Gibson Cues Up Obama Refutation on Ayers But Demands McCain Justify Topic

Photo of Brent Baker.

For ABC's World News on Wednesday and Thursday, Charles Gibson conducted interviews with Barack Obama and John McCain aboard the ABC News bus, but on McCain's “line of attack” against Obama he shared Obama's annoyance (“Are you going to have to address that again?”) while he pushed McCain to justify the criticism: “You're comfortable that this should be a focus in the last days of the campaign?”

With Obama in Indianapolis on Wednesday, Gibson noted how “John McCain has unloaded on you in the last 72, 96 hours, as has Sarah Palin” about how “we don't know who Barack Obama is,” but “were you surprised that he didn't bring it up last night at the debate and use that line of attack?” Gibson next cued up Obama, as if it's an unfair burden for Obama to “again” have to address Ayers: “Sarah Palin has come at you because of the Bill Ayers connection. Are you going to have to address that again?”

Talking to McCain on Thursday in Milwaukee, Gibson raised the obvious (“Does this almost monolithic focus on the economy, in the news, and in people's minds in recent weeks, hurt your campaign?”) before then treating McCain's efforts to change the subject as odd: “Why...have you focused so in what you've had to say on Senator Obama's character?” When McCain brought up Obama's level of “knowledge and judgment,” a befuddled Gibson pressed: “You don't think he's been thoroughly vetted, having gone through all the primaries he did, all the campaigning, running for President as long as you have -- two years?” As for Ayers, Gibson pushed McCain to show his own better judgment, posing the question cited above about being “comfortable” with making Obama's character an issue.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

As for Obama's being “thoroughly vetted,” two Media Research Center studies released in August proved otherwise:

Editing Reverend Wright’s Wrongs: How the Networks Censored and Manipulated Jeremiah Wright Soundbites and Glorified Barack Obama’s Race Speech”

Obama’s Margin of Victory: The Media; How Barack Obama Could Not Have Won the Democratic Nomination Without ABC, CBS and NBC,” determined:

Barack Obama had a crucial advantage over his rivals this year: the support of the national media, especially the three broadcast networks. At every step of his national political career, network reporters showered the Illinois Senator with glowing media coverage, building him up as a political celebrity and exhibiting little interest in investigating his past associations or exploring the controversies that could have threatened his campaign.

Gibson's first questions to set up the two segments weren't exactly equal as Gibson prompted Obama to expound, but pressed McCain to explain a supposed failure:

For Obama:

And we asked him about what we've been hearing on this trip.

For McCain:

And, we asked Senator McCain why at the debate the other night, there weren't more new ideas about how to solve the current economic crisis.

An example of similar questions to both:

To Obama: “Somebody said to us, where is the passion in these guys? Where is the anger? People have lost trillions of dollars in their stock accounts, in their pension plans, in their 401 (k) s. You said out there to this rally, fear and panic cannot pervade us. And yet, fear does right now. And people look to leaders to turn that around or to counter that.”

To Mccain: “We've talked to a lot of folks as we've taken this bus around the battleground states in the Midwest, and somebody said to us: 'I don't see the passion and I don't see the anger in either one of these guys.'”

Gibson's queries to Obama, from their interview on the ABC News bus parked in Indianapolis, as aired on the Wednesday, October 8 World News:

CHARLES GIBSON: All along our Midwest bus tour, the economy has been the first topic of conversation with people we've been meeting along the way. After two days in Ohio, we drove through an early fall rainstorm this morning across the border to Indiana and the Indiana State Fairgrounds here in Indianapolis. Barack Obama held a rally here where he focused on the economy, and he focused on people's fears. Those were the primary topics of our conversation with the Senator as he came on board to visit. And we asked him about what we've been hearing on this trip.

CHARLES GIBSON: Somebody said to us, where is the passion in these guys? Where is the anger? People have lost trillions of dollars in their stock accounts, in their pension plans, in their 401 (k) s. You said out there to this rally, fear and panic cannot pervade us. And yet, fear does right now. And people look to leaders to turn that around or to counter that.

[OBAMA]

GIBSON: You also said to this rally, we need new direction, we need new leadership in Washington. But what would you be doing right now that's any different than what the Bush administration has done or is doing?

