Television journalists were nearly uniformly enthralled with Barack Obama's Thursday night acceptance speech, relieved he showed the toughness to take on John McCain directly, unlike, in their world view, all too-soft past Democratic nominees. Only FNC offered a contrarian view or mentioned the word “liberal” while David Gergen on CNN trumpeted the address as a “symphony” and a “masterpiece” with elements of Lincoln, MLK and Reagan.
ABC's Charles Gibson insisted that “four years ago John Kerry” was “held accountable for not being tough enough on George Bush,” and “Obama was obviously not going to make that mistake.”
On CNN, Gloria Borger decided: “If anybody ever thought that Barack Obama was not tough enough to run against John McCain, this speech should really put an end to that.”
Over at NBC, that network's political director, Chuck Todd, asserted:
Obama was basically sending a message to Democrats: I'm not going to be Michael Dukakis, I'm not going to be Al Gore, I'm not going to be John Kerry, I'm going to fight John McCain, I'm going to take him on. It was almost, it was almost him saying come on John McCain, let's drop the gloves.
CBS's Dean Reynolds concluded that Obama demonstrated “the will” to take on McCain in “perhaps the most pugnacious speech I've ever heard him give.” ABC's George Stephanopoulos hailed how “Obama really made an audacious choice tonight” to prove he is “tough enough to be commander in chief” by “going right on the attack against John McCain.” Later presenting Nightline's “Report Card,” on delivering “Red Meat” he awarded Obama an A.
Even the conservative Bill Kristol, on FNC, was impressed:
Barack Obama faced very high expectations tonight and, honestly, I think he met them and I honestly think he exceeded them.
Fred Barnes and Nina Easton actually uttered the word liberal, a term not heard on the other networks. Easton, of Fortune magazine, declared:
I thought it was a lost opportunity. I thought, the first half of it, I was looking at when he was talking about the economy, I'm thinking, “How many times have I heard this same speech from liberal Democrats over 20 years, not just at this convention?” Then he switches gear and he dismisses worn-out ideas and politics of the past, which is what he's just engaged in with his worn-out ideas and the politics of the past in the way he's attacking McCain.
The Weekly Standard's Barnes agreed “Nina’s right” as he saw “the same liberal speech” of past Democratic nominees, “only better delivered and it was quite magnificently delivered.”
Gergen, checking in from Manhattan, glowed as he began with a “Kool-aid” reference prompted by Anderson Cooper observing that Paul Begala's effusive praise for the speech showed he had drunk the Kool-aid:
Anderson, we're sharing the Kool-aid here tonight in New York. Listen, there are going to be people after this speech who are still fierce, fierce, fierce critics of Barack Obama. This opened up an important and legitimate debate the Republicans will carry on next week about issues, about the role of government in our lives. But as a speech, I was deeply impressed. In many ways it was less a speech than a symphony. It moved quickly, it had high tempo, at times inspiring, then it became more intimate, slower, all along sort of interweaving a main theme about America's promise, echoes of Lincoln, of King, even of Reagan and of Kennedy. It was -- it will not be in the -- I don't think it was as good as his civil rights speech, but as a political speech, it was a masterpiece.
My Tuesday night NewsBusters item, “Frustrated by Lack of 'Red Meat,' Not 'Hitting McCain Hard Enough,'” recounted the media's desire for tougher attacks on McCain.
ABC, CBS and NBC post-speech on Thursday night, August 29:
ABC News:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Charlie, plenty of fireworks in that speech. Barack Obama really made an audacious choice tonight. You know, the question hanging over him, is he tough enough to be commander in chief? Is he prepared? And he decided to answer it by going right on the attack against John McCain and tying him to President Bush. He is betting this election that on the question he can convince the American people that John McCain is running for a third Bush term....
CHARLES GIBSON: And four years ago John Kerry and a lot of Democrats were held accountable for not being tough enough on George Bush at this convention. And Barack Obama was obviously not going to make that move. He was not going to make -- if it was a mistake, not going to make that mistake.
STEPHANOPOULOS: There is absolutely no comparison. I think Barack Obama had something like 22 references to John McCain in this speech. Far more, five-times more than John Kerry had four years ago. But he did more as well: He defined the change tonight. He spelled out what he would do. And interestingly, at the end of the speech, he set up a defense against issues that have defeated Democrats -- on abortion, on gay rights, and on guns. We'll see over the next several months and over debates, whether it works.
CBS News:
DEAN REYNOLDS: I think Barack Obama answered an important question tonight to Democrats. And that is does he have the will to bring this case to John McCain? This was perhaps the most pugnacious speech I've ever heard him give, and I've been covering him since November. Talking not only about McCain's judgment, but the temperament, does he have the temperament to be commander-in-chief? Tough words from Barack Obama.
