Sotomayor Prompts More 'Conservative' Than 'Liberal' Labels

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

Amazingly, after showing no reluctance in 2005 to describe John Roberts and Sam Alito as “conservative” or worse, the Tuesday network evening newscasts, particularly ABC and NBC, applied more “conservative” tags to Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor's critics than “liberal” labels to her, as the coverage suggested calling her a liberal was a hasty judgment from accusatory partisans. In total, ABC's World News and the NBC Nightly News combined for a piddling two uses of the “liberal” term while issuing a “conservative” tag eight times. (CBS viewers heard “liberal” four times and “conservative” just once.)

Setting up a look at Sotomayer's record, ABC anchor Charles Gibson fretted about how conservatives had “already” assessed her: “Even before the President announced his decision, conservatives were reviewing Judge Sotomayor's judicial record and were already saying she would be an activist on the court.” Jan Crawford Greenburg then framed any notion of Sotomayer as liberal as based on accusations from conservatives: “...which conservatives have called code for,” “...conservatives today seized on this comment” and “already, conservatives have jumped on the decision.”

Over on NBC, Pete Williams presumed a conflict between her rise from poverty and being liberal: “Despite her remarkable personal odyssey, Judge Sotomayor is already being called a liberal activist by some conservative groups.” (That sentence included NBC's only liberal label utterance during four segments.)

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

“Conservatives view Sotomayor as a liberal with an agenda,” CBS's Wyatt Andrews relayed before he cautioned the nominee “is generally seen as liberal, but experts say is not always predictable.” The CBS Evening News, however, came closest to an unattributed description of Sotomayer as a liberal when anchor Katie Couric, who also trumpeted her “amazing life story,”  asked Jeff Greenfield: “Will she really change the make-up of the court, or have an impact on some hot-button issues because many people are saying that Justice Souter is just being replaced by another liberal?”

But earlier in the newscast, CBS reporter Priya David failed to make a connection between a socialist and Sotomayer's views. As the quote from Sotomayer's college yearbook was enlarged, David concluded her review of the judge's life story:

Her past also offers a hint of what's ahead. From her Princeton University yearbook, Sotomayor's chosen quotation: “I am not a champion of lost causes, but of causes not yet won.”

David didn't name the author of the quote, but the image showed: “Norman Thomas.” That would be the same Norman Thomas who was the Socialist Party presidential nominee from  1928 through 1948 (and also the grandfather of Newsweek's Evan Thomas).

Neither ABC or NBC mentioned or showed the yearbook page and/or quote. Beliefnet, the MRC's Rich Noyes noticed, pointed out that the White House distributed yearbook page image to the news media.

In relating conservative criticism of Sotomayer, all three newscasts at some point did report her “the court of appeals is where policy is made” boast, the controversy over the New Haven reverse discrimination case and her proposition that it's a good thing her ethnicity shapes her decisions and leads to better decisions than would be made by a white male.

Earlier Tuesday NewsBusters post: “Flashback: Nets Were Quick to Tag Alito and Roberts as 'Ultra' and 'Hardline' 'Conservatives.'”

Labeling rundowns for the Tuesday, May 26 newscasts:

ABC's World News: (one “liberal,” five “conservative”):

Jake Tapper: “He has called this empathy in the past, which conservatives have called code for liberals creating laws from the bench.”

Charles Gibson: “Even before the President announced his decision, conservatives were reviewing Judge Sotomayor's judicial record and were already saying she would be an activist on the court.”

Jan Crawford Greenburg: “Conservatives today seized on this comment Sotomayor made four years ago when she was a federal appeals court judge.”
Sotomayer: “Court of Appeals is where policy is made. And I know this is on tape, and I should never say that, because we don't make law, I know.”

Greenburg, re New Haven: “Already, conservatives have jumped on the decision.”

Greenburg: “Conservatives point a to a speech she gave in 2001 at the University of California at Berkeley law school, when she suggested her ethnicity shapes her decisions.”

CBS Evening News (four “liberal,” one “conservative”):

Wyatt Andrews: “While Senate Republicans were restrained in their reactions today, conservatives view Sotomayor as a liberal with an agenda -- an agenda captured in the judge's own words when describing the courts of appeal.”

Andrews: “Sotomayor is known to favor abortion rights and in her 700 opinions is generally seen as liberal, but experts say is not always predictable.”

Couric: “Will she really change the make-up of the court, or have an impact on some hot-button issues because many people are saying that Justice Souter is just being replaced by another liberal?”

Jeff Greenfield: “We simply really don't know whether Sotomayor's kind of liberalism on the bench is the same as David Souter's or she'll have very different views.”

NBC Nightly News (one “liberal,” three “conservative”):

Pete Williams: “Despite her remarkable personal odyssey, Judge Sotomayor is already being called a liberal activist by some conservative groups.”

Pete Williams: “But some conservatives criticize her for saying in a 2001 speech, quote, 'a wise Latino woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.'”

David Gregory: “The idea here that this is, in the minds of so many conservatives, a real activist.”

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Great post but what jumped

Great post but what jumped out to me was the fact that Evan Thomas has inherited his grandfather's view of the world.

d1.... Yep...keeping up

d1....

Yep...keeping up the family tradition, he's been at it quite awhile eh?

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

When a lib calls a lib a conservative, you know...

they are peeing on your boots!  The things this mujer (a little espanol for you) has said would instantly ruin the political or judicial career of a white devil!  Tolerance...yeah right!

Angry White Dude

www.angrywhitedude.c...

Since Sotomayor is a racist..

