If Clarence was able to endure a high tech lynching so should Sonya. A blogger and law student, Jeff Schreiber asked the following questions. Republicans should pull out their crayons and take notes.

1. Is a Hispanic female party more or less likely to bring a bona fide grievance before the Court than a white male party?
2. If you were in my shoes, and Chief Justice John Roberts were to have said, on several occasions, that he has been able to come to a better decision because of his life experiences and his being a white male judge than, say, a Hispanic or black or Native American female judge could, how fit would you consider him to be objectively adjudicating matters where the legal and constitutional issue, rather than the parties, are of the utmost importance?
Most of your decisions which have reached the Court at which you aspire to sit have been overturned or otherwise scrutinized for your failure to properly interpret the law. With no court to review the Supreme Court, should the American people be confident you’ll get it right?
3. Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution lays out the 17 enumerated powers vested in Congress. Are there any limits to the power of Congress pursuant to that clause? What is your opinion as to the role of the “Necessary and Proper Clause?”
4. When it comes to interpreting the Constitution, what role if any should foreign and international jurisprudence play?
5. When it comes to interpreting the Constitution, what is the role of the original intent of our founders?
6. Which carries more weight, in terms of being more persuasive or even binding, the contemporaneous writings of our nation’s founders at the time the Constitution was adopted, or the various facets of international and foreign law?
7. What extrinsic factors and considerations, outside the law, should have an effect on your decisions, and to what extent?
8. Absent a “case” or “controversy,” what is the power of a federal court to interpret the law?
9. In terms of statutory interpretation, what role does the actual text of the statutes play?
10. In your various speeches, you’ve spoken of the rapidly changing social policy here in the United States. Is it the role of a judge to update and adapt the law in order to reflect and account for those societal changes?
11. Should the Constitution be interpreted so as to allow capital punishment?
12. For more than a decade, you counseled the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund on many issues of law and policy. You served on the group’s board, you served as an executive. That group, while an admirable one, touted capital punishment as a manifestation of racism – what role did you have in assisting the PRLDEF in taking such a position on capital punishment?
13. Do you personally believe that capital punishment is a manifestation of continuing racial underpinnings in our society?
14. What relationship, if any, did the PRLDEF have with ACORN, the community organization group under investigation in more than a dozen states for voter fraud and intimidation?
15. Why does Lady Justice wear a blindfold? Is the Constitution color-blind?
16. Do you believe that the City of New Haven, Connecticut should have been permitted to do away with all of the firefighter examinations because of race alone?
17. With regard to the claims of Frank Ricci and the other firefighters, did constitutional concerns take a back seat to the nature of the case and ethnicity of those involved? What of the dissent by your Court of Appeals colleague and mentor?
18. How did your life experiences and insight as a wise Latina judge affect your disposition on the Ricci matter?
19. What role does empathy have in adjudicated cases and controversies before the Court?
20. How can a judge fairly and objectively adjudicate a certain matter and apply the law if he or she is of the opinion that different standards and differing versions of the truth apply to different people based upon race, national origin, or financial status?
21. What role does the First Amendment play in campaign finance?
22. Are there any provisions in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act worthy of consideration as possibly unconstitutional?
23. The Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. Heller, noted that “[u]nder any standards of scrutiny that we have applied to enumerated constitutional rights, banning from the home ‘the most preferred firearm in the nation to ‘keep’ and use for protection of one’s home and family’ . . . would fail constitutional muster.” Given the Court’s decision in Heller, how do you reconcile your decision in Maloney v. Cuomo—nearly two years later—that a state or city not under federal purview could ban the possession of weapons for self-defense?
24. Should the Second Amendment be incorporated against the states?
25. What did you mean when you held, in United States v. Sanchez-Villar, that the Second Amendment does not protect a fundamental right?
26. At what point, under our Constitution, does an unborn child have constitutional rights, equal protection of the laws?
27. Do you consider Roe v. Wade to be good law? Is it the role of the federal government to weigh in on abortion in America?
28. Speaking of possible government overreach, what role should a judge have in defining the nature of a marriage or family?
29. Again, speaking of the role of the federal government and judges, does the Takings Clause provide for any restriction in the power of government to take private property?
30. In Kelo v. City of New London, the Court supported eminent domain by arguing that the plan by the city to take public property—in that case, houses—and give them to a private entity for the development of a shopping mall fell under the Fifth Amendment’s “public use” requirement. In her dissent, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor warned of the slippery slope. What is your perspective on “public use” and eminent domain?
31. In the name of “social justice,” can the federal government rewrite contracts such as residential mortgages and leases?
32. What role does the government have, if any, in the regulation of activity that does not cross state lines? What is your feeling as to the nature of “commerce?”
33. What is the role of the Court with regard to national security? What measure of deference, if any, should the court have to the judgment of Congress and the White House?
34. How should the Court reconcile the duty of the federal government to protect America and Americans against terrorism from sources overseas and stateside?
35. What rights should captured foreign terrorists enjoy under the United States Constitution?
36. Where in the Constitution is the right to privacy?
37. In the history of the Court, which Justices do you most admire? With which do you find yourself most continually at odds?
38. What has been the Court’s biggest triumph? Greatest mistake?
39. Why do you want to serve on the United States Supreme Court?

Graham's comment about her inevitability was dumb. It takes the air out of the entire process to more or less label it a waste of time from the beginning. He was right, but it's dumb to come out and say it. Graham is too much like his buddy McCain, sometimes he gets it right and sometimes his RINO side shows.

              She has had 60+ rulings overturned, and that was just the few they looked into. Racist, yes. Qualified, no. But with 60 dems in the senate, WE are stuck with the woman.