NBC News:
CHUCK TODD: I thought what was interesting is how Obama was basically sending a message to Democrats: I'm not going to be Michael Dukakis, I'm not going to be Al Gore, I'm not going to be John Kerry, I'm going to fight John McCain, I'm going to take him on. It was almost, it was almost him saying, come on John McCain, let's drop the gloves, let's go do this. Some Republicans are remarking at how negative they thought he was during this speech. It was tougher than they expected. And I'm guessing we're going to see quite the response next week when the Republicans take over and try to respond to this. This is a speech that a lot of Democrats have been waiting for, for months, particularly Hillary Clinton supporters who are wondering when is this guy going to define change and when is he going after McCain. He did both tonight very well.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





I thought it was a lost opportunity. I thought, the first half of it, I was looking at when he was talking about the economy, I'm thinking, “How many times have I heard this same speech from liberal Democrats over 20 years, not just at this convention?” Then he switches gear and he dismisses worn-out ideas and politics of the past, which is what he's just engaged in with his worn-out ideas and the politics of the past in the way he's attacking McCain.
CHUCK TODD: I thought what was interesting is how Obama was basically sending a message to Democrats: I'm not going to be Michael Dukakis, I'm not going to be Al Gore, I'm not going to be John Kerry, I'm going to fight John McCain, I'm going to take him on. It was almost, it was almost him saying, come on John McCain, let's drop the gloves, let's go do this. Some Republicans are remarking at how negative they thought he was during this speech. It was tougher than they expected. And I'm guessing we're going to see quite the response next week when the Republicans take over and try to respond to this. This is a speech that a lot of Democrats have been waiting for, for months, particularly Hillary Clinton supporters who are wondering when is this guy going to define change and when is he going after McCain. He did both tonight very well. 













Editor at Large
Comments Policy
GEORGE
August 29, 2008 - 05:14 ET by MidAmericaGEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: ......... He is betting this election that on the question he can convince the American people that John McCain is running for a third Bush term.
But.... obama also has to convince the American people that he won't be worse than a third Bush term. If McCain creates doubts about obama's abilities the third term ploy won't work. When gas prices went up obama's polls went down. Voters get nervous about 'change' when they feel unsure about their personal circumstances.
I wonder, if this idiot gets
August 29, 2008 - 05:41 ET by USA4freedomI wonder, if this idiot gets the job of the worlds most powerful man, and puts us in true danger with his simpleton ideas on foreign relations, will the MSM feel any responsibly?
Mc Cain needs to do the opposite of this idiot, town hall meeting, one on one type of talk. Quiet. Reserved. Dignified. No yelling. I don’t think that I would even go after Obama, I would just talk of the greatness of this country, how we have gotten here, how despite the Democrats talk (as always) of victims that this country is truly blessed. That it’s easyto go against the war when you are not in the position to vote (as in Obama was not even there to cast a vote, that is just how inexperienced he is).
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
I have been thinking of this
August 29, 2008 - 06:05 ET by USA4freedomI have been thinking of this all morning, I believe he will get a big bump out of this speech. In a few day or weeks when American starts to see that he backs up none of the rhetoric with actions his numbers will start to fall.
America will be hoodwinked for a few days with the MSM going overboard with the analysis. They (like the Democrats) will over play their hand in praise, while it starts to sink into the minds of Joe six pack that “hey he did not give any details” or has he ever.
He is an excellent READER. THAT’S IT. A READER!!!
My wife is an excellent speller, that does not make her the best choice for the leader of the free word.
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
He is an excellent READER.
August 29, 2008 - 06:09 ET by USA4freedomHe is an excellent READER. THAT’S IT. A READER!!!
My wife is an excellent speller, that does not make her the best choice for the leader ofthe free word.
Good idea for an ad there RNC??
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Negative campaigning redefined
August 29, 2008 - 05:51 ET by Mica the MagnificentSooo.
Getting tough and taking off the gloves and 'taking him on' is no longer 'going negative' according to the MSM.
I'm very surprised Obama isn't gagging with all those MSM tongues down his throat.
Mica, you should have
August 29, 2008 - 06:05 ET by motherbeltMica, you should have posted a "spew alert"!
Good thing I had just swallowed that sip of coffee!
I didn't watch the speech, but from reading here I gather he "went after McCain."
Isn't that "the same old politics?"
Me too!! bad
August 29, 2008 - 06:06 ET by USA4freedomMe too!!
bad vision.....
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Spew alert continues . . .
August 29, 2008 - 06:11 ET by Mica the Magnificent. . . and Matthews joining in standing there in his boxers shaking his leg because the tingle tickles.
