CBS Confirms ObamaCare Would Oust People from Health Insurance and Doctor

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

CBS, of all news outlets, is setting a high standard for ABC to meet Wednesday in its broadcasts from the White House. On Tuesday night, just a week after a “Reality Check” on how President Obama's claim that his government-expansion health care plan won't hike the deficit doesn't match reality, the CBS Evening News aired a story on how his plan would likely force many to lose their current health insurance and/or doctor.

Katie Couric noted “72 percent of Americans say they favor a government plan that would compete with private insurers,” but “at the same time, nearly two-thirds are concerned that would reduce the quality of their own health care. And some experts believe they're right to be worried.”

Sharyl Attkisson featured the Cato Institute's Michael Cannon, who explained: “Employer premiums will go up and employers might respond by dropping coverage entirely. So if you're one of those unfortunate workers, then it will be a government policy that ousted you from your health plan.” Attkisson added: “And if you do choose a public plan, you may want to keep your favorite doctors, but they may not want to keep you. Under government health care, they could be paid 20 to 30 percent less.” Attkisson pointed out how “Obama also scoffed at claims that a public plan would put private insurers out of business,” but she countered: “The answer, say critics, is that the government has many tools to get an unfair advantage and undercut private companies.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

(On ABC's World News, Jake Tapper highlighted how, in answering a press conference queston from Tapper, Obama had “backed off” the promise he made that people won't have to change plans, citing “the President conceding that companies may change their employees' health care plans because of circumstances the government creates.”)

My June 16 NewsBusters item, “CBS Airs 'Reality Check' on Obama's False Claim Health Plan 'Deficit Neutral,'” recounted:

Reality catches up with CBS News which on Tuesday night ran a “Reality Check” story on how a new CBO report shows President Obama's claim that his government-expansion health care plan won't hike the deficit doesn't match reality. So, will ABC News display similar skepticism when it broadcasts GMA and World News from the White House next Wednesday, culminating in a prime time hour, “Questions for the President: Prescription for America”? (ABC's Jake Tapper on Monday night briefly cited the CBO report, but ABC and NBC were silent on Tuesday evening.)

Fill-in CBS Evening News anchor Jeff Glor announced “there are growing concerns that President Obama lacks a realistic plan to pay for this sweeping reform.” Reporter Wyatt Andrews related “how the nation really pays for health reform just got a shocking wake-up call. The Congressional Budget Office, CBO, said Senator Ted Kennedy's health care proposal could cost one trillion dollars over ten years, and 36 million Americans would still be uninsured.” Andrews proceeded to note how Obama “claims he can achieve reform without raising the deficit,” but, he asserted, “the fact is, this means raising taxes.” Andrews also pointed out that Obama's “more than $600 billion worth of spending cuts” to Medicare and other programs don't comport with inevitable resistance from hospitals.

The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide this transcript of the story on the Tuesday, June 23 CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: As Chip Reid reported earlier, the President put in a plug for health care reform during his news conference today. He wants it to include a public insurance plan, something Republicans are decrying in a new ad released today.

CLIP OF AD: Republicans also believe another government takeover would diminish health care choice and quality. President Obama-        

COURIC: Meanwhile, in a CBS News/New York Times poll, 72 percent of Americans say they favor a government plan that would compete with private insurers. But at the same time, nearly two-thirds [63%] are concerned that would reduce the quality of their own health care. And some experts believe they're right to be worried. Here's Sharyl Attkisson.

SHARYL ATTKISSON: Today the President again insisted that his health care reform won't force you to switch plans or doctors.

BARACK OBAMA: What I'm saying is the government is not going to make you change plans under health reform.

ATTKISSON: That's technically correct, but what the President didn't say is that reform could lead your boss to change your health care plan. Here's how: 160 million people are insured through work. Their employer actually picks up most of the cost. Under the President's plan, Americans would be required to carry a certain level of coverage. That means many people would have to increase their insurance.

MICHAEL CANNON, CATO INSTITUTE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH POLICY STUDIES: Employer premiums will go up and employers might respond by dropping coverage entirely. So if you're one of those unfortunate workers, then it will be a government policy that ousted you from your health plan.

ATTKISSON: And if you do choose a public plan, you may want to keep your favorite doctors, but they may not want to keep you. Under government health care, they could be paid 20 to 30 percent less. Today Mr. Obama also scoffed at claims that a public plan would put private insurers out of business.

OBAMA: If private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality health care, if they tell us that they're offering a good deal, then why is it that the government – which they say can't run anything – suddenly is going to drive them out of business?

ATTKISSON: The answer, say critics, is that the government has many tools to get an unfair advantage and undercut private companies.

CANNON: The government can subsidize its plan with tax revenue from other taxpayers. The government can enact regulations that favor its plan over other private insurers.

ATTKISSON: In the end, the President argues it's riskier to do nothing because rising health care costs have put employers on the brink of raising premiums or dropping health insurance entirely. Sharyl Attkisson, CBS News, Washington.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Absolutely amazing

the same 2/3s that want a government plan, are concered about how their own medical coverage would be decreased if government plan was started,

and questioning the Divinity, on how it shall be payed for? Wow, who woke up on the wrong side of whose peed in MSM bed?? I guess you are not feeding the masses with a single loaf of bread on this one are you Pres???

