In 'Nightline Report Card' Stephanopoulos Gives Obama the Win

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

Awarding Barack Obama two grades of A-minus and one B-minus while presenting John McCain with two grades of B-plus and one B-minus, at the end of his “Nightline Report Card” segment on Friday night, ABC's George Stephanopoulos declared Obama the “winner” -- with a big illustrative check mark on screen:

Bottom line, the winner is Barack Obama. He comes into this race where the country wants change. His number one goal was to show that he belonged on that stage. He was a credible commander-in-chief, that he could hold his own on national security. He did that tonight. He gets the win.

The grades from the ex-Democratic operative: On “Strategy,” Obama an A-minus, John McCain a B-plus; for “Style,” Obama another A-minus, McCain another B-plus; and on “Accuracy,” Obama got his lowest grade, a B-minus, McCain a B.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

In assessing “strategy,” Stephanopoulos trumpeted Obama's performance:

Even better was overcoming the bar on commander-in-chief. He comes in at a significant disadvantage on commander-in-chief. People wonder whether he as this experience to be President, to handle national security and I think on answer after answer after answer, he showed confidence, he showed toughness and he showed he belonged on that stage.

Looking at “style,” Stephanopoulos marked down McCain:

John McCain tended not to look either at his opponent, Barack Obama, or at the camera. He tended to address Jim Lehrer so he wasn't looking at the camera. Look at Barack Obama: He looked straight at the camera, he also was willing to engage John McCain again and again and I think he got the advantage there, so A-minus for Barack Obama, B-plus for McCain.

Full transcript of the segment on the Friday, September 26 Nightline:

TERRY MORAN: George Stephanopoulos joins us to grade tonight's action in the Nightline Report Card. All right, George, let's -- how you doing tonight?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Good, thank you.

MORAN: Let's start with their approaches. The approach that each candidate took, strategy. What are the grades?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Barack Obama A-minus, John McCain B-plus. Each of them had an offensive and a defensive strategy tonight. Let's take Obama first. On offense, he had to try to tie John McCain to George Bush and I thought he did that relatively effectively on the economy, particularly at the beginning. But even better was overcoming the bar on commander-in-chief. He comes in at a significant disadvantage on commander-in-chief. People wonder whether he as this experience to be President, to handle national security and I think on answer after answer after answer, he showed confidence, he showed toughness and he showed he belonged on that stage.

For John McCain, he also had two goals. On one, he had to try to tarnish Barack Obama on the issue of -- the question of experience, the question of judgment. He used the words often. How many times did he say Barack Obama doesn't understand. I think where he didn't do enough, even though he did a good job at showing how he was different from President Bush in the past, I don't think John McCain did enough going forward to show how he would take the country in a different direction. That's why I think Barack Obama gets the edge here. A-minus for Obama, B-plus for McCain.

MORAN: Okay, how about the intangibles, that's the substance, how about the style? What are the grades there.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Again, Barack Obama A-minus, John McCain B-plus. Let's take McCain first. He did do a good job. As you pointed out in your piece, he was crisp and he was declarative. I also thought he did a very good job at bringing out emotion over the course of the debate in telling stories, weaving that. But, and I want to show some of this here, John McCain tended not to look either at his opponent, Barack Obama, or at the camera. He tended to address Jim Lehrer so he wasn't looking at the camera. Look at Barack Obama: He looked straight at the camera, he also was willing to engage John McCain again and again and I think he got the advantage there, so A-minus for Barack Obama, B-plus for McCain.

MORAN: And just a follow-up on that, George, quickly. That visual contrast that's up there, that's historic really. Black, white, an older man, Barack Obama 47. What do you make of that?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Barack Obama a little taller, John McCain a little shorter. Generally the taller candidate wins for President. But there's something else going on here. I'm not sure if it was our monitor and I can't wait to see what people at home thought about this. It did appear that John McCain, at times, was looking a little more washed out than you might expect. And Barack Obama, and maybe I was wrong, but we were talking about it up here on the set, sometimes it seemed like the lighting on him was even darker than he appears in person. I'm wondering if people saw that at home as well.

MORAN: The perils of the makeup artist as you know as we both know there, George. How about accuracy. A lot of claims out there, what are the grades?

STEPHANOPOULOS: So many it's hard to sort them through all. But let's look at the grades. For Barack Obama, B-minus, John McCain a B. Again, they both were in the range for politicians. I think McCain had a trivial error when he told the story about Eisenhower's letters, he didn't actually say he'd resign, whether he wrote a letter of resignation before D-Day. He also said that Barack Obama would have the government take over the health care. That's not the Obama plan. But on the points where there's more engagement, I think Barack Obama had a little more trouble. He said that Admiral Mullen did not say his time line was dangerous, Admiral Mullen in fact did say that. They had a big dispute over whether Henry Kissinger wanted direct talks with Iran. He does want direct talks with Iran, but not at the presidential level, at the level of Secretary of State. So I give a little bit of an edge here because more time was spent on the areas where Barack Obama was a little less accurate than John McCain.

