A week-and-half before he'll moderate the third and final presidential debate, CBS's Bob Schieffer opened Sunday's Face the Nation by calling a foul on one team as he took sides and denounced Sarah Palin's daring to say, that “our opponent is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who targeted their own country,” as a sign of “a campaign that's turned down and dirty,” as well as “nasty,” thanks to John McCain's “new attack dog” who “took after Barack Obama in a style reminiscent of Spiro Agnew when he was Richard Nixon's running mate.” In the Washington press corps, a comparison to Agnew is no compliment.
Later in the program, he fretted to New York Times columnist David Brooks: “Do you think it's going to get nastier and nastier? It does look as if McCain is really going on the attack. You saw what Sarah Palin said.” Brooks, whom Schieffer labeled as a “conservative columnist,” assured Schieffer it would be an ineffective tactic since “Republicans have been using this attack -- too dangerous, too liberal” for “too long” and “you can't win that way anymore.”
Sunday night, ABC reporter David Wright described Palin's reference to Bill Ayers as “incendiary” as he asserted on World News: “Today, in San Francisco, Sarah Palin defended her incendiary comments that Barack Obama has been 'palling around' with terrorists.” Earlier in the day, ABC's This Week host George Stephanopoulos had scolded guest Tim Pawlenty about Palin's charge: “When Governor Palin says of Obama 'this is not a man who sees America as you do,' it sure does sound like she is questioning Senator Obama's patriotism.”
From the Sunday, October 4 Face the Nation on CBS:
BOB SCHIEFFER: Today on Face the Nation: the Palin factor, the bailout package and a campaign that's turned down and dirty. Down in the polls, the McCain campaign has found a new attack dog:SARAH PALIN: The heels are on, the gloves come off.
SCHIEFFER: McCain's once embattled running mate, Sarah Palin. Will it work? And what bout the bailout, will it make a difference in this campaign? All questions for Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California; Representative Heather Wilson, Republican of New Mexico; House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, Republican of Missouri; and Governor of Michigan Jennifer Granholm. David Brooks will be here with a Campaign Quick Check, and I'll have a final word on the bailout. But first, the campaign turns nasty, on Face the Nation.
....
SCHIEFFER: Well, good morning again. We had two major events last week. First, Congress passed the bailout. We won't know for a while if it is going to work. What we do know is that we have a very hot presidential campaign, and we saw last week the second thing, the emergence of the -- Sarah Palin as the McCain camp's new attack dog. Yesterday she took after Barack Obama in a style reminiscent of Spiro Agnew when he was Richard Nixon's running mate. Listen to what she said in California.
SARAH PALIN: These are the same guys who think patriotism is paying higher taxes. Remember, that's what Joe Biden said. Now, this is not a man who sees America as you and I see America. We see America as a force for good in this world. We see an America of exceptionalism. [reacting to crowd] Yes, USA! USA! Our opponent is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who targeted their own country.
SCHIEFFER: So, that was Sarah Palin yesterday out in California. Let's start with Congresswoman Heather Wilson. Do you agree with that line of attack, that Barack Obama does not see America as a force for good?
U.S. REP. HEATHER WILSON (R-NM): He has actually, you know, he goes over to Germany and talks to the Germans about America and the need to tear down the walls between the United States and our European allies as if it's all America's fault that we've, you know, we're in the situation that we're in. That's not what we expect from our President. We expect someone to stand up for America and to realize that America is a force for good in the world and has been for a century.
SCHIEFFER: Well, that sounds like you're saying that he's somehow unpatriotic, which seemed to be the underlying theme of what she said yesterday, Congresswoman.
WILSON: Well, he has talked down about America. And you know, we've always had this history of saying, “Well, you know, politics ends at the water's edge,” and it didn't for Barack Obama. He's been critical not only of the President, but of American policy and hence of a -- has kind of a negative view of America in the world. That's not unusual, frankly, among liberals in kind of post-Vietnam America to say that America's the problem. I think Sarah Palin believes that America is part of the solution. We are an exceptional country, we are a force for good and we need to talk about the good things we do.
SCHIEFFER: Well, let's see what Senator Feinstein would say about that. The ad also suggested that he is the pal of a -- of a terrorist. That refers, of course, to Bill Ayers, who was part of the anti-Vietnam underground weather people, I think was the name of it. He's now a professor in Chicago. She suggested that they're pals. What about this whole thing, Senator?
...
SCHIEFFER: Do you think it's going to get nastier and nastier? It does look as if McCain is really going on the attack. You saw what Sarah Palin said.