[OBAMA]

GIBSON: But that puts you in a position -- that puts you in a position of essentially saying, trust me. I'm a 47-year-old guy with one term in the Senate, and you got to put your faith in me.

[OBAMA]

GIBSON: We passed a $700 billion rescue package, the market went down. The Fed said we'll be the primary lenders to banks and to businesses. The market tanked. We now have a worldwide rate cut to try to increase liquidity. The market is yawning at that today. It almost seems -- and the credit markets remain frozen. It almost seems as if rationality is out the window.

[OBAMA]

GIBSON: A group of kids at Bowling Green, I watched the debate with them last night. They don't believe the money's going to be there to pay for their loans to get them through four years of college. And then on top of that, I said to them, well, if you don't have faith in that, how many of you believe Social Security will be there when you get to be 65? 21 kids, 3 held up their hands. That again is a breakdown of faith in the system.

.....

GIBSON: In recent days, John McCain at his rallies has been talking a lot about Barack Obama the man, saying America doesn't really know Obama. So we asked Barack Obama about that in our conversation today.

GIBSON TO OBAMA: John McCain has unloaded on you in the last 72, 96 hours, as has Sarah Palin. McCain saying essentially we don't know who Barack Obama is, where he came from. I'm an open book. He's not. Were you surprised that he didn't bring it up last night at the debate and use that line of attack?

OBAMA: Well I am surprised that we've been seeing some pretty over the top attacks coming out of the McCain campaign over the last several days, that he wasn't willing to say it to my face. The notion that people don't know who I am is a little hard to swallow. I've been running for President for the last two years. I've campaigned in 49 states. Millions of people have heard me speak at length on every topic under the sun. And I've written two books which everybody who reads them will say are about as honest a set of reflections by at least a politician as are out there.

GIBSON: Finally, she's come at you; Sarah Palin has come at you because of the Bill Ayers connection. Are you going to have to address that again?

SENATOR BARACK OBAMA: Why don't we clear it up right now? I'll repeat again what I've said many times. This is a guy who engaged in some despicable acts 40 years ago when I was eight years old. By the time I met him 10 or 15 years ago, he was a college professor of education at the University of Illinois. And we served on a school reform board together. A board, by the way, that was funded by Walter Annenberg, who had been an ambassador and close friend of Ronald Reagan's. So I have talked to him about school reform issues, and the notion that somehow he has been involved in my campaign, that he is an adviser of mine, that I palled around with a terrorist, all these statements are made simply to try to score cheap political points. You know, look, I can handle these attacks for the remaining four weeks, but it's certainly not serving our democracy right now. We need to be having a debate about how we're going to yank ourselves out of a very difficult situation, and that's what I'm going to spend my time talking about.

Gibson's question to McCain on the ABC News bus parked in Milwaukee, as aired on the Thursday, October 9 World News:

CHARLES GIBSON: The economy continues to dominate the conversations on our tour of the Midwest battleground states. We traveled 620 miles so far, and our first stop this morning was Milwaukee to see Senator John McCain. That's actually his bus parked there. We talked to him about his recent attacks on Barack Obama, concerning the Illinois Senator's relationship with Bill Ayers, a radical from the 1960s. And, we asked Senator McCain why at the debate the other night, there weren't more new ideas about how to solve the current economic crisis.

[McCAIN]

GIBSON: Let me talk about that plan. $300 billion. New money? Or part of the $700 billion?

[McCAIN]

GIBSON: Some of the reaction to your plan, though, $300 billion to buy up mortgages: People say, “Look, I'm paying my mortgage. I didn't overspend, I didn't take a house that I couldn't afford. I'm paying my mortgage. Why are you going to help them and do nothing for me?”

[McCAIN]

GIBSON: We've talked to a lot of folks as we've taken this bus around the battleground states in the Midwest, and somebody said to us: “I don't see the passion and I don't see the anger in either one of these guys.”

[McCAIN]

GIBSON: One of the women the other night asking questions said, why should we trust either one of you guys with our money? Simple question, but I thought it was rather profound in that it expresses a basic lack of faith in any institution in this country.     

[McCAIN]

GIBSON: Does this almost monolithic focus on the economy, in the news, and in people's minds in recent weeks, hurt your campaign?             

