All of the broadcast and cable network anchors challenged President Barack Obama in some questions during their Tuesday afternoon Oval Office interview sessions, but CBS's Katie Couric and NBC's Brian Williams also painted Obama as a victim of Washington's culture which forced HHS Secretary nominee Tom Daschle's withdrawal. “You campaigned to change the culture in Washington, to change the politics as usual culture here,” Couric noted as she empathized: “Are you frustrated? Do you think it is much, much harder to do that than you ever anticipated?”
Williams noted “you lost two nominees, two appointments today,” so, as if Obama were an uninvolved casualty of unfairness: “Did that make you angry, I imagine?” Echoing Couric, Williams fretted: “How do you prevent the lesson from being that, no matter how lofty the goals of the new guy coming in, Washington wins, in the end?” Maybe it was just following the law and paying a penalty for avoiding taxes which won in the end.
Expressing disappointment with how Obama allowed the Daschle withdrawal to hurt one of Obama's left-wing policy goals, CNN's Anderson Cooper, in an excerpt run during the 6 PM EST hour of The Situation Room, rued: “Explain what happened today. Tom Daschle. You've let one of the most important domestic issues, which is health care, get caught up in what looks, to many Americans, like politics as usual.”
During a piece on Daschle's withdrawal which preceded the Cooper/Obama interview excerpt, CNN displayed on screen:
STUNNING SETBACK TO HEALTH REFORM
(In contrast, to Couric and Williams, ABC's Charles Gibson held Obama accountable for the nominees who failed to pay all the taxes they owed: “But there's more of a problem than just Daschle, and you're the one, in your inaugural speech, who talked about an era of responsibility. You've now got three major appointees who, it turns out, haven't paid all their taxes. What kind of a message does that send about responsibility?”)
On the stimulus, NBC's Williams sympathized with how the bill is being “hacked to death” by those who don't appreciate how the full package is made up of many valuable parts:
Is it tougher to make the case that this enormous package is more like a million little things? Is it getting hacked to death as you watch?
All the questions posed by Williams, in the portion shown on the Tuesday, February 3 NBC Nightly News, as collated by the MRC's Brad Wilmouth:
- Philadelphia Inquirer today: “Surely, President Obama can find qualified people to serve in his cabinet who aren’t hustling to write overdue checks to the IRS. You lost two nominees, two appointments today. Did that make you angry, I imagine?- How do you prevent the lesson from being that, no matter how lofty the goals of the new guy coming in, Washington wins, in the end?
- Mr. President, how do you make the case to American families who are losing jobs today, right now, and hurting -- and those who aren’t are worried -- that you’ve got something for them, that a big, enormous stimulus package is either going to save their job, get them a job, or generally help their lot in life, and, meantime, they see the federal government buying up bad banks?
- For all the provisions that you just chose to outline, there are others like the one Senator McConnell was mocking today, subsidy for Hollywood film makers. Is it tougher to make the case that this enormous package is more like a million little things? Is it getting hacked to death as you watch?
- Among the levers your enemies on the Hill are using is, about this personnel matter. This is from Howard Fineman, Newsweek magazine, MSNBC last evening: “If they keep saying,” they, the Obama White House, “that all these people deserve special treatment because they’re indispensable -- ‘Geithner is indispensable’ -- it begins to sound not only hypocritical, but elitist. It’s like there are rules for everybody else, and then there are rules for indispensable people, and that’s exactly the opposite of the grassroots message that he,” meaning you, Mr. President, “came here with.”
All of the quotes/assessments above in this item are based on what aired on the evening newscasts, not the full interviews, which were not much longer than what aired. Links to what the networks have posted online:
ABC News: Article and video of Charles Gibson with Obama.
CBS News: Transcript and video of Katie Couric with Obama.
NBC News: Video of entire interview Brian Williams conducted with Obama.
CNN: Video clips posted of Anderson Cooper with Obama. (More will air on Tuesday's Anderson Cooper: 360.)
