“Another case of Sarah Palin derangement syndrome has reared its ugly head,” FNC's Bret Baier announced Tuesday night in citing Todd Purdum's lengthy piece in the August issue of Vanity Fair magazine, “It Came from Wasilla.” Purdum, a New York Times reporter for 23 years until leaving the paper in 2006, is married to ex-Clinton White House Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers.
In the “Grapevine” segment, Baier recounted how Purdum was appalled by “a public official who often seems proud of what she does not know is not only accepted but applauded,” quoted “an anonymous friend of presidential nominee John McCain as referring to Palin as quote, 'little shop of horrors,'” and charged “that on the campaign trail aides quote, 'worried about her mental state: Was it possible that she was experiencing postpartum depression?'” Plus, “quote: 'No political principle or personal relationship is more sacred than her own ambition.'”
In “Liberal Media and GOP Hacks vs. Palin” on the Weekly Standard's blog, Bill Kristol denounced the “hit piece” from the “lefty” Purdum:
You don't have to be a big Palin fan to recognize the article is full of dubious claims, and is dependent on self-serving stories provided on background by some of the people who ran the McCain campaign into the ground.
Kristol highlighted how Purdum claimed: “More than once in my travels in Alaska, people brought up, without prompting, the question of Palin’s extravagant self-regard. Several told me, independently of one another, that they had consulted the definition of 'narcissistic personality disorder' in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – 'a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy' – and thought it fit her perfectly.”
Kristol marveled:
Is there any real chance that “several” Alaskans independently told Purdum that they had consulted the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders? I don’t believe it for a moment. I’ve (for better or worse) moved in pretty well-educated circles in my life, and I’ve gone decades without “several” people telling me they had consulted the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Baier's item in the “Grapevine” segment on the Tuesday, June 30 Special Report with Bret Baier on FNC:
Another case of Sarah Palin derangement syndrome has reared its ugly head, apparently. Vanity Fair's Todd Purdum writes in a piece titled, "It Came From Wasilla," quote: "What does it say about the nature of modern American politics that a public official who often seems proud of what she does not know is not only accepted but applauded?" Purdum quotes an anonymous friend of presidential nominee John McCain as referring to Palin as quote, "little shop of horrors."
He writes that on the campaign trail aides quote, "worried about her mental state: Was it possible that she was experiencing postpartum depression?" And that quote, "no political principle or personal relationship is more sacred than her own ambition."
One blogger [Tom Bevan] at Real Clear Politics calls it a hit piece quote: "Complete with a slew of juicy, negative quotes from insiders and a smoothly crafted narrative that demeans and diminishes Palin's accomplishments."
And even liberal Salon.com Web site [Alex Koppelman] calls it quote "devastatingly critical...Todd Purdum paints Palin as a narcissistic egomaniac unable to take the advice of others."
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





Another case of Sarah Palin derangement syndrome has reared its ugly head, apparently. Vanity Fair's Todd Purdum writes in a piece titled, "It Came From Wasilla," quote: "What does it say about the nature of modern American politics that a public official who often seems proud of what she does not know is not only accepted but applauded?" Purdum quotes an anonymous friend of presidential nominee John McCain as referring to Palin as quote, "little shop of horrors."















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
yo
July 1, 2009 - 00:28 ET by owlpelletsGuess my kids are going to contribute more to CFP. My wife absolutely hates what guys like this are doing. Hey Katie...how are you ratings nowadays????? Hmmmmm??????
Don't blame me....I voted for Palin...
Advice of McCain Staffer
July 1, 2009 - 06:52 ET by allanfPalin was correct not to take the advice of McCain staffers. They ran the single worst Presidential campaign in modern times. For some reason, McCain decided not to vigorously criticize his opponent. Apparently, the approbation of press liberals was more important to him than serving as President of the United States. McCain did not fulfill his duty to the Republican Party. If he felt he could not campaign enthusiastically he should have stepped aside.
McCain didn't criticize
July 1, 2009 - 07:37 ET by BruzillaMcCain didn't criticize Obama because there was really nothing he could criticize him on! What could he say... "Obama is for ending the Bush tax cuts. Oh yeah, so am I", "Obama is for amnesty for illegals! Oh yeah, so am I", 'Obama is for Cap & Trade! Oh yeah, so am I", "Obama supports gun control measures! Oh yeah, so do I", "Obama will close Gitmo! Oh yeah, so will I", and on and on.