[McCAIN]

GIBSON You were sort of humming along there in the polls for a while, and then this issue sort of pervaded everything, and it's not, it seems to-

McCAIN: Look, I'm not going to complain about the hand I'm dealt, my friend. We're coming up with solutions, trying to give the vision and leadership for the American people, and I'll accept their judgment.

GIBSON: Why, then, in recent days, have you focused so in what you've had to say on Senator Obama's character? Talked about the fact that we don't know him, that he's come out of no where, that's he's not an open book, et cetera.

McCAIN: Well, I'm not sure that's character. What I think it is, does he have the experience and knowledge and judgment, and has he made the right decisions, and has he been candid with the American people. And I think that's important.

GIBSON: You don't think he's been thoroughly vetted, having gone through all the primaries he did, all the campaigning, running for President as long as you have -- two years.

McCAIN: No, actually, I don't. In fact, Senator Clinton, in their debates, said the American people didn't know enough about him, including his relationship with Mr. Ayers. That's what she said and I agree with that. He launched his political career in his living room, in Mr. Ayers' living room. And I don't care about two washed up old terrorists that are unrepentant about trying to destroy America. But I do care, and Americans should care, about his relationship with him, and whether he's been truthful and candid about it.

GIBSON: Do you think his character or lack of candor disqualifies him to be President of the United States?

McCAIN: I'll leave that up to the American people. But I have every right to insist that he be candid and truthful with the American people. And he needs to be asked about it and he needs to be forthcoming.

GIBSON: You didn't raise that, this line of argument in the debate the other night. And I asked Senator Obama about that yesterday. He said, yeah, I'm surprised that John didn't say that to my face.

McCAIN: Oh, I'll be glad to -- again, two things I've never been accused of lacking. And one is passion, and the other is courage. I can accept a lot of the other criticisms. It didn't come up in the flow of conversation.

GIBSON: And you're comfortable that this should be a focus in the last days of the campaign?

McCAIN: Oh I think it's something that needs to be examined, just as Senator Clinton said it should be examined during their primary and never was.

GIBSON: Senator John McCain on our bus today.

 

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Neanthethal Press does it again.

Neanthethal Press does it again.

 

Question

What network is he on again?  I want to make sure it's scrubbed from my remote control.  MSM is so busy overlooking Ayers/ACORN/Wright stuff that they think treating the guy you aren't voting for like crap is professionalism. CHARley needs to turn in his journalist i.d. card and then take his pen to the real pen where hopefully he'll be able to interview BHO face to  face as his celly.  DIS-gusting

"I have a bracelet too" ..Barak Obama, Psychopath extremis 

Neanderthal Press rides again

Neanthethal Press does it again.

The point McCain is making about Obama's association with Ayers is this:

- you do not legitimize unrepentent terrorist by working with them, and
Obama did work with Ayers, consistently for 4 years, and even started
his political career in Ayers' living room

- is not Obama's judgment the issue here? I mean in this day and age
with terrorism being what it is, how can Obama work to protect the USA
against terrorists, if his history is one of "palling around with them"
as Sarah Palin put it?

- And it is also related to the other point McCain makes, that you
do not just sit down with a terrorist nation such as Iran, and "make
friends" over tea and say, "Oh, won't you please be nice now?" This is
what Obama advocates, and just as working with Ayers is bad judgment,
so too is sitting down with the evil, monster leaders of Iran without
preconditions. Obama is a jerk.

- the argument about what Ayers did was 40 years ago is a
re-direction trick. People certainly know Obama was only a kid then,
but that is not the issue, as the trick of re-direction is meant to
make you think. Instead, the intelligent issue, which Neanderthal Press
cannot comprehend, is rather that Obama de facto approved of Ayers'
attittude as an unrepentent terrorist, and even now refuses to admit he
was wrong to have this association, especially since he also launched
his political career in Ayers' living room.

Let us now re-direct ourselves. Question: Would you work closely with
an unrepentent terrorist on any project whatsover, even a few times, or
would you dissassociate yourself with such an "animal", immediately, if
not sooner?

Apparently Obama loves unrepentent "animal" terrorists.