FNC: Video of Chris Wallace's session with Obama. A substantial excerpt ran at the top of Special Report with Bret Baier.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





- For all the provisions that you just chose to outline, there are others like the one Senator McConnell was mocking today, subsidy for Hollywood film makers. Is it tougher to make the case that this enormous package is more like a million little things? Is it getting hacked to death as you watch?














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Which of the interviewers
February 3, 2009 - 21:17 ET by BKeyserWhich of the interviewers asked the question:
"Now that you've been in office for a couple of weeks, and already things are taking a nosedive -multiple cabinet nominees having to withdraw in shame, Iran basically calling you a punk, the EU screaming about protectionism and the failed FDR example in the 30's, even India telling you to pack sand on Kashmir- is it possible that your predecessor was not quite the imbicile you thought he was? I mean, clearly, Hope and Change was just a load of campaign crap, right?"
WISH
February 3, 2009 - 21:30 ET by MaytagHe or She would be locked on my tv. But would never get another interview with that one.
Thank You
February 3, 2009 - 21:36 ET by sevans1956Bkeyser:
Thank you for one of the most intellegent questions that I have heard in the last two weeks. I hope that the rest of America wake up and come to the same conclusion.
§ BKeyser..BRILLIANT QUESTION!!
February 3, 2009 - 21:42 ET by TheSterAmazing!!! Pure ART!!
Maybe we can get the FOX News DC reporter to ask it in the next Gibbs TRAIN WRECK of a News Conference....Gibbs WILL NOT be able to dodge it!!!
Ster.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
bho's answer to brilliant question.....
February 3, 2009 - 21:49 ET by porpoiseboyuh uh uh uh uh uh you can't uh uh uh uh uh just listen to uh uh uh uh uh uh uh rush or fox news uh uh uh uh uh uh and expect to uh uh uh uh uh uh get things uh uh done. whew!!!! i need a break! SMOKES PLEEZE!!
"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason" Ben Franklin
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
BK.....
February 3, 2009 - 21:52 ET by TheBigBI believe that interview is taking place on April 31st. I've already set my DVR.
Artillery lends dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl.
President,/ Cabinet and Associates.-
February 5, 2009 - 01:42 ET by Charles H. GarridoHello! 3/5/09 01:38 AM
ANECDOTE.-
After the French Revolution.. Imperial Napoleon Bonaparte.The Paris City, had during that time, Vandalism, Robberies, etc.The cabinet call in by the "Chief " "Napoleon" Said: who gave us a couple "RESUME" Following.. must be a good fellow such as a Thief, Robber, Crafty, Cunning, (smooth -tongued) also be as an Arrogant.
PARABOLA.-
Imperial Napoleon Bonaparte gave the "JOB" MONSIEUR, JOSEPH FOUCHE,MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR AS WELL AS THE POLICE .-, (around 1809/10) Paris France.- Thanks & Cooperation.-
Charles H. Garrido.
Miami Fla.
As per usual, Fox did the best interview.
February 3, 2009 - 21:41 ET by thebutlerdiditI don't understand what's so hard about doing a fair interview. Wallace is a lefty, too, yet he manages to push Obama, and ask him much better question. Plus, he asked about 3 questions to the others 1. The others sat there mesmerized by his presence, I guess. I really wish he would put the kibosh on the "I screwed up." phrase. That's just not presidential. Plus, making those comments about Fox, beating him up. Please. They are nice to him. Other than a few commentators, he gets very fair treatment.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
I agree, butler (may I call
February 3, 2009 - 21:57 ET by motherbeltI agree, butler (may I call you butler? LOL)
Once is refreshing, more than that, not so much.
People don't want to hear the leader of the country regularly admitting that he messed up.
What's next...Hey, I'm new at this and still learning???
Then later the segue into...Well I told you I was going to make mistakes....