Allow me to paraphrase R. Lee Ermey in "Full Metal Jacket" (ahem)

"Hey Sonia, one thing you're going to learn real fast is that they don't serve refried beans and tacos in the White House Mess HALL!!!"

"Let him who would move the world, first move himself." -Socrates

"We sit together, the mountain and I, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po

What the .... does her

What the .... does her "remarkable personal odyssey" have to do with anything.  She is a typically twisted leftist who believes the constitution means whatever she wants it to mean.

We've got some very dangerous people running this country.

You ever wonder why it is ok

You ever wonder why it is ok for a black or latino to want a black or latino to win a position because they are black or latino?  Is that not exactly what racism is?  I seriously hope the GOP really looks into Sotomayer and ignore any fear of being looked at negatively by the hispanic population.  We still have a right to have competent public servants regardless of their race or origin.

They're opposing her!

They've begun their usual process.

  1. Cite the person as a noble and humble servant
  2. Argue that the conservatives are attacking her!

The process, as Brent pointed out, involves demeaning the opposition before they have a chance to speak. Before the media presented what conservatives believe, they spiked the punch with generic media insinuations. Gibson insinuated that the conservatives were being unreasonable, having the nerve to criticize her before the announcement was even made! (As if we didn't already know about her name on the short list for weeks.) Greenburg said that they would "seize upon" this one little quote, made almost 4 years ago! (as if she made a bad joke in high school, why are they still picking on her?). The others did much the same: attack the critics.

And again, it's all straw men. They're telling you how unreasonable the conservatives are for criticizing her, but the criticisms they cite are cartoon cut-out versions of genuine differences in theory. They can't afford to present her as a champion of liberal judicial activism, so they attack the critics ... for, well ... criticizing.

Isn't it funny that when

Isn't it funny that when the Leftists try to get mainstream support they present __ as being 'conservative', 'traditional', etc.?

Rather like Carrie Nation offering free beer to entice people to attend her temperance rallies.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

Help me out here

Are we supposed to refer to her as half Mexican and half Peurto Rican, or half Peurto Rican and half Mexican. Identity politics can be hard to get right.

After reviewing her juriprudence, you know, the ability to apply the law, should we just refer to her as another half-assed racist lawyer.

I'm not shocked at all

that the FIRST Affirmative Action POTUS would appoint the FIRST Affirmative Action Judge to the SCOTUS.  I don't know why anyone else would be shocked as well.  After all, liberals LOVE Affirmative Action, even though that it's been PROVEN countless times to keep minorities beaten down UNLESS they follow the liberal way.

Half-Rican American please!

Or is it 'Half-Ican American'? Puerto Mexican?

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Anyone notice

that Obama made use of a teleprompter to aid him in introducing her and her "qualifications?"  Can this guy ever say a word in public without this electronic "advisor?"  I'll bet he even had to use one to make his wedding vows.  I guess that's what you do when you have no guiding principles and are unable to speak from the heart.  Pathetic.

Coup....

The Marxist Coup is almost complete.

Executive Branch- Check....

Legistlative Branch- Check

Judicial Branch- Check

Mainstream Media- Check

The only problem with instituting the Socialist Utopia is that it will fail as that type of government has never and will never succeed. The numbers never add up. Obama has already bankrupted the United States. The American people need one hell of a reformer as President in 2012. The media has become irrelevant. People like Gibson have absolutely no credibility left....

You left off trashing our

You left off trash talking our country and cozying up to despots while snubbing our allies.

"Umm .... ahhh .... you know?"

If he didn't use the teleprompter he'd come off bumbling like Bush and babbling like joke Biden wrapped into Karl Marx. After all he has "57 states" in which to flame "typical white women" and "redistribute [our] wealth."

Speaking of labels.

Is is a unwritten rule that female justices appointed by democrats be dowdy frumps? First Ruth, now Sonia ... just damn!

Hey, wouldn't Sarah Palin make a hot supreme court justice? Sorry, I couldn't resist using her name to contrast the disrespect given to conservative woman by the "drive by(s)."

Sotomayer is an racist, extremist lefty kook

There is nothing even remotely conservative about this woman.

-Dave

Last night's Nightline

Last night's Nightline program predictably followed the same pattern.  Not once did the execrable political activist Cynthia McFadden even hint that Sotomayor was a leftist.  In Jake Tapper's piece, he predictably used the label "conservative" six, seven or eight times to identify anyone who did not adore Sotomayor.  Tapper also never identified the ideology of Sotomayor, but he did attempt to disguise her ideology by claiming that "conservatives allege that she is liberal" or some such construction.

I'm betting that the phrase

I'm betting that the phrase "painting" her as a liberal came up too.

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

Verrrry Interesting

"President Obama's radical new nominee to replace Associate Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor, used to serve on the board of LatinoJustice PRLDEF, one of the racial grievance groups that helped to sink the judicial nomination of Honduran-born Miguel Estrada in 2003."

Sotomayor's Radical Legal Group Helped Kill the Estrada Nomination: http://spectator.org

Well isn't that interesting. What goes around comes around. This doesn't show that Sotomayor actively worked personally against Estrada, but it points out the raging hypocrisy in the Hispanic 'rights' movements and democratics in general, and it would make a great line of questioning for confirmation hearings.

My only question for the

My only question for the hearings:

"Judge Sotomayor, if your nomination succeeds, will you stop issuing race-based activist opinions from the bench?" 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

→ Good question

And if your life experience qualifies you to make better decisions than white men, will you continue to deny white petitioners the same protection under the law?