CBS Relays Obama-Backer Buffett's Specious Claim Rich Under-Taxed

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

Missing a golden opportunity to correct a specious presumption of Barack Obama and his liberal supporters that the wealthy are under-taxed, CBS reporter Chip Reid on Monday night highlighted how “ending the Bush tax cuts for people making more than $250,000 a year and using the money for a tax cut for the middle class” is one of Obama's highest priorities and one supported by “Warren Buffett, the richest man in the world who, despite his billions, says the rich are not taxed enough.” Reid, who later in his story asserted “critics wonder how” McCain could possibly balance the budget “given his support for extending all of the Bush tax cuts,” failed to inform viewers of how the wealthy increasingly pay far more than their fair share of income taxes.

The Tax Foundation reported on July 18 that new 2006 IRS tax data revealed “both the income share earned by the top 1 percent of tax returns,” those earning $388,806 or more, “and the tax share paid by that top 1 percent have once again reached all-time highs.” Gerald Prante pointed out those top 1 percent “paid about the same amount of federal individual income taxes as the bottom 95 percent of tax returns.” The top 5 percent, those making $153,542 or more, earned 36 percent of all the reported income, but they paid just over 60 percent of the total income taxes collected.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

An excerpt from the Tax Foundation's “Summary of Latest Federal Individual Income Tax Data,” by Gerald Prante posted on July 18:

The latest release of Internal Revenue Service data on individual income taxes comes from calendar year 2006, a year in which the economy remained healthy and continued to grow, increasing individual income tax collections along with overall average effective tax rates.

This year's numbers show that both the income share earned by the top 1 percent of tax returns and the tax share paid by that top 1 percent have once again reached all-time highs. In 2006, the top 1 percent of tax returns paid 39.9 percent of all federal individual income taxes and earned 22.1 percent of adjusted gross income, both of which are significantly higher than 2004 when the top 1 percent earned 19 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI) and paid 36.9 percent of federal individual income taxes....

From other IRS data, we can see that in 2006, 92.7 million of the tax returns came from people who paid taxes into the Treasury. That leaves 43 million tax returns filed by people with positive AGI who used exemptions, deductions and tax credits to completely wipe out their federal income tax liability. Not only did they get back every dollar that the federal government withheld from their paychecks during 2005, but some even received more back from the IRS....

The top-earning 25 percent of taxpayers (AGI over $64,702) earned 68.2 percent of the nation's income, but they paid more than four out of every five dollars collected by the federal income tax (86.3 percent). The top 1 percent of taxpayers (AGI over $388,806) earned approximately 22.1 percent of the nation's income (as defined by AGI), yet paid 39.9 percent of all federal income taxes. That means the top 1 percent of tax returns paid about the same amount of federal individual income taxes as the bottom 95 percent of tax returns....

The first half of Reid's story, about the economic policies of the presidential candidates, from the Monday, July 28 CBS Evening News:

CHIP REID: In Washington today Barack Obama huddled with his economic team, people who've served Presidents from Carter to Clinton, even George W. Bush.

BARACK OBAMA: We have to change course and we're going to have to take some immediate action.

REID: One of his first priorities: Ending the Bush tax cuts for people making more than $250,000 a year and using the money for a tax cut for the middle class, a position with broad support in this room and on the phone.

OBAMA: Warren, are you on?

WARREN BUFFET, AUDIO: I'm here. I'm here.

REID: "Warren" is Warren Buffett, the richest man in the world who, despite his billions, says the rich are not taxed enough. But Obama has also called for more spending on everything from universal health care to a new economic stimulus package, and with the deficit now soaring, even these great minds may have trouble finding the money. John McCain has also surrounded himself with some of the best minds in business, including Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett Packard and Meg Whitman, former head of E-Bay. Today they briefed reporters on the importance of cutting taxes on business to create jobs. Lying

FIORINA, AUDIO: Small business is the engine of growth in this economy.