MB
February 3, 2009 - 22:07 ET by thebutlerdiditYou can call me whatever ya like. I also go by the handle of "Di" for anyone who wants to use that. Much shorter. I just don't appreciate the flippant answers. I do appreciate the fact he owned up to the mistake. I am not sure he's too sincere, but I am willing to cut him a tiny bit of slack. As for his firm stance on porkulus, no. He is out and out fabricating the impact of that mess. If he uses the "Hey, I'm new and still learning" phrase, we all need to run for cover. Our enemies will probably get together and bomb us, happily, off the planet. As far as I'm concerned, he used the "mistake" word today, he doesn't get to troll it out everytime they get caught doing the wrong thing. I say put it away with your childish things, and trash-talking, Prezbo.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
hate to say it but wasn't it a hillary
February 3, 2009 - 22:24 ET by porpoiseboycommercial that pointed out he would not be ready to answer the phone at 3am from day one? well, i would say that "i'm new at this" is just affirmation of that commercial. btw, did you catch that he MEANT to say "it probably won't be my LAST mistake"....but what he actually said was "it probably won't be my FIRST mistake". i'm thinking that electing you was the first mistake shahinshah.
"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason" Ben Franklin
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
Making mistakes ... new at this ...
February 4, 2009 - 00:51 ET by KC MulvilleLet's see. For months, we warned that McCain to a small degree, Hillary to a large degree, and Obama to the maximum ... as senators, what's the one quality that they all lacked?
Executive experience.
Oh, they ran a squadron, or a campaign (how hilarious does than sound now?). But they never ran a large enterprise. This is the kind of thing that happens when you have a captain of the ship who's never been to sea before. The biggest difference is that instead you have to depend on other people. They need your direction, but they're the ones that do it. You depend on them.
You want to know what makes executive experience different? I'll give you an example in a small scale. Do this on a side street so you don't kill anyone. (Yeah, I know, we've all done this before.)
That's just for driving a car. Now realize that Obama is trying to do it, for the first time, to millions of employees in the federal government. And the people he's hired to drive the car? Each of them has a huge ego, a clear idea of where they want to drive (long before they ever heard of Obama), and most of them are new to this also.
In the campaign you can laugh about executive experience. Come January and February, nobody's laughing - except at you.
Excellent analogy, KC
February 4, 2009 - 02:20 ET by Scout FinchYou must be some sort of "expert" on this kind of stuff.
You've described Obama's administrative duties, indeed most liberal administrative duties, to a T.
It's funny, but not funny. Scary.
In the chorus
February 4, 2009 - 09:16 ET by KC MulvilleAs far as executive experience, I'm just in the chorus. A lot of people have been pointing out Obama's lack of experience for a long time. As Reverend Wright said, the chickens are coming home to roost.
I agree
February 3, 2009 - 22:01 ET by katainkentThe "I screwed up" phrase made me squirm. Correct the problems, fire the weak links. Deal with the speedbumps swiftly... but save the introspective comments for the memoirs. It shows weakness that just invites a good face stomping.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke
tbdi....Why do you consider
February 3, 2009 - 22:33 ET by Jertbdi....Why do you consider Wallace a "lefty"?
Jer
Because he does, Jer.
February 3, 2009 - 22:41 ET by thebutlerdiditHe is registered as a Democrat, and said he voted that way. I heard him give an interview to that effect, years ago, he said he had been a Dem since he began voting, but, that he voted for Reagan, his only exception. I will admit I don't know how he voted this time, but I would be willing to bet.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
Wallace
February 4, 2009 - 00:56 ET by KC MulvilleWallace also said that he lives in Washington, and since DC is so overwhelmingly Democratic, being a Democrat is the only way your vote will count. I've heard him say that.
But of course, as you said above, even if he's a lefty Democrat, Wallace still managed to ask some probing and uncomfortable questions for Obama - why can't the rest of them do it? Excellent point.
→ All we ask
February 4, 2009 - 01:04 ET by Cool ArrowIt's a tall order, but these guys are paid (alleged) professionals.
Wallace does the best job of leaving his ideology at the door. I'm enjoying Brit Hume now. He was a great anchor, but he's an even better analyst.
Something to ponder...
February 4, 2009 - 01:33 ET by JerSomething to ponder...