I guess it only takes a Lib realising that they may have to suffer too, to decide that maybe that plan is not so good in the first place,

and how is it that their own plans would be diminished if the system is so horrible now?

not sure if I should cheer, cry, or just scream obsenities at them

there is no spoon...

Just close your eyes and relax.....

The Obama administration will appoint Dr. Jack Kevorkian types to be your very own Personal Health Czar.

"I'm from the government and I'm here to heal"

Yeah, let's experiment and

Yeah, let's experiment and see how many people we can force to suffer and/or die needlessly so we can be more like Europe.

Brilliant!

Hey, gov't knuckleheads...how about reducing this outlandish spending and people's taxes so we can afford the damn health care that's already available.

Oh, and quit rewarding high school drop outs and illegal immigrants with entitlements and make them pay their fair share of taxes.

Quit rewarding those who have and continue to make poor choices with my hard-earned money.

A$$holes.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

If private insurers say

If private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality
health care, if they tell us that they're offering a good deal, then
why is it that the government – which they say can't run anything –
suddenly is going to drive them out of business?
- President Obama

That's easy, Mr. President.  The government doesn't drive anyone out of business by doing things better (you're right: they can't); they do it by unreasonable standards and burdensome regulation. 

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

I just wish these idiots

I just wish these idiots would realize that insurers do not provide healthcare!  All insurers do is manage a shared risk money pipeline, where small premiums of many are used to pay the high medical bills of a few.  They should also realize that most insurers retain about 18% of every dollar they receive, and the remaining 82% is paid out to doctors, hospitals, etc.  The usual government "passthrough" rate is about 24%, so once government takes over, we're instantly going to get about a 6% drop in our bang for the buck.

If Obama really wants to make healthcare affordable, there's only one way to do it: eliminate all healthcare insurance, and force doctors to charge patients what they can afford to pay out of their own pockets for service or go out of business.

Re the idiots

All good points. The liberals seem to think that the healthcare insurance industry is another 19th Century robber baron business that they can plunder for Obamacare. From an article from last week:

"Health insurance isn’t the inordinately profitable industry that Obama and his surrogates say it is. By my rough count, the four big public insurers (Aetna, United, Cigna and Wellpoint) are showing aftertax profit margins of barely three percent. And their total profits add up to well under $10 billion a year." (Ref)

That $10B is what Obamacare will spend on stationery if they take over.

The Road to He**

is paved with "good?" intentions. Absolutely no one knows the ramifications of such far reaching legislation. The result could be and probably will be a disaster of confusion, corruption, dislocation and unintended consequences. I am pretty sure that those who do have adequate health insurance will suffer inordinately once the millions of deadbeats join the rolls. I have seen health insurance advertised as low as 75 bucks a month it may be much cheaper just to pay the deadbeats health insurance rather than destroy the present system. 

"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'

misdirection

We are constantly told about health insurance being too expensive and always going up....First, our current health care system is not insurance..it is a health maintenance plan. Insurance is for high unexpected costs. What we now have in the US, thanks to these same politicians who now want to run everything, is health maintenance plans. When "insurance" covers all expenses from dollar one, then it will be an unending financial disaster. Health Insurance at one time was a reasonable expense. The politicians saw a way to send it off a financial cliff, by mandating every doctor visit and sniffle be paid for by "insurance" policies. This has had the expected effect. From the beginning politicians have known, if you want to take over a segment of the economy, first destroy it and then the people will ask you to fix it. A good example is the auto industry, mandate stupid cars and silly fuel standards and then have these companies "compete" against countries with no labor costs. Should we talk about oil? Yes the US must not use our own oil (a supply which is greater to aIl foreign sources) and then tell us we have to cut back because we are using too much...Health care is messed up because the politicain want it that way...It is so simple even a Barak could do it..

Maybe

the govt should just subsidize the building and staffing of clinics built next to every emergency room (which are the present "free" clinics) it still would be cheaper than anything the Government could manage. Obamacare is still going to become a typical moneypit inefficient bureaucratic disaster. After this and Cap and Trade the dems will be whining how come the recession isn't ending?

"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I,Robot"

Insurance should only be

Insurance should only be for catastrophic coverage.  Anything else, including government-run healthcare and HMOs, introduces an unnecessary middle-man, which drives costs up.

The HMO pushers want their program because it makes them rich.

The Fascists want the GOV program because it gives them power.

Both are wrong, not that it matters, we're screwed either way.

Finding a Dr

  It is already hard to find a Dr that will that you when you have Medicare. Why would it get better when they are going to pay less???

Doctors Rights?

In order for Obamacare to come anywhere close to working, doctors will have to be forced to accept Obamacare patients and perhaps even forbidden to do work for cash. Otherwise it will be a non-starter. The question is, would forcing all doctors into Obamacare survive a Supreme Court challenge? Obviously it didn't in Canada, but Canada has a very shoddy record of upholding any basic schedule of rights for citizens. They have a very nice Constitution, but so did the former Soviet Union.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.