McCain lost because no self-respecting conservative could possibly hold their nose long enough to vote for this RINO.
Fred
July 1, 2009 - 07:44 ET by XJ.JonI think Fred Thompson did a better job campaigning than McCain, at least at first. That's why the media wouldn't cover him. They knew they wouldn't get their "savior" if Fred got any publicity.
I'm mad as Hell, and I'm NOT going to take it anymore!
Wimps and other liberals
July 1, 2009 - 06:57 ET by canuckDoesn't this just tell you more about the author than the subject of the hit piece. The guy is obviously a panty-wearing lib who probably has a lot of Perez Hilton in him. This is a feminist hissy fit, pure and simple...we have a central government full of them.
Confirmed when one reads that he is married to Dee Dee Myers and whatever drugs she is on at this time. Too bad she didn't have a blue dress too....maybe her future husband was wearing it.
Purdum's problem in a nutshell regarding Palin.
July 1, 2009 - 07:31 ET by acaiguanaKoppelman inadvertently defines Purdam here:
"And even liberal Salon.com Web site [Alex Koppelman] calls it quote "devastatingly critical...Todd Purdum paints Palin as a narcissistic egomaniac unable to take the advice of others."
I love it when Liberals take on one of their own. Purdam is not, I repeat not a narcissistic egomaniac unable to take the advice of others.
He is a narcissistic egomaniac who follows all the advice of his 'friends' who call him when they want a fantastic made-up story about some Conservative target.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
I think there's plenty of
July 1, 2009 - 07:43 ET by BruzillaI think there's plenty of Palin Derangement Syndrome going on with both sides. The Dems are scared of her because she's a likeable conservative woman who could take women votes away from Obama or Clinton. And compared to a RINO like McCain, Palin came off as a shining example of conservatism to Republicans, who were willing to overlook the fact that she was in no way qualified for national office. As a result, they're falling all over themselves to justify someone who they would be laughing their arses off at if she were a Democrat.
Palin's a nice lady, and seems like a true conservative, but I just don't see her having what it takes to be POTUS, at least not yet.
Palin not qualified to be POTUS?????
July 1, 2009 - 07:45 ET by acaiguanaAnd your point would be? As he looks askance toward the White House...
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
Palin not qualified
July 1, 2009 - 12:03 ET by allanfThe point was that if Palin was not experienced enough to be President than Obama, with his less than two years of US Senate experience and lack of executive experience also was not qualified.
Some people are finally beginning to realize that now.
allanf, I admit I'm confused as to the point. ACA
July 1, 2009 - 12:08 ET by acaiguanaI couldn't see the point of saying Palin wasn't (isn't) qualified to be the President. She wasn't running to be President. That would be my first point.
Second, (this is me again) she has a lot of executive experience in a lot of areas that seem to mirror what Presidents do. Or try to do anyway.
That brings me to your post.
I don't see your point. I think I just said what you posted. If not, then I am truly obtuse today.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
To your first point, anyone
July 1, 2009 - 13:54 ET by BruzillaTo your first point, anyone who is running as VP must be qualified to be President. This was especially the case with someone like McCain who has age and health issues.
To your second point, not all executive experience is the same. I was once the head of a MOPAR club, which is executive experience but hardly qualifies be to be POTUS. As for Palin, she was mayor of a small town where the town hall was a storefront in a strip mall, and her need to govern on a wide range was minimal. She was elected to be governor of Alaska, but she had barely settled into her new office before she was tapped for VP, and then spent most of her time afterwards campagning.
As I ask all Palin supporters... imagine that someone with her experience and background was put forward to be VP by the Democrats, would you still feel like she had adequate executive-level experience? Be honest.
Well, the Dem's put Joe Biden in for VP.
July 1, 2009 - 14:22 ET by acaiguanaHe isn't even qualified to think.
So, I rest my case for Palin being more qualified than anyone in the Democrat field and actually, more qualified than you will allow.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
Cult not Qualifications
July 2, 2009 - 08:05 ET by allanfObama won the last election because the media elevated him to cult like status. His lack of experience was ignored, while Palin's lack of experience was highlighted.
Joe Biden's eccentricities (well known inside the Beltway) were ignored by the media. Palin was even called "wrong" by the media when she corrected Biden's mistake about the VP's duty.
The press bias in the last election cycle was unprecedented. The campagin McCain ran for President should be studied for years to come as an example of what not to do. McCain ran the worst and least effective campaign for President in modern times. Even Mondale had more spunk.
You're 100% correct.
