before Obamessiah swooped in and "saved" us all...Otherwise, the "victims" would all be singing "The One's" praises... 

"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan~ January 20, 1981

Missed that one. I have seen book reviews on weekend BookTV (an addiction) on several FDR books however, and more and more, historians are taking a new look at FDR. He will still be idolized by generations of liberals though; the brainwashing is just that thorough. Some of the things that FDR did make Dick Cheney look like Mother Theresa. It's really odd how the public perception of fascism has flipped; in the thirties it was seen as a new 'third way' by FDR and many liberals in the West. Liberal propaganda has had its effect since, and now fascism is associated with the right.

There used to be a core of moderate to conservative dems in congress who tended to keep the far-left kook fringe pretty much in check. The problem is, they are all gone now.

Our only hope in the congressional arena may just rest with some of those moderate dems who were elected to congress last November that I read about just after the election, and who are nowhere near as far out in left field as is Obama.

Let's hope they start to catch on to what is happening, before its too late.

-Dave

Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.

There are plenty of internet hate sites which would welcome your anti-Semitic bile.  How about checking them out and not bother coming back here.

Jer

CT

every time I hear his voice I think of my dad and some of his lines.

A few Dad lines: usually starts off  with: "that boy”: Doesn’t know shit from shinola, or his arse from a hole in the ground or my old personal favorite "doesn't know whether to scratch his watch or wind his ass"

All laughing aside, these are desperate times. I am truly worried.

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

Jer, the aggregate of Obama's proposals add up to more federal spending than the entire period starting from 1776 through his inaguration. 

Let me appeal to the patriotism you mentioned: Why don't you want him to fail?

Further, there's no need to find a quote.  This site has relentlessly chronicled the psychosis level efforts working for the failure of this country through the failure of President Bush for a number of years.  Actions speak louder than words.  One of the first steps to curing yourself of liberalism is to realize that words do not carry the same weight as actions.   

You know, sometimes I write responses to posts, as if to put bait in the water. I'm sure everyone else does that, to some degree. You write something, hoping to get a nibble of an argument. You check back a couple times, and if no one responds, you figure, OK, no one's interested, so move onto the next topic. This one, I checked back after I wrote it, and no one had responded. No big deal. But now I see a bunch of responses! Sorry I didn't respond earlier.

Both of your questions, Jer, have the same hidden premise: namely, that the political agenda of a president is equivalent to the welfare of the country. They're not. I can comfortably support the country while opposing the president's political agenda.

• But let's make sure we don't forget something important. Because so much time has passed, we tend to lump accusations together. As a conservative, I didn't object when liberals didn't support Bush politically. That's certainly their right, as it is our right to oppose Obama now.
• However, I did object when liberals sought to actively undermine a war effort (like when the NY Times published the entirely-legal eavesdropping program, or wallowed for months over Abu Ghraib, and yet deliberately refused to report the success of the surge, etc.).
• So let's make that a clear distinction there. I welcome political debate. I reject supporting a war for political reasons.

My desire for the country to succeed doesn't mean that I have to support Obama's policies, especially when I think they are horribly misguided. Don't ask me to support policies that I think will hurt the country, and call it patriotism.

As for your second question, I won't get roped into the premise that I have to name someone who said that exact statement. I'm Irish, but I'm not that stupid. The fact that he doesn't use those words doesn't mean he doesn't share the sentiment. So, when Dan Rather refused to say that Bush was elected, and instead insisted that he was "selected," he was representing the same opposition to Bush that Limbaugh expressed about Obama.