MORAN: Bottom line?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Bottom line, the winner is Barack Obama. He comes into this race where the country wants change. His number one goal was to show that he belonged on that stage. He was a credible commander in chief, that he could hold his own on national security. He did that tonight. He gets the win.

MORAN: All right. George Stephanopoulos declaring Barack Obama the winner. I might have gone a little bit the other way. I'm not sure.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Obama struck gold on

Obama struck gold on fashion sense, too!

Obama wore a magnificent bracelet he received from sgt, er, airman, er, ensign, um, *shuffle papers* lance corporal Smith from Blawnox, PA.

 

George...

What would have had to happen for Stephanopoulos to declare McCain the winner? Obama passing out? His pants falling down?

Bah

Senator Obama could have shown up thirty-five minutes late, still in his sweaty gym clothes, flipped everyone off and promptly walked back out, and he still would have been declared the winner based solely on the boldness of his debate style.

While chain-smoking... with

While chain-smoking... with a bottle of cheap scotch in his hand...

Yeah, do not forget mooning

Yeah, do not forget mooning the audience with a tattoo saying "I've got one too" on his rear....

....or walking in with

....or walking in with sunglasses on, 10 pound gold chain around his neck accompanied by p.diddie and Chris Rock singing 'Because I got High'  and then hip-hopping his way up to the podium.

...no wait, steffie would

...no wait, steffie would love that.

Steffie is too young to be

Steffie is too young to be senile.

 

I guess he must just be stupid.

But they are biased

These and others are why the media cannot be trusted...you must see or tape everythnig live these days...2008, the year the MSM died. Besides, I NEVER watch them.

Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)

Wrong & Not right George!

If anything McCain won by a narrow margin due to lower media expectations by he MSM, not to mention that Obama gave very few specifics; some of which went against his earlier statements from the trail.

Lefty wishful speculation came upon the news of McCain announcing earlier in the week that he suspend his campaign and the debate hoping that McCain was not ready or afraid to debate the chosen one. I do however think McCain missed a marked opportunity to point out that his bill to fix Freddie & Fannie was shot down by Obama's friends and fellow democrats.

McCain should have also had a line ready to refute Obama when he kept linking him to Bush and his Administration. "My friend Obama met with the Bush administrations yesterday, that doesn't make him a conservative." or "If you think Bush and I are joined at the hip, then why didn't he adopt my idea for the surge earlier than he did?" or "Even your buddy Chris Matthews knows that I'm a Maverick, my country always stands before my party." 

Stephanopolopolis

What a maroon!!!

lapdog of the left had that report card written back in July!!! The only thing he changed was the photo of Obama from Hillary.

If Stephanopoulos ever

If Stephanopoulos ever starts ranting he will be in the same ballpark as Olbermann. That is the only trait that seperates the two of them. I wish Obama would add him to his staff of 2500 of which 300 are advisors because Obama knows nothing. 

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

News Parody

These folks have become a parody of "news".  An ex-Clinton aide giving a report card on a debate.  Throw in a little Chris Cuomo and Diane Sawyer into the mix.   The receipe insures only Democrats will be in the audience. 

Then you wonder why ratings are down?

Poll

Funny, Drudge has a poll showing McCain winning 67% to Obama's 31%, even with the KosBots and DU's flooding it. The internet will do that.

D

Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.

McCain Should Have

McCain should have stuck to his guns and not gone to the debate. He should have reminded the American public that the Democrat congress had not passed legislation to deal with the financial "crisis" and that apparently it needed the Republicans' help to make a decision. That he has been elected by the people of Arizona to represent them in Congress and that right now his job was to take care of Arizonians just as he will take care of Americans when he is President. He could remind the people of Illinois that their representative, Obama, has not been doing his job. But, alas, McCain is too old-school polite to do that. Fortunately I'm not.

From the We Are Illinois.org Web Site: 

PRESS RELEASE: Does Obama even care?
1/16/2008

With five-year presidential campaign taking its toll, does Obama even remember which state he was elected to represent…does he care?

History holds true – another no-show job for Chicago Democrat

For Immediate Release - Jan. 16, 2008 CHICAGO 

That's like reading Marx to become an entrepreneur.

I saw Stephie's contortion

I saw Stephie's contortion of logic live.  His verdict was so lame that even Terry Moran rolled his eyes before lodging his disagreement.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

debate summary

mccain: senator obama just doesn't understand...

 obama: um uh er uh uh uh uh... john's right.

Media bias?

So wait, anybody who doesn't think that McCain blew Obama out of the water must be demonstrating blatant media bias?  I don't know, the debate seemed fairly even to me; I don't see where either one obviously came out on top.  So I can't see where one would get angry that someone had an opinion one way or another.  I mean, Fox News showed McCain to be the obvious winner - big surprise.  Why even bother getting worked up over people's opinions?  Doesn't anybody know the definition of "opinion?"