July 1, 2009 - 13:55 ET by BruzillaYou're 100% correct.
What does it take?
July 1, 2009 - 10:04 ET by CobraMan"Palin's a nice lady, and seems like a true conservative, but I just
don't see her having what it takes to be POTUS, at least not yet."
What does it take to be POTUS? Does a potential candidate need experience? Not according to the results of the last election. Does a potential candidate need a Harvard and/or Yale Degree? Plenty of Presidents had nether, so I don't think that's a major, or even minor, consideration. Does a potential candidate need to be a member of one of two major parties? I don't think Party Membership is a major qualification, do you?
So, just what IS needed, beside being a natural born citizen AND popular support?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Dee Dee Meyers?????
July 1, 2009 - 07:48 ET by GecksThe CRIMINAL Dee Dee Meyers? Well, that explains it! He's married to this pissy criminal, probably wollowing in his misery at the thought that he actually married her, and feels the need to destroy our LOVELY Sarah, because he knows he could never, ever have anybody like her. It is said that people fear what they don't understand, but I think the libertard men try to destroy what they know they can never have.
"The Government is not responsible for raising my children!" - My Mom
Lift your skirt.....
July 1, 2009 - 08:49 ET by John WILift your skirt, Mr. Purdum, your stockings are riding up!
What kind of a sissy, would tie his name, to be national editor of "Vanity Fair", and expect to be respected as a man?!
What a bunch of generalized, grey area crap! And this is supposed to be in depth journalism!?
Get a life......PRINCESS!
And he shall forevermore be
July 1, 2009 - 09:44 ET by HockeyKidAnd he shall forevermore be known as "Nancy Purdum".
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
sarah palin, is quite an oddity in today's political world
July 1, 2009 - 10:14 ET by larry on LIshe is a bright star compared to to most of our governers, knows where she wants to go and gets there against against her opponents best efforts to discredit or derail her.most impressed with her ng pipeline and renegotiating the royalty contract.
purdummy
July 1, 2009 - 12:46 ET by east tennessee john"narcissistic egomaniac unable to take the advice of others". Exactly what politician was Purdummy referring to? It certainly applies to BO more than Govenor Palin. Anyone with a positive IQ knows that description could never apply to a mother of 5, but to a parentless, thin skinned bully politician from Chicago?
Question for NewsBusters
July 1, 2009 - 12:48 ET by Not a Liberal LoonThis article was posted July 1 at midnight, this same subject was aslo on Hannity. He gave almost 10 minutes to it, video: http://www.youtube.c... -- For some reason NewsBusters never mentions Hannity's reports even if they are better and longer than the ones shown on Fox in the afternoon. Why? Please check the video.
Not a Liberal Loon
please
July 1, 2009 - 14:42 ET by candanceBill Kristol *is* one of those GOP hacks who whined about Sarah Palin during the election. Now people suddenly see that the hatred spewed at her is too much? Whatever.
Bill Kristol 'whined' about Palin???????????
July 1, 2009 - 15:26 ET by acaiguanaI remember him complaining about how the campaign was run by McCain. That included some of the Palin stuff.
I don't remember him whining about Palin per se. Maybe you could link to some article from a reputable source that cites him - quotes not opinions about him.
On the other hand, your labeling Kristol as a GOP Hack is quite intersting. Do you think you would last more than 30 seconds with him debating anything?
Hack. Is that the new Liberal term for all GOP supporters? Or did you think of that all by yourself.
By the way, is the use of *is* some sort of secret decoder ring stuff? I'm having a hard time figuring out its use.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
wow aca
July 1, 2009 - 16:19 ET by candanceI'm a liberal? Are you sure??
Bill Kristol is the very personification of a beltway insider rino. Yes he recommended McCain choose Palin for VP, but only because he had a big hand in helping McCain win the primaries and then knew that they needed a conservative to win over the Bible belt.
He consistently prods the GOP to move leftward, and criticized angry conservatives who wanted to boycott McCain.
This time I was careful not to use any elaborate punctuation.
candance, I have no idea whether you are a Liberal - ACA
July 1, 2009 - 16:47 ET by acaiguanaWhen you call Kristol a GOP hack, I must believe that you are at least a Democrat, but there I go assumin' again.
I haven't picked up from Kristol that he wants the GOP to move Left. Maybe he does. But he strikes me as too smart not to notice that McCain lost. McCain was a loser.
I'll say it again. McCain was a loser. He was a ringer for the MSM in that he fit the bill to lose.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)