Don Hewitt, the creator and long-time Executive Producer of CBS's 60 Minutes, who passed away this morning (Wednesday) at age 86, had recognized the bias which led Dan Rather to target President George W. Bush with a 2004 story based on forged documents, as he suggested such a flimsy hit piece damaging to the liberal candidate would have earned more scrutiny for accuracy before it ever got onto the air: “Does anybody really think there wouldn't have been more scrutiny if this had been about John Kerry?” (Rather's piece aired on the weekday 60 Minutes, which Hewitt did not oversee, four months after Hewitt's retirement.)
Though in 2004 he predicted “I would bet I'll probably vote for Kerry” since “I know why I don't want to vote for George Bush,” in 2007 he recalled how in the aftermath of the Bush National Guard story he had proposed to Rather: “If this had been John Kerry, wouldn't you have been more careful about the story?” He also defended CBS's decision to fire Rather: “Any news organization, print or broadcast, has the right to protect its reputation by divesting itself of a reporter, irrespective of who he or she is, who it feels reported as fact something that reflected his or her biases more than the facts bear.”
In early January of 2005, on MSNBC's Hardball, Chris Matthews quoted Hewitt, the Executive Producer of 60 Minutes until May of 2004, as conceding during a meeting at CBS: “Does anybody really think there wouldn't have been more scrutiny if this had been about John Kerry?”
A September of 2007 item, “Ex-60 Minutes Boss: I Asked Rather If He'd Whack Kerry Like Bush,” recounted:
In a Friday afternoon Newsweek Web exclusive, reporter Johnnie Roberts talked to CBS insiders about Dan Rather's lawsuit against his long-time employer. Don Hewitt, the founder and long-lasting Executive Producer of 60 Minutes, told the magazine he asked Rather the big bias question: "If this had been John Kerry, wouldn't you have been more careful about the story?"Roberts reported that while the network wouldn't comment beyond saying it was old news, others were more forthcoming:
Take, for example, Don Hewitt, the legendary producer of 60 Minutes. "Any news organization, print or broadcast, has the right to protect its reputation by divesting itself of a reporter, irrespective of who he or she is, who it feels reported as fact something that reflected his or her biases more than the facts bear," he said in a NEWSWEEK interview. "And if the reporter's defense is that he or she had been 'had,' isn't he or she someone a news organization worth its salt can no longer trust not to be 'had' again."Hewitt says he had questioned whether the reporting was biased at a CBS meeting convened to discuss the controversy that began to swell after the story aired. "Let me ask one question," he recalls addressing the gathering. "If this had been John Kerry, wouldn't you have been more careful about the story?" A senior CBS News insider said Rather is further damaging his reputation by suing. "I think it looks pathetic," this executive told NEWSWEEK on condition of not being identified. "It looks like the musing of an older man who can't let go. This will have no winners. But the biggest loser will be Dan."
A couple of more posts conveying interesting comments Hewitt made during interviews on C-SPAN and FNC in April of 2001 to plug his book, Tell Me a Story: 50 Years & 60 Minutes in Television.
From the April 3, 2001 MRC CyberAlert:
Discussing on C-SPAN’s Booknotes on Sunday night his new book about his career, 60 Minutes Executive Producer Don Hewitt disclosed he voted for Nixon, Reagan, Clinton and Gore, conceded that he and correspondent Steve Kroft knew Bill and Hillary Clinton "were lying" about Gennifer Flowers during the Super Bowl night 60 Minutes appearance and, that in the midst of the 1992 interview, James Carville arrived and began sobbing: "Oh I love them, I love those people, I love them so much, I love them." Plus: Hewitt acknowledged that Dan Rather "likes" Bill Clinton.
From the April 16, 2001 MRC CyberAlert:
Don Hewitt, Executive Producer of CBS’s 60 Minutes, refused last week to defend Dan Rather for attending a Democratic fundraiser, denied 60 Minutes is liberal or conservative, argued that those two terms are "ridiculous" and that he believes in "sense" and "nonsense." But he revealed that his view of "sense" follows the liberal line: "It makes no sense to me that there are 200 million handguns in American cities. I have always believed that if you get the NRA out of the way, decent reasonable Americans would figure out a way to respect the Second Amendment and get guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them."
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Normally I don't like to
August 19, 2009 - 17:09 ET by buddycNormally I don't like to speak ill of the dead until a proper time of mourning has passed but this is one of the truely evil and awful men of the television news era. Probably, he was the most evil monster and awful of all of them. He would dwarf even Walter Cronkcrude. He will never get pity from me. THe harm he has done to the US and to YOUR industry can never be corrected.
You said; "He also defended CBS's decision to fire Rather: “Any news organization, print or broadcast, has the right to protect its reputation by divesting itself of a reporter, irrespective of who he or she is, who it feels reported as fact something that reflected his or her biases more than the facts bear.”
If the stores are 1/2 true about the "I have caused pain in my family" infomercial of super bowl sunday for Bill and Hillary and how he and Wallace ran it by focus groups before airing it and if 1/2 of the hit job stories of what he did to Nixon and for Kennedy in the Kennedy/Nixon debate are true, then by his own statement, CBS should have fired him on at least 2 prior occasions.
"It makes no sense to me
August 19, 2009 - 17:51 ET by MikeB"It makes no sense to me that there are 200 million handguns in American cities. I have always believed that if you get the NRA out of the way, decent reasonable Americans would figure out a way to respect the Second Amendment and get guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them."
There was such an effort. It was called "Project Exile" And, if I recall correctly, there was no, to almost no, coverage of the success of Project Exile by the Mediots.
From the SFGate of Feb. 17, 1999, "Here on the streets of Virginia's capital, Melvin Douglas Smith was known for his luck as much as his troublemaking. For all the charges brought against him in state courts over a decade, from larceny and resisting arrest to illegal firearms and murder, none stuck. He never served a day in prison.
Then Smith's luck ran out. When a patrol officer pulled him over for a traffic violation in 1997, the officer looked in the car and found 12 grams of crack cocaine, a 12-gauge shotgun and a 9-millimeter semiautomatic pistol. The combination of guns and drugs was his undoing: Under a new program aimed at gun offenders called Project Exile, prosecutors were able to charge Smith in the tougher federal system. He is now serving 16 1/2 years in a federal prison. "
First of all, I am surprised that the SF paper printed this story at all. It is well worth the read. The website for the story is: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/02/17/MN66584.DTL&type=printable
If the anti-gunners were truly anti-crime instead of anti-gun, they would have agitated for this program to be applied nationwide. It was an effective deterrent against crime. But, it allowed the law abiding to keep their guns and exercise their 2nd amendment rights, so the anti-gun GFW crowd wouldn't support it.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
What an obit.
August 19, 2009 - 21:24 ET by needleDon Hewitt…[r]eprimanded Rather and CBS Over Bush National Guard Hit Piece
Ooo, wow. Like, man, he was shocked, shocked, that there was something fishy going on…
“Does anybody really think there wouldn't have been more scrutiny if this had been about John Kerry?” Is this a rhetorical question or what?
Do you mean like the total blackout with respect to commenting on the total blackout of the Swift boater trying to warn the electorate of Kerry’s character flaws?
Plus: Hewitt acknowledged that Dan Rather "likes" Bill Clinton.
Dan tried to lie big; but try as he might, Dan just could not achieve stratospheric level of lying routinely accomplished by Bill Clinton, Dan’s hero. Ah, touching.
- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.