DAVID BROOKS: Right. Liberal, and -- she botched -- there's a legitimate point in there, the belief in American exceptionalism, Americans can stand alone because we're an unusual nation. But she botched the argument of that. And I just don't think that's going to work this year. You know, Republicans have been using this attack -- too dangerous, too liberal, too liberal -- too long. They used it against Paul Wellstone, the Senator in Minnesota, about a decade ago. It's worked less and less each time. This economic crisis changes the climate of the country. We were in a conservative era where conservatives could win running conservative vs. liberal campaigns. Because of this economic crisis and a bunch of other stuff, we're no longer in a conservative era. You can't win that way anymore. You better win the way of this new era. And I'm afraid the Republicans are not adapting to this new era.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





SCHIEFFER: Do you think it's going to get nastier and nastier? It does look as if McCain is really going on the attack. You saw what Sarah Palin said.













Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Define Nasty...
October 6, 2008 - 02:47 ET by Radar_OneIs it nasty when people attack McCain for his age?? Is it nasty when you try to say that your daughter actually had your down syndrome child??? I am confused raising a point about ties to a KNOWN Domestic Terrorist is nasty, but outright gossip isn't a lie? Oh well....theres the "we're not biased" coverage from the MSM.
Barack Obama= Half Honkey...ALL Donkey
The horse is out of the barn
October 6, 2008 - 03:09 ET by NortoThe horse is out of the barn and the public is probably buying it, sad to say. NB is great reading, but having little or no effect on the msm's bias, only giving it more space and may even be encouraging the likes of those mentioned herein today's stories and exacerbating the situation.
The only prayer is that evangelical, white women will come out on election day and steam roll this thing, I have no proof, just praying.
A campaign that's turned down and dirty,” as well as “nasty?
October 6, 2008 - 04:08 ET by The Goat WhispererWhat planet has Bob Schieffer been on since the democRAT National CONvention? As long as Governor Palin is NOT a democRAT, dragging her children through the dirt isn't down and dirty.
Oh that's right. Bob pimps for SeeBS network.
Babbling Brooks, liberal crooks
October 6, 2008 - 04:25 ET by Jack BauerWith "conservfauxtives" like Brooks, who need liberals?
Hey David Brooks, take a hike to your next Manhattan upper east side cocktail party.
You can join your effete, metrosexual lieberal friends in sneering about the millions of folks who are more like Sarah Palin, than the very minority report Sally Quinn
Then on Nov 5, you can echo that famous elite quote: "How'd THEY win. I don't know anyone who voted for McCain/Palin."
And that'll be the first thing you've written in years I'll actually believe
Jack!
October 6, 2008 - 05:03 ET by MrShy"Hey David Brooks, take a hike to your next Manhattan upper east side cocktail party."
Maybe I'll hop the cross-town bus and crash it, listen in on what the latest faux-conservative/leftist party chatter is in this leftist, loony town. :p
NOW PLAYING:
Governor Palin Get Your Gun
Mr S .. I guess you mean
October 7, 2008 - 13:25 ET by Jack BauerMr S .. I guess you mean crash the party, not the crosstown bus! Though the later would make more of a splash!
I miss those handy NY buses and my metrocard. How much is weekly card these days?
David Brooks Is a Disgrace
October 6, 2008 - 05:52 ET by henryblackDavid Brooks being allowed to pose as a conservative commentator is getting farcical. This guy should be ousted and the media should stop labeling him conservative. This joke is getting stale.
Keep going
October 6, 2008 - 05:24 ET by ConLosRepublicanosNoThe media can do whatever the f they want, Americans need hear this. I sure hope McCain goes after Obama on this during the debate, I don't care if it is an economic debate. Also David Brooks is no consevative, he tries but he is no consevative.
Obama: "No, if we're going to ask questions about who is promulgating negative ads that are completely unrelated to the issues at hand, I think I win that contest pretty handily"
520 Electoral Votes
October 6, 2008 - 05:49 ET by TexndocThat's how many electoral votes Nixon and Agnew won when Agnew was Nixon's "attack dog". I'm sure the media hated them with good reason. Oh, but in case of trivia: McGovern did win DC.
Schiet fer brains playing dumb.........
October 6, 2008 - 05:51 ET by old croIt's not an act....
SCHIEFFER: Well, let's see what Senator Feinstein would say about that.
The ad also suggested that he is the pal of a -- of a terrorist. That
refers, of course, to Bill Ayers, who was part of the anti-Vietnam
underground weather people, I think was the name of it. He's now a
professor in Chicago. She suggested that they're pals. What about this
whole thing, Senator?
Who is he trying to fool with this statement? Yessirree Bob, he's now a respected professor and she's also just suggesting they're pals. Buy a clue you numbnutz.
Don't forget To Digg this story!
October 6, 2008 - 05:57 ET by henryblackDon’t forget to digg the story. The buttons are at the end of the post. The Huffs and other Dem sites are dominating social sites like digg and yahoo buzz. We should change that.