Euuuu.. thanks.. Ronald
August 29, 2008 - 06:34 ET by USA4freedomEuuuu.. thanks..
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Although not the "ideal" candidate.....
August 29, 2008 - 05:56 ET by old croJohn McCain showed a lot of class in his message to the O. I don't know if I am warming more towards him or him looking so much better when compaired to the dems. He has said some things lately that I like, but, has done things in the past that irritate the heck out of me. His campaign lately has done a good job, especially using humor in thier adds. My thought of a campaign poster would be someone looking like the Marlboro man with a bullet in his mouth, written along the length of the bullet, "McCain 08". IMHO his VP pick will seal the deal if he "chooses wisely".
Gloves off?
August 29, 2008 - 06:08 ET by Cool ArrowBlack Velvet is smooth as James bond
The old Navy man may have temper issues, but he better let loose with a little of it, because he just got accused of negligent homicide
Torches & Pitchforks
So when Obama is President
August 29, 2008 - 06:14 ET by motherbeltSo when Obama is President the homeless will disappear and no one will be poor?
Wow.
Even Jesus said that "the poor will always be with you."
He knows what he's doing
August 29, 2008 - 06:16 ET by Cool ArrowNothing instills the embrace of liberal ideology like a good downsizing.
Obama is preparing us for a big step down in the international arena.
Torches & Pitchforks
MB, "So when Obama is
August 29, 2008 - 07:50 ET by MassConservMB,
"So when Obama is President the homeless will disappear and no one will be poor?"
Well, heck... The Chinese accomplished that for the Olympics. After raising our taxes, Obama will use the same method and pocket the "Change".
You missed nothing, mb
August 29, 2008 - 07:51 ET by KC MulvilleApparently, Obama's guiding principle is: "Individual responsibility and mutual responsibility, that's the essence of America's promise." But when economic times get tough, that American Dream is in danger.
His "new politics" spent the whole speech saying that the era of "old politics" is over. The new politics is about moving ahead together, completely unified. We all must work together. And then he told us that those nasty, greedy, war-mongering, city-drowning, hate merchants on the right were refusing to go along with the new direction. Why can't they just stop disagreeing with us, and accept our new direction? Again, without a trace of irony or self-reflection, he tried to scare us about how the GOP was ... trying ... to ... uh, um ... scare ... us.
And then, they lit fireworks.
Cool, Talk about temper
August 29, 2008 - 06:12 ET by USA4freedomCool,
Talk about temper issues, my wife got up and went to bed in the other room, because I was yelling at the TV.
I quote “ you can yell as loud as you like he is not going to hear you all the way to Denver!”
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
USA
August 29, 2008 - 06:18 ET by Cool ArrowAnd he will never hear you. He just wants to sift you like wheat.
Torches & Pitchforks
Same problem here, USA4Freedom!
August 29, 2008 - 06:20 ET by Mica the MagnificentMy wife makes me promise not to yell at the t.v.
It takes about 2 minutes of lib-speak before I make quick one liners, annoying her to the point she leaves the room.
If elected I will turn the oceans and rivers into wine: Chardonney for the Atlantic, Merlot for the Pacific and Ripple for the Harlem River. - - - Rumored to be a line in the first draft of Obama's speech.
I tell her, I cant help it,
August 29, 2008 - 06:24 ET by USA4freedomI tell her, I cant help it, our country is going to be in such deep crap with this guy.
I know I have railed against Mc Cain, I hope an pray he can give me some small reason (a solid conservative VP) to hold my nose and vote for him.
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Harlem river..ripple?? good
August 29, 2008 - 06:32 ET by USA4freedomHarlem river..ripple?? good one
A long time ago, my car broke down coming from a Yankees night game, right in the middle of the Harlem river bridge. I had my whole family with me. I prayed for it to start, finally after about 15 minutes (felt like 15 hours) it started.. I was out of there like a flash. That was the last time I went to a night game.
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Mystery fluid
August 29, 2008 - 06:37 ET by Mica the MagnificentI always enjoyed getting my car windshield washed with the mystery fluid by some homeless drug addict as I left Yankee Stadium.
I preferred the hobo free zone of Shea stadium.
A great mayor of the city
August 29, 2008 - 06:41 ET by USA4freedomA great mayor of the city got rid of the squeeze guys.. and his name is not Bloomburg.
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
prove he is “tough enough
August 29, 2008 - 06:22 ET by motherbeltprove he is “tough enough to be commander in chief” by “going right on the attack against John McCain.”
HUH???? Attacking McCain proves he can be Commander-in-Chief? I wish McCain would come back with something like "Attacking a political opponent is easy. It is not the same thing as commanding the armed forces; maybe ordering them to kill."
Someone said he had to give sort of a "State of the Union" address.