I do not think we will know

I do not think we will know the true outcome of this debate for a while.  It was pretty tight and the ramifications of the comments both candidates made will "Change" with time.

Sort of like "Antietam" for the military historians amongst us.

Drudge by contrast...

http://www.drudgerep... Shows a poll wherein some 250,000 people have voted. %68 say McCain won... Drudge I am sure would be considered a right wing propaganda machine by ABC News, but then since they in turn are a propaganda machine for Obama it is at least fair to work Drudge's poll into the balance. BTW Drudge had 29 million hits just yesterday.

last night's snap shot poll

Both CNN and Fox had "punch in" polling. Here were the numbers about midnight:

:                         CNN             FoxNews     TOTALS

McCain                15530             73800        104117

Obama                73250             15300        88550

These results show a few things:

1) for the total of all Democrats and Republicans and Independents, more voted for McCain where the vote ratio was 44% for Obama, but 56% percent for McCain.

2) CNN has a viewership that is mostly Democrats, that is a ratio of 3:1 over Republicans, yet Obama only got 7:3 ratio which, when a common denominator is used, yields 7:3 ratio out of 9:3 proving that many Democrats switched sides, at least when looking at debate performance. (A tie ratio would have been 9:3, but Obama only got 7:3).

3) FoxNews viewship is mostly Republicans, and that ratio is about 7:5 over Democrats according to recent viewer's survey. In this case McCain got a ratio of 3:1 and when the common denominator is changed for comparison we see that with a viewership of 7:5 McCain got a vote of confidence of 15:5 which exceeds a tie of 7:5 by 2 to 1

4) There was of course some independent voters in the mix, so the ratios are not perfect, but still close

5) Finally, the FoxNews poll also shows a much larger percentage of Democrats watch FoxNews than the percentage of Republicans that watch CNN.  Could it be that FoxNews presents both sides more fairly that CNN?

Ans: I watched the interviews after the debate and very strong arguments were allowed to be made by spokespersons from both McCain and Obama camps on FoxNews. I have watched CNN on occasion in the past, just to compare, and sure enough, CNN lets a Republicn who is a "numb nuts" speak on behalf of McCain/Palin, but picks the brightest Democrat to speak for Obama/Biden.

7) I believe it was 6 times Obama had to say something like, "Sen McCain is absolutely right", while McCain only agreed with Obama ever so slightly on a few key points (like doing something about the financial crisis). It seems McCain articulated much better, which was not just debating skills alone, but he has more knowledge in the background of all issues.

8) This simple survey shows that all the MSM commentators are clearly in the Obama camp, because they all said Obama won the debates, but the combined Democrat-Republican survey I just did proves them to be biased at bias can get.

9) I watched a discussion afterwards, where Juan Williams could NOT look anyone in the face when he said Obama won the debate and also while explaining why, showing Mr Williams, in truth, did not believe what he was saying. He finally did look the moderator in the face for those things that were simple statements of fact, however, proving he was embarassed when he lacked confidence in his support of Obama, but OK when what he said was just a statement of fact. All the other commentators looked the moderator in the face, because they all provided more balanced comments that were fairly truthful, including those comments favoring Obama. No one looked down or away when providing favorable comments for McCain.

 

Great post on polls

Fox VS CNN: Excellent example of two biased News channels leading to suggesting a draw as opposed to a landslide.

I am curious to know what others think of my post from the Drudge report.

Do you consider Drudge to be like Fox news, or more independent? 

 

I must confess that I do not

I must confess that I do not read Drudges post and therefore only hear snippets from others.

THere are only so many hours in the day for BD...

THEY GAVE MILLIONS OF MORTGAGE LOANS TO ILLEGAL ALIENS

THEY GAVE MILLIONS OF MORTGAGE LOANS TO ILLEGAL ALIENS

GREED!  BOTH PARTIES ARE EQUALLY TO BLAME FOR THIS ECONOMIC CRISIS!

With the bailout of mega investment business and banks on the front
burner. Nobody dare mention, that illegal immigration is implicated in
this financial catastrophe?  HOW THE BAILOUT WAS CAUSED.
www.familysecurityma...

Rep. Tancredo Demands Safeguards in any Economic Bailout
http://www.numbersus...

Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) has demanded that any bailout of the
finance industry should include safeguards that prevent the bank or
lender from recouping funds spawning from their own fraudulent or
dishonest activities.

Tancredo also wants to ensure that taxpayers do not provide assistance
to illegal aliens who have lost their homes and do not absorb any bad
debts owed to financial institutions. He maintains that these
protections are a "must" for any bailout package.

Rep. Tancredo also wants legislation passed that would require banks to
verify the legality of potential home buyers to ensure that illegal
aliens do not benefit from federally backed home loans.

JOIN 756.000 other American patriots at www.numbersusa.com , to stop
the travesty of our immigration laws. Learn about Immigration
governmental corruption at www.judicialwatch.org