Reality Check: Will Nets Notice Sheehan's Anti-Obama Protest?

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

Media Embraced Cindy Sheehan's Anti-Bush Push in 2005; ABC Anchor Now Says: "Enough Already"

When Cindy Sheehan arrives on Martha’s Vineyard tomorrow (Tuesday), to protest against President Barack Obama, will the news media be as drawn to her as they were in the summer of 2005 when she was condemning George W. Bush?

Last week, ABC anchor Charles Gibson declared “enough already when asked on Chicago’s WLS Radio about Sheehan’s plan to travel to Obama’s island vacation spot to protest the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. When she camped near Bush’s Crawford, Texas ranch four years ago, that was hardly the view of Gibson and his colleagues. At the time, NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell aptly dubbed her “a media magnet.”

Back then, the networks were eager to publicize her cause from the moment she arrived. Katie Couric, for instance, showcased Sheehan at the top of NBC’s Today show: “A mother’s vigil. Her son died in Iraq. Now this woman is camping outside the Bushes’ Texas ranch and demanding a meeting with the President today, Monday, August 8th, 2005.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The next day, Gibson, then co-host of ABC’s morning show, led by touting: “Standing her ground. She lost her son in Iraq, she opposes the war, now she’s camped out at President Bush’s ranch and says she won’t leave until he meets with her. An exclusive interview on Good Morning America.”

The following evening, CBS’s Bill Plante noted the obvious as he provided more publicity: “She’s gotten a lot of media attention by camping out on the road that leads to the President’s ranch.” Anchor Bob Schieffer ruminated: “I wonder why the President doesn’t meet with her?”

When Bush’s motorcade drove by Sheehan’s protest camp, CNN’s Situation Room pounced with “BUSH WALKS ON BY” and “PRES. BUSH PASSES UP CHANCE TO MEET WITH ‘PEACE MOM’” on screen as reporter Elaine Quijano highlighted how “Sheehan held up a sign saying, ‘Why do you make time for donors and not for me?’” On ABC’s World News Tonight, Geoff Morrell asked Sheehan: “Are you disappointed he didn’t stop?”

That weekend, Sunday, August 14, NBC Nightly News devoted its “In Depth” segment to Sheehan’s impact, as anchor David Gregory touted how she “has become both a magnet and a source of controversy in the President’s hometown, single-handedly bringing the Iraq debate to Mr. Bush’s doorstep.” Kelly O’Donnell began with how “she’s tiny Crawford’s biggest draw. This woman said she drove 900 miles from Denver, compelled by Cindy’s story.”

Three nights later, CBS’s Plante celebrated the fame he and his colleagues had delivered: “Out of nowhere, Cindy Sheehan has suddenly become the red-hot symbol of opposition to the war.” Plante touted how “in just ten days,” Sheehan “has become a magnet for the anti-war movement.”

A week into her vigil, Sheehan appeared as a guest on MSNBC’s Hardball, going on at length about how the U.S. is “building bases the size of Sacramento, California in Iraq. They plan on never leaving” and “I see Iraq as the base for spreading imperialism. And if we don’t stop them now, our babies and our unborn grandchildren will be fighting this.” Host Chris Matthews was impressed: “You sound more informed than most U.S. Congresspeople, so maybe you should run.”

When Sheehan departed, the networks celebrated her supposed achievements: “Did just one grieving mother spark the beginnings of an anti-war movement? We’ll give you the ‘Inside Story,’” CBS anchor John Roberts promised before Wyatt Andrews trumpeted: “Her movement seemed to catch fire Wednesday night as tens of thousands of people in more than a thousand places attended vigils in support.” ABC’s Charlie Gibson championed: “All across the country protests against the war in Iraq, inspired by the mother standing her ground at President Bush’s ranch.” On screen, GMA heralded: “MOM ON A MISSION: IS ANTIWAR MOVEMENT GROWING?”

Finally, NBC’s Carl Quintanilla suggested Sheehan may be evolving as an icon in the war’s turning point, if this is one. For three weeks, she’s dominated headlines, mobilized protesters” and made “it safe, her supporters say, to voice doubts about the war, just as Walter Cronkite did on the Evening News in 1968.”

This was first posted on MRC.org as a Media Reality Check.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I was sick of her from day

I was sick of her from day one, I'm sick of her now.

No hypocrisy there. ..unlike the msm.

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

New Reality Show

"Who's Under That Bus?"

"What a revoltin' development this is!"

Chester Riley

At least she's consistent -

At least she's consistent - unless this is just a ruse to create plausible deniability to charges of hypocrisy....

matt--

I don't think she's really bright enough for that. I do wonder how long it will take her to realize that the liberal media used her to their own advantage.

Nope, they'll ignore her

The MSM aren't going to give time to anyone who might make Obama look bad.  She'll be lucky if they don't start calling her names and saying things about her mental stability.

Char-lie Gibson: Most Dishonest of them All

Char-lie Gibson may be the most dishonest man in a totally dishonest industry. Remember:

  • The adverserial Palin interviews when he was fawning all over Barack Obama
  • The comments about conservative town hall attendees appearing to be "orchestrated" and silence over ACORN members being bussed in and SEIU thuggery
  • Now this
  • I'm sure I am missing a lot, but there's no way I'd ever watch this liar

 

BW222

Cindy will be covered, but

Cindy will be covered, but I wouldn't be surprised to see "compassion"  appearing in their attitude, rather than support.  You know, Poor Cindy...has she finally "snapped"?

MB - Do you think

Do you think they'll start attacking her if she gains any traction in getting attention through the conservative sites or news?

Nah.  I think they'll try

Nah.  I think they'll try to marginalize her.  The same media who had no qualms about using the loss of her son to portray her as a hero with "absolute moral authority" will have no problem using the loss of her son to cast doubt on her stability, if it suits their purposes.

MB - that's what I meant

Casting doubt on her stability is the kind of thing I meant by "attacking" her.

She has been tossed away

She has been tossed away like a used Kleenex

Would Janeane call her a Functionally Retarded Racists because of her straight up hatred of a black man in the white house.

Janeane Who?

;^)

 

"Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1

Probable MSM reaction

Cindy who??

Two questions for Mrs. Sheehan:

1) So, how did all that protesting work out for you?

and 2) Who's bankrolling your travel?

One word:

HELLNO! (Okay, I cheated.)

 

"Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1

Cindy

I don't care for her approach and think that she insults the memory of her son. That said, at least she is consistant in protesting against government, whether it is GOP lead or DUM lead.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.