Now let me add this note:

Obama gave a "pep talk" to a crowd of his cousin's terrorist followers
in Kenya in 2006, who by that time, had committed genocide on over
500,000 people, including burning people alive inside of churches, and
raping and murdering women and children and displacing hundreds of
thousands from their lands and their homes. Is this the makings of a
great president, or the makings of a maniac terrorist lover?

 

gibson

Gibson has really pulled out all the stops for Obama this election and showed his true partisan colors.

Call him and rant here: 212-456-4040 and let them have it with the SPECIFICS of their bias and don't let them forward you to their comment line.  I'd mention that they are doing exactly what their old bias said: ABC is at least 70 percent DEMOCRATS: http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/8096249b-e534-43ac-81ac-8c4722648377

Also email them here:

 http://abcnews.go.com/WN/

here: http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=World%20News%20with%20Charles%20Gibson

and at charlie.gibson@abcnews.com 

Saddam Hussein and terrorism.  The rest of the story...

http://www.regimeoft...

 

Charlie, how do you sleep at night

With that bag of bias for Obama tied so tightly around your neck each night?

What will you say if, Lord willing, the American people find their way and vote against this monster, in the first week after the election?

Yeah, I know... no bias here.

This is off topic, but I

This is off topic, but I thought I would share it with you guys. Proof that Obama is ignorant - or a devious Marxist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtO_eefhQ00

 

 

"We just want truth, we want fairness. We want that balance." ~ Sarah Palin (re: hypocricy of the press)

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" ~ Martin Luther King Jr.

Well Charlie,   let's say

Well Charlie,   let's say a candidate was friendly with an un-repentent KKK leader.  Would you give him a pass if he claimed; "I was only 8 years old when he was lynching people", or would you question  the judgement of anyone who would associate with a person like that?

When asked if he went to war with Iraq  to derail the impeachment vote:  “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

What McCain should have said to Charlie Gibson.

How Sen. McCain should have responded to Charles Gibson:

Gibson [to McCain]: “You're comfortable that this should be a focus in the last days of the campaign?”

No, Charlie. I'd be much more comfortable if you and the rest of the MSM were conducting yourselves like reporters; if you would simply try the ole standards of investigative reporting and of asking, and challenging, both candidates on the issues in front of us.

PS. Charlie. also said this: "All along our Midwest bus tour, the economy has been the first topic of conversation with people we've been meeting along the way." Well, I remember NB covering the story about the ABC tour thru Rome, NY. Mayor Brown and the city had looked forward to the visit, and the media attention, as they had some great economic news to share about new business coming to town and had planned a wonderful reception for ABC.

ABC came to town. They had misrepresented their agenda to Mayor Brown. They were not interested in the views of the town of Rome and it's citizens; rather, they were interested only in seeking out Bush/McCain haters and Obama supporters to support their candidate. Let me say, that I had a wonderful chat with Mayor Brown on the subject. (;~> Gary

Wow Gary, the only thing

Wow Gary, the only thing missing from ABC's Rome hit piece were the exploding gas tanks.

When asked if he went to war with Iraq  to derail the impeachment vote:  “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

Jerry. Yea and Charlie...

Jerry. Yea and Charlie... Gibson sittin on top of them when they blew! (;~> gary

This is ridiculous...

Why are McCain and Palin even talking to these people?

Good Point

The McCain campaign should have been smart enough to realize that most of the mainstream media are no longer objective journalists and have turned into Obama propagandists.

Because of that they should refuse to be interviewed by the likes of Brian Williams, Charlie Gibson, Katie Couric, Tom Brokaw, George Stefanpoulus, and the rest of the bunch.

Knowing that Palin is going on SNL this week I can only hope she sticks it hard to Tina Fey and maybe does a parody of her.

At the very least, when

At the very least, when Gibson said this:

“You don't think he's been thoroughly vetted, having gone through all
the primaries he did, all the campaigning, running for President as
long as you have -- two years?”

McCain should have responded thus:

No, Charlie, he hasn't.  Because the media, yourself included, have spent two years following him around as cheerleaders, not journalists, and have not had an iota of interest in doing your job.  The media's  idea of "vetting" has been to ask the candidate about these things, and then to report that he said they are untrue; end of story.

And ditto for Joe Biden.  Bloggers have written about 14 lies that Biden propounded as fact during his debate with Gov. Palin, and you guys haven't mentioned any of them.