Being a registered Democrat doesn't make one a "lefty", just as being a registered Republican doesn't make one a conservative or a "righty".
There are seven registered Republicans on the Supreme Court. It would be absurd to suggest that, therefore, conservatives outnumber liberals 7-2.
Jer
Jer
February 4, 2009 - 04:35 ET by well99Agree.Wallace is one of the best at leaveing his politics at home.I liked Bret the best but still Chris asked tough questions of all.As far as
"Being a registered Democrat doesn't make one a "lefty", just as being a registered Republican doesn't make one a conservative or a "righty".
That is the problem.People identify others by party as all haveing the same political view because they have a D or a R.Some only want a small tent.That is the party that will be hurt the most.
Interesting link
http://www.house.gov/ross/BlueDogs/
Jer cast his line into the choppy waters
February 3, 2009 - 22:45 ET by choselife3xOf NB, and settled back in his chair with a contented sigh. Maybe Butler would rise to the bait, maybe not. No matter, Jer has plenty of time, and little else to do. :-O
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Must be my lucky day, chose.
February 3, 2009 - 22:48 ET by JerMust be my lucky day, chose. I'm catching 'em two at a time on the same hook.
Jer
Catch and release, Jer
February 3, 2009 - 23:01 ET by choselife3xYour bag limit is one per day. I see guttermouth's already gutted in your basket.
Lower Butler gently back into the water before she fins ya.
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
§ Chose, Jer...Great Job on Gutter!!! YOU ROCK!!
February 3, 2009 - 23:07 ET by TheSterYa'll done GOOD!!
I'm working on PC issues and have been off and on all night!!!
Ster.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Ster
February 3, 2009 - 23:29 ET by choselife3xYou sir, are a RIOT.
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Ster...
February 4, 2009 - 16:39 ET by JerThanks for the compliment.
Jer
choselife...
February 3, 2009 - 23:09 ET by JerBy the way, doll, is there a thread that you haven't posted a comment on since you joined us.
Jer
But, you're right...Maybe, I have been spending too much time here. Gonna kick back and pop my favorite movie in the DVD player: Gentlemen Prefer Blondes
'Gentlemen Prefer Blondes'
February 3, 2009 - 23:25 ET by choselife3xWhy Jer, you never told me you were blonde. :-O
(doll?) So you've noticed my multitudinous posts, huh? And here I thought I was a brunette just blending in with the wallpaper.
Whenever you see :-O, it means I am TOTALLY teasing.
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
choselife...
February 3, 2009 - 23:42 ET by JerYou never asked. And, about the movie, if it's any solace, I'm no "gentleman".
I know you were teasing [and I hope you know me well enough to know that I was, too--even without putting the little do-hickeys at the end].
Jer
Jer
February 3, 2009 - 23:53 ET by choselife3xJust checkin'. Don't want none a them thar friendly fire incidents.
After bigtimer asked me "Are you joking?" a couple of times I started using emoticons. Can't be too careful with this razor sharp wit....
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Know what you mean. There
February 4, 2009 - 00:04 ET by JerKnow what you mean. There have been times when I thought my "kidding" was plain as day, and yet my comment was interpreted as being deadly serious.
Jer
→ Jer
February 4, 2009 - 00:14 ET by Cool ArrowWhat the h&ll is that supposed to mean?
You better apologize, Bucko!
Yeah, I'm callin' you a Bucko! ;-)
I'm sorry, Mr. Arrow,
February 4, 2009 - 00:19 ET by JerI'm sorry, Mr. Arrow, sir. ;-)
Jer
→ OK, Jer
February 4, 2009 - 00:25 ET by Cool ArrowI guess you can call me Bucko too if you want to.
cool
February 4, 2009 - 00:43 ET by thebutlerdiditMight as well call Jer bucko, he has already admitted he is no gentleman. Of course, I didn't see the answer on the blonde part. Hmm. As for CL, he had better watch out, that girl carries a razor, I think. Or something like that.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
Or something like that
February 4, 2009 - 00:53 ET by choselife3xJust don't tell them about the .38 in my ankle holster. And I carry the balisong in the diaper bag.
