing just another gray suit. [Audio: MP3 clip, video below jump](Didn't Joe Biden get in trouble back in 2007 for describing Obama as “clean”?)
Minutes after Todd, NBC Nightly News viewers learned Obama is also quite an expert on women since he's supposedly “perhaps the man who knows the most about what it's like to live in a women's nation, work in a women's nation, and get elected by a women's nation,” liberal activist Maria Shriver touted in plugging an interview with Obama for her “A Woman's Nation” series:
Perhaps the man who knows the most about what it's like to live in a women's nation, work in a women's nation, and get elected by a women's nation is, of course, President Barack Obama. And he'll be doing an interview on this subject here on Nightly News tomorrow. So it will be interesting what he says.I doubt it.
Most of the report from NBC's chief White House correspondent on the Tuesday, October 20 NBC Nightly News:
CHUCK TODD: ....The lion's share of the President's trip is about raising campaign cash, something he's been doing more of as election day 2009 draws closer. The President is coming under some criticism for tonight's big-ticket events because they are taking place just a stone's throw away from Wall Street, a place where as many as a third of tonight's donors work and the appearance is somewhat awkward for the President, given his tough talk last month on reining in Wall Street.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We will not go back to the days of reckless behavior and unchecked excess that was at the heart of this crisis, where too many were motivated only by the appetite for quick kills and bloated bonuses.
TODD: Still, the picture of the President with donors who paid upwards of $30,000 to see him may not sit well with the public.
BOB EDGAR, CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM ADVOCATE: There are so many people unemployed today and when they see the President going to a fundraiser where people are paying thousands of dollars to get their picture with the President, it's just unseemly.
TODD: ....Experts know presidential fundraising is nothing new, but today's economic realities make for a tougher backdrop.
CHARLIE COOK, NBC NEWS POLITICAL ANALYST: Unfortunately for Barack Obama, he's having to raise money at a time when, you know, we're either in or just coming out of a recession and times are tough for people.
TODD: Brian, one Democratic strategist said that part of the President's problem is simply his own expectations. Some of the rhetoric he said on the campaign trail made it seem as if he was coming into office in a clean white suit. So now any speck of mud -- like raising money from Wall Street donors -- shows up a lot clearer than if he came in just as another politician wearing just another gray suit. Brian?
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
What goodness, is Todd
October 20, 2009 - 21:43 ET by rockyracoonWhat goodness, is Todd talking about, sheesh!!
Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.
It appears to be Brent
October 20, 2009 - 23:57 ET by JerIt appears to be Brent Baker talking about it, not Todd.
Jer
My bad, I only glanced at
October 21, 2009 - 02:57 ET by rockyracoonMy bad, I only glanced at the headline, while watching the ALCS.
Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.
Good game if you're a
October 21, 2009 - 06:44 ET by JerGood game if you're a Yankees fan. Still can't figure out what looked like a double play at third base when both Posada and Cabrera were tagged out standing off the bag at third base, unless the ump was ruling Posada was interfered with by the catcher from getting back to the bag. Made no difference in the outcome though.
Jer
Jer, longtime Yankee fan
October 21, 2009 - 15:00 ET by rockyracoonJer, longtime Yankee fan and yes very bad umpiring, and on the Yankee front very poor baserunning. My take on Posada, is that he didn't know how many outs there were, but both base runners were out, or should have been called out. I suppose that's why pencils have erasers, and yes thank God it had no real effect on the outcome. I want the Yanks to win, but not as a result of a blown call.
Good luck to the team you're rooting for, even if it aint the Yanks. I'm enjoying watching both series.
Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.
Not that it matters now, but
October 21, 2009 - 16:51 ET by Another Dead KennedyNot that it matters now, but it was Robbie Cano, not Melky Cabrera who made the base running error in which he should have been called out. Even a little leaguer knows you're not safe if you're not standing on the base.
xoxo - Ted
ILTK...
October 21, 2009 - 19:22 ET by JerI thought it was Cano initially, but then I thought I heard the announcer say Cabrera. Excuse my ignorance, but do the Yanks even have a Cabrera on their roster? I know the Angels do, and of course the Tigers, but I am obviously confusing the players.
Jer
I believe Melky Cabrera
October 21, 2009 - 19:31 ET by Another Dead KennedyI believe Melky Cabrera (Yanks center fielder) is the one who ended the inning on the subsequent out, erasing the ump's error. I'm not one for slowing the game down any more than it already is, but instant replay seriously needs to be expanded to help avoid these mistakes. As a pretty diehard Yankees fan, I don't want to win a championship because of a blown call.
xoxo - Ted
To reiterate my earlier
October 21, 2009 - 19:48 ET by JerTo reiterate my earlier thought, the only possible justification for the call in my view--and it's a stretch-- is that the Angels catcher kept his foot pinned against Posada while he turned and tagged Cano. This arguably interfered with and blocked Posada's ability to return to third base, although he showed no signs of even making the effort.
Or had the catcher already tagged Posada? I need to watch the play again. Anyway, it's all moot.
Jer
Expecting anything short of
October 20, 2009 - 23:47 ET by mattmExpecting anything short of disaster would be a high expectation with this brainwashed libtard neophyte punk in office.
Funny how the Leftards go
October 21, 2009 - 02:23 ET by RR GOPFunny how the Leftards go from one God to another. They don't mention Johnson, Carter nor even Slick Willy very much now that they have found the One True Libtard God (yet again), yet we Conservatives still carry on about Reagan.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
Wait, so a "white suit" is
October 21, 2009 - 05:35 ET by HockeyKidWait, so a "white suit" is good, but a "gray suit" isn't good? Seems that Democrat strategist has some deep-rooted race issues to deal with.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Religious worship
October 21, 2009 - 06:55 ET by nadadhimmiI have heard this viewpoint before. Some religions preach that we are not good enough, not worthy to accept HIS goodness. We must try, but will never reach the level of purity required to worship at his feet. We are not worthy of you oh GREAT LORD OBAMA. Please shower your forgiveness and grace upon us!!!!!!!!!!Excuse me while I puke in my throat.
Isn't calling a black man
October 21, 2009 - 13:02 ET by eaglewingz08Isn't calling a black man 'a clean white suit', racist? I mean doesn't that make Obama an "Uncle Tom"? And what's so great about having a 'clean white suit'? Is Mr. Todd stating that Obama is like John Travolta in Saturday Night Fever? Isn't linking Obama to disco dancing, racist or anti gay or something? And who gave Mr. Obama that 'clean white suit'" Wasn't it a media that refused to vet Mr. Obama or his Chicago associates and did everything to downplay or ridicule anyone who even dared to bring them up?
Honestly, if Mr. Todd was conservative and talked all this crap up about Obama, lots of someones would be screaming racism and hate crimes and demanding his ouster from his news organization.