You know, Republicans have
October 6, 2008 - 06:16 ET by MidAmericaYou know, Republicans have been using this attack -- too dangerous, too liberal, too liberal -- too long. They used it against Paul Wellstone, the Senator in Minnesota, about a decade ago. It's worked less and less each time.
It won't cost an election to declare your conservative beliefs but no politician dare run as a self declared unabashed liberal. Even obama, since winning his nomination has moved to the center to avoid being labeled liberal. In fact he's even adopted some conservative positions like tax cuts and securing our borders. So if slamming the democrat as liberal is less than effective it's because liberals disguise who they are and run as centrists.
That's not all he's
October 6, 2008 - 18:29 ET by chambodiaThat's not all he's "adopting." He said he was one of the one to warn against his friends in Fannie and Freddie (I suppose to diminish McCain's efforts in that area). If there is proof of that, I'd like to see it. Or is it another case of "Me, too."?
conservative icons
I know that I am not
October 6, 2008 - 06:20 ET by SeashellI know that I am not suppose to change the subject but Mika just had a fit about the Ayers issue being raised and is saying we must now talk about Keating. I think the MSM is worried!
Saw that.
October 6, 2008 - 06:39 ET by TexndocMika is spinning like the loon she is. I love the look on her face and her downturned eyes as she speaks and doesn't believe a word of what she's saying.
I know I'm not the only one.....
October 6, 2008 - 06:44 ET by MOONSTRUCKBut it scares the crap out of me that there are many (American's) who believe it is okay to sweep ALL of barry's associations under the rug. It just doesn't matter what he does or has done. He's the chosen one. It's OKAY!!
I would have NEVER voted for barry based on his liberal beliefs. But when the reverend wright story broke, my head nearly exploded. This one "association" makes me sick. And listening and watching the congregation react to his "sermon". Unreal!
I pray the majority of American's wake up before Nov. 4th.
Ditto that
October 6, 2008 - 06:51 ET by SeashellDitto that moonstruck!
This is just like Bill
October 6, 2008 - 06:56 ET by motherbeltThis is just like Bill Clinton all over again. Character doesn't matter. And just like with Clinton, the media will push that line. They will ignore for him, spin for him, probably even lie for him. That's why McCain doesn't have a chance.
And when he's President, you can forget about them being the watchdogs of government.
Our only hope is that after two years of him, the American people will wake up and throw out of Congress and the Senate every Democrat who's running for re-election, and put the brakes on some of it.
But Obama can't hide behind a third-party candidate either
October 6, 2008 - 09:07 ET by Mary Louise TurnerYes, I know the MSM is performing every sick trick in the book to get the "Anointed One" elected. However, there is one key difference between Mr. Obama and Mr. Clinton. In 1992, there was a viable third party candidate, H. Ross Perot. He siphoned votes away from Bush/Quayle and enabled "Slick Willie" to win. This year's third party candidates are strictly on the fringe, so Mr. Obama can't get help from them.
Oh man I get a kick out of Schieffer.
October 6, 2008 - 06:58 ET by superconI like the way he talks about the name of the group as if no one had ever heard of them before including himself.
"That refers, of course, to Bill Ayers, who was part of the anti-Vietnam
underground weather people, I think was the name of it. He's now a
professor in Chicago."
I wonder if this week after Obama launches his new attack if he will be saying"Apparently McCain has had some financial scandal of his own with this..Keating ...or Kooting ...or something or other five group.Anyone ever hear of them...?"
I'm sure he will know all the details.
Victory in Iraq.
Liberals suck.
McCain for Preznint.
Obama is not patriotic
October 6, 2008 - 07:33 ET by kg"it sure does sound like she is questioning Senator Obama's patriotism.”
Obama is not patriotic in any sense of the word.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
Those of us old enough
October 6, 2008 - 07:38 ET by IamTinmanThose of us old enough to remember the Days of Rage in Chicago, The Students for a Democratic Society, and the Weather Underground, remember Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn well.
When the prosocialist SDS proved to be too peaceful for Dohrn, they formed the Weather Underground.
The Weather Underground used the Vietnam War as a recruiting and fundraising issue but they were relentlessly pursuing a pro-communist agenda.
Schieffer and Brooks well know Ayers and Dohrn and what they are, unrepentent terrorists!
If a man is known by the company he keeps, then Barack's in a heap o'trouble!
the manufactured disdain is
October 6, 2008 - 08:34 ET by ugottalaughthe manufactured disdain is expected and laughable... the presence of it is as telling as the absence of it when the smears were flying about sarah shooting wolves from helicopters and wanting to secede from the union.
The Truth
October 6, 2008 - 09:27 ET by Wildcatter1980Since when is telling the truth a "vicious attack"?
Oh, I forgot. We're not allowed to point out inconvenient truths or, for that matter, criticize the liberal left's Chosen One, the Obamassiah.