I'm sure the bum's been around this long because he has government healthcare. Every week he goes to the government doctor and waits in line. In fact, he goes to the same clinic as Barry and his family. ---RIIIGHT!

NEVER.NEVER trust a "liberal"

This is a plain outrage.

Despicable, deplorable, disgusting, and I would use the word disgraceful here, but won't because the people using this to gain favor and votes with O-Care/Kennedy-Care do not have an understanding what disgrace means, they could care less, they are in this to win this..however it's accomplished by any means.

They all make me sick, the audacity to do this when all you can think of is Mary Jo right off, boy, she would have loved some of that Teddy Boy's Health Care as she stayed in an air-pocket waiting for her hero to came rescue her until she died.

The State Run Media are pure slime....arm in arm with the leftists on the O-Team and those in congress in any way shape or form.

Soros has to be grinning.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

If I had ever been for Obama care, I would be against it now...

Hey Ted, last time I read the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, "decent, quality health care" was NOT mentioned as a fundamental right. 

Nowhere in those documents is the government called on to coddle, pamper, spoil, and baby the citizenry.

Neither are access to food, water, clothing and shelter, things I need WAY AHEAD of health care.  Without those things, health care becomes the least of my worries, in fact. 

So QUIT TRYING TO BABY ME.

By the way, judging by the Postal Service, schools, and other things the government is involved in, the LAST thing you do to ensure people get "decent, quality health care" is through the government.   

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Here's a fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives: conservatives deny that everything good is a right.

In the fog of rhetoric, politicians claim so many things as a "right." They tell us that we all have a right to decent housing, and quality healthcare, and a well-paying job, etc. (Not to mention two chickens in every pot.) Of course, it's certainly true that these things are crucial to a decent standard of living.

But that's the difference:

• Liberals claim these are rights, and that therefore, someone (i.e., government) owes it to them.
• Conservatives think that no one should give them to you; these goods are why you go out into the world and work hard.

When conservatives deny that these are rights, liberals claim that conservatives want to "deny" these goods to the poor. The liberals charge conservatives with being "heartless." They portray conservatives as racist white men who want to hoard all good things for themselves.

It all starts with that fundamental liberal misunderstanding about what a right is. This isn't just an honest disagreement, where two theories diverge. Liberals are simply wrong. Healthcare isn't a right. A job isn't a right. A house isn't a right. These things aren't rights, they're motives. This is why we drag our sorry asses off to work, and why we keep our mouth shut when we'd love to scream about how stupid bureaucracies are. The pursuit of these things is what drives people to work hard and stay disciplined.

Edward Kennedy never worried about anyone but Edward Kennedy his entire life and isn't about to start now. This is just a way to get a memorial since there will never be a Ted Kennedy Presidential Library.

This Spoiled son of a nazi sympathiser, womanizing lush, only reached and kept his seat in the senate by massive use of Daddy Joes money and his brothers memory. However since he is a member of the Kennedy family and the democrat left, he will be praised by many and mourned by few!

He does bail out of cars in nothing flat..

His life task should have been to get enhanced 911 capabilities and rescue squads, Mary Jo would understand, don't you think so?

Just another hypocrite in office.   

Nobody says nothing better than Obama. 

...especially other people's money.

And I am still digging around in the Constitution trying to find where it authorizes other people to use the police powers of government to force me, at the point of a gun, to pay for their health care.

So far, I have found exactly zilch.

-Dave

"...stimulus plan is 'working exactly as we had anticipated.'" - PrezBO

I was just curious. Exactly how long did Senator Kennedy have to wait to receive medical attention for his condition? How long will Joe Blow civilian have to wait under Obama-care? I'd venture to say that most folks will die waiting to see a (read any, not their own) doctor for a similar diagnosis. Unless you're a member of "the ruling party".

I encourage Sen Kennedy to have the nation of Cuba operate on his brain tumor.

By the liberal definition of Rights, shouldn't the government buy me a gun for my right to bear arms.  Shouldn't they provide me a soapbox for my right to free speech. Heck, they also need to provide me with my own media outlet for my right to a free press.

Oh wait, these are actual rights as explicitly defined in the Constitution, so by liberal definition these rights don't really exist. 

Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.

If ted kennedy was an ordinary Citizen, he would already be dead because at his age he would be denied all treatment under nobamacare.

                        The sooner he dies, the sooner Mary Jo can rest in peace. Never did like Kennedy. He thought he was better than anybody else.

Ted can afford a brain tranplant on his own dime (not a bad idea actually).  Someone with his wealth, fame and connections has nothing whatsoever to do with the health and financial concerns of the Average Joe....that goes for far more than just health care BTW.

But, it's the Average Joes up there in Taxachusetts that have been voting him back in time and time again so I assume most of them will buy this pitch.

Maybe when the supply of Kennedys has dried up and more conservative types take their place, people would be astonished (though loathe to admit it) at how much better off their states and their lives are down the road.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

...oh, that's right...such a gene doesn't exist after (real) research.

These are confused people that have had messed up childhoods, and/or bad straight relationships.  They don't know what they're about emotionally and sexually and homosexuality is a comfy place for them to run to...and maybe leave later on when they figure out that's not really where they want to be.

If you have severe hang ups concerning the opposite sex, what are you going to do?  Many have a deep need for a sexual/pseudo-romantic connection with another person so they'll settle with the same sex out of desperation.

To me it's the same mentality where (women usually it seems) hook up with the same abusive loser time and time again.

What the flamers have done is turn this into something preferable to heterosexuality...a superior alternative if you will...and along with it the support of Liberalism, the media and legislators.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).