REID: McCain says he'll balance the budget by the end of his first term, but critics wonder how that's possible given his support for extending all of the Bush tax cuts....

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well the liberal's answer

Well the liberal's answer to the question of how much tax the wealthy should pay is always "More."

If they still have more money than other people after paying their taxes, they're not paying enough.


Obama's theme song

It's Simple Warrent

It's really simple Warren. Just write write a check to the government for 100 billion if it makes you feel better and you feel undertaxed. They will take your money. 

Perhaps the government will do a better job with Berkshire Hathwaay than you.

Really. I just love these

Really. I just love these rich guys who think they should pay more (Clinton comes to mind too...he said he didn't need a tax cut) but won't pony up unless everyone else is forced to, also.

Obama's theme song

Charity

We need a poll that reveals how little of liberals' ill gotten wealth is donated to real charities helping real people. The press made a big deal of the Clinton gang giving 15 million dollars to charity. They gave it to themselves via the Clinton foundation. That helped three needy people.

Solution for the National Debt

Being for the benefit of Mr. Buffet (pronounced buf-fay) the link to make donations to the National Treasury (the place with all the money not the Nicholas Cage movie) can be found here:

http://www.treasuryd...

Scroll to the bottom of the page. Here are the instructions if you are too lazy for that (some of you folks in Ohio don't get enough meat, you know).

"How do you make a contribution to reduce the debt?
Make your check payable to the Bureau of the Public Debt, and in the memo section, notate that it is a Gift to reduce the Debt Held by the Public. Mail your check to:

Attn Dept G
Bureau Of the Public Debt
P. O. Box 2188
Parkersburg, WV 26106-2188"

<insert witty signature here>

Really.... I thought this

Really.... I thought this was a joke. I'm sad to see it's not. Funny though!

Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his imminent relationship with a superior law and with an objective will that transcends the particular individual - Mussolini

  If anyone wants to help

  If anyone wants to help the middle class a tax cut would be a small relief compared to new domestic oil drilling and nuclear developement.  The actions of Congress over the years to restrict energy supply costs everyone thousands of dollars per year whereas a 'stimulus check' or a small income tax reduction is a few hundred dollars at most.

Buffet's a hypocrite.

Are these assholes kidding? $250,000 is a middle class income with the cost of living and under the current punitive tax code. It seems the only people who are out of touch with the American people on this are reporters, liberals, and politicians.

When Buffet downsized his billions I found it amusing when he announced that he was only keeping a few billion. The lout should have given it all away and tried to live on an "income" instead of looking so hard for tax shelters all of these years.

My wife and I have discussed a personal spending freeze on anything but essentials if a tax increase gets pushed through. We own a small business and are getting hammered by taxes as it is. 

The MSM just read the DNC talking points and move on

REID: McCain says he'll balance the budget by the end of his first term, but critics wonder how that's possible given his support for extending all of the Bush tax cuts....

The facts show that because of the 'tax cuts', revenue increased dramatically. More people working (and working at better jobs) means more revenue for the Gov. The liberals just can't seem to get their heads around that concept. If they were running FORD, their plan to recover from the recent losses would be to double the cost of all their cars and trucks.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

So Obama takes money from 1

So Obama takes money from 1 group and gives that same amout to another group then proposes more spending...in simple math revenue stays the same outlays increase and he is going to balance the budget how?....let's not get into the fact that the feds took in more revenue under Pres Bush's tax cuts than at any other time in the history of the republic....

Dead weight costs

Group 2 doesn't get the same amount of money that was taken from Group 1.  There are "middlemen" (bureaucrats) who facilitate the transfer, which adds to the transaction cost.  These transactions are deadweight costs.  It is like paying people to dig holes and fill them up again.

<insert witty signature here>

that's why i went with

that's why i went with simple math.  those costs are not kept in the till to help reduce the deficit...

“ending the Bush tax cuts

“ending the Bush tax cuts for people making more than $250,000 a year and using the money for a tax cut for the middle class”

Class-based income redistribution; Karl Marx would be proud.