So how is "vetting" supposed to work, Charlie?

Even if we ignore Ayer's

Even if we ignore Ayer's terrorist past, everything else about his radical life should be enough to disqualify Obama from being elected. They work together because they have a shared idealology: socialism. They despise capitalism. The project they worked on together was designed to radicalize the education system by encouraging students to reject capitalism and embrace socialism.

And it's not just Ayers. I can't believe Rev. Wright, another socialist who rejects capitalism,  hasn't been brought out as well. There's a long line of socialist connections in Obama's life. Hell, just read Obama's own books, one of which some believe was actually written by Ayers.

No, we don't need to talk about Ayer's terrorist past. That's just the icing on the cake. But, that this country may be willing to elect a man with the shady associations that Obama has tells me that this country may already be too far gone. 

By the way, Obama has now admitted to once having Kenyan citizenship, if that matters to anyone. It's on his website, which I won't link to here.  

 

Obama's Economic plan: more taxes, more spending, more regulation. Prosperity here we come.

Does this disqualify Obama?

No. It just makes McCain a better choice. Why does Obama have to be disqualified for McCain to be better? What a straw man! Why do they demand that McCain score a knockout, but Obama only needs to stay on his feet? Because of five poll points? McCain's within the margin of error. It's a staggering double standard.

The media demands that McCain prove that Obama is insane, criminal, or a dope peddlar. But then in their next breath, they do everything they can to minimize anything McCain says. They draw the line for what McCain "has to do," but they move the line if McCain gets close.

McCain would have to create two miracles: one normal miracle and then the miracle of getting the media to report it.

Where did all this headstart come from? I'll tell you - it's a fiction invented by reporters to justify their bias. They trying to make it impossible for McCain to be judged evenly.

Is Gibson a stalker?

The man has no shame, no credibility after his Pain interview and now fully shows he is in the tank for Obama.

I don't get it?  He got bashed for the "gotcha" tactics with Palin and didn't learn anything.  He just couldn't wait to get his hands on McCain.

I call this stalking! 

Who's watching the watchers?

"GIBSON: You don't think he's been thoroughly vetted, having gone through all the primaries he did, all the campaigning, running for President as long as you have -- two years."

Isn't that the question the press should be asking themselves? They've known Obama was an up and comer since the speech at the democratic convention. Currently we still know little more than we knew then.

The total lack of investigative reporting by the media is a sorry commentary on the profession.

I've never watched...

Charlie Gibson on TV until he interrogated Sarah Palin.  Also, until that interview the thought of that guy had never entered my mind.  Now that I know he is a Liberal, it explains to me why he acted like a pompous ass.  No wonder the media's approval rating is below that of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.  Jim Webster

CHARLES GIBSON: "Somebody

CHARLES GIBSON: "Somebody said to us, where is the passion inthese guys? Where is the anger? People have lost trillions of dollars in their stock accounts, in their pension plans, in their 401 (k) s. You said out there to this rally, fear and panic cannot pervade us. And yet, fear does right now. And people look to leaders to turn that around or to counter that."

 

I would pay money if Mc Cain would say: Me?? How about you guys in the press? Where is the anger? Why don’t you investigate who was responsible for this? Why are you not asking for heads to roll? Why are you not sticking mikes in front of Barney Franks or Chris Dodd?? Why are you not asking Clinton why he expanded this give a way? Why are you not asking Carter why he thought that giving loans to people that could not afford it, was a good idea?? Why are you not asking Obama why he has these people advising him? Why? Why? Why??

 

You, the press, tell me that one of your jobs is working for the American people, DO YOUR JOB!!!! Jack A$$..

 

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

 

Where is..?

Where is Charles' half moon glasses? Where is his stack of notes? Where is Charles' high(er) chair?

Charlie, to which question?

Charlie Gibson,

To which question should McCain have responded and questioned Obama's cred's?  You libs set the debate with the questions which The Dinosaur chose.  Were there questions from the gallery which Brokaw rejected which would have raised the issue?

"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."


G. W. F. Hegel

It Must Painful

BigSpoon65

Must be very hard for Charlie to take off his "Obama Hope/Change lapel pin before conducting these GOP roasts!

Conservative.....Because we can't all be on welfare!

McCain just sounds like a