Preparedness is key, but improvisation is FUN.
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
That doo-hickey
February 4, 2009 - 00:30 ET by choselife3xLooks mighty fine on you, Jer!
I love a man who knows how to accessorise.
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
all men look better with doo-hickeys
February 4, 2009 - 00:45 ET by thebutlerdiditIMHO. I happen to be a fan of them, myself.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
You never saw my
February 4, 2009 - 00:50 ET by JerYou never saw my dickey did you, chose? I must say, it made me look quite dashing.
Jer
Speaking of dashing....
February 4, 2009 - 00:58 ET by choselife3xI go night-night.
Send me a picture, Jer. I won't paste it all over the internet, I promise.
*fingers crossed behind back*
But does that mean the right should emulate the left?
-balboa http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Good Night, R, thanks for the vid, earlier, too cute!
February 4, 2009 - 01:11 ET by thebutlerdiditI agree on the being prepared thing. I carry a SWAT knife and a .44. I was a good girl scout.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
Jer
February 4, 2009 - 01:14 ET by thebutlerdiditGPB's is one of my favorite movies. My mom was a dead ringer for MM, back in the day. I look a little like her, got the blonde hair and curves, unfortunately, I am only 5'2, and skinny is in. *sigh* Born in the wrong dang decade.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
tbdi
February 4, 2009 - 02:01 ET by Jertbdi...
I'm very partial to blonde hair and curves--no matter what the height. Maybe I'll buy you and your mom dinner. I guess I should bring my wife along, too [just in case she's monitoring this site]. :-) And, I bet my mom was as good looking as your mom, in her day as you say.
Jer
Jer
February 4, 2009 - 07:48 ET by thebutlerdiditYeah, I think you probably should bring your wife along. ;.) She might not appreciate you dining with busty blondes. I just wish I had of gotten mom's legs, but my sister has those. Or, rather some like 'em, mom's still using the originals. Nothing wrong with having a good looking ma, I'm sure your friends enjoyed playing at little Jer's house.LOL.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
Looks like CNN and CBS had
February 3, 2009 - 21:52 ET by R D HelmLooks like CNN and CBS had planned well in advance for this contingency.
I wonder what other "cover his ass" story lines they have filed away, ready to be pulled on a moment's notice.
"- How do you prevent the lesson from being that, no matter how lofty
the goals of the new guy coming in, Washington wins, in the end?"
ROFL!
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
I'm down there rolling with
February 3, 2009 - 22:01 ET by motherbeltI'm down there rolling with you, Dave!
Washington wins??? How about integrity wins in the end, Ms. Katie?
As I said below, "Pobrecito..." (Poor little one!)
Now he's being attacked by Washington itself!!
mb.... But he is from
February 3, 2009 - 22:09 ET by Clear thinkermb....
But he is from Krypton so he should have no problem defeating Washington. Here's how the media views him... http://giovanniworld.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/u12copy1vb_edited2.jpg?w=214&h=300
Ecofascists Defy Logic
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Has anybody noticed...
February 3, 2009 - 21:58 ET by TheBigBI thought the SNL Obama "Can we get you a pillow?" parody was funny, now I don't because it's getting closer and closer to being spot on.
".....And as we look at the News at 10 time-lapse SkyCam, we see as the sun goes down it gets dark."
When you are part of the
February 3, 2009 - 21:59 ET by Clear thinkerWhen you are part of the 'culture of death' you are always a victim. This time it's probably 'whitey's fault'!
Obama Ok’s Killing Of Babies World-Wide
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Washington wins in the
February 3, 2009 - 22:16 ET by SnappyWashington wins in the end?
Are you kidding me? I thought this was actually a perfect example of hope and change in effect? I thought he didnt want the same old Washington insiders and business as usual? "Shake things up" bring in a breath of fresh air, out with the old and in dawns a new day, or whatever he was selling during the election, guess he didnt count on the Dimocrats getting called out for being Washington insiders or tax dodgers, If he has fallen for the MSM bias line and actually believes his own shtick we are in for a bigger mess than I thought.
