Top Washington Post Editor Forced Off Twitter After Urging More Spending on Health Care

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

A few weeks ago Washington Post Managing Editor Raju Narisetti rued in this tweet via his Twitter account: “We can incur all sorts of federal deficits for wars and what not. But we have to promise not to increase it by $1 for healthcare reform? Sad.” Washington Post ombudsman Andrew Alexander cited the tweet in a Friday night blog post about how the newspaper has issued new guidelines, on the use of social network sites, which state “nothing we do must call into question the impartiality of our news judgment.” That forced Narisetti to close his Twitter account. Alexander recounted:

Narisetti said today he now realizes that his tweets, although intended for a private audience of about 90 friends and associates, were unwise. They were “personal” observations, he said. “But I also realize that...seeing that the managing editor of The Post is weighing in on this, it’s a clear perception problem.”

On his defunct Twitter page, as captured by Google, Narisetti declared, as if he'd buy this contention from any politician (say, Virginia GOP gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell and his 1989 college thesis over which the Post has obsessed): “My tweets have nothing to do with my day job.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Narisetti initially wasn't so willing to drop Twitter:

Earlier this week Peter Perl, the editor who oversees newsroom personnel, alerted Narisetti that questions about his tweets had been raised within The Post's staff. That prompted Narisetti to discuss the issue with Post Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli.

Prior to that meeting, Narisetti tweeted again: “For flagbearers of free speech, some newsroom execs have the weirdest double standards when it comes to censoring personal views.”

Today, Narisetti noted that this tweet was “before Marcus and I chatted” and was “me thinking aloud on the feedback of whoever had flagged it to Peter.” He stressed that it wasn’t directed at Brauchli and that he fully supports the new guidelines.

So much for speaking truth to power! More like sucking up to the boss. (Narisetti and Brauchli both worked at the Wall Street Journal.)

Alexander provided this description of Narisetti's role at the newspaper in the position he assumed in January of this year: “As one of two managing editors, he’s responsible for The Post's features content and oversees its Web site. But he also sits in on news meetings and occasionally gets involved in 'hard' news.”

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Once again the hypocrisy of

Once again the hypocrisy of the dinosaur media comes out swinging like a street gangster high on crystal meth.

The man is a leaning tower of overcooked spaghetti, and has the morals of a hyper-sexualized goat.

Sam

Your tour de force use of similes and metaphors leaves me in awe.

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

Perhaps too much? We have to

Perhaps too much? We have to pick our battles. So this guy's a flaming lib. No one's exactly shocked.

They've only taken him off twitter because he's making his biases KNOWN.

___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums

"hyper-sexualized goat" This

"hyper-sexualized goat"

This one makes me nervous...;+}

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

How Clintonesque.

The WaPo needs guidelines because the people they hire don't have enough integrity to figure out how to conduct themselves without them. But I forget -- the are Professionals. Uh huh. 

So Obama tripled the national debt in 6 months

so he could increase the Dept. of Defense's budget for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars?  That's truly outrageous!  Thanks so much WaPo for bringing this info to light.  For a minute there I thought all that money was going to be spent on truly necessary things like liberal pork projects and kickbacks to campaign/party contributors.  Thanks for setting the record straight!  (/sarc)

Translation

...new guidelines, on the use of social network sites, which state “nothing we do must call into question the impartiality of our news judgment.”

We know we're biased, we're not supposed to make it obvious.  

Right. Kicked off twitter

Right. Kicked off twitter for showing his bias in an unprofessional manner.

Retained by WAPO where his bias can be fine-tuned by editors who know how to weasle-word biases so that they appear as facts -- in the liberal sense of course.

WAPO seriously needs to buy a dictionary, and ear-mark the page that defines hypocrite. hip-uh-krit. -noun. A person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.

___________________________________ 

"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Obama." - The liberals cool-aid drinking song

“nothing we do must call

“nothing we do must call into question the impartiality of our news judgment.”

Hey, Andrew, baby, you passed that mile marker about 30 years ago. Where the heck have you been?

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

“nothing we do must

“nothing we do must call into question the impartiality of our news judgment.”

[...or highlight our serious misunderstandings of the U.S. constitution.] 

Defense spending - yes.  Healthcare spending - no.

These people must be the

These people must be the dumbest people on earth. No wonder their business in going down the tubes. Enjoy your irrelevance!

reminds me of an old lawyer joke

Judge: "Counselor, you are showing your contempt for the court."

Lawyer: "Sorry, your honor, I was trying to hide it."

 

“We can incur all sorts

“We can incur all sorts of federal deficits for wars and what not.
But we have to promise not to increase it by $1 for healthcare reform?
Sad.”

National defense - Constitutional

Income Redistribution - unConstitutional

We all talk alot about Congress and the President doing things that are not Constitutional, and today as I'm working in the yard something occured to me.................DON'T WE HAVE SOMETHING CALLED "CHECKS AND BALANCES?"  Why should I have to protest unConstitutionality?  I'm not a Constitutional scholar or a lawyer.  That's what the Supreme Court is for!!!!  So where is our Supreme Court!?!?!  They are checking almost NOTHING the other two branches of government are doing.  (and yes, haven't been for years.  It's not a new phenomenon.)

If only Andy worried as much about...

...what his staff put on the pages of his newspaper as he does what they put on their Tweets.

tweets

So if his biased tweets have nothing to do with his day job, then that must mean he is an...actor...pretending to be a jounalist, right?

Liberals will never get it.

Don't liberals understand that, running a deficit for a war, which would hopefully end sometime, is considerably different than running a deficit for an ongoing entitlement? 

Ironically, it won't be long before 60% of the Federal Budget will be entitlements, doesn't leave much for anything else, does it? 

Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.  

pbthinker

Spot-on. That argument FOR government-run/funded health care, that "Hey, we spend more on war" goes out the window.

 

I feel sorry for Washington

I feel sorry for Washington Post ombudsman Andrew Alexander. He is trying hard but he is playing a loosing game. There is no way that WaPo will ever come out of it's hard left turn.