Did he find anything good to say about the USA? Other than how great it WILL be if we elect him?
Obama's toughness
August 29, 2008 - 06:58 ET by KC MulvilleObama proved he can look very tough, so long as he's reading from a teleprompter in front of wildly enthusiastic crowds.
Put him in a debate, in front of a crowd that isn't in his favor, where his opponent has the opportunity to fight back right there ... that's when Obama goes quiet, and not very tough, and all that rhetorical smoothness and poise becomes a halting mess.
He'll debate McCain anytime, anywhere, just not this summer or fall, 'cause he's booked up. Oh, and it can't be town hall, because he'll want time to have the questions leaked to him.
Obama: Big talk on "DEBATING ANY TIME, ANYWHERE..."
August 29, 2008 - 06:29 ET by krendlerThis is the 2nd time at least that Obama has stated how eager he is to debate John McCain on this or that (to a hurge reaction from the crowd). Yet, back in the real world - away from the teleprompters, the guy avoids debates like the plague (e.g., town hall meetings). He did the same during the Dem primaries.
McCain should do an ad on this.
Can't wait for the actual debates to start. Obama wasn't even able to hold his own against the Dem field. Against McCain, it's going to be like Cheney dressing down Edwards, only much, much worse.
Spot on! They should be
August 29, 2008 - 06:35 ET by USA4freedomSpot on!
They should be airing the ad right now!!
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
KC, I don't know what
August 29, 2008 - 07:12 ET by motherbeltKC, I don't know what happened to my "debate" comment (Darn Nanites!!). But I said pretty much the same thing. He only wants to do MSM-hosted debates where he can count on them to ask only the questions they know he wants to answer.
Ode to Obama: Friend of
August 29, 2008 - 07:34 ET by FoolicanOde to Obama:
Friend of motherless! Fountain of happiness!
Lord of the larder! Oh, how my soul is on
Fire when I gaze at thy
Calm and commanding eye,
Like the sun in the sky,
President Obama!
Thou art the giver of all that thy creatures love,
Full belly twice a day, a mattress to lie upon;
Every man white or black,
sleeps at peace in his shack,
Thou watchest over all,
President Obama!
Had I a baby of mine, ere he had grown as high,
even as a bread box or as an apple pie,
He should have learned to be
Faithful and true to thee,
Aye, his first squeak should be,
President Obama!
OBAMA SPEECH: ANOTHER ACTING JOB
August 29, 2008 - 07:35 ET by reelman46OBAMA SPEECH: ANOTHER ACTING JOB
Why
is it the more liberal an office seeker is the more they talk like
their record is not? The more they say that “you misunderstand”, that
“I meant”, that “commentators got it wrong”, that “this is my real
plan”. Why do they avoid their big gov-ment-high taxes-secular values
record?
The man has a radical secular socialist record like no other candidate
in history, was steeped in angry radical socialism as a youth, chose to
hang around angry radical socialists in college, chose to continue
hanging around with angry radical socialists after law school and chose
to be in a church led by an angry radical socialist for 20 years. A few
months, a few speeches and “all that” never happened?
This man is a “no achievement”, “no leadership’ dangerous radical who
still surrounds himself with the most radical liberals in politics.
Such a coward he won’t appear on Fox News or talk radio. What does that
tell you about his ability to defend his
“achievements-principles-record”?
Smiling confident speeches written by others can never erase a life of
acting and voting as a radical..unless you are a non-thinking (sucker)
voter.
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)
readers
August 29, 2008 - 08:08 ET by NonanonIt seems all of those who make money by reading what others have written are sticking together. Actors, anchors, African-American presidential candidates. Most who do that well but when off-script are bumbling idiots.
Since this orgasmic coverage of Obama is now well documented, it will be interesting (or revealing) to see how quickly the tone of coverage of McCain will switch to the attack and negativity we know is going to occur.
YES WE CAN'T!
August 29, 2008 - 08:16 ET by CrashCan we spend your money ... "Yes we can!"
Can we cut our pork ... No we can't!
Can we depend on foreign oil ... "Yes we can!"
Can we drill off shore ... No we can't!
Can we open nuclear plants ... No we can't!
Can we open new refineries ... No we can't!
Can America win a war ... "Yes we can!"
Can liberals win a war ... No they can't!
Can we trust Obama ... No we cant!
Not living up to the hype
August 30, 2008 - 17:12 ET by lareeIt didn't get er done for me sorry. I just wasn't feeling the magic. If he wasn't a historic candidate, would the pundits have been more critical of the speech? Peggy Noonan was pretty honest makes me think, she isn't going to play the game, that his color makes any difference when it comes to critiquing his words and performance.They are not doing him any favors if he needs to retoo,l he could use honest feedback.