I think there's a point
February 4, 2009 - 01:46 ET by RR GOPI think there's a point there. What if he had flooded his admin with naive ideologue amateurs like Carter did? No, can't do that, a few maybe.
Find experienced, political-savvy people that can get the job done that don't have any baggage? No, not going to happen.
The thing that ticks me off is that the MSM and the nastiest people on earth (the Democrats/Communists) insisted that he had all the answers and elevated him to a God-like status while going way over the line and bashing a good man and a decent sitting President in George Bush.
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
Washington wins in the end
February 4, 2009 - 05:53 ET by eaglewingz08Washington wins in the end (Well if it was George Washington I would have to agree that he won in the end). But who is more Washington than Mr. Deadbeat Daschle? Only ONE republican came out before Deadbeat's withdrawal of his nomination, to have Deadbeat Daschle do so, Sen. JIM DeMINT, Thank you, sir for upholding your OATH of office! So, I guess the NYSlimes, in Ms. Couric's opinion is Washington Winning? And I guess I must have missed that phrase when Judge Bork was defeated in his nomination to SCOTUS? Was that Washington Winning too? Was that a sad day to Ms. Couric? How about when Eugene Scalia was not allowed a proper vote by then Majority Leader Deadbeat Daschle, was that Washington Winning, too?
And to think Couric is the hack whose hands McCain placed the success of Gov Palin into.
Absurd Katie
February 4, 2009 - 07:07 ET by jdlybrandnewsisblues
My favorite Katie question was to a Marine sniper; she asked "What do you feel when you kill a terrorist"?
His answer; "A slight recoil".
Semper Fi
Great comeback
February 4, 2009 - 07:40 ET by jackssnI'm going to send this to a frend who's hubby was marine. She will get a kick out of it.
jackssn ETCS(ss) retired
Obama Has No Character
February 4, 2009 - 07:30 ET by Retired GeekHow does someone defend a person with NO character?
Obama Character
---------------
1) The summation of all of Obama's decisions and actions (judgment).
Chose a 'Black Separatist Church' to raise his kids in.
2) Obama's personally held values.
Brother and Aunt living in poverty and Obama ignores them.
3) Obama's view on sancity of life.
Thinks 'Partial Birth Abortion is a right for women.
4) Obama's defense of the helpless.
Worked hard to deny any aid to babies dying in excruciating pain.
5) Obama's associations, allies and friends.
ACORN, Terrorists, Communists, Socialists.
6) Obama's honesty and personal integrity.
Lies about anything for political expediency.
Those Trying to Defend Barack Obama have no other recourse than to attack the messenger of the truth about him or change the subject.
Those Trying to Defend Barack Obama have no other recourse than to point to other peoples bad behaviour in hopes of mitigating the horrendous lack of empathy that Barack Obama has for defenseless little Babies.
Those Trying to Defend Barack Obama have no other recourse than to try and point to others 'Radical' alliances and friendships in hopes of changing the subject.
Those Trying to Defend Barack Obama have found there is absolutely NO way to defend Barack Obama so they use any ruse they can to get off subject or change the topic.
Attempting to defend Barack Obama is a 'fools' quest at the very best.
http://hisfacts.blog...
http://hisfacts.blog...
Hey Greek
February 4, 2009 - 09:59 ET by BlondeI don't know what Obama is doing about his paper-shack bro, but this was linked on Drudge this a.m.:
Group Calls On Obama To Deport Aunt
Will the press even ask him about this? Remember, during the campaign, he said he was in favor (??) of upholding our laws.
omg
February 4, 2009 - 09:13 ET by Duymon"oooh, poor baby! You got all riled up in Washington! Are you ok?"
WTF
THIS IS OUR PRESIDENT! Do the fecking libtards understand that by showing our president is a VICTIM of his govt they are reinforcing to the world that he is a naive know-nothing idiot